Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chien 2005
Chien 2005
Chien 2005
www.elsevier.com/locate/ijfatigue
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, 2250 GG Brown, 2350 Hayward Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 2125, USA
b
DaimlerChrysler, Auburn Hills, MI 48326, USA
Received 13 August 2003; received in revised form 30 April 2004; accepted 14 June 2004
Abstract
In this paper, the inuence of the residual stresses induced by the llet rolling process on the fatigue process of a ductile cast
iron crankshaft section under bending is investigated. The stress concentration near the llet of the crankshaft section under
bending without consideration of residual stresses is rst investigated by a two-dimensional elastic nite element analysis. The
plastic zone development and the residual stress distribution near the crankshaft llet induced by the llet rolling process are then
investigated by a two-dimensional elasticplastic nite element analysis. In order to use the two-dimensional nite element analysis to shed light on the residual stress distribution due to the three-dimensional rolling process, the rolling depth after the unloading of the roller in the two-dimensional nite element analysis is determined by the llet surface proles measured by the
shadowgraphs taken before and after the llet rolling process. After the rolling process, a bending moment is then applied to the
crankshaft section. With consideration of the stresses due to the rolling process and the bending moment, the fatigue failure near
the llet is investigated based on a linear elastic fracture mechanics approach. An eective stress intensity factor, which combines
the stress intensity factors due to the bending moment and due to the residual stresses, is dened. An eective stress intensity factor range is then approximated and compared to an assumed threshold stress intensity factor range to determine if the crack can
continue to propagate for a given crack length. The results indicate that the four-bubble failure criterion only determines the
crack initiation life for small cracks initiated on the surfaces of llets. The four-bubble failure criterion does not indicate whether
a fatigue crack initiated on the llet surface can propagate through or arrest in the compressive residual stress zone induced by
the rolling process.
# 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Crankshaft; Rolling; Residual stresses; Fracture; Fatigue; Bending
1. Introduction
Crankshafts in automotive engines can experience a
signicant number of service cyclic loads. Since fatigue
fracture initiated near the llets is one of the primary
failure mechanisms of automotive crankshafts, llet
rolling processes have been used to improve the fatigue
lives of crankshafts for many years [17]. The llet rolling process induces compressive residual stresses near
the llet surface. The compressive residual stresses
lower the fatigue driving stresses near the llet surface
Corresponding author. Tel.: +1-734-764-2694; fax: +1-734-6473170.
E-mail address: jwo@umich.edu (J. Pan).
0142-1123/$ - see front matter # 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.06.009
Fig. 1. (a) An automotive ductile cast iron crankshaft, (b) a crankshaft section used in the resonant bending fatigue test and (c) a closeup view of the llets.
Fig. 4. (a) A schematic plot of the cross-sectional view of the crankshaft section near the llet and (b) a cross-sectional view of a crankshaft section near the llet.
Fig. 5. (a) A small crack initiated from a graphite nodule near the
llet surface and (b) a larger crack grown into the llet material.
Fig. 10. The stressstrain curve for the crankshaft used in the nite
element analysis.
Table 1
The material properties for the ductile cast iron from Tartaglia et al. [27]
Hardness (BHN)
Youngs modulus (GPa)
Ultimate strength (MPa)
Tensile yield strength (MPa)
Elongation (%)
236
169
759
419
8.1
Fig. 9. Schematic plots of two cross-sectional views of a crankshaft section. The hatched areas indicate the so-called football region.
due to the rolling process. The value of the cyclic compressive yield strength of 462 MPa is taken as the yield
stress for the Mises yield criterion for the nite element
analysis. Note that, for example, the DruckerPrager
yield criterion can also be adopted to describe the plastic behavior of the ductile cast iron when the tensile
and compressive strengths of the ductile cast iron are
available.
3.1. Bending tests without consideration of residual
stresses
The crankshaft section under a bending moment
without consideration of residual stresses is rst considered in order to investigate the stress concentration
near the llet. The stress eld near the llet under a
bending moment is obtained by applying linear distributed displacements on the crank pin and the main
journal of the crankshaft section, as schematically
shown in Fig. 11, in an elastic nite element analysis.
The displacement distributions are based on the results
from a three-dimensional nite element analysis where
the crankshaft section is subject to a bending moment
of 508.4 N m (4500 lb in.) with respect to the centerline
of the crank main journal. The details of the threedimensional elastic nite element analysis are reported
Fig. 11. A schematic drawing of the displacement boundary conditions under bending.
The results of an elasticplastic nite element analysis of the llet rolling process are rst reported in this
section in order to obtain the residual stress distributions near the llet. Since the llet rolling process
involves plastic loading/unloading, the kinematic hardening rule is selected to account for the possible reverse
plastic loading eects when the roller is released.
Fig. 15(a)(c) shows the boundary conditions of the
plane strain nite element models of roller loading,
roller unloading and bending. As shown in Fig. 15(a),
the left edge of the crankshaft section represents the
symmetry plane in the llet rolling process and is constrained to have zero displacements in the x direction.
The central axis of the crank pin is also set to have the
symmetry condition and is constrained in the y direction. The right edge of the crankshaft section is set to
Fig. 13. Angular distributions of the hoop stress, the radial stress
v
and the shear stress along the llet surface as functions of h from 0
v
to 90 under the displacement corresponding to a bending moment of
508.4 N m (4500 lb in.).
Fig. 14. Radial distributions of the hoop stress under the displacement corresponding to a bending moment of 508.4 N m (4500 lb in.)
v
v
v
v
v
v
at several angles of h 0 , 14.41 , 28.90 , 43.38 , 60.73 , 73.25 and
v
90 .
Fig. 16. The llet surface proles before and after the llet rolling
process based on (a) shadowgraphs and (b) the nite element analysis.
10
of the axes of the crankpins and the main journal. Further investigations are still needed to nd a boundary
condition to simulate the rolling of a crankshaft section
instead of the complex rolling of the entire crankshaft
as in plants.
Since the computational results based on the plane
strain model and the axisymmetric model are quite
similar, we only present the computational results
based on the plane strain model. Fig. 17 shows the
Mises stress contour in the area of interest (the football
region) when the roller is down at its maximum displacement based on the two-dimensional plane strain
model. The plastic zone is the region with the darkest
shade. Note that the size of the plastic zone based on
the two-dimensional plane strain model is slightly smaller than that based on the axisymmetric model. The
smaller plastic zone in the two-dimensional plane strain
model can be attributed to the fact that the two-dimensional plane strain model has more constraints than the
axisymmetric model. The result suggests that the twodimensional plane strain model may be a reasonable
simplication for the simulation of the llet rolling
process.
Fig. 18(a) shows the angular distributions of the
hoop stress rhh, the radial stress rrr and the shear stress
v
rrh along the llet surface as functions of h from 0 to
v
90 when the roller is down at its maximum displacement based on the two-dimensional plane strain model.
As shown in the gure, the radial stress rrr is near
2300 MPa, and the hoop stress rhh is near 1000
v
MPa at h 0 . In general, the magnitude of the compressive radial stress rrr and the magnitude of the compressive hoop stress rhh become less as h increases. The
v
compressive radial stress rrr vanishes at h from 80 to
v
90 , indicating that no contact occurs between the
Fig. 17. The Mises stress contours near the llet surface when the roller is down at its maximum displacement based on two-dimensional plane
strain model.
Fig. 18. Angular distributions of the hoop stress, the radial stress
v
and the shear stress along the llet surface as functions of h from 0
v
to 90 based on the two-dimensional plane strain model for (a) the
roller down at the maximum displacement and (b) the roller released
with no contact force between the roller and the crankshaft.
11
Fig. 19. Angular distributions of the hoop stress, the radial stress
v
and the shear stress along the llet surface as functions of h from 0
v
to 90 based on the two-dimensional plane strain model after the
symmetry conditions are released and a bending moment corresponding to 508.4 N m (4500 lb in.) is applied.
12
KI2 KII2
1 m2
E
where KI and KII are mode I and mode II stress intensity factors, respectively, E is Youngs modulus and m is
Poissons ratio.
Strictly speaking, the J integral is applicable only to
linear or nonlinear elastic materials where the strain
energy is a unique function of the strain eld. For elasticplastic materials, the J integral can still be adopted
to characterize approximately the crack tip elds if the
loading is increased monotonically. In such cases, the J
integral is path independent and can be evaluated from
elds remote from the crack tip. However, when
unloading occurs in elasticplastic materials, the values
of the J integral calculated far away from the crack tip
may show signicant path dependence and have no
clear connection with the stress and strain elds near
the crack tip. For the llet rolling process considered
here, the residual stresses are the result of plastic loading/elastic unloading. Therefore, the validity to use the
J integral to characterize the crack tip elds will be in
question.
Hou et al. [15] showed that when the stresses near
the crack tip due to the applied load are large compared to the residual stresses, the J integrals with consideration of the residual stresses for dierent paths
follow the same trend as those without consideration of
13
Fig. 20. Radial distributions of the hoop stress, radial stress and shear stress of the crankshaft at h 52:35 based on the two-dimensional plane
strain model (a) under bending, (b) roller down, (c) roller released and (d) summation of (a) and (c).
shear stress rrh is also quite small near the llet surface.
However, the magnitude of the shear stress rrh gradually reaches to 150 MPa at the depth of about 3 mm
from the llet surface.
The summation of the radial distributions of the
hoop stress rhh, the radial stress rrr and the shear stress
v
rrh at h 52:35 from those of the bending moment
and those of the residual stresses due to the rolling process is shown in Fig. 20(d). As shown in the gure, a
tensile hoop stress rhh occurs near the llet surface.
The depth of the region with the tensile hoop stress rhh
is about 0.5 mm. As the distance from the surface
increases, the magnitude of the compressive hoop stress
rhh increases and then decreases. As the distance from
the surface is larger than 3.3 mm, the hoop stress rhh
becomes tensile again. The radial stress rrr remains
small to the depth of 4 mm. Here, it should be mentioned that the values of the shear stress rrh are not
small when the distance increases away from the llet
surface. However, Fig. 20(a) shows that the magnitudes
of the shear stress rrh near the llet surface at h
v
52:35 are quite small due to the bending fatigue tests.
Since the stress intensity factor ranges due to the bending are the main driving force for crack propagation,
only the mode I eects on the fatigue crack propagation will be considered in the following analysis.
The mode I stress intensity factors KI max
b s due to
bending are calculated by the normal traction method.
14
Table 2
corresponding to 508.4 N m (4500 lb in.), (KI)r
The values of KI max
b
and D(KI)e for several crack lengths
KI max
b
Crack
length (mm)
MPa m
0.13
0.33
0.60
0.90
1.25
1.60
2.28
2.96
3.65
4.33
7.65
10.23
11.66
12.48
13.17
13.73
14.59
15.6
16.64
17.75
1=2
(KI)r
(MPa m1/2)
D(KI)e
(MPa m1/2)
4.89
7.33
9.96
12.78
16.23
19.76
24.84
26.87
25.64
22.88
2.76
2.9
1.7
0.3
3.06
6.03
10.25
11.27
9.0
5.13
Fig. 21. A rened nite element mesh near the crack tip for
a 0:33 mm.
15
Table 3
A comparison of the values of (KI)r based on the original coarse
mesh and the rened mesh
Crack
(KI)r (MPa m1/2,
length (mm) coarse mesh)
0.33
1.25
Fig. 22. The mode I stress intensity factors for several dierent contours as functions of the normalized contour distance from the crack
tip, r=a, for the crack length a 0:33 mm under the residual stresses.
Fig. 23. The mode I stress intensity factors for several dierent contours as functions of the normalized contour distance from the crack
tip, r=a, for the crack length a 1:25 mm under the residual stresses.
7.33
16.23
Dierence (%)
7.58
16.58
3.30
2.11
16
17
18
Acknowledgements
The support of this work by a DaimlerChrysler
Challenge Fund project is greatly appreciated. Helpful
discussions with Darryl Taylor, Yung-Li Lee, Paul Spiteri and Andy Hartiger of DaimlerChrysler on crankshaft bending fatigue tests and William Hosford of the
University of Michigan on the material properties of
cast irons are greatly appreciated.
References
[1] Beghini M, Bertini L. Fatigue crack propagation through
residual stress elds with closure phenomena. Eng Fract Mech
1990;36:37987.
[2] Bhargava V, Hahn GT, Rubin CA. Elasticplastic nite element
model of rolling contactpart 1: analysis of single contacts. J
Appl Mech Trans ASME 1985;52:6774.
[3] Bhargava V, Hahn GT, Rubin CA. Elasticplastic nite element
model of rolling contactpart 2: analysis of repeated contacts. J
Appl Mech Trans ASME 1985;52:7582.
[4] Bijak-Zochowski M, Marek P. Residual stress in some elastoplastic problems of rolling contact with friction. Int J Mech Sci
1997;39:1532.
[5] Choi KS, Pan J. Fatigue process of llet rollers and crankshaft
sections with consideration of llet rolling, submitted for publication.
[6] Clement P, Angeli JP, Pineau A. Short crack behaviour in nodular cast iron. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 1984;7:25165.
[7] Dang Van K, Flavenot JF, Le Douaron A. Critere damorcage
en fatigue a grand nombre de cycles sous solicitations multiaxiales. J Comm Fatigue Soc Franc Metall, RE1123, 1984.
[8] Dang Van K, Maitournam MH. Steady-state ow in classical
elastoplasticity: applications to repeated rolling and sliding contact. J Mech Phys Solids 1993;41:1691710.
19
[9] Eberhard A. Einuss der formgebung auf die spannungsverteilung von kurbelkropfungen mit langsbohrungen-teil 1. MTZ
1973;34:20510.
[10] Guagliano M, Terranova A, Vergani L. Theoretical and experimental study of the stress concentration factor in diesel engine
crankshafts. J Mech Des Trans ASME 1993;115:4752.
[11] Guagliano M, Vergani L. A simplied approach to crack growth
prediction in a crankshaft. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct
1994;17:1295306.
[12] Ham G, Rubin CA, Hahn GT, Bhargava V. Elasto-plastic nite
element analysis of repeated, two-dimensional rolling-sliding
contacts. J Tribol Trans ASME 1988;110:449.
[13] Henry J, Toplosky J, Abramczuk M. Crankshaft durability predictiona new 3-D approach, SAE Paper 920087. Warrendale
(PA): Society of Automotive Engineers; 1992.
[14] Hibbitt HD, Karlsson BI, Sorensen EP. ABAQUS user manual,
version 6-2, 2001.
[15] Hou Y-C, Kim M, Pan J, Brust FW. Eects of residual stresses
on fracture of welded pipes. ASME Pressure Vessels Piping Div
PVP 1996;327:6775.
[16] Lee Y-L, Morrissey W. Uncertainties of experimental crankshaft
fatigue strength assessment. Int J Mater Prod Tech 2001;16:37992.
[17] Love RJ, Waistall DN. The improvement in the bending fatigue
strength of production crankshafts by cold rolling. M.I.R.A.
Report No. 1954/1, 1954. p. 18.
[18] Maab H. Die gestaltsfestigkeit von kurbellwellen, insbesondere
nach den forderungen der klassikation-gesellschaften. MTZ
1964;25:391405.
[19] Merwin JE, Johnson KL. An analysis of plastic deformation in
rolling contact. Proc Inst Mech Eng 1963;177:67690.
[20] Pavier MJ, Poussard CGC, Smith DJ. Eect of residual stress
around cold worked holes on fracture under superimposed
mechanical load. Eng Fract Mech 1999;63:75173.
[21] Perl M, Arone R. Stress intensity factors for a radially multicracked partially autofrettaged pressurized thick-walled cylinder.
J Pressure Vessel Technol 1988;110:14754.
[22] Pfender M, Amedik E, Sonntag G. Einuss der formgebung auf
die spannungsverteilung in kurbelkropfungen. MTZ 1966;27:
22537.
[23] Rice JR. A path independent integral and the approximate
analysis of strain concentration by notches and crack. J Appl
Mech 1968;35:37986.
[24] Seo Y, Taylor D, Chien WY, Pan J, Close D. Modeling of resonant testing for determination of cracking in cast iron crankshafts. SAE 2002 International Congress and Exhibition,
Detroit, Michigan, March 47. 2002.
[25] Spiteri P. Private communication 2004.
[26] Shih CF, Moran B, Nakamura T. Energy release rate along a
three-dimensional crack front in a thermally stressed body. Int J
Fract 1986;30:79102.
[27] Tartaglia JM, Ritter PE, Gundlach RB, Jenkins L. Monotonic
and cyclic property design data for ductile iron castings. SAE
Paper 2000-01-0758. Warrendale (PA): Society of Automotive
Engineers; 2000.
[28] Taylor D, Ciepalowicz AJ, Rogers P, Devlukia J. Prediction of
fatigue failure in a crankshaft using the technique of crack modelling. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 1997;20:1321.
[29] Taylor D, Zhou W, Ciepalowicz AJ, Devlukia J. Mixed-mode
fatigue from stress concentrations: an approach based on
equivalent stress intensity. Int J Fatigue 1999;21:1738.
[30] Yu V, Chien WY, Choi KS, Pan J, Close D. Testing and modeling of frequency drops in resonant bending fatigue tests of notched crankshaft sections. SAE Technical Paper No. 2004-011501. Warrendale (PA): Society of Automotive Engineers; 2004.