Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Armare Fibre MusmarCES5!8!2013
Armare Fibre MusmarCES5!8!2013
Armare Fibre MusmarCES5!8!2013
5, 225 - 237
HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com
http://dx.doi.org/10.12988/ces.2013.3531
Abstract
Studies have shown that the addition of steel fibers in a concrete matrix
improves all the mechanical properties of concrete, especially tensile strength,
impact strength, and toughness. The resulting material possesses higher tensile
strength, consolidated response and better ductility.
Accordingly, this study moves toward deriving an expression that relates
split cylinder tensile strength of fiber reinforced concrete to cylindrical
compressive concrete strength and fiber reinforcement index, based on data
gathered for a wide spectrum of concrete grades, ranging from 20 MPa to 102
MPa.
Regression analysis was carried out on gathered data. Eventually a
mathematical expression that predicted split cylinder tensile strength of steel fiber
reinforced concrete was eventually derived. The predicted values fit well with
experimental data.
Keywords: Steel Fiber Reinforced concrete, composite concrete
1. Introduction
Early technological development of steel fiber reinforced concrete (SFRC)
was hampered by lack of information and authenticated measures until the early
226
Mazen Musmar
1960s. Since that, researchers have done extensive researches on SFRC, driven
by the promising performance enhancements in terms of strength, durability and
toughness. Studies have shown increasing evidence that the brittle behavior of
concrete can be overcome by the addition of short steel fibers of small diameters
in the concrete mix [1, 2]. ACI Committee 544[3] reported that the addition of
steel fibers in a concrete matrix improves all mechanical properties of concrete,
especially tensile strength, impact strength, and toughness. Identifying the
correlation between the tensile strength as the dependent variable and each of the
aspect ratio and the volumetric ratio as independent variables is an important
aspect of successful design.
Concrete fiber composites have been found more economical for use in
Airport and Highway Pavements, Bridge Decks, Erosion resistance structures,
slope stabilization, Refractory concrete, Earthquake resistance structures and
Explosive resistance structures [4]
In the design of concrete structures, the two essentially considered material
properties are compressive and tensile strengths. Compressive strength is a major
parameter in the case of structural applications, whereas flexural strength is an
essential parameter in pavement applications. In certain applications, toughness is
a vital parameter [5].
The observations given by published literature indicate that the selection of
SFRC volumetric fraction can be chosen within the range of 1 to 2.5% by
concrete absolute volume [6].
Few studies have been carried out towards investigating the relationship
between the split tensile strength and the compressive strength of SFRC. The
available relationships are either based on limited number of specimens or narrow
range of fiber content or fiber aspect ratio. Ashour et al [7] suggested the
following equation for high strength concrete specimens of a single aspect ratio,
l/d of 75
f sp = 4.95 2.13 v f
(1)
227
Studies carried out by Yazici et al. [9], Holschemacher et al.[10] and others
concluded that in case of SFRC, volumetric fraction as well as the aspect ratio
(l/d) are two major factors in terms of performance enhancement.
The aim of the present work is to develop an expression that correlates SFRC
split strength with concrete cylindrical compressive strength and fiber
reinforcement index, using nonlinear regression analysis. The importance of the
study is that it employs a large number of experimental data of SFRC obtained
from previous researches. Such data cover a variety of factors of significant effect
on the SFRC split strength. This may serve as useful tool to quantify the effect of
fiber reinforcement on strength in terms of fiber reinforcing index.
(3)
f 'c
f 'c
(4)
228
Mazen Musmar
l
= (0.614 + 0.4 (v f )1.029 )
d
f 'c
f c' as follows
(5)
(6)
strength divided by
l
f sp = (0.6 + 0.4 (v f ) )
d
f 'c
(7)
3. Conclusions
The following conclusions can be drawn from this study:
1- A mathematical expression that predicts the split tensile strength of steel fiber
reinforced concrete is derived.
2- The suggested equation correlates the split tensile strength of steel fiber
reinforced concrete with concrete compressive strength and fiber reinforcement
index.
3- The predicted values of the splitting tensile strength are in good agreement with
the experimental results. Thus the validity of the suggested expression is verified
against the experimental results gathered from previous researches.
4- The outcomes of descriptive statistical analysis confirm the credibility of the
derived expression.
5- Concrete compressive strength, fiber content and the fiber aspect ratio are the
major effectual parameters in specifying the tensile strength of fiber concrete.
229
2,5
f sp/(f'c)0.5
1,5
0,5
0
0
0,5
1,5
2,5
3,5
Hundreds
Fiber reinforcement Index,% FRI
Fig. 1 Relationship between steel fiber reinforcement index % FRI and fsp/(f'c)0.5
18,00
16,00
14,00
12,00
10,00
8,00
6,00
4,00
2,00
0,00
0,00
5,00
10,00
15,00
20,00
230
Mazen Musmar
Appendix
Table 1. Compressive strength, fiber reinforcement index and split cylinder strength
no
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
no
39
40
41
42
FRI
0
30
60
75
90
105
120
37.5
75
93.75
112.5
131.25
150
41.5
83
103.75
124.5
145.25
166
FRI
0.00
42.00
100.00
90.00
f'c (Mpa)
40.69
40.00
43.45
35.86
Craig et al [12]
fsp
(MPa)
no
FRI
3.45
43
120.00
5.72
44
200.00
6.34
45
120.00
5.31
46
160.00
fsp (MPa)
5.13
5.68
6.95
8.26
8.93
9.97
10.83
6.94
8.14
9.12
10.03
11.16
11.74
7.51
8.89
10.71
11.5
12.54
13.16
f'c (Mpa)
28.97
47.59
40.00
45.52
fsp (MPa)
4.55
6.00
6.07
7.10
f'c (Mpa)
48.6
47.7
43.2
fsp (MPa)
7.16
6.96
6.62
Sharma [13]
no
47
48
49
50
FRI
0
0
0
0
f'c (Mpa)
42.3
43.2
47.7
46.8
fsp
(MPa)
4.55
4.6
4.83
4.79
no
51
52
53
FRI
72
67.5
67.5
231
Batson [11]
no
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
FRI
44
44
44
44
30.8
30.8
30.8
30.8
61.6
f'c
(Mpa)
40.19
40.19
40.19
40.19
40.19
40.19
40.19
40.19
39.71
fsp
(MPa)
5.71
5.71
5.71
5.71
5.71
5.71
5.71
5.71
6.18
f'c (Mpa)
42.49
41.9
41.9
42.49
39.7
41.42
40.11
fsp
(MPa)
4.56
4.53
4.53
5.4
5.49
6.7
5.24
f'c (Mpa)
23.83
23.57
23.27
24.20
23.75
23.82
25.83
24.66
24.90
27.39
26.41
25.99
26.68
25.63
26.19
Bani-Yasin [21]
fsp
(Mpa)
no
2.62
99
2.49
100
2.54
101
2.49
102
2.46
103
2.51
104
2.86
105
3.02
106
2.97
107
3.44
108
3.15
109
3.01
110
3.88
111
3.64
112
3.58
113
no
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
FRI
61.6
61.6
61.6
61.6
61.6
61.6
61.6
61.6
f'c (Mpa)
39.71
39.71
39.71
39.71
39.71
39.71
39.71
39.71
fsp (MPa)
6.18
6.18
6.18
6.18
6.18
6.18
6.18
6.18
FRI
75
56.25
93.75
37.5
75
0
f'c (Mpa)
42.67
40.47
40.85
40.47
40.11
41.42
fsp (Mpa)
5.69
6.62
6.11
7.17
5.51
6.7
FRI
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
30.00
30.00
30.00
60.00
60.00
60.00
75.00
75.00
75.00
f'c (Mpa)
51.90
49.64
52.13
53.80
52.94
52.89
54.25
55.54
54.72
55.72
55.85
56.80
55.26
55.88
55.58
fsp (Mpa)
5.66
5.23
5.64
5.73
5.86
5.94
6.44
6.12
6.13
7.42
7.28
7.29
7.65
7.55
7.48
Ghosheh [16]
no
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
no
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
FRI
0
0
0
26.6
35
70
37.5
FRI
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
30.00
30.00
30.00
60.00
60.00
60.00
75.00
75.00
75.00
no
78
79
80
81
82
83
232
Mazen Musmar
no
114
115
116
117
118
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
FRI
0
30
60
60
0
60
0
30
60
60
0
60
30
30
30
60
60
60
30
30
30
f'c (Mpa)
20.1
21.37
22.753
22.91
20.65
22.15
32.76
34.48
35.72
36.43
32.60
35.96
21.73
22.07
21.55
22.33
22.08
22.16
22.72
22.32
22.25
Ayish[20]
fsp (Mpa)
no
3.1
119
3.23
120
3.67
121
3.53
122
3.14
123
4.08
140
3.84
141
4.15
142
4.66
143
4.36
144
3.74
145
4.64
146
2.48
147
2.31
148
2.47
149
2.49
150
2.46
151
2.51
152
2.6
153
2.66
154
2.54
155
no
156
157
FRI
0.00
31.25
f'c (Mpa)
60.72
61.89
fsp (Mpa)
4.32
5.88
no
160
161
162
163
FRI
0
42
100
90
f'c (Mpa)
40.69
40.00
43.45
35.86
fsp (Mpa)
3.45
5.72
6.34
5.31
no
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
FRI
60
60
60
90
90
90
30
30
30
60
60
60
30
30
30
60
60
60
90
90
90
f'c (Mpa)
22.78
24.65
23.02
24.65
25.45
24.73
53.52
52.03
53.66
51.74
52.74
53.35
54.52
53.66
54.29
54.85
56.68
54.14
56.64
56.03
56.72
fsp (Mpa)
2.94
2.76
2.79
3.58
3.63
3.68
5.96
6.08
5.91
5.73
5.86
5.94
6.26
6.57
6.45
6.89
7.3
7.13
8.56
8.34
8.63
Kwak [19]
no
158
159
FRI
46.88
31.25
f'c (Mpa)
66.54
29.88
fsp (Mpa)
6.08
3.83
Craig [12]
no
164
165
166
167
FRI
120
200
120
160
f'c (Mpa)
28.97
47.59
40.00
45.52
fsp (Mpa)
4.55
6.00
6.07
7.10
fsp (Mpa)
6.39
5.14
7.88
10.70
6.39
5.09
7.88
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
233
no
203
204
205
FRI
0.00
14.25
28.50
f'c (Mpa)
54.15
55.96
59.47
Robert [14]
fsp (MPa)
no
2.90
206
5.60
207
6.00
208
no
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
FRI
0
0
0
0
0
40
40
40
40
40
60
60
60
60
60
80
80
80
80
80
120
120
120
120
f'c (Mpa)
55.22
63.71
71.06
80.87
91.85
59.76
65.65
74.69
84.84
94.78
62.51
76.71
85.62
92.98
97.03
64.73
78.91
88.01
94.67
99.21
66.81
80.82
91
96.73
FRI
42.75
57.00
57.00
12.11
14.36
16.14
17.98
6.52
7.43
7.48
6.52
11.07
11.32
f'c (Mpa)
56.72
54.15
51.40
fsp (MPa)
5.90
5.60
6.20
f'c (Mpa)
59.76
65.65
74.69
84.84
94.78
63.07
78.66
88.3
93.94
97.06
65.21
80.42
90.17
94.97
98.11
67.31
81.14
92.93
96.62
99.98
69.08
82.29
94.17
96.35
fsp (MPa)
5.18
5.26
5.91
6.74
6.77
6.1
6.79
7.36
8.81
8.95
7.32
7.95
8.9
9.75
9.92
8.41
9.15
10.04
11.1
11.5
9.71
10.74
11.23
12.04
234
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
Mazen Musmar
120
0
0
0
0
0
40
40
40
40
40
60
60
60
60
60
80
80
80
80
80
120
120
120
120
120
0
0
0
0
0
40
40
40
40
40
60
60
60
60
60
80
80
100.18
65.25
70.21
79.51
89.27
98.92
66.23
79.42
90.79
94.13
99.94
67.37
82.66
91.89
95.62
99.98
69.71
84.31
93.76
96.2
100.12
71.23
85.21
94.78
98.71
101.3
48.74
58.81
67.31
74.92
80.77
52.63
61.27
74.67
82.89
91.07
54.01
62.89
76.63
84.62
92.86
55.22
64.73
100.2
51.22
60.85
69.39
80.11
86.48
54.71
67.91
79.31
89.76
93.62
55.84
69.42
81.61
90.31
94.28
57.88
73.07
82.60
92.61
95.31
59.12
74.24
84.63
93.11
96.72
57.87
64.08
75.31
84.42
93.64
52.63
61.72
74.67
82.89
91.07
54.01
62.89
76.63
84.62
92.82
52.2
64.73
12.63
3.95
4.1
4.42
4.75
4.98
4.94
5.94
6.28
6.63
6.91
6.41
7.04
7.68
8.2
8.57
7.23
7.92
8.45
9.57
9.92
8.21
9.00
9.64
10.36
10.74
4.08
4.25
4.63
4.82
4.15
4.68
4.97
5.51
6.15
6.26
6.05
6.48
7.08
7.91
8.08
6.83
7.44
No
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
FRI
80
80
80
120
120
120
120
120
f'c (Mpa)
78.98
87.03
93.91
56.77
66.82
80.11
88.18
94.22
235
f'c (Mpa)
78.98
87.03
93.91
56.77
66.82
80.11
88.18
94.22
fsp (MPa)
8.12
8.97
9.2
7.68
7.94
8.72
4.98
10.33
0.95
0.78
Cylinders
100x200 mm
Cubes
150x150x150mm
0.97
0.8
cylinders
150x300 mm
Cubes
200x200x200mm
1
0.83
P value
= 0.614
= 0. 4
= 1.029
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
R2 = 0.841
adjusted R2 = 0.840
References
[1]
D.A. Fanella and A.E. Naaman, Stress-strain properties of fiber reinforced mortar
in compression, ACI Journal, 82(4)(1985), pp.475-583.
[2]
L.S. Hsu and C.T.T. Hsu, Stress-strain behavior of steel fiber reinforced high
strength concrete under compression, ACI Materials Journal, 91(4)(1994),pp.448457.
[3] ACI Committee 544, State of the art report on fiber reinforced concrete,
ACI 544.1R-96, American Concrete Institute, 1996.
[4]
ACI Committee 544, (2006), State of the art report on f iber reinforced concrete,
ACI 544,1R-82. American Concrete Institute, Detroit.
236
Mazen Musmar
[5]
ACI Committee 544, (2006), Design considerations for steel fiber reinforced
concrete, ACI 544,4R-89. American Concrete Institute, Detroit.
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
237
[20] Ayish, M. "Punching Shear Behavior of Flat Plates with Fiber Reinforced
Concrete", M. Sc. Thesis, June 2004, Jordan University of Sceince and Technology.
[21] Bani-Yasin, I. S. "Performance of High Strength Fibrous Concrete slab concrete
connections under gravity and lateral loads" M. Sc. thesis, Jordan University of
Science and technology", June, 2004
[22] Rjoub, M. I. M., Rasheed, T.M. "Shear Strength of Steel Fiber High Strength
Concrete Beams", Seventh International Conference on Concrete Technology, Oct.
2004.