Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Meconium Aspiration Syndrome
Meconium Aspiration Syndrome
MECONIUM ASPIRATION
SYNDROME
Ismail Haron
Consultant Paediatrician & Neonatologist
Hospital Sungai Buloh
Introduction
Epidemiology
Pathogenesis of MAS
Clinical features
Management
General
Specific
Conclusion
SMC/KL/2008
Introduction
Meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS) is not
an uncommon problem.
Important cause of respiratory distress in the term
newborn with high morbidity and mortality.
The pathophysiology is complex and is not well
defined.
Despite advances in neonatal intensive care over
the last 2 decades, MAS remains one the most
vexing clinical conditions to manage.
SMC/KL/2008
Composition of meconium
Sterile compound made primary of water (75%),
with mucous glycoproteins, lipids and proteases.
Small dried amniotic fluid debris, vernix and lanugo.
Bile pigments.
The residue from intestinal secretions.
SMC/KL/2008
Epidemiology
SMC/KL/2008
Epidemiology
Approximately 10 15% of all live births are
complicated by meconium stained amniotic fluid (MSAF).
About 5% of neonates born through MSAF develop MAS.
MSAF and MAS related to advanced gestation.
Generally incidence of MSAF and MAS are in a declining
trend.
SMC/KL/2008
Incidence of MAS
Pathogenesis of
MAS
SMC/KL/2008
Causes of MSAF
Under normal circumstances, the passage of meconium from
the fetus into the amnion is prevented by;
Lack of intestinal peristalsis (low motilin level)
Tonic contraction of anal sphincter
Terminal cap of viscous meconium
Risk factors
Maternal hypertension
Maternal diabetes mellitus
Maternal heavy cigarette smoking.
Maternal chronic respiratory or CVS disease.
Post-term pregnancy.
Pre-eclampsia / eclampsia
Oligohydramnios
Intrauterine growth retardation
Poor biophysical profile
Abnormal fetal heart rate patterns
SMC/KL/2008
Causes of MAS
Reason why some infants born through MSAF develop
an aspiration syndrome whereas others do not unclear.
Mechanisms of injury
Mechanical obstruction of airways.
Chemical pneumonitis.
Vasoconstriction of pulmonary vessels.
Inactivation of surfactant.
Activation of complement.
SMC/KL/2008
V/Q mismatch
SMC/KL/2008
Pneumonitis
Neutrophils & Macrophages
Cytokines
Pneumonitis
Vascular leakage
Inactivation of surfactant
In the early 1990s meconium inactivates surfactant.
Greenough A. Eur J Pediatr 1995;154:S2-4
Activation of complement
Meconium is a potent activator of the complement
Castellheim A et al. Pediatr Res 2004;55(2):310-318
system.
Castellheim A et al. Scand J Immunol 2005;61(3):217-225
Activation of complement system was correlated
with lung dysfunction and mortality.
Lindenskov PH et al. Pediatr Res 2004;56(5):810-817
SMC/KL/2008
Postpartum aspiration
Inutero gasping
Continued compromise
Meconium aspiration
Peripheral airway
obstruction
Complete
Atelectasis
V/Q mismatch
Proximal airway
obstruction
Partial
Air trapping
Inactivation of surfactant
Pneumonitis
Decreased lung
compliance
Ball-valve
effect
Air leaks
SMC/KL/2008
Cytokines activation
Acidosis
Acidosis
Hypoxemia
Hypoxemia
Hypercapnea
Hypercapnea
Remodeling of pulmonary
vasculature
(muscular hyperplasia)
Vasoactive mediators
PPHN
Clinical features
SMC/KL/2008
Diagnosis
MAS must be considered in any infant born through MSAF
who develops symptoms of respiratory distress.
SMC/KL/2008
SMC/KL/2008
SMC/KL/2008
SMC/KL/2008
Diagnosis
Severity of MAS
Mild
Requires < 40% oxygen for less than 48 hours
Moderate.
Requires > 40% oxygen for more than 48 hours
No air leak
Severe
Requires assisted ventilation for more than 48 hours
Often associated with PPHN
Management
SMC/KL/2008
Prevention
Prevention
Prevention
Prevention
Prevention
SMC/KL/2008
Antepartum
Intrapartum
Postnatal
SMC/KL/2008
Treatment
General
Temperature regulation
Haemodynamic status
Biochemistry
Haematology
Possible infection
Associated asphyxia
SMC/KL/2008
SMC/KL/2008
Treatment
Respiratory management
Depends on the amount of respiratory distress.
Increasing oxygenation while minimising
barotrauma/volutrauma.
Hyperventilation did not proven beneficial.
No randomised trials have compared different
forms of ventilation in MAS.
SMC/KL/2008
Treatment
Mode of ventilation
HFV claimed to be gentler.
Theoretically, HFV should reduce air leaks.
HFV may slow the progression of meconium
down the tracheobronchial tree and allow more
time for meconium removal.
Hachey WE et al. Crit Care Med 1998;26:556-61
SMC/KL/2008
Treatment
Surfactant Therapy
Two randomised trials evaluate the efficacy of
exogenous surfactant therapy in MAS showed
promising results with decrease in the number of
infants requiring ECMO and possible reduction
of pneumothorax.
Findlay RD et al. Pediatrics 1996;97:48-52
Lotze A et al. J Pediatr 1998;132:40-7
SMC/KL/2008
Treatment
Surfactant Therapy
Surfactant inactivation property of meconium.
Herting E et a. Pediatr Res 2001;50:44-9
SMC/KL/2008
Treatment
Surfactant Lavage
Removal of noxious material from the lungs.
Minimised obstruction.
Offset the inactivation of surfactant by meconium
Increase oxygenation & reduction in duration of
mechanical ventilation
Lam BCC, Yeung CY. Pediatrics 1999;103:1014-8
Wiswell TE et al. Pediatrics 2002;109:1081-7
LessMAS Trial.
SMC/KL/2008
Aetiology of PPHN
Treatment
Inhaled nitric oxide
Selective pulmonary vasodilation.
Activate guanylate cyclase and increases cyclic GMP
and acting directly on the vascular smooth muscle.
Decreased need for ECMO (RR 0.61) but no difference
in mortality.
Treatment
Inhaled nitric oxide
HFOV + iNO seems to work better, likely due to improve
lung inflation and better delivery of the drug.
Kinsella JP et al. J Pediatr 1997;131:55-62
SMC/KL/2008
(RR:0.6)
(RR:0.6)
(RR:0.6)
(RR:0.6)
Treatment
Steroid
Insufficient evidence to assess the effects of
steroid therapy in the management of MAS.
Ward M, Sinn J. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003
SMC/KL/2008