Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 13

I NDIA O PINES

Publish Your Opinions

CONTRIBUTE BLOGS SHOWCASE POLITICS TVSERIALS ENTERTAINMENT

EatingBeefIsNotSinful

YOUMAYALSOLIKE

5.9k

ShareonFacebook

TweetonTwitter

SHARES

Beefistheculinarynameofmeatfrombovines,especiallycattle.Inalmosteverypartof
theworld,Beefisharvestedfromcows,bulls,heifers,etc.Acceptabilityofbeefasafood
sourcevariesindifferentpartsoftheworldaccordingtotheavailability.

3 BHK Flats in Mangalore

2/3/4 BHK @Bajpe Road Beverly Hill. Pre-launch Projects. Book Now!

InterestingFactsAboutArnab
Goswami

AllAboutIndiasYoga

Thisscribeisnotastrictnonvegetarianbychoiceandcantexactlyrememberwhenthe
beefwasconsumedatmydinnertablelasttime.However,GodhadgiftedusINCISORS
amongthesetofteethfurnitureofmouth.Thattellsmethatnothingisaddedtohuman
bodybynaturewithoutpurpose.Itisknownthatmostoftheworldreligionssanctify
offeringofanimalsinsacrificeandthatincludesmanypracticesofHinduism.Numerous
Hinduscripturesarewitnessestosuchsacrifices.BeingaMuslim,Imafraiditwould
evokeunduereactionifItoreproducewhatDr.DNJha,aProfessorofHistory,
DelhiUniversityandmemberofICHR,hadwritteninhisbooktheMythoftheHoly
Cow.Mr.Jhahadreceiveddeaththreatsoverhisbook.Justtobringhomethepoint,I
amquotingtheHinduscriptureslikeManusmriti,Vedas,Upanishads,Brahmins,
Grihsutras,Dharmasutrasandothers.

TheEndofHakimullahMehsud

Manusmriti(Chapter5/Verse30)says,Itisnotsinfultoeatmeatofeatableanimals,for
Brahmahascreatedboththeeatersandtheeatables.
Manusmriti(5/35)states:Whenamanwhoisproperlyengagedinaritualdoesnoteat
meat,afterhisdeathhewillbecomeasacrificialanimalduringtwentyonerebirths.
MaharishiYagyavalkyasaysinShatpathBrahmin(3/1/2/21)that,Ieatbeefbecauseitis
verysoftanddelicious. 8
ApastambGrihsutram(1/3/10)says,Thecowshouldbeslaughteredonthearrivalofa
guest,ontheoccasionofShraddhaofancestorsandontheoccasionofamarriage.
Rigveda(10/85/13)declares,Ontheoccasionofagirlsmarriageoxenandcowsare
slaughtered. 3

HolyCow!MindBlowingFacts
AboutIndia

Rigveda(6/17/1)statesthatIndrausedtoeatthemeatofcow,calf,horseand
buffalo. 5
VashisthaDharmasutra(11/34)writes,IfaBrahminrefusestoeatthemeatofferedto
himontheoccasionofShraddhaorworship,hegoestohell.

8ReasonstoDateaParsiGuy

10FeaturesThatDefineBengali
Intellectuals

OneofthegreatestscholarandpropagatorofHinduismSwamiVivekanandsays,You
willbesurprisedtoknowthataccordingtoancientHinduritesandrituals,amancannot
beagoodHinduwhodoesnoteatbeef 7 .(TheCompleteWorksofSwami
Vivekanand,vol.3,p.536).

GODMANRAMPALFINALLY
ARRESTED

ThesubsequentBrahmanicaltextsGrhyasutrasandDharmasutrasprovideample
evidenceoftheeatingoffleshincludingbeef.

One&Only Reethi
Rah
Book 4 Nights And Receive a
Complimentary Night. Book
Now!

TheideaofahimsaseemstohavemadeitsfirstappearanceintheUpanisadicthought
andliterature.GautamaBuddhaandMahavirahadvehementlychallengedtheefficacyof
theVedicanimalsacrifice.Thus,althoughbothBuddhism,and,toagreaterextent,
Jainismcontributedtothegrowthofahimsadoctrine,neitherseemstohavedeveloped
thesacredcowconceptindependently.Thepracticeofflesheatingandkillingcattlefor
foodwascustomaryrightthroughtheGuptaperiodandlaterissufficientlyborneoutby
referencestoitfoundinthePuranasandtheEpics.Strangebutverified,mostofthe
charactersintheMahabharataaremeateaters.DraupadipromisedtoJayadrathaandhis
retinuethatYudhisthirawouldprovidethemwithavarietyofgame
includinggayal,sambaraandbuffalo.

VedasBeckonandMantras
MakeLifeMeaningful

14IndianThingsSurprisinglyare
notINDIANatall!

IndiaOpinesisAboutFreedomof
SpeechandTheRightToOpenly

ItsinterestingtonotethatAruvedaprovidesanimpressivelistoffishandanimalsand
speakofthetherapeuticusesofbeef.Somesvarashowsclearpreferenceforporkover
othermeats.SimilarlytheauthorsDharmasastracommentariesandreligiousdigests
fromtheninthcenturypermitbeefinspecificcircumstances.
So,thefirstinferencewecandrawisthatMuslimsrulersorreligionhavenothing
todowithbeefconsumptioninIndia.BeefhadbeenassociatedwithIndiandietary
practicesmuchbeforetheadventofIslam 3 .
Now,thepertinentquestionisHowdidthecowbecomeasymboloffaithand
reverencetotheextentofassumingthestatusof`motherhood?
ManyscholarsbelievethatachallengetoBrahminicalorderappearedwiththe

ExpressOne'sOpinions

Contribute

Doyouhaveanycontraryopinion
tothispostDoyouwishtoget
heardYoucannowdirectly
publishyouropinioninasecond
orlinktoanotherblogwithan
interestingviewatour

emergenceofBuddhism.ItposedathreattotheBrahminicalvaluesystem.Thelow
casteswereslippingawayfromthegripofBrahminism.Therebellionandtheemergence
ofanewderivativereligionpushedhardtheconceptoftheprotectionofcattlewealth,
whichwasneededfortheagriculturaleconomy.Itisherethatthisideologytookupthe
cowasasymboloftheirreverence,physicalandideologicalaswell.Buddhas
pronouncementswerebasedonscientificreasons.Thosewerenotbasedonmere
assertions.
LetthereaderknowthatitwasShahanshahBabur,thefirstMughaltoruleIndia
whohadadvisedinhiswilltohissonHumayuntorespectthecowandavoidcow
slaughter.
Thewritewouldadvicethosewhoselivelihoodisdependentontheprofessionof
butcheryinMahaharshtraoranywhereinIndiatorespectthesentimentsofthosewho
worshipcowandregardherastheirmother.Theyshouldtrytotakeleadinthebusiness
ofthepermittedvarietiesofanimalswithmoreemphasisonHygieneandSanitation.

Devendra Fadnavis

Follow

@Dev_Fadnavis

Thanks a lot Hon President Sir for the

assent on

MaharashtraAnimalPreservationBill.Our dream of ban on cow

Wewilllikelyhighlight/promoteyour
opinionorblogpieceat
IndiaOpineswithfullcredits

ALSOREAD
FromTheBlogsImNotSorryThat
IAteBeef
DadriBeeflynchingandCommunal
Politics
CowSlaughterReligiousConcernOr
EconomicalConcern?
KillAManForACow,ProvidedThe
ManIsMuslim.ChiHindus!
TheMythicalDayanOfKishtwar&
TheEatingAwayOfTheIndianState
HolyCow!!!

slaughter becomes a reality now.


4:50 PM - 2 Mar 2015
2,035

Blogs

SherSinghRanaHadthePolice
EatingOutofhisHands

1,349

WhoseFaultWasIt?

However,Idoubtifthebuckisgoingtostophere.TheRSSjuggernautisalloutfor
troublefullthrottleastherecentcallofSadhviPrachiabouttheboycottofKhansisany
signofthat.Thefarrighthasletloosethesecommunalandpoliticalpredatorsand
nothingdeterringormonitoryiscomingfromrulingclass.
TheysayEnjoyrapewhenitisinevitable.IsayWeshouldlearnfromhistory.
AnUrdupoetsaysMatmererangezardkacharchakarokedost,rangeksakabhi
bheekisikanaheenrehta.OhmyfriendDontstressaboutthepalenessofmyface,
rememberthatonlyonecolorcantalwaysdominateallthetimes.

IsItJustifiedToKillAHumanBeing?
[Part1]
TheJainCommunityShould
SubsidiseMilkAndCheeseInIndia
TheTopTrendingPostsonRepublic
Day!
ReligiousConcernOutweighs
WomenSecurityInIndia.Isntit?

By:NaimNaqvi

VegetarianDietNotaMoral
Choice

ImageSource:1

NotEveryKhanKillsCows

SEARCHINDIAOPINES

CustomSearch

FromTheCommunity:Top10
ReasonsNottoEatCows
THEWORLDHINDUCONGRESS
2014

NowyoucanhighlightanysentenceandautomaticallyshareonFacebook/Twitter
DoyouhaveanycontraryopiniontothispostDoyouwishtogetheardYou
cannowdirectlypublishyouropinionorlinktoanotherarticlewithadifferent
viewatourblogs.Wewilllikelyrepublishyouropinionorblogpieceat
IndiaOpineswithfullcredits

SEARCHINDIAOPINES
CustomSearch

DISCLAIMER
Allviews,includingthoseexpressedin
affiliatedsocialmediapagesofthe
website,arepersonalandbelongtothe
contributingauthor(s)inaccordance
withourfundamentalrighttofreedomof
speechgiventousbyourconstitution
underArticle19(1a).IndiaOpinesinno
wayendorsesanyview.Tocontribute
pleaseusethislink.Tocontactus

pleaseusethislink.Allimagesused
onthissite(barringtheonespurchased
byus)havebeencreditedwitha'Image
Source'anddulybelongtotheir
respectiveownerstheyareusedfor
illustrativeandcommentingpurposes
andweclaimnoownershiponthem.

India Opines
Follow

+1

+ 1,561

WhatsApp

Facebook

Twitter

Google
Adsby Google

Related Posts:

SwamiVivekanandaQuotes
MuslimEatBeef
BeefCow

FromTheBlogsImNotSorryThatIAteBeef
DadriBeeflynchingandCommunalPolitics
CowSlaughterReligiousConcernOrEconomicalConcern?

YOUROPINIONS

KillAManForACow,ProvidedTheManIsMuslim.ChiHindus!

ClickHereToPublishYourOpinions

TheMythicalDayanOfKishtwar&TheEatingAwayOfTheIndianState

WithinSeconds

HolyCow!!!

Bihar2015electionsMythsandTruths

SherSinghRanaHadthePoliceEatingOutofhisHands

MythsofMahabhartaPartIIIKubjas
CureMiracleorScience?

WhoseFaultWasIt?
IsItJustifiedToKillAHumanBeing?[Part1]

ParisCarnage:MirageofIslamicState

TheJainCommunityShouldSubsidiseMilkAndCheeseInIndia

IsLaughingamedicinetoallsickness?

TheTopTrendingPostsonRepublicDay!

CanHindusandMuslimscoexistin
India?

ReligiousConcernOutweighsWomenSecurityInIndia.Isntit?
VegetarianDietNotaMoralChoice

TVSerialEnding

NotEveryKhanKillsCows

Arthritis(symptoms,causesand
treatments)

FromTheCommunity:Top10ReasonsNottoEatCows
THEWORLDHINDUCONGRESS2014

TheMythsOfMahabharata:The
CharacterofShriKrishnaPartI
DOYOUTHINKBRITAINISRIGHTNIN
KEEPINGTHEKOHINOORBY
AkankshaPattanaik

Mehr Tarar Says Im Too Pretty To


Be An ISI Agent

48 Comments

20BestFoodsWhichWillHelpYou
SleepBetter

Sort by

!
,

!
Top

Add a comment...

Shaikh Fakhr Ul Islam Senior Manager, Procurement at Pakistan Railway Advisory And
Consultancy Service Limited (PRACS)

Womenarejustbetteratthisstuff:
emotionallaborfeminism.
HereiswhyFarmersareNOTapartof
ModisDevelopmentPlan?
TheToleranceTussle

IF ONE SALAUGHTERS A COW IS PUNISHABLE IN THE INDIAN SOCIETY, WHY THOSE WHO
SLAUGHTER HER HUSBAND "OX" IS LEFT FREE, SAFE AND ALIVE WHEREAS IN INDIAN
SOCIETY THE HUSBAND IS GIVEN HIGH RESPECT RATHER THAN HIS WIFE.

GetHeavenlyBlessingswithAuspicious
LaxmiPujaonDiwali

Like Reply Nov 3, 2015 10:41am

TheInnerVoicesofADrugAddict
Suhas Baburao Choudhari Lokmanya Tilak Municipal Medical College
I am born Hindu......and not ashamed to be a beef eater.....one must eat what suits his palate
Like Reply Oct 31, 2015 12:18am

Shaikh Fakhr Ul Islam Senior Manager, Procurement at Pakistan Railway Advisory And

BUILDALIBRARYOFHEROICBOOKS
5basicskincarerulesyoumustfollow

Shaikh Fakhr Ul Islam Senior Manager, Procurement at Pakistan Railway Advisory And

THELEADERINYOUABOOK
REVIEW

Consultancy Service Limited (PRACS)


BUT STILL YOU MR. SUHAS BABURAO CHOUDHARI ARE LIVE AND SAFE FROM
THOSE WHO ARE BENT UPON SLAUGHTERING ALL THOSE WHO SLAUGHTER THE
COWS.
Like Reply Nov 3, 2015 10:37am

Sameer Fazil
Manusmriti (Chapter 5 / Verse 30) says, It is not sinful to eat meat of eatable animals, for Brahma
has created both the eaters and the eatables.

Manusmriti (5 / 35) states: When a man who is properly engaged in a ritual does not eat meat, after
his death he will become a sacrificial animal during twenty-one rebirths.

Maharishi Yagyavalkya says in Shatpath Brahmin (3/1/2/21) that, I eat beef because it is very soft
and delicious.7

Apastamb Grihsutram (1/3/10) says, The cow should be slaughtered on the arrival of a guest, on the
occasion of Shraddha of ancestors and on the occasion of a marriage.

Rigveda (10/85/13) declares, On the occasion of a girls marriage oxen and cows are slaughtered.2
... See More
Like Reply Oct 5, 2015 12:17pm

U Mahesh Prabhu Consultant at The Sunday Guardian


A chunk of dimwits, which include #RATIONALISTS as well as ill informed #AYURVEDIC
#DOCTORS, profess that "#beef eating" was approved by the #Vedas. This is the most hilarious
assumption with no basis - whatsoever! Vedas regarded all being - men and animals - alike. They
made it clear that man was custodian of mother nature and that it was his bounden #duty to protect
all beings - alike. Here's a quote from the #RIGVEDA in the verse entitled HYMN TO #AGNI
(10.87.67)
The fiend who partakes of human #flesh, the flesh of a horse or of any another animal, and deprives
others of milk by #slaughtering cows, O King, if such a fiend does not desist by other means, then
you should not hesitate to cut off his head.
Like Reply Oct 2, 2015 7:50am

U Mahesh Prabhu Consultant at The Sunday Guardian


Mr Maratha, just for your GK - Babasaheb never claimed to be a Sanskrit scholar or Vedic
oracle. Given this I wonder what on earth do want to say with that statement. Also,
Babasaheb converted to Buddhism and left meat eating. So spare Babasaheb out of this
ignoble controversy. As for your nonsensical article you can shove that to wherever it came
from.
Like Reply Oct 11, 2015 2:51am Edited

Misanthropic Broke Guy Kolkata, India


people shall eat whatever they like be it beef or pork. nobody have the right to poke a nose
or giving lectures to others what should be eaten or should not be . Status of religion is
bogus to carry out everyday life.
Like Reply Oct 21, 2015 6:18am

U Mahesh Prabhu Consultant at The Sunday Guardian


Swaroop Chirke Saheb, Humnein padha hai isiliye bol raha hu yeh sab bakwas hai.

Aap

padke dekho - lekin thik se. Ye Marxist ya Leftist ke translation mat padhna. Thik se Sanskrit
mein padna. Aapko Sab samaj mein aa ja ye ga. Dhanyavad.
Like Reply Oct 21, 2015 7:10am

Arpit Pathak Aligarh


A human stomach cant digest green vegetables, because of inactive apendix, which is very active in
grass eating or herbivores animals, now thing about meat, how can a stomach digest meat, when it
cant digest greenery, we eat green vegitables just to clean our stomachs, because of fibres present
in greenery, most of the vitameens are just absorbed or disolves in HCl present in Stomachs
Like Reply Sep 22, 2015 4:03pm

Arpit Pathak Aligarh


I would like to ask to Dr. D N Jha, a Professor of History, Delhi University and member of ICHR,
which book or which printed version of Rigveda he read and point out this conclusion, before coming
up on any conclusion he must Know that our history and Vedas are manipulated by Britishers, to
avoid us to get correct knowledge, I would Agreed with his Conclusion only if He could Show me
Genuin text which should have atleast 600 years old from know, which i m pretty sure if e found one,
then there will be no such nonveg comment on indradev, and I would like to suggest Dr Jha to go to
south india, there he can found tamra patra with some ancient Vedas written on it, and rechek what
he conclude here
Like Reply Sep 22, 2015 3:52pm

Saiyal Aseer Hashmi L.N.M.U. Darbhanga


It is one thing. Man must respect the man. The sense of honor to be afraid, It is not right. Therefore it
is important that controversy should be avoided.

is important that controversy should be avoided.


Like Reply Sep 14, 2015 2:35am

Shoukat Hassan Works at Maulana Azad National Urdu University


this is good for Kashmir cause, india shud continue to do such activities.
Like Reply Sep 11, 2015 11:18am

Anilo Fernandes Goa, India


It is not a sin to eat holy. If you eat holy things you will become more holy and God will bless you
more.
Like Reply Apr 3, 2015 7:40pm

Syed Abdul Sayeed Syed Osmania University


nafeesa jee aap ahle tashee hai aur saare article jo references k saath diye gaye by those who are
intellectuals unless and untill u dont u dont even know should not supposed to b giving fatwas after
all u ahle tashee.
Like Reply

1 Mar 30, 2015 2:22pm

Load 10 more comments

Facebook Comments Plugin

119 Comments

India Opines

Recommend

Share

Login

Sort by Newest

Join the discussion

Rohit

25 days ago

I would like to ask people , what will happen if people stop eating beef ? it hurts hindu and
u can eat any other animals, we dont have any issue with that , and some crazy hindu ppl
who are against beef ban should change their religion and become muslims or christians if
u dont respect cow whom we consider as our god.

Reply Share

Prem Anand

7 months ago

If eating an animal is a sin on what basis. Is it because you kill a life? In that case logically
thinking, killing any living form is sin. Right? Then don't you kill millions of living cells all
around you in a day. Even vegetables can reproduce if you put the seed under the soil, so
eating them is also sinful. Ants and mosquitoes? Are goats and chickens then permitted to
kill? Some of them dont eat beef but eat goats, fish, chicken etc. what does that mean?
They are less sinful? So only vegetarians are going to heaven? They are killing the plants
which the animals need badly, so they too are sinning in their own lawful way. So they cant
go to heaven right? So if heaven is the reason for killing and not killing then both don't go
to heaven, because both kill each other's food. So killing for eating is 100% not sinful. If
that is clear then why ban? If you say you will ban cow, then also ban all other creatures.
Can you do that? you will not do because you eat chicken kabab daily, Lolz. That is the
reason they backed up on saying total ban on all animals. What about the flesh-eating
swamiji's of kashi. They are not Hindus? If they are not Hindus who are they? If they are
Hindus then whoever outside of them are not hindus? i am logically speaking. I believe they
are the TRUE Hindus who drink and eat the flesh of dead human beings by the river at
midnight. All hindus who live outside are pseudohindus because they say something not in
commensurate with the holy text which is stated as above. Be a true hindu and start eating
meat or better change your religion. Do not live in falsehood.

Reply Share

sarfraz

> Prem Anand

a month ago

what you think chiken is dead? vegetables are dead ? every second you are
breathing that time how many bacterias u r killing ? do u stop all these things ?
what u mean less sin ? more sin? sin is sin my friend . your scripture saying to eat
then if u not follow which religion u r following .


Sandy

Reply Share

7 months ago

I wonder when chicken and goat slaughter ban would arrive!! Must see the face of non
vegetarian Indian Hindus at that time.. There are people who claim all Hindus are

vegetarians.. Its not true.. there are Hindus who sacrifice cattle breeds in the name of God
and eat them, Hindus who go to non veg restaurants for a lunch, Hindus who devour on
animal flesh just for its taste..where did religion go then?? people eat fish and fish is Vishnu
according to Hinduism, we have horoscope sun sign as fish.. half the population eats non
veg.. if u convert non veg to veg what will be left for vegetarians to eat ? does anyone have
an idea of how much agricultural land is left in the country to feed a 1.2 billion?
India is a secular country and not a religious country like the Arab nations.. we have been
secular for more than 800 years.. Now why suddenly this insecularism??

Reply Share

amit shukla

> Sandy

a month ago

Muslims are generally non vegetarian. but do they eat pork? ..

Reply Share

sarfraz

> amit shukla

a month ago

our scripture says what eat and what not to eat we r following scripture then
only we can b a muslim name is doesnt matter what ever it is do you follow
your scripture ?


Sandy

Reply Share

> amit shukla

a month ago

because pork is forbidden according to their religion..


krishna

Reply Share

8 months ago

Such is the situation prevailing in India the converts and even the people who represent the
religion of this land belive what is written above are you all educated in real sense have u
ever tried to know the real history of India and its heritage the above essay is nothing but a
adulterated piece of history by Britishers who ruled this country there are many insertions
done by british right from their arrival to this country if any one of you can get hold of real
manuscripts of vedas and shastras before britisher or Malechha (down trodden) religion
arrived to this country you can get a feel of reality there are many books available which is
documented and also mentions how britisher manupulated with our books to change the
beliefs of people of this land its a irony that people dont even realise and belive blindly any
one like the author or for that matter zakir naik.
1

Reply Share

BHARATIYA

8 months ago

THIS IS JUST YOUR IMAGINATION. THE WEST IS LIBERAL, SWAMI NARAYAN MANDIRS
ALE ALLOWED IN THE U.S. THE SHAHS AND PATELS, IN THE U.S WANT ALL
PRIVILAGES, BUT IN INDIA, THEY TEAM UP WITH THE RSS TO CREATE PROBLEMS
FOR THE MINORITIES.

Reply Share

happy diwali

8 months ago

it is also written in koran that allah is not the ruler of the


universe and muhammad is not a prophet. yes. i am readin the koran
prepared by same people who created those vedas which you are citing as
references.

and the last thing we need is an article on hindu


faith by a muslim. and did you read vedas only to find references to
beef eating? did you read all vedas thorougly? no. you jsut read a
(deliberately) misinterpreted part of vedas.
1

Reply Share

paul milton

> happy diwali

7 months ago

who told u that its bot written by any person anytime because the first line of the
khoran says allah is the lord of earh and heavens and prophet is his messenger the
first line no question of misunderstanding it.

Reply Share

paul milton

> paul milton

7 months ago

and one more thing every major religious books have authors more than one
ramayana has 300 versions as said by your hindu pundits not me even bible
has many versions except khoran only one.And well i was a christian now
going to conver to muslim because of this.

Reply Share

happy diwali

8 months ago

it is also written in koran that allah is not the ruler of the universe and muhammad is not a
prophet. yes. i am readin the koran prepared by same people who created those vedas
which you are citing as references.

and the last thing we need is an article on hindu faith by a muslim. and did you read vedas
only to find references to beef eating? did you read all vedas thorougly? no. you jsut read a
(deliberately) misinterpreted part of vedas.

Reply Share

sarfraz

> happy diwali

a month ago

show me were mentioned in veda to worship cow ???????????????

Reply Share

happy diwali

> sarfraz

20 days ago

we don't worship cows


BHARATIYA

Reply Share

8 months ago

YES THERE IS A TEMPLE IN RAJASTHAN WHERE RATS ARE REVERED AND FED WITH
MILK AND SWEETS.

Reply Share

Mr.Magdalene

> BHARATIYA

8 months ago

Now you have come down from big words like "worshipping" to revere and fed?
Now its a sin to feed animals? Can you even name the rat god? You make me
laugh, just because in one vague temple on rajasthan this is done, you are shouting
in Maharashtra about entire Hinduism, show me one sacred book which even talks
about worshipping rat? The rats are fed doesnt mean they are worshipped and this
is a local practise, in case of any ambigience the vedas prevail over any smirit, and
this is the brillance and freedom of Hinduism, local cultures, practices can be
preserved while maintaining a larger well defined identity, unlike your monotonous
black and white religion.
If the pope francis kisses a girl's feet or devils bible exits or pentecostal christianity
exists does it become the standard in mainstream religion?I know a serpent givien
apple of sin is part of it.
1

BHARATIYA

Reply Share

8 months ago

THIS IS NOTHING BUT MAJORITY APPEASEMENT.

Reply Share

Boss

> BHARATIYA

2 months ago

Majority appeasement....a.k.a..the will of the majority....a.k.a....democracy.


1

Reply Share

happy diwali

> BHARATIYA

8 months ago

convert to hinduism then. after all a lot and lot of people are leaving christianity in
west these days.


BHARATIYA

Reply Share

8 months ago

SOME HINDUS WORSHIP RATS, SO WHY IS THE BMC TRAPPING RATS? ALLOW THEM
TO BREED AND MULTIPLY. I MEAN THAT RELIGION CANNOT BE STRICTLY
ENFORCED, ONE HAS TO BE PRACTICAL. NOW MUTTON WILL GET COSTLIER, WHO
WILL COMPENSATE THE POOR MAN FOR THAT? POOR MEN HAVE TO EAT GRASS?

Reply Share

krishnaxyz

> BHARATIYA

8 months ago

u r not even a christian, ur a roman catholic

Reply Share

GunsN'Moses

> BHARATIYA

8 months ago

Hindus worship rats? My Dear Santa Claus are you high on grass(weed) or are you
a school dropout?If we apply your religion practically you cant even define
evolution, going by your logic, or even know which animals lived on this earth
beyond 6000 years, or even explain why you worship jesus's idol. As for your Grass
arguement :

According to the USDA and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United
Nations, meat is not an essential part of a healthy diet.According to the American
Dietetic Association, a vegetarian diet can meet protein requirements, provide all
the essential amino-acids (the building blocks of protein), and improve health. It can
also provide all the necessary vitamins, fats, and minerals, and can improve ones
health.

Over 10 pounds of plant protein are used to produce one pound of beef protein.If
these grains were fed to humans instead of animals, more food would be available
for the 925 million people in chronic hunger worldwide. Research from Cornell
University found that the grain used to feed US livestock alone could feed 800
million people.

Why dont you think about Poor people now?No wonder meat is expensive it takes
so much resources to rear it.All you have to do is take one item off your menu and
you cant do it for the poor man? Ppl are known to change their diet and look at you
complaining? Think about the poor now?


BHARATIYA

Reply Share

8 months ago

WHY SHOULD THE GOVT. DECIDE , WHAT I WISH TO EAT? MANY HINDUS ALSO EAT
BEEF. COW SLAUGHTER BAN IS OK, WHY BAN ON BULLOCKS AND OX? MAJORITY
APPEASEMENT? WHAT ELSE DOES IT MEAN? THE MEN WHO KILLED THE MAHATMA
ARE NOW RULING INDIA BY PROXY.

Reply Share

NoahsArk

> BHARATIYA

8 months ago

Govt is not deciding what you it's just taken one item off your menu there are loads
of choices for you to follow, red meat is red meat, if Gov took exception to your
remark- COW SLAUGHTER BAN IS OK, WHY BAN ON BULLOCKS AND OX? only
your kin will starve to death, such stupidity,no wonder you joined the religion of man
who killed Martin Luther King, Abraham Lincoln or John Kennedy , its easy to
blame, but being a minority you cant adjust, what will happen when people like you
become majority.One Hungry leech exposed


Bengali

Reply Share

8 months ago

I am a practising hindu and I eat beef and pork...that does not make me a lesser
hindu. Swami Vivekananda himself discouraged such idiosyncrasies regarding food.

Reply Share

dpk

> Bengali

8 months ago

what do you mean by practising hindu if you eat beef and feel happy..the animal are
worshiped in our religion dont feel proud on this kind of act
1

Brijwasi

Reply Share

> Bengali

8 months ago

Vivekananda never lived ascetic lifestyle or tried to achieve nirvana.

Antonio Dagama

Reply Share

9 months ago

stop the holy cow eating plastic trash from the municipal waste bins and straying and
blocking the roads

Reply Share

MidasTouch

> Antonio Dagama

8 months ago

Looks like you got some of the plastic and garbage in your beef stew,no wonder
you want cows to stop eating that , the jokes on you. :)


Vinit

Reply Share

> Antonio Dagama

9 months ago

So, for you, the cow is blocking the roads in order to have fun ? lol! Very intelligent
animal then :))
Give the animal the space to graze and sit and it won't block your tiny car's way.

Reply Share

Kalelemulla ibn MohamedAli

9 months ago

God the creator has given humans canines for what? to tear and eat all kinds of flesh. Man
has both carnivorous and herbivorous teeth. Its Zoology for the educated, Its religion for

has both carnivorous and herbivorous teeth. Its Zoology for the educated, Its religion for
the illiterates. Muslims eat only beef, but the poor scheduled caste and scheduled tribes do
not leave anything in cattle. They can only afford to eat all internal organs of the cattle,
which is very cheap. They eat everything. We do not even appose pork for the non
Muslims. Let the non Muslims eat pork. Its not our religion::.

Reply Share

happy diwali

> Kalelemulla ibn MohamedAli

8 months ago

also in our religion beef eating is not allowed.

Reply Share

> Kalelemulla ibn MohamedAli

Sunny Lax

8 months ago

Humans do not have the large mouth or long, pointed teeth of carnivores. Human
teeth are short and flat for chewing fibrous food.Human bite force is negligible when
compared to predators in the animal kingdom.Neither they have the claws and
evolutionary adaptations of a meat hunter. Carnivores have short intestines (3-6
times body length) while human intestines are long (10-11 times body length) to
allow slower digestion of plant foods. The liver of a carnivore can detoxify the
excess vitamin A absorbed from a meat-based diet. The human liver cannot
detoxify excess vitamin A, Zoology for the educated.:) Let's go to the Mid-East and
allow people to eat pork and spread the message:)

Of tribals started killing all cattle before they get old they would starve themselves
soon, according to your own philosophy.:)
2

satyawadi

Reply Share

9 months ago

If beef eating is not a sin, some people believe that pork eating too is not a sin,so would
Naim Naqvi start eating pork? No because it is a matter pertaining to ones religion and
belief.When it comes to freedom of right of an individual to decide what he should eat and
drink,in Islamic countries sale of pork is banned for religious reasons and non-muslims are
not allowed to eat it.So what about their rights?Would Naim Naqvi advocate the same logic
to the Islamic countries? In some Islamic countries even non- muslims can not bury or
cremate their dead.If so why play with the sentiments of the Hindus?Even MCCI (Muslim
Chamber of Commerce and Industries) have urged the PM to extend ban of cow slaughter
through out India and the funny thing is the so called Hindu secularist who do not eat beef
are the one whining more than the muslims on the ban on cow slaughter.It is shame on
them.Islam came some 1400 years back which declared pork eating as "haram".Was not
pork being eaten before the advent of Islam?These people were idolaters too before
advent of Islam.But things changed there after and both idol worshipping and pork eating
were declared haram.If Naim can quote the old script well others too can quote,would
Naim start eating pork on that? It is always sane to respect each others religious
sentiments rather than quoting some old scripts and trying to humiliate and ridicule others
belief.
3

Reply Share

ROHIT

> satyawadi

9 months ago

Well said!! Articulate and well thought out response!!!


Evano oruvan

Reply Share

9 months ago

IS BEEF EATING ALLOWED FOR HINDUS????


A recent photograph of some Hindu Protesters demanding a ban on non-vegetarian food
made me sit and take notice on vedaas.
I believe that these protesters are ignorant of what their religion preaches.
They are simply going against their own religious scriptures.
BEST ANSWERS
Manusmriti (chapter5/verse30):"It is not sinful to eat meat of eatable animals,for God has
created both the eaters and the eatables".
Aapastanba Grishsutram(1/3/10):says,"The cow should be slaughtered on the arrival of a
guest, on the occasion of 'Shraaddha of ancestors and on the occasion of a marriage".
Rigveda (10/85/13):declares "On the occasion of a girls marriage oxen and cows are
slaughtered".
Rigveda (6/17/1) : states that, "Indra used to eat the meat of cow, calf, horse and buffalo".
Vashishta Dharmasutra (11/34):says,If a Brahmin refuses to eat the meat offered to him on
the occasion of ,'Shraaddha' he goes to hell".Hinduisms great propagator Swami
Vivekaanand said thus: "You will be surprised to know that according to ancient Hindu rite
and rituals, a man cannot be a good Hindu who does not eat beef ".
(The complete works of Swami Vivekanand vol :3/5/36)

"The book The history and culture of the indian people" published by Bharatiya vidya
bhawan,bombay and edited by renowned historian R C Majumdar (vol 2 ,page 18 says)This
is said in the mahabharata that "king Ratinder used to kill 2000 other animals in addition to
2000 cows daily in order to give their meat in charity".
Aadi shankaraachaarya commentary on Brahadaranyakopanishad 6/4/18 says:'Odaan' rice
mixed with meat is called 'maansodan' on being asked whose meat it should be, he
answers 'Uksha' is used for an ox, which is capable to produce semen.

Reply Share

happy diwali

> Evano oruvan

8 months ago

we don't need to learn what is written in our scriptures from you at least. tell us is
evolution real or creationism?

Reply Share

> Evano oruvan

Pslap:22

8 months ago

STOP PASTING FAKE VERSES FROM ANTI HINDU SITES CHECK THE REAL
ONES AND SEE THE TRUTH:

the Manu-samhita clearly and logically recommends that, Meat can never be
obtained without injury to living creatures, and injury to sentient beings is
detrimental to the attainment of heavenly bliss; let him therefore shun the use of
meat. Having well considered the disgusting origin of flesh and the cruelty of
fettering and slaying corporeal beings, let him entirely abstain from eating flesh.
(Manu-samhita 5.48-49)

He who permits the slaughter of an animal, he who cuts it up, he who kills it, he who
buys or sells meat, he who cooks it, he who serves it up, and he who eats it, must
all be considered as the slayers of the animal. There is no greater sinner than that
man who though not worshiping the gods or the ancestors, seeks to increase the
bulk of his own flesh by the flesh of other beings. (Manu-samhita 5.51-52)

If he has a strong desire (for meat) he may make an animal of clarified butter or one
of flour (and eat that); but let him never seek to destroy an animal without a (lawful)
reason. As many hairs as the slain beast has, so often indeed will he who killed it
see more

ROHIT

Reply Share

> Evano oruvan

9 months ago

Mr Evano, no one is going against scriptures!! i am sure you do not follow half of the
things taught in bible. Vent your frustration to the best possible measure. Hope
converting to Christianity is treating you well, no point being a low caste poor Hindu
guy with an inferiority complex for life.
1

Reply Share

Ankit Gautam

> ROHIT

8 months ago

Lol xD , nice one....


some random guy

Reply Share

9 months ago

http://www.deccanherald.com/co...

Reply Share

ranjitganguly

9 months ago

How one can tolerate slaying a cow whom one worships.


1

Reply Share

Jeet Bhargava

9 months ago


...



 ...  


...


... 


...


... 




...


...



 ...


...

 ...


...



...


... 



O
 ...

... 

 ...

-
tweet

... 


!!
O

Reply Share

Kashish Kumar

9 months ago

http://www.vedicgranth.org/mis...

These phrases have been misinterpreted. They were originally written in Sanskrit in a
cryptic manner which is not to be taken by literal translation.
2

james

Reply Share

9 months ago

Be**c**d, Mo***r F**ker writing his own ideas in the name of Vedas. I will tell you what is
written there in vedas. Here it goes:-


:
.

Meaning: One who promotes or supports non-vegetarianism,


the butcher, one who sells or purchases meat, the one who cooks it, serves it
or consumes it, are all destructive / vicious in nature.

Meaning: One who slaughters non-violent, helpless


animals for his own happiness never attains happiness when alive and even after
death.

Abstaining from meat eating is equivalent to performing one hundred Asvamedha Yajna
(MS 5.53-56).
2

Reply Share

mythbreaker

9 months ago

All misinterpreted bullshit... Ask any genuine practitioner and preacher of hinduism not
some bogus hypocritical gurus making whimsical concoction.

Reply Share

mythbreaker

> mythbreaker

9 months ago

I had been extensive reader of vivekanand misinterpretations


who has spoken in both favor and against meat eating, he himself was
not following strictly the order of sannyasa, eating whatever whenever


BHARATIYA

Reply Share

9 months ago

AND THERE ARE SOME WHO ABANDON THEIR WIVES TO BECOME NO. 1. ACCHE DIN
AGAYE.

Reply Share

Vinit

> BHARATIYA

9 months ago

And there are those who remain with their wives, cheat them and STILL remain
losers lol!

Reply Share

INDIA OPINES
India Opines 2015

You might also like