Third Circuit 15-3400 Lambert Appeal DOCKET With SUMMARIES of ALL Recorded Filings As of January 5, 2016

15-3400 Docket
1 of 6
https://ecf.ca3.uscourts.gov/cmecf/servlet/TransportRoom
General Docket
Third Circuit Court of Appeals
Court of Appeals Docket #: 15-3400
Nature of Suit: 3530 Habeas Corpus
Lisa Lambert v. Superintendent Framingham MCI, et al
Appeal From: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Fee Status: Due
Docketed: 10/08/2015
Case Type Information:

1) civil
2) private
3) Habeas Corpus-prisoner
Originating Court Information:
District: 0313-2 : 5-14-cv-02559
Court Reporter: Joan Carr
Trial Judge: Paul S. Diamond, U.S. District Judge
Date Filed: 05/02/2014
Date Order/Judgment:
Date Order/Judgment EOD:
09/14/2015
09/14/2015
Date NOA Filed:

09/30/2015
Prior Cases:
None
Current Cases:
None
LISA MICHELLE LAMBERT

Plaintiff - Appellee
Jeremy H.G. Ibrahim, Sr., Esq.

Direct: 215-568-1943
Email: jeremyibrahim.esq@verizon.net
Fax: 610-456-2727
[NTC Retained]
P.O. Box 1025
1631 Baltimore Pike
Chadds Ford, PA 19317
v.
SUPERINTENDENT FRAMINGHAM MCI
Defendant - Appellee
District Attorney Lancaster County

[NTC city/county gov]
Lancaster County Office of District Attorney
50 North Duke Street
Lancaster, PA 17608
DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY


(see above)
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA


(see above)
-----------------------------STANLEY J. CATERBONE
Not Party - Appellant
Stanley J. Caterbone
Direct: 717-669-2163
Email: scaterbone@live.com
[NTC Pro Se]
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
1/4/2016 5:05 AM
15-3400 Docket
2 of 6

v.
SUPERINTENDENT FRAMINGHAM MCI;
DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY;
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
*Stanley J. Caterbone,
Appellant
*(Pursuant to Rule 12(a), Fed.R.App.P.)
1/4/2016 5:05 AM
15-3400 Docket
10/08/2015
30 pg, 3.25 MB
10/08/2015
CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone in District Court No. 5-14-cv02559. [-The notice of appeal that was attached to the entry was the incorrect document. The notice of
appeal has been corrected and notice is being resent.]--[Edited 10/09/2015 by CJG] (SB)
RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (SB)
10/09/2015
2 pg, 27.26 KB
LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case will be submitted to a panel of this Court for a
decision on the issuance of certificate of appealability and possible summary action. (JW)
42 pg, 4.58 MB
ECF FILER: EXHIBITS filed by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone for the Court's consideration. Certificate
of Service dated 10/21/2015.--[Edited 10/22/2015 by CJG] (SJC)
0 pg, 0 KB
ECF FILER: Motion filed by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Certificate
of Service dated 10/21/2015. (SJC)
312 pg, 15.13 MB
ECF FILER: EXHIBITS filed by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone for the Court's consideration. Certificate
of Service dated 10/22/2015.--[Edited 10/22/2015 by CJG] (SJC)
1 pg, 28.36 KB
COPY OF ORDER OF DISTRICT COURT dated 10/21/2015 denying Mr. Caterbone's motion to proceed in
forma pauperis signed by Paul S. Diamond, filed. (CJG)
44 pg, 4.6 MB
ECF FILER: DOCUMENT by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone titled Submission as Exhibit. Certificate of
Service dated 10/23/2015.--[Edited 10/23/2015 by CJG] (SJC)
10/21/2015
10/21/2015
10/22/2015
10/22/2015
10/23/2015
10/26/2015
ECF FILER: Request by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone for Oral Argument. [SEND TO MERITS] (SJC)
194 pg, 22.28 MB
10/27/2015
2 pg, 21.62 KB
11/02/2015
227 pg, 29.4 MB
11/03/2015
8 pg, 1.94 MB
11/03/2015
FOLLOW UP LETTER to District Attorney Lancaster County for Attorney General Pennsylvania,
Superintendent Framingham MCI and District Attorney Lancaster County and Jeremy H.G. Ibrahim, Sr.,
Esq. for Lisa Michelle Lambert requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form on or before
11/10/2015. (CJG)
ECF FILER: DOCUMENT filed by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone titled Submission as Exhibit.
Certificate of Service dated 11/02/2015.--[Edited 11/02/2015 by CJG] (SJC)
ORDER (Clerk) The motion proceed in forma pauperis is held in abeyance pending the submission of an
additional document. Appellant must submit this Court's affidavit of poverty within 14 days of the date of
this order or the appeal may be dismissed, filed. (CJG)
462 pg, 53.19 MB
ECF FILER: DOCUMENTS by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone titled Submissions as Exhibits.
528 pg, 20.01 MB
0 pg, 0 KB
ECF FILER: Motion filed by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Certificate
of Service dated 11/04/2015. (SJC)
6 pg, 134.36 KB
ECF FILER: ARGUMENT In Response to Summary Action from Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone, filed.
Certificate of Service dated 11/06/2015 by ECF.--[Edited 11/06/2015 by MLR] (SJC)
174 pg, 33.18 MB
ECF FILER: DOCUMENT by Appellant Stanley J. Caterbone titled Submission as Exhibit. Certificate of
45 pg, 312.16 KB
ECF FILER: Motion filed by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone Consideration for fees in the amount of
$284,702.50. Certificate of Service dated 11/07/2015.--[Edited 11/10/2015 by CJG] (SJC)
11/04/2015
11/04/2015
11/06/2015
11/06/2015
11/07/2015
11/09/2015
2 pg, 46.85 KB
11/10/2015
ECF FILER: DOCUMENT filed by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone titled Submission as Exhibit "Audio
File of Authentic Recordings of 1987 and 1991". Certificate of Service dated 11/09/2015.--[Edited
11/10/2015 by CJG] (SJC)
102 pg, 4.75 MB
91 pg, 21.28 MB
11/10/2015
11/13/2015
ORDER (Clerk) The Motion Proceed In Forma Pauperis is referred to a motions panel, filed. (CJG)
1 pg, 6.04 KB
11/13/2015
185 pg, 19.73 MB
3 of 6
1/4/2016 5:05 AM
15-3400 Docket
11/16/2015
91 pg, 37.06 MB
1585 pg, 37.55 MB
ECF FILER: 3DOCUMENT filed by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone titled submission as exhibit.
807 pg, 79 MB
232 pg, 10.74 MB
232 pg, 9.11 MB
69 pg, 17 MB
275 pg, 20.95 MB
3 pg, 1.86 MB
ECF FILER: Motion filed by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone for 30 Day Continuance. Certificate of
11/17/2015
11/18/2015
11/19/2015
11/20/2015
11/21/2015
11/22/2015
11/22/2015
11/24/2015
1 pg, 71.71 KB
11/25/2015
783 pg, 35.13 MB
128 pg, 16.12 MB
94 pg, 10.13 MB
122 pg, 15.55 MB
5 pg, 931.06 KB
120 pg, 5.45 MB
11/27/2015
11/28/2015
11/29/2015
11/30/2015
12/02/2015
12/03/2015
0 pg, 0 KB
12/06/2015
84 pg, 4.14 MB
12/08/2015
ECF FILER: LETTER filed by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone. Certificate of Service dated 12/03/2015.
[As this document contains medical information, it has been locked from public view.]--[Edited 12/07/2015
by CJG] (SJC)
102 pg, 6.97 MB
ECF FILER: 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT re In Forma Pauperis Fraud by the Judiciary of the
Lancaster County Courts, the U.S. District Court, and the PA Superior Court, December 8, 2015 filed by
Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone. Certificate of Service dated 12/08/2015. (SJC)
114 pg, 24.94 MB
ECF FILER: THE COMPUTER HACKER RUINED THIS FILE, BUT I AM TOO TIRED OF FIXING MY
WORK EVERY DAY BECUASE OF HIM - DO WITH IT WHAT YOU WANT filed by Appellant Mr. Stanley J.
Caterbone. Certificate of Service dated 12/09/2015. (SJC)
12/09/2015
12/12/2015
57 pg, 2.26 MB
ECF FILER: DOCUMENT filed by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone titled "Submission as Exhibit".
1 pg, 38.48 KB
ECF FILER: Motion to Withdraw Case pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) filed by Appellant Mr. Stanley J.
Caterbone without costs. Certificate of Service dated 12/14/2015. (SJC)
1 pg, 41.47 KB
ECF FILER: LETTER from Party Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone Clarification of December 14, 2015 Motion to
Dismiss be Dismissed WITHOUT Prejudice. Certificate of Service dated 12/17/2015. (SJC)
643 pg, 76.22 MB
ECF FILER: Exhibits filed by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone. Certificate of Service dated 12/18/2015.-[Edited 12/21/2015 by CJG] (SJC)
12/14/2015
12/17/2015
12/18/2015
4 of 6
ORDER (Clerk) The motion for continuance is granted to the extent it can be construed as a motion for
extension of time to file a response regarding possible summary action. Appellant's response must be filed
and served within thirty (30) days of the date of this order, filed. (CJG)
1/4/2016 5:05 AM
15-3400 Docket
5 of 6
12/19/2015
124 pg, 10.35 MB
ECF FILER: COMPLAINT to U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania re Fulton Bank Criminal
Conspiracy, December 19, 2015 filed by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone. Certificate of Service dated
12/19/2015. (SJC)
4 pg, 1.02 MB
ECF FILER: 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT re Samuel Caterbone Jr Evidence of MKULTRA Dates of
1957 and 1943, December 19, 2015 filed by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone. Certificate of Service
dated 12/19/2015. (SJC)
12/19/2015
12/25/2015
112 pg, 5.78 MB
12/29/2015
161 pg, 24.06 MB
12/31/2015
1 pg, 56.93 KB
01/02/2016
69 pg, 5.03 MB
01/04/2016
165 pg, 12.59 MB
ECF FILER: DOCUMENT filed by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone titled "Submission as Exhibit".
ECF FILER: 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT re IC3 Complaint Referral Form Receipt and RECORDED
Complaint I1512261722030362[1] of December 26, 2015 15-3400 EXHIBIT re Social Security Disability
Benefits for Mind Control with Application Documents and Correspondence filed by Appellant Mr. Stanley
J. Caterbone. Certificate of Service dated 12/29/2015. (SJC)
ECF FILER: LETTER from Party Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone Letter to Rescind Motion To Dismiss of
December 14, 2015. Certificate of Service dated 12/31/2015. (SJC)
ECF FILER: 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT re Document re Mind Control Victims Symptoms and
Demographics Sent From My Friend Soleilmavis Liu of China, Sent Jan 1, 2016 Filed on January 2, 2016
filed by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone. Certificate of Service dated 01/02/2016. (SJC)
ECF FILER: 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT re Document re Advanced Media Group and Stan J.
Caterbone Legal Document re Tolling the Statute of Limitations for ALL Claims - Do I Have a Rico Claim
Authored on Jul 9, 2006, January 4, 2016 filed by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone. Certificate of Service
dated 01/04/2016. (SJC)
1/4/2016 5:05 AM
United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania
https://ecf.paed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?928330091138807-L_1_0-1
CLOSED,APPEAL,HABEAS,A/R,DOC-RESTRICT
United States District Court

Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Allentown)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 5:14-cv-02559-PD
LAMBERT v. BISSONETTE et al
Assigned to: HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND
Case in other court: THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS,
15-03400
Cause: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Date Terminated: 05/22/2014
Jury Demand: None
Nature of Suit: 530 Habeas Corpus:
(General)
Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Petitioner
represented by JEREMY H.G. IBRAHIM

LAW OFFICES OF JEREMY H.
GONZALEZ IBRAHIM
P.O. BOX 1025
CHADDS FORD, PA 19317
215-568-1943
Email: jeremyibrahim.esq@verizon.net
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
DAVID W. BROWN
BORJESON & MAIZEL LLC
1500 WALNUT ST STE 413
PHILADELPHIA, PA 19012
215-772-3020
Email: dbrown@levinlegalgroup.com
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
V.
Respondent
LYNN BISSONETTE
SUPERINTENDENT,
MCI-FRAMINGHAM
Respondent
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF
LANCASTER COUNTY,
PENNSYLVANIA
Respondent
1 of 4
12/30/2015 2:39 AM
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF

PENNSYLVANIA
V.
Movant
STANLEY J. CATERBONE
AND ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
2 of 4
represented by STANLEY J. CATERBONE

1250 FREMONT STREET
LANCASTER, PA 17603
717-669-2163
PRO SE
Date Filed
Docket Text
05/02/2014
1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (Filing fee $ 5 receipt number

100526.), filed by LISA MICHELLE LAMBERT. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover
Sheet)(ks, ) (Entered: 05/05/2014)
05/22/2014
2 CJA 20 APPIONTMENT OF ATTORNEY JEREMY H.G. IBRAHIM for LISA

MICHELLE LAMBERT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON
5/22/14. 5/22/14 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jpd) (Entered: 05/22/2014)
05/22/2014
3 ORDER THAT JEREMY IBRAHIM, ESQ., IS APPOINTED AS PETITIONER'S

COUNSEL. ACCORDINGLY HER HABEAS PETITION IS DISMISSED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE TO PETITIONER'S RIGHT TO FILE A COUNSELED MOTION FOR
RELIEF. COUNSEL SHOULD BE PREPARED TO ADDRESS WHETHER
PETITIONER MUST SEEK PERMISSION FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS
BEFORE FILING A SECOND OR SUCCESSIVE HABEAS PETITION. SIGNED BY
HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 5/22/14. 5/23/14 ENTERED AND COPIES
MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED. (jpd) (Entered: 05/23/2014)
06/23/2015
4 BRIEF ON BEHALF OF AMICI CURIAE STANLEY J. CANTERBONE AND

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP IN SUPPORT OF LISA MICHELLE LAMBERT'S
HABEAU CORPUS, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE.(jpd) (Entered: 06/25/2015)
07/06/2015
5 STATEMENT OF MOVANT STANLEY J. CATERBONE. (jpd, ) (Entered:

07/07/2015)
08/14/2015
6 LETTER FROM STAN J. CATERBONE DATED 8/7/15 ADDRESSED TO THE

HONORABLE JUDGE J. CURTIS JOYNER AND THE HONORABLE JUDGE PAUL
S. DIAMOND RE: ELECTRONIC CASE FILING PRIVILEGES. (jpd) (Entered:
08/14/2015)
09/02/2015
8 MOTION TO FILE SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by STANLEY J. CATERBONE.

(ems) (Entered: 09/03/2015)
09/03/2015
7 ORDER THAT MOVANT STANLEY J. CATERBONE'S REQUEST FOR

PERMISSION TO ELECTRONICALLY FILE DOCUMENTS (DOC. NO. 6) IS
DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 9/3/2015. 9/3/2015
12/30/2015 2:39 AM
ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED; AND MAILED TO PRO SE. (ems) (Entered:
09/03/2015)
09/03/2015
09/03/2015
10 MOTION TO FILE STATEMENT OF MOVANT filed by STANLEY J. CATERBONE.

(ems) (Entered: 09/04/2015)
09/09/2015
11 MOVANT STANLEY J. CATERBONE'S MOTION TO FILE EXHIBT. (jpd, )

(Entered: 09/10/2015)
09/09/2015
12 MOVANT STANLEY J. CATERBONE'S MOTION TO FILE STATEMENT OF

MOVANT.(jpd, ) (Entered: 09/10/2015)
09/09/2015
13 LETTER APPLICATION FROM TIMOTHY RICE #DU-2363 ADDRESSED TO THE

HONORALE TIMOTHY R. RICE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (jpd)
(DOCKETED IN ERROR SEE 15-CV-291). (Entered: 09/10/2015)
09/09/2015
14 MOVANT STANLEY J. CATERBONE'S MOTION TO FILE EXHIBIT OF MOVANT.

(jpd, ) (Entered: 09/10/2015)
09/14/2015
15 ORDER THAT MR. CATERBONE'S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

(DOC. NO. 8 AND 9) AND MOTIONS TO FILE EXHIBITS OR STATEMENTS
(DOC. NO. 10, 11, 12, 14) ARE DENIED AS FRIVOLOUS. IT IS FURTHER
ORDERED THAT STANLEY J. CATERBONE MAY NO LONGER SUBMIT
FILINGS-WHETHER ELECTRONIC OR IN PAPER FORMAT IN THE ABOVE
CAPTIONED MATTER. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL NOT DOCKET ANY
SUCH FILINGS WITHOUT MY APPROVAL. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S.
DIAMOND ON 9/11/15. 9/14/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE
MOVANT AND E-MAILED TO COUNSEL. (jpd) (Entered: 09/14/2015)
09/30/2015
16 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 15 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment,, Order on

Motion for Order, Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, Order on Motion for
Leave to File by STANLEY J. CATERBONE. IFP PENDING Copies to Judge, Clerk
USCA, Appeals Clerk.(jpd) (Entered: 10/02/2015)
10/01/2015
17 Clerk's Notice to USCA re 16 Notice of Appeal, : (jpd, ) (Entered: 10/02/2015)
10/01/2015
18 MOVANT STANLEY J. CATERBONE'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (jpd) (Entered: 10/02/2015)
10/09/2015
10/21/2015
3 of 4
9 MOTION TO FILE SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by STANLEY J.

CATERBONE.(jaa, ) Modified on 9/3/2015 (afm, ). Modified on 9/4/2015 (jaa, ).
(Entered: 09/03/2015)
NOTICE of Docketing Record on Appeal from USCA re 16 Notice of Appeal, filed by

STANLEY J. CATERBONE. USCA Case Number 15-3400 (jpd, ) (Entered:
10/09/2015)
19 ORDER THAT MR. CATERBONE'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN
FORMA PAUPERIS (DOC. NO. 18) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL
S. DIAMOND ON 10/21/15. 10/21/15 ENTERED AND COPIES TO USCA, MAILED
TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED. (jpd) Modified on 10/28/2015 (tjd).
(Entered: 10/21/2015)
12/30/2015 2:39 AM
10/30/2015
20 EX PARTE ORDER FILED UNDER SEAL. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S.

DIAMOND ON 10/30/15. 11/2/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO
COUNSEL. (jpd) (Entered: 11/02/2015)
12/07/2015
21 MOVANT STANLEY J. CATERBONE'S MOTION TO RECUSE JUDGE PAUL

DIAMOND. (jpd) (Entered: 12/07/2015)
12/08/2015
22 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECUSAL (DOC. NO. 21) IS DENIED.
SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 12/7/15. 12/9/15 ENTERED
AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED. (jpd) (Entered: 12/09/2015)
12/29/2015
23 APPLICATION BY DAVID W. BROWN FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF

BRIAN E. CLAYPOOL, ESQUIRE, SPONSOR'S STATEMENT, CERTIFICATE OF
SERVICE. (FILING FEE $40.00 #PPE13287). (jpd) (Entered: 12/29/2015)
PACER Service Center

Transaction Receipt
12/30/2015 02:29:28
PACER Login: am6446:3514696:0 Client Code:
Description:
Docket Report
Billable Pages: 3
4 of 4
Search Criteria: 5:14-cv-02559-PD

Cost:
0.30
12/30/2015 2:39 AM
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112098354
Page: 1
OFFICE OF THE CLERK
MARCIA M. WALDRON
CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
TELEPHONE
215-597-2995
21400 UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE

601 MARKET STREET
PHILADELPHIA, PA 19106-1790
Website: www.ca3.uscourts.gov
October 9, 2015
Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
RE: Lisa Lambert v. Superintendent Framingham MCI, et al.
Case Number: 15-3400
District Case Number: 5-14-cv-02559
_________________________________________________
Dear Mr. Caterbone:

This appeal has been listed for possible summary action by a panel of this Court, pursuant to
Chapter 10.6 of the Internal operating Procedures of the United States Court of Appeals for the
Third Circuit. See also Third Circuit Local Appellate Rule(3rd Cir. LAR) 27.4 Chapter 10.6
provides that the Court sua sponte (by its own action) may take summary action on an appeal if it
appears that no substantial question is presented or that subsequent precedent or a change in
circumstances warrants such action. Specifically, the Court may affirm, reverse, vacate, modify,
or remand the judgment or order appealed. The parties may submit written argument supporting
or opposing summary action.
The panel of this court that considers possible summary action also will consider whether a
certificate of appealability is required for the purpose of this appeal. See 28 U.S.C. Section 2253.
If the Court determines that a certificate of appealability is required, appellant's notice of appeal
will be deemed to be such an application, unless appellant has submitted a formal application for
a certificate of appealability. See 3rd Cir. LAR 22.1.
Any response regarding summary action or issuance of a certificate of appealability must be
received in the Clerk's Office within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter. Please submit to
the Clerk and original copy of any response, and a certificate of service indicating that all parties
have been served with a copy of the response. The Court will carefully review the District Court
record, along with any written submissions received from the parties.
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112098354
Page: 2
October 9, 2015
Page 2
_________________
Issuance of the briefing schedule will be stayed pending action by the Court. If the Court
declines to take summary action or grants the application for a certificate of appealability, the
Clerk will issue a briefing schedule. The parties will be advised of any order issued in this
matter.
Very truly yours,
Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk
By:
Jo-Ann Williams, Administrative Assistant
cc:
Jeremy H.G. Ibrahim, Sr., Esq.

www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
Stanley J. Caterbone, APPELLANT, Pro Se
Advanced Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
IN THE UNITED STATES THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
_______________________________________________________________________________
Lisa Michelle Lambert
:
PETITIONER
:
:
v.
:
CASE NO. 3400-2015
U.S. District Court Case No. 14-02559
:
Lynn Bissonnette, et al.,
:
RESPONDANT
:
:
:
APPELLANT
:
SUBMISSION AS EXHIBIT BY APPELANT

EXHIBIT re Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Legal Document re Tolling
the Statute of Limitations for ALL Claims - Do I Have a Rico Claim Authored on July 9,
2006
_______________________________________________________________________
I hereby on this 4th day of January, 2016, submit for considerations in the above captioned
case the attached document as an EXHIBIT to be considered by the court in the deliberations of this
case.
In Lower Court Case No. 14-02559, the MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT, which is the ORDER
appealed for this case, filed on September 2, 2015 the APPELLANT has requested from this court
the following: In addition the MOVANT must be restored to whole by administering
SUMMARY JUDGEMENTS in cases 05-2288; 06-4650; and all other cases filed by the
MOVANT in this court. SUMMARY JUDGEMENTS must also be administered in Case No. 0813373 in the Lancaster Court of Common Pleas, and other cases filed by the MOVANT in
that said court.
This EXHBIT titled Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Legal Document re Tolling
the Statute of Limitations for ALL Claims - Do I Have a Rico Claim Authored on July 9, 2006
directly and sufficiently addresses the question of the statute of limitations of all of the APPELLANT'S
claims for redress and financial considerations in both state and federal courts.
The APPELLANT does not intend to overburden the Court with unnecessary filings, however
this burden of supporting the claims and statements falls on the shoulders of all those in the
government that ignored the APPELLANT'S pleas for help to resolve these issues dating back to the
days immediately following the meeting with International Signal & Control, Plc., (ISC) Executive
Larry Resch on June 23, 1987.
This information could explain the COINTELPRO attributes of the APPELLANT'S situation and
persons under oath of law must refer this to the U.S. Attorney's Office and provide me with relief.
/S/ Stanley J. Caterbone

Date: January 4, 2016
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Appellant

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717)-669-2163
http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/__
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
_______________________________________________________________________________
:
PETITIONER
:
:
v.
:
CASE NO. 3400-2015
:
:
RESPONDANT
:
:
:
APPELLANT
:

EXHIBIT re Document re Mind Control Victims Symptoms and Demographics Sent
From My Friend Soleilmavis Liu of China, Sent January 1, 2016
_______________________________________________________________________
I hereby on this 2nd day of January, 2016, submit for considerations in the above captioned
case.
The APPELLANT has maintained his victimization of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control and the
attached EXHIBIT titled Social Security Disability Benefits for Mind Control with Application
Documents and Correspondence From SSA Examiners and Investigators of 2009,
December 27, 2015 provides the evidence and proof. This exhibit, like the previous EXHIBITS, is
intended to help the Court understand the complexity of the APPELLANT'S obligation to provide the
Court with the evidence and insight to support the APPELLANT'S claims and statements.
These
documents will also provide the Court with sufficient knowledge of the APPELLANT'S claim of the
value of the Appellant's litigation of up to $50 million dollars as stated in the U.S. Bankruptcy Case
No. 05-23059.

Date: January 2, 2016

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717)-669-2163
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112168218
Page: 1
Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
December 31, 2015

To:
United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Clerk of Courts
Re:
Case No. 15-3400 Lambert Appeal

Motion to Dismiss of December 14, 2015
RESCIND MOTION TO DISMISS
Dear Clerk of Court:

Unfortunately there have been many developments regarding my issues in
the courts, including the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas, the Pennsylvania
Superior Court, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, and of
course the U.S.C.A.
There have also been a fluid and horrendous amount of
computer and electronic hacking attacks upon my electronics, including my

computers. Since I filed my motion to dismiss there have also been developments in
the Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane scandal that directly involves
myself and my issues. In addition, on Wednesday, December 30, 2015 I was able to
take back possession of my new Lenovo Laptop and have been able to file
electronically in the ECF system.
Accordingly, I wish to rescind my MOTION TO DISMISS and would ask that if
you require a Motion to contact me as soon as possible.
/S/
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se APPELLANT
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
_______________________________________________________________________________
:
PETITIONER
:
:
v.
:
CASE NO. 3400-2015
:
:
RESPONDANT
:
:
:
APPELLANT
:

EXHIBIT re IC3 Complaint Referral Form Receipt and RECORDED Complaint
I1512261722030362[1] of December 26, 2015
_______________________________________________________________________
I hereby on this 26th day of December, 2015, submit for considerations in the above
captioned case the attached document as an EXHIBIT to be considered by the court in the
deliberations of this case. The APPELLANT was instructed by the Lancaster City Police Department
Duty Officer that they cannot be of any value to the APPELLANT'S problems or provide any solutions
to the computer hacking issues, in a meeting at the precinct at approximately 11:00 am on
Saturday, December 26, 2015.
This exhibit, like the previous EXHIBITS, is intended to help the
Court understand the complexity of the APPELLANT'S obligation to provide the Court with the
evidence and insight to support the APPELLANT'S claims and statements. These documents will also
provide the Court with sufficient knowledge of the APPELLANT'S claim of the value of the
Appellant's litigation of up to $50 million dollars as stated in the U.S. Bankruptcy Case No. 0523059. The APPELLANT does not intend to overburden the Court with unnecessary filings, however

Date: December 25, 2015

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717)-669-2163
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
_______________________________________________________________________________
:
PETITIONER
:
:
v.
:
CASE NO. 3400-2015
:
:
RESPONDANT
:
:
:
APPELLANT
:

EXHIBIT re Social Security Disability Benefits for Mind Control with Application
Documents and Correspondence From SSA Examiners and Investigators of 2009,
December 27, 2015
_______________________________________________________________________
deliberations of this case. The APPELLANT has maintained his victimization of U.S. Sponsored Mind
Control and the attached EXHIBIT titled Social Security Disability Benefits for Mind Control
with Application Documents and Correspondence From SSA Examiners and Investigators
of 2009, December 27, 2015 provides the evidence and proof. This exhibit, like the previous
EXHIBITS, is intended to help the Court understand the complexity of the APPELLANT'S obligation to
provide the Court with the evidence and insight to support the APPELLANT'S claims and statements.
These documents will also provide the Court with sufficient knowledge of the APPELLANT'S claim of
the value of the Appellant's litigation of up to $50 million dollars as stated in the U.S. Bankruptcy
Case No. 05-23059.


1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717)-669-2163
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
_______________________________________________________________________________
:
PETITIONER
:
:
v.
:
CASE NO. 3400-2015
:
:
RESPONDANT
:
:
:
APPELLANT
:

EXHIBIT re Dr. Nick Begich Lecture at the Covert Harassment Conference in Berlin
Germany October 1, 2015, Submitted on December 25, 2015
_______________________________________________________________________
deliberations of this case. The lecture by Dr. Nick Begich is one of the most qualified and respected
current lectures on the history and the current state-of-affairs of the use of U.S. Sponsored Mind
Control Technologies. Dr. Nick Begich (Brother of U.S. Senator Mark Begich), of Alaska, is the son
of Congressman Begich of Alaska who was killed in a mysterious plane crash with the Speaker of
the U.S. House of Representatives Wayne Boggs in the 1970's. Boggs was an enemy of Director of
the FBI J. Edgar Hoover. Hoover was beginning to use COINTELPRO IN THE 1960'S. In his lecture,
Dr. Nick Begich affirms the contributions of Whistelblowers, the danger of utilizing these
technologies for the advancement of Department of Defense Weapons and the risk to our civil
liberties. Dr. Nick Begich helped convince the European Parliament to ban Non-Leathal Weapons.
This is his most recent lecture on U.S. Sponsored Mind Control. His book, "The Mind Has No
Firewall" is a best seller. The lecture can be viewed on the following link:
http://covertharassmentconference.com/speaker?Nick_Begich
This exhibit, like the previous EXHIBITS, is intended to help the Court understand the
complexity of the APPELLANT'S obligation to provide the Court with the evidence and insight to
support the APPELLANT'S claims and statements. These documents will also provide the Court with
sufficient
knowledge
of
the
APPELLANT'S
claim
of
the
value
of
the


1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717)-669-2163
Former Fulton Bank manager accused of stealing $99,000 from Manor m...
Case: 15-3400
Fulton Bank Extortion

1 of 3
http://lancasteronline.com/business/local_business/former-fulton-bank-...
Document: 003112160036
Page 1 of 124
Page: 1
Saturday, December 19, 2015

12/19/2015 3:42 AM
Former Fulton Bank manager accused of stealing $99,000 from Manor m...
Case: 15-3400

2 of 3
http://lancasteronline.com/business/local_business/former-fulton-bank-...
Document: 003112160036
Page 2 of 124
Page: 2

12/19/2015 3:42 AM
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112160036
Page 3 of 124
Page: 3
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112160036
Page 4 of 124
Page: 4
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112160036
Page 5 of 124
Page: 5
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112160039
Page: 1
Sameuel P. Caterbone Affidavit
Page 1 of 4
15-3400 Lambert Appeal
Page 1 of 4
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Page 35 of 41
06/10/2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112160039
Page: 2
Sameuel P. Caterbone Affidavit
Page 2 of 4
Page 2 of 4
Page 36 of 41
06/10/2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112160039
Page: 3
Samuel P. Caterbone MKULTRA
Page 3 of 4
Page 3 of 4
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112160039
Page: 4
Samuel P. Caterbone MKULTRA
Page 4 of 4
Page 4 of 4
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112159626
Page: 1
"
!
#"
$
% &
'
(
) *+
!"
) )-
%&
'
%) ,
/
2
+
3 4
,
+
#,
)
# $
-) !
) !
,
#0
+
, ) !
+
. 2 #0 - 4 )
+
) )
+
+
)
!
+ )
! "
,
) + .
+
.
)
) +
!
)
+
1 )
. )
1
. -
+ ,
, ) 4+
6
)
)
+
-
+ ) '
7
$
)
-
+
+
+
)
- 5 !
+
) !
)
)
)
,
+ +
+
1 )
1
+ +, )
+) +
,
)
,
+
+
+ ,
) 8
4
+
,
)
) .
)
.
) + %) .
!
+
+
)
,,
)
) .
! )
+
)
.!
9 .
) )
%)
+ ,
)
)
)
: +
.
+
,
+
. )
+
+
)
)
+
4
.
+ . )
*
'%
,
) 8
%) + 4
4
,
)
! !
) ;
4
,
!
+
+
+
< )
+
)
. ## = )
+ ,
)
## 8
$
> +
$ ?
,
+ )
.
+
2
, )
,
+
) *
)
/
2
+
+) ,
%)
+
+
)
)
.!
. @
)
</
)
+ ) )
, # )
.
)
) ,
) , +
)
;
4
%
/
0
+
!
) ;
$ ? ,
) , +
)
/
)
NewslancKane
Kathleen
LetterMental
&toMental
the Health
Editor
Illness
Issues
Page
Page11ofof125
6
Tuesday,
Friday, December 15,
18, 2015
Case: 15-3400
%
+
Document: 003112159626
</
)
+
#
)
)
)
%) ;
> +
,
+
.
+
"
+ .
,
< !
+
%)
+
/
,
3*
Page: 2
< )
)
4
) )
) +
%)
+
7 4
!
)
2@ + ( + 7 . 2
+
< )
) -) +
+
)+
) <(B '%
+ +!
.
+
)
, )
.
, )
.
, ) ! .
)
< )
,,
+
,
)
)
)
+
)
,
)
,
)
)
) ;
4
)
) 8
$
> +
.
!
! +
)
/
)
,
,,
++
+ ,,
/
,4
.4
)
!
+
A0 ;
+
+
,,
)
!
)
,
)
. )
+
)
)
< . ,
A
+ +
.
,
.
.
! .
)
.
+
<.
.
.
, +
+
,
)
+ - ,
+ + ,
,
)
#0 = )
) +
+
#
+
, #
) - )
#0 =
. ## = ,
+
)
) + )
,
4$C(<= )
+ +
)
) +
)
+ +
!
+ ,
+
#0
. ,
+
+ % . 7
!
+ ) ,
+
+
+
, '
D /
+ !
+
+
) ,
2+
! 2 %)
.
)
+ ) C-4(
)
.
.
, +
),
) 2@ + ( + 7 . 2
) +
- ) / -=
)1 )
+!
+
,
+
+
9.
!
"
#"
NewslancKane
Kathleen
LetterMental
&toMental
the Health
Editor
Illness
Issues
Page
Page22ofof125
6
Tuesday,
18, 2015
Case: 15-3400
" #
$
Document: 003112159626
"
$%
$ '(
&
Page: 3
( *
$
!" #$
%+ +,
- % ./+ 01-
23
4"
8
5
#
(
#
&
6
%
5
"
6 7
6 #
!
&
6
:
$
#
#
5
&
$ #
9
&#
8
#
$
;
< :
=1# 6
*& #
8
8 : *
5 5
5
6#
88
# 6
1&
* 5
#
6 1 '(
)
8
&
4 $
#(* 8
& #
65 6
5 #
C D
&&&
6! 6
**
#
*
6
# 8 2EE&&&
1 6 6(
5 /
&
$C D
6
E6
8
>
6
(
6 #
$ *
$
! 6 !6?
1 # 6 A(
6 6 A
*
$
)
6( 6 #
5
( &#$ # $ & ( 6
'
($ & )
4 1
#
68
66 (
B 8
6& $
(8
(8
D
E =3
6 ! 6 D
6
+F
!1D)+
B#
(
&
(
!<+,0
6 0 *
6
$ /86
6 -
C D
NewslancKane
Kathleen
LetterMental
&toMental
the Health
Editor
Illness
Issues
Page
Page33ofof125
6
Tuesday,
18, 2015
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112159626
NewslancKane
Kathleen
LetterMental
&toMental
the Health
Editor
Illness
Issues
Page
Page44ofof125
6
Page: 4
Tuesday,
18, 2015
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
_______________________________________________________________________________
:
PETITIONER
:
:
v.
:
CASE NO. 3400-2015
:
:
RESPONDANT
:
:
:
APPELLANT
:
MOTION TO DISMISS
_______________________________________________________________________
I hereby on this 14th day of December, 2015, I Stanley J. Caterbone, appearing pro se, as
the APPELLANT do hereby file a Motion to Dismiss the above captioned appeal for reasons previously
affirmed in previous filings.


1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717)-669-2163
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
_______________________________________________________________________________
:
PETITIONER
:
:
v.
:
CASE NO. 3400-2015
:
:
RESPONDANT
:
:
:
APPELLANT
:

EXHIBIT re Clerk Recorded Petitioner Stanley J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus to US
District Court Judge Joyner in Case No. 15-03984 December 10, 2015
_______________________________________________________________________
deliberations of this case. This exhibit, like the previous EXHIBITS, is intended to help the Court
understand the complexity of the APPELLANT'S obligation to provide the Court with the evidence
and insight to support the APPELLANT'S claims and statements. These documents will also provide
the
Court
with
sufficient
knowledge
of
the
APPELLANT'S
claim
of
the
value
of
the
Signature Continued on Page 2


1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717)-669-2163
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
_______________________________________________________________________________
:
PETITIONER
:
:
v.
:
CASE NO. 3400-2015
:
:
RESPONDANT
:
:
:
APPELLANT
:

EXHIBIT re re Superior Court 1561 MDA 2015 Submission of Paper Brief Trip, Accident
Report, and Iphone Fraudulent Transaction of Dec 8, 2015, on December 9, 2015
_______________________________________________________________________
I hereby on this 9th day of December, 2015, submit for considerations in the above captioned
case. The APPELLANT had to deliver 7 copies of the brief for Superior Court Case No. 1561 MDA
2015 and a copy of an incident involving the hacking of the APPELLANT'S Iphone and the purchase
of a fraudulent Iphone 5 on eBay to Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane. The APPELLANT
had previously delivered a document regarding Ms. Kane's allegations of misconduct in the state of
Pennsylvania by what she called the Old Boys Network. Ms. Kane acknowledged the APPELLANT'S
information in a letter immediately following delivering the letter to one of her agents. On the way
home from visiting his brother in nearby Carlisle, Pennsylvania, the APPELLANT was rear ended and
sustained significant damage to his newly purchased Honda CRV.
Accidents of this nature have
been common place due to either the Federal Whistleblowing activities, the victimization as a
Targeted Individual, or both.
sufficient
knowledge
of
the
APPELLANT'S
claim
of
the
value
of
the
This information could explain the COINTELPRO attributes of my situation and persons under
oath of law must refer this to the U.S. Attorney's Office and provide me with relief.
/s/ Stanley J. Caterbone


1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717)-669-2163
scaterbone@live.com
U.S.C.A. Case No. 15-3400

Case No. 14-02559 in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Lisa Michelle Lambert Habeus Corpus
Order Appealed: Motion for Summary Judgment
EXHIBIT re Superior Court 1561 MDA 2015 Submission of Paper Brief Trip, Accident Report, and
Iphone Fraudulent Transaction of Dec 8, 2015, on December 9, 2015
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Dec 8, 2015 - Receipts for Trip to Superior Court in Harrisburg to file paper copies
of brief for 1561 MDA 2015
2. Dec 8, 2015 - Recorded Copy of Paper Brief for Case No. 1561 MDA 2015 in
Superior Court
3. Dec 8, 2015 - Copy to PA Atty General Kathleen Kane of Iphone eBAY 5c Scandel
Cover Page
1. Dec 8, 2015 - Communication with the Seller
2. Dec 7, 2015 - Photos of Iphone 5c
3. Dec 8, 2015 - Shipping Log of USPS Priority Mail
4. Dec 7, 2015 - eBAY Packing Slip and Order Confirmation
4. Nov 24, 2015 - Change of Address to Steve Caterbone in Carlisle for Invoice for
Superior Court Case No. 1561 MDA 2015
5. Dec 8, 2015 - Email address of Car in the Accident that Rear Ended Me
6. Dec 8, 2015 - Hampden Township Incident Report of Accident
7. Dec 8, 2015 - Photos of Trip to Superior Court Case No. 1561 MDA 20151200340
8. Dec 8, 2015 - ACCIDENT REPORT by Hampden Twp Police Officer Robert Higgens
Incident No. 20151200340 of December 8, 2015
9. Dec 8, 2015 - Accident Scene Photos Taken With Iphone 5c
10.Dec 8, 2015 - Email With Statement to Allstate Insurance Agent Dan Nauman
TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 2

11.Advanced Media Group Press Released re Proposed Organized Stalking Bill
12.Notarized Affidavits for Press Release and Executive Summary of November 28,
2015
13.Proposed Organized Stalking Bill
14.May 2015 Richmond California City Ordinance to Ban Space Based Weapons and
Weapons of Mind Control
15.Cover Page for Executive Summary
16.Executive Summary
17.Updates for Executive Summary October 10, 2015
18.History of Federal Whistleblowing Case and Targeted Individual
19.The Courts and the United States Legal System
20.Family History
21.The Public Record
22.Is Lancaster County Ground Zero for U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
23.Affidavit of Joinment of October 10, 2015
24.29 FALSE ARRESTS RECORD Since 1987
25.21 ILLEGAL NO TRESPASS NOTICES
26.Stan Caterbone's Notarized Affidavit for FFCHS September 16, 2010 Redacted
Version
27.Stan Caterbone's Detailed Victimization Affidavit of 2010
28.Samuel P Caterbone US Sponsored Mind Control Affidavit 1996
29.Sammy A. Caterbone Affidavit of US Sponsored Mind Control 1991
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
_______________________________________________________________________________
:
PETITIONER
:
:
v.
:
CASE NO. 3400-2015
:
:
RESPONDANT
:
:
:
APPELLANT
:

EXHIBIT re In Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts,
the U.S. District Court, and the PA Superior Court, December 8, 2015
_______________________________________________________________________
case.
In 2015 the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas began a campaign of DENYING In
Forma Pauperis Applications, and demanding that current cases with legitimate In Forma Pauperis
Status be DENIED in an effort to again subvert the laws of due process and obstruction of justice.
The Superior Court had followed, as did the U.S. District Court in this case by Judge Diamond. This
was an outright effort to extort monies from the APPELLANT and in the long term make service of
the complaints cost prohibitive due to the fact that Pro Se Litigants with In Forma Pauperis Status,
by law, receive free service from the Lancaster County Sheriffs and the U.S. Marshalls. This tactic,
in the end, would have effectively dismissed all legitimate claims of the APPELLANT. The Judges
used the excuse of monies in bank accounts as the rationale for the illegal tactic, however, attached
are 5 cases of GRANTED In Forma Pauperis applications in both the Lancaster County Court of
Common Pleas, the Pennsylvania Superior Court, and the United States District Court with financial
affidavits containing amounts of monies in bank accounts exceeding $10,000.00, all prior to 2015.
sufficient
knowledge
of
the
APPELLANT'S
claim
of
the
value
of
the


1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717)-669-2163
scaterbone@live.com
TABLE OF CONTENTS
December 8, 2015
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

Case No. 14-02559, Lisa Michelle Lambert Habeus Corpus
Order Appealed: Motion for Summary Judgement
15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT re In Forma Pauperis

FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, the
U.S. District Court, and the PA Superior Court,
December 8, 2015
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Dec 8, 2015 - 15-3400 Cover Page for the Exhibit re In Forma Pauperis
Fraud
2.
Nov 13, 2015 - Case No. 1915 MDA 2015 IFP Fraud Argument Superior
Court
3. Dec 8, 2015 - Listing of 29 FALSE ARRESTS of Stan J. Caterbone from 1987

to Present in Lancaster County
4. June 2009 - Millersville University WANTED Poster Issued for No Trespass
Notice Posted on Campus
5. May 13, 2009 - Millersville University Graduate Studies Acceptance Letter
6. Dec 6, 2015 - ILLEGAL NO TRESPASS NOTICES AGAINST
7. Nov 13, 2015 - 1915 MDA 2015 In Forma Pauperis Financial Affidavit for
Application of November 13, 2015
8. Nov 30, 2015 - Case No. 15-10167 In Forma Pauperis DENIED Judge
Wright
9. 1) Dec 8, 2008 - Case No. 08-13373 In Forma Pauperis GRANTED Judge
Madenspacher
10. Dec 1, 2008 - Case No. 08-13373 In Forma Pauperis Application
11. 2) Nov 30, 2007 - Case No. CI-07-11822 In Forma Pauperis GRANTED
Judge Reinaker
12. Nov 29, 2007 - Case No. CI-07-11822 In Forma Pauperis Application
13. 3) Nov 13, 2008 - Superior Court Case No. CI-07-05230 [G1602] In
Forma Pauperis GRANTED
14. 4) May 5, 2007 - Case No. CI-07-03924 [G1410] In Forma Pauperis
GRANTED
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
December 8, 2015
(continued)
15. 5) Apr 6, 2010 - U.S. District Court Case No. 5:10-cv-01558-MAM In

Forma Pauperis GRANTED
16.
Advanced Media Group Press Released re Proposed Organized
Stalking Bill
17.
Notarized Affidavits for Press Release and Executive Summary of
November 28, 2015
18.
Proposed Organized Stalking Bill
19.
May 2015 Richmond California City Ordinance to Ban Space Based
Weapons and Weapons of Mind Control
20.
Cover Page for Executive Summary
21.
Executive Summary
22.
Updates for Executive Summary October 10, 2015
23.
History of Federal Whistleblowing Case and Targeted Individual
24.
The Courts and the United States Legal System
25.
Family History
26.
The Public Record
27.
Is Lancaster County Ground Zero for U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
28.
Affidavit of Joinment of October 10, 2015
29.
29 FALSE ARRESTS RECORD Since 1987
30.
21 ILLEGAL NO TRESPASS NOTICES
31.
Stan Caterbone's Notarized Affidavit for FFCHS September 16, 2010
Redacted Version
32.
Stan Caterbone's Detailed Victimization Affidavit of 2010
33.
Samuel P Caterbone US Sponsored Mind Control Affidavit 1996
34.
Sammy A. Caterbone Affidavit of US Sponsored Mind Control 1991
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
_______________________________________________________________________________
:
PETITIONER
:
:
v.
:
CASE NO. 3400-2015
:
:
RESPONDANT
:
:
:
APPELLANT
:

Notes - Cards - Receipt From Lobby Efforts in PA Legislature 2015 updated December 5,
2015
_______________________________________________________________________
case.
PLEASE
NOTE THIS FILE
WAS
HACKED
AND THE
APPELLANT
HAD JUST
RECONSTRUCTED THIS FILE ON THIS DATE, SUNDAY, DECEMBER 6, 2015 AT 1:55AM. This
ekhibit, like the previous EXHIBITS, is intended to help the Court understand the complexity of the
APPELLANT'S obligation to provide the Court with the evidence and insight to support the
APPELLANT'S claims and statements. These documents will also provide the Court with sufficient
knowledge
of
the
APPELLANT'S
claim
of
the
value
of
the
This information could ekplain the COINTELPRO attributes of my situation and persons under

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717)-669-2163
scaterbone@live.com
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
December 3, 2015
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
_______________________________________________________________________________
:
PETITIONER
:
:
v.
:
CASE NO. 3400-2015
:
:
RESPONDANT
:
:
:
APPELLANT
:

Outstanding Receivables with Pro Se Billings To Date of $4,295,443.24, December 2,
2015
_______________________________________________________________________
I hereby on this 2nd day of December, 2015, submit for considerations in the above
deliberations of this case. This ekhibit, like the previous EXHIBITS, is intended to help the Court
the
Court
with
sufficient
knowledge
of
the
APPELLANT'S
claim
of
the
value
of
the

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717)-669-2163
scaterbone@live.com
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
_______________________________________________________________________________
:
PETITIONER
:
:
v.
:
CASE NO. 3400-2015
:
:
RESPONDANT
:
:
:
APPELLANT
:

LNP Article Rogue FBI Agents in Lancaster Killing US Attorney on February 27, 2007 Are
The Still Here - Of Course They Are, November 30, 2015
I hereby on this 30h
day of November, 2015, submit for considerations in the above
the
Court
with
sufficient
knowledge
of
the
APPELLANT'S
claim
of
the
value
of
the

Date: November 30, 2015
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
_______________________________________________________________________________
:
PETITIONER
:
:
v.
:
CASE NO. 3400-2015
:
:
RESPONDANT
:
:
:
APPELLANT
:

U.S. District Court Case No. 14-02559 Judge Diamond Motion to Recuse, November 29,
2015
the
Court
with
sufficient
knowledge
of
the
APPELLANT'S
claim
of
the
value
of
the


1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717)-669-2163
scaterbone@live.com
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
_______________________________________________________________________________
:
PETITIONER
:
:
v.
:
CASE NO. 3400-2015
:
:
RESPONDANT
:
:
:
APPELLANT
:

Affidavit of AFFIANT Stanley J. Caterbone re Judge Diamond Misconduct, November 28,
2015
deliberations of this case. This ekhibit, like the previous EXHIBITS, is intended to help the Court
the
Court
with
sufficient
knowledge
of
the
APPELLANT'S
claim
of
the
value
of
the


1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717)-669-2163
scaterbone@live.com
U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Order Appealed: Motion for Summary Judgment Dismissed October 14, 2015
SUBMISSION Statement as EXHIBIT re Affidavit of AFFIANT Stanley J.
Caterbone re Judge Diamond Misconduct, November 28, 2015
Affidavit of AFFIANT Stanley J. Caterbone re Judge Diamond Misconduct,

November 28, 2015
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. 15-3400 Lambert Appeal in U.S.C.A. Nov 28, 2015 General Affidavit of
AFFIANT Stanley J. Caterbone
2. LAMBERT Docket Amicus Filed in Federal Court June 23, 2015
3. July 9, 2015 - Jeremy H Gonzalez Ibrahim Email Cease Desist
4. Sep 15, 2015 United States District Court Lisa Michelle Lambert Habeus
ORDER Summary Judgment DENIED Case No 5-14-cv-02559-PD
5. May 22, 2014 - Lambert ORDER Dismiss for Appellate Jurisdiction
6. May 2, 2014 Lisa Michelle Lambert Pro Se Habeus Corpus
7. 1998 Affidavit of Stanley J. Caterbone re Lisa Michelle Lambert
8. Cover Page for Executive Summary
9. Executive Summary
10.
11.
12.
13.
Family History
14.
The Public Record
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
Redacted Version
20.
21.
22.
23.
Letter to Kathleen Kane re "Old Boys Network" of November 12,
2015 Hand Delivered to Agent Tyson of PA Attorney General Office

24.
Letter from Kathleen Kane of November 13, 2015
25.
No Trespass Notice from Tobias Frog of August 15, 2015
26.
Praecipe of CATERBONE v. Duke Street Business Center et.al., with
Named Defendants Tobias Frog and Owners of August 31, 2015
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
_______________________________________________________________________________
:
PETITIONER
:
:
v.
:
CASE NO. 3400-2015
:
:
:
RESPONDANT
:
:
APPELLANT
:
:
:

Chapter 11 Reorganization Plan for Case No. 05-23059 Filed January 12, 2010,
November 27, 2015
deliberations of this case. This ekhibit, lixe the previous EXHIBITS, is intended to help the Court
understand the complekity of the APPELLANT'S obligation to provide the Court with the evidence
the
Court
with
sufficient
xnowledge
of
the
APPELLANT'S
claim
of
the
value
of
the
Appellant's litigation of up to $50 million dollars as stated in the U.S. Bankruptcy Case No. 0523059. The following EXHIBIT titled Chapter 11 Reorganization Plan for Case No. 05-23059 Filed
January 12, 2010, November 27, 2015 was not completed when it was filed in the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
After careful review the APPELLANT has since recovered documentation and evidence that
can substantiate that the $50,000,000 valuation on the APPELLANT'S litigation is a low estimate.
For example, in the Original and Authentic Documentation of 1987 the Court will see a document
called the HARSCO Pension Plan Proposal of $144,000,000.
corporation.
HARSCO was a Harrisburg based
In 1987 Michael Dipaolo was an auditor for KPMG Maine Hurdman, a Big Eight
accounting firm. He was also a personal friend of the APPELLANT whose wife, Mary Lynn, was hired
as an ekecutive assistant at Financial Management Group, Ltd., Mixe Dipaolo referred the pension
plan to the APPELLANT in order to bid on the management of that pension plan. The Court will see
the bidding documents from several management firms that were re uested to provide disclosures
to the APPELLANT in order to secure the management of the pension plan. That pro ect alone would
have generated some $900,000 in management fees to the APPELLANT on an annual basis, of which
the APPELLANT had a fee sharing agreement with Mixe Dipaolo that would have generated at least
$250,000 per year in annual income. The following outlines income and e uity owned and claimed
by the APPELLANT, not by Financial Management Group, Ltd., The APPELLANT had an agreement
E back into the firm of Financial Management Group, Ltd., which was
for sharing approkimately 10
negotiated by Robert Kauffman and the APPELLANT.
In the July of 1987, after the meeting with ISC executive Larry Resch of June 23, the
APPELLANT and Tony Bongiovi had a meeting on the Wildwood Boardwalk, namely the portion that
Tony Bongiovi owned. The APPELLANT was already named in the operating budget of the movie to
receive $200,000, not including the Managing Limited Partner Fee of the investors, as outlined in
the original documents which the Court can confirm.
On that night, Tony Bongiovi had made a
verbal disclosure to the APPELLANT that he wanted the APPELLANT to manage the business affairs
of every project that Tony was then involved in and promised that the APPELLANT would share in
the profits of every said project. In addition to the Digital Movie, Tony was involved in a number
of other projects including but not limited to the pier of Wildwood in which Tony wanted to open an
open-air concert venue, similar to that of the Steel Pier in Atlantic City. Tony also had a project in
which he was recreating the flight of Amelia Earhart; the recording artists and band that was
secured and under management for the past year or so called French Lick; the comic act of the
Wid; the video editing suite at power station built by engineer Ed Evans; and of course the
recording studio itself Power Station Studios, now operating as Avatar Studios of New York. The
APPELLANT can only guesstimate that those revenues and future revenues would be worth almost
the full $50,000,000 today had many of those projects been successful. The Court is reminded at
the track record and resume of both the APPELLANT and Tony Bongiovi.
On March 2nd of 1987 the Court will see a document from real estate developer Owen Kugal
that outlines the fees to the APPELLANT for the securing of financing his real estate portfolio, that
fee is stated at $433,592.
The APPELLANT had also secured financing for Noris Boyd, of Boyd
Wilson and owner of the Olde Hickory property on the Oregon Pike. The financing package was for
a refinance agreement of $5,000,000.000 which would have generated at least a $75,000.00 fee for
the APPELLANT.
In May of 1987, the APPELLANT and attorney Randy Grespin, of Life Underwriters of
Harrisburg (Owned and Operated by Tony Pascotti and representing Tony Pascotti) flew in the
APPELLANT'S plane to Atlanta for a scheduled meeting with Bill Koegler of the Planners Securities
Group, a regional Broxer Dealer. The APPELLANT had negotiated a merger of Financial Management
Group, Ltd., and Planners Securities Group which contained a clause granting Financial Management
Group, Ltd., a 10
ownership position, which was worth approkimately $1,800,000. The deal was
consummated by a vote of the FMG Board of Directors in May of 1987.
The Court will see a
document titled Financial Analysis of FMG in June of 1987 which values the shares of FMG at
approximately $17.00. The APPELLANT at that time owned some 50,000 shares, which puts a fair
market value of approximately $850,000.00 in his FMG stock holdings.
The real estate holding of the APPELLANT is outlined in the Chapter 11 Reorganization Plan,
the EXHBIT.


1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA
17603
(717)-669-2163
scaterbone@live.com
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
_______________________________________________________________________________
:
PETITIONER
:
:
v.
:
CASE NO. 3400-2015
:
:
:
RESPONDANT
:
:
APPELLANT
:
:
:

Stan J. Caterbone United Nations Human Rights Council of Geneva Switzerland
Complaint and Exhibit re U.S. Sponsored Mind Control filed on October 4, 2009, November
25, 2015
I hereby on this 25th day of November, 2015, submit for considerations in the above captioned case the
attached document as an EXHIBIT to be considered by the court in the deliberations of this case. This exhibit, like
the previous EXHIBITS, is intended to help the Court understand the complexity of the APPELLANT'S obligation to
provide the Court with the evidence and insight to support the APPELLANT'S claims and statements. These
documents will also provide the Court with sufficient knowledge of the APPELLANT'S claim of the value of the
Appellant's litigation of up to $50 million dollars as stated in the U.S. Bankruptcy Case No. 05-23059. The
APPELLANT does not intend to overburden the Court with unnecessary filings, however this burden of supporting
the claims and statements falls on the shoulders of all those in the government that ignored the APPELLANT'S
pleas for help to resolve these issues dating back to the days immediately following the meeting with International
Signal & Control, Plc., (ISC) Executive Larry Resch on June 23, 1987.

Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se
Appellant
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717)-669-2163
scaterbone@live.com
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112136750
Page: 1
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
_______________________________________________________________________________
:
PETITIONER
:
:
v.
:
CASE NO. 3400-2015
:
:
:
RESPONDANT
:
:
APPELLANT
:
:
:
MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE
I hereby on this 22nd day of November, 2015, the APPELLANT requests a 30 day CONTINUANCE for the
above captioned case in order to regain possession of a Lenovo Computer and establish a more secure and safe
manner to obtain computer services to restore the same said computer after hacking attacks. The EXHIBIT of
November 16, 2015 titled Linkedin.com Restricted Access and Computer Hacking Documentation contains
documentation of 15 computer repairs from reputable computer service groups for computer hacking since August
1 (Geek Squad), and one dating back to June 22, 2015 (Aplus Computers).
On November 15, 2015 the APPELLANT visited the Geek Squad in Lampeter Township at the Best Buy
Store to schedule another drop-off date for repairs. The Geek Squad employee, again agitated and harassed the
APPELLANT. The Geek Squad employee stated there were appointments opened all day. APPELLANT replied to
schedule the drop-off and the APPELLANT answered at 10:00am the following morning, November 16, 2015.
Then the Geek Squad employee said the earliest time was 11:30am. Frustrated, the APPELLANT left the store.
The APPELLANT planned to call a supervisor.
There was no email sent to confirm the appointment.
The
APPELLANT showed up the next morning and took a photo outside the store to document the time of arrival, which
was 10:22am. A Geek Squad female employee asked for an appointment time and another Geek Squad mail
employee said he had a cancellation and would check the APPELLANT'S computer in in a few minutes, after he
was done working with another customer. The APPELLANT asked to roam the store, and the Geek Squad
employee told the APPELLANT that he had to stay in line. After about an hour of frustration, the APPELLANT
wrote instructions from another day's repair notes, dated and timed it, and signed it. The APPELLANT then took a
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112136750
Page: 2
picture of the sheet of paper on the Lenovo computer. The APPELLANT left at 11:24 after first taking a photo of
the sign on the cash register that states Your time is IMPORTANT to us. The APPELLANT never received any
email confirmations for the repair, which never happened.
On November 18, 2015 Rod, the DCI Manager at Geek Squad in Lancaster left several messages
requesting that the APPELLANT come in to sign paperwork. The APPELLANT never heard of the person, nor did
he trust the message to be authentic. On November 21, 2015 the APPELLANT called Ron and he would not
provide any proof of identification and kept demanding that the APPELLANT come in to sign paperwork. The
APPELLANT accused Ron of being a law enforcement official and he got upset and said he was terminating the
call. The APPELLANT must now replace the Lenovo computer, which was purchased August 1, 2015. The
APPELLANT will not return to the Geek Squad at Best Buy for any reason unless security assurances are
promised and protection from stalking and harassment is guaranteed.
The APPELLANT submits this motion for consideration in the above captioned case, and as before
request the court to include this MOTION in the deliberations of this case.
This exhibit, like the previous
EXHIBITS, is intended to help the Court understand the complexity of the APPELLANT'S obligation to provide the
Court with the evidence and insight to support the APPELLANT'S claims and statements. These documents will
also provide the Court with sufficient knowledge of the APPELLANT'S claim of the value of the


Appellant
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717)-669-2163
scaterbone@live.com
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112136750
Page: 3
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
_______________________________________________________________________________
:
PETITIONER
:
:
v.
:
CASE NO. 3400-2015
:
:
:
RESPONDANT
:
:
APPELLANT
:
:
:

Complaint to General Counsel of PLCB and Letter to and From PA Attorney General
Kathleen Kane on November 21, 2015
Unfortunately the APPELLANT'S emails and other documentation regarding the incident that was named
in the letter of November 16, 2015 from Rogrigo Diaz, Executive General Chief Counsel of the Pennsylvania Liquor
Control Board have been destroyed or removed from the APPELLANT'S computers and flash drives.
On
November 12, 2015 after taking care of legal business in the Pennsylvania Superior Court Prothonotary's Office,
regarding Case No.'s 1561 MDA 2015 and 1961 MDA 2015, the APPELLANT proceeded to the Office of the
Executive General Chief Counsel of the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board. As customary, the APPELLANT was
misdirected and given false directions. The APPELLANT checked into the security desk where a member of
SHADD Detective Agency was requesting identification. The APPELLANT provided a current drivers license and
was processed and cleared and given visitor badge no. 62. The Security Officer refused to allow the APPELLANT
access to the 4th floor office of the Executive General Chief Counsel of the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board and
made declarations that the office is constantly receiving bomb and other threats on a daily basis. The Security
Officer requested that the APPELLANT leave the bound complaint at the Security Desk.
The APPELLANT
requested that someone from the Executive General Chief Counsel's office come to the security desk to retrieve
the Complaint. The Security Officer agreed and called up to the office of the Executive General Chief Counsel.
About fifteen minutes later a woman approached the Security desk. The APPELLANT requested to see some form
of identification from the woman and she refused. The woman would only provide a first name. The APPELLANT
requested to take a photo of the woman, and again she refused. The Security Officer started to berate the
APPELLANT, so the APPELLANT handed over the bound complaint and started to turn around declaring that the
bound complaint better be delivered to the Office of Chief Counsel. The Security Officer placed his right hand on
his gun and shouted is that a threat?. The APPELLANT quickly responded no and immediately vacated the
building.
On Friday, November 20, 2015 the APPELLANT received via regular U.S. 1 st class mail the attached letter and
immediately called the Office of Executive General Chief Counsel and DEMANDED that the Complaint be returned
to the APPELLANT as soon as possible, and terminated the phone call.

Appellant
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717)-669-2163
scaterbone@live.com
U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Order Appealed: Motion for Summary Judgment Dismissed October 14, 2015
SUBMISSION Statement by Appellant November 21, 2015
Complaint to General Counsel of PLCB

and Letter to and From PA Attorney General
Kathleen Kane on November 21, 2015
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. 15-3400 Lambert Appeal in U.S.C.A. Cover Page to Exhibit of November
21, 2015
2. No Trespass Notice from PLCB of November 16, 2015
3. PALCB Visitor Badge from November 12, 2015
4. Photo of PALCB Headquarters Northwest Building before Delivering
Complaint to General Counsel
5. Emails to and from PALCB re Complaints of June 25, 2015
6. Complaint to PALCB of November 12, 2015
7. Email from the General Counsel of the PALCB re Reciept of Complaint June
25, 2015
8. Named Bars & Restaurants re Complaint and Incident Reports in Email of
November 12, 2015
9. Cover Page for Executive Summary
10. Executive Summary

11.
12.
13.
14.
Family History
15.
The Public Record
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
Redacted Version
21.
22.
23.
24.
Letter to Kathleen Kane re "Old Boys Network" of November 12,
2015 Hand Delivered to Agent Tyson of PA Attorney General Office

25.
Letter from Kathleen Kane of November 13, 2015
26.
No Trespass Notice from Tobias Frog of August 15, 2015
27.
Praecipe of CATERBONE v. Duke Street Business Center et.al., with
Named Defendants Tobias Frog and Owners of August 31, 2015
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
_______________________________________________________________________________
:
PETITIONER
:
:
v.
:
CASE NO. 3400-2015
:
:
:
RESPONDANT
:
:
APPELLANT
:
:
:
!" % &
' ( ! '" % )( ) -

Outstanding Acc unts R
sf
N
tigati
It
s N
Appellant's litigation of up to $50 million dollars as stated in the U.S. Bankruptcy Case No.
&)*
The

Appellant
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717)-669-2163
scaterbone@live.com
scaterbone@live.com
https://www.scribd.com/stan5j.5caterbone
Stan J. Caterbone
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717)669-2163
PRESS RELEASE
Saturday, July 4, 2015
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Proposed ORGANIZED
STALKING AND DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS HARASSMENT BILL to Pennsylvania House of
Representative Mike Sturla (Lancaster, Pennsylvania) and City of Lancaster Mayor Richard Gray.
The draft legislation is the work of Missouri House of Representative Jim Guest, who has been
working on helping victims of these horrendous crimes for years. The bill will provide protections to
individuals who are being harassed, stalked, harmed by surveillance, and assaulted; as well as
protections to keep individuals from becoming human research subjects, tortured, and killed by
electronic frequency devices, directed energy devices, implants, and directed energy weapons.
Stan J. Caterbone has been a victim of organized stalking since 1987 and a victim of electronic and
direct energy weapons since 2005. He has also been telepathic since 2005. Stan J. Caterbone will
help introduce measures that also pertain to remote viewing; mental telepathy and synthetic
telepathy in more detail. Personal accounts of his pain and torture are also filed in various United
States federal and state courts.
We are urging you to contact your local representatives and support our efforts to pass this
legislation. Below you will find the listings of Pennsylvania State Representatives.
For More Information Please Contact Us At: scaterbone@live.com and visit our library of
documents at https://www.scribd.com/stan5j.5caterbone
_________________________________________________
The draft of the legislation can be found on the following page:
Page 1
Capitol Office
State Capitol
Jefferson City Mo.
573-751-0246
District Office
Second Street
King City Mo.
660-535-6664
May 21, 2009

To Whom It May Concern,
This letter is to ask for your help for the many constituents in our country who are being affected unjustly
by electronic weapons torture and covert harassment groups. Serious privacy rights violation and physical
injuries have been caused by the activities of these groups and their use of so-called non-lethal weapons on
men, women, and even children.
I am asking you to play a role in helping these victims and also stopping the massive movement in the use
of Veri-chip and RFID technologies in tracking Americans.
Long before Veri-chip was known we were testing these devices on Americans, many without their
knowledge or consent.
There are new revelations of the cancer risk besides the privacy and human rights problems with the use of
Veri-chip and RF signals.
I am asking for your help in stopping these abuses and aiding those already affected.
Sincerely,
Rep. Jim Guest
Organized Stalking and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons Bill
Section 1. Short Title This bill may be cited as the Organized Stalking and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons
Bill
Section 2. Findings and Purpose
A) Findings
1) The constitution guarantees the right of the people to be secure in their person. The Declaration
of Independence asserts as self-evident that all men have certain inalienable rights and that among
these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
2) As Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis wrote in 1928, the framers of the Constitution sought
"to protect Americans in their beliefs, their thoughts, their emotions, and their sensations." It is for
this reason that they established, as against the government, the right to be let alone as "the most
comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized men.
3) The first principle of the Nuremberg Code states that with respect to human research, the
voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. The Nuremberg Code further
asserts that such consent must be competent, informed, and comprehending.
4)There are current regulations implementing the obligations of the United States to adhere to
Article 3 of the United Nations Convention Against Torture and other Forms of Cruel, Inhumane or
Degrading Treatment including all terms that are Subject to any reservations, understandings,
declarations, and provisions contained in the United States Senate resolution of ratification of the
Convention.
B) Purpose
To establish regulations and penalties for those who use any type of electronic frequency devices,
directed energy devices, implants, surveillance technology, and directed energy weapon to
purposefully cause any of the following: stalking, harassing, mental or physical harm, injury,
harmful surveillance, torture, diseases, and death to any United States citizen.
Section 3. Organized Stalking
If two or more persons willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follow or willfully and maliciously
harass another person and who make a credible threat with the intent to place that person in
reasonable fear for his or her safety, or the safety of his or her immediate family, they are guilty of
the crime of organized stalking, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one
year, or by not more than one thousand dollars ($ 1,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment,
or by imprisonment in a federal prison.
If two or more persons violate subdivision (a) when there is a temporary restraining order,
injunction, or any other court order in effect prohibiting the behavior described in subdivision (a)
against the same party, they shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for two, three,
or four years.
For the purposes of this section, "harass" means engages in a knowing and willful course of
conduct directed at a specific person that seriously alarms, annoys, torments, or terrorizes the
person, or damages his personal property or possessions and that serves no legitimate purpose. *
**
Page 2
For the purposes of this section, "course of conduct" means two or more acts occurring over a
period of time, however short, evidencing a continuity of purpose. Constitutionally protected
activity is not included within the meaning of "course of conduct."
For the purposes of this section, "credible threat" means a verbal or written threat, including that
performed through the use of an electronic communication device, or a threat implied by a pattern
of conduct or a combination of verbal, written, or electronically communicated statements and
conduct, made with the intent to place the person that is the target of the threat in reasonable fear
for his or her safety or the safety of his or her family, or personal property or possessions and
made with the apparent ability to carry out the threat so as to cause the person who is the target
of the threat to reasonably fear for his or her safety or the safety of his or her family or personal
property or possessions. It is not necessary to prove that the defendant had the intent to actually
carry out the threat. The present incarceration of a person making the threat shall not be a bar to
prosecution under this section. Constitutionally protected activity is not included within the
meaning of "credible threat."
For purposes of this section, the term "electronic communication device" includes, but is not limited
to, telephones, cellular phones, computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or synthetic
telepathy devices.
The sentencing court also shall consider issuing an order restraining the defendant from any
contact with the victim, that may be valid for up to 10 years, as determined by the court. It is the
intent of the Legislature that the length of any restraining order be based upon the seriousness of
the facts before the court, the probability of future violations, and the safety of the victim and his
or her immediate family.
For purposes of this section, "immediate family" means any spouse, parent, child, any person
related by consanguinity or affinity within the second degree, or any other person who regularly
resides in the household, or who, within the prior six months, regularly resided in the household.
Section 4. Punishment for threats
Any person or persons who willfully threatens to commit a crime which will result in death or great
bodily injury to another person, with the specific intent that the statement, made verbally, in
writing, or by means of an electronic communication device, is to be taken as a threat, even if
there is no intent of actually carrying it out, which, on its face and under the circumstances in
which it is made, is so unequivocal, unconditional, immediate, and specific as to convey to the
person threatened, a gravity of purpose and an immediate prospect of execution of the threat, and
thereby causes that person reasonably to be in sustained fear for his or her own safety or for his or
her immediate family's safety, shall be punished by imprisonment in a federal prison not to exceed
one year..
For the purposes of this section, "immediate family" means any spouse, whether by marriage or
not, parent, child, any person related by consanguinity or affinity within the second degree, or any
other person who regularly resides in the household, or who, within the prior six months, regularly
resided in the household.
"Electronic communication device" includes, but is not limited to, telephones, cellular telephones,
computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or synthetic telepathy devices
Obscene, threatening or annoying communication
(a) Every person or persons who, with intent to annoy, telephones or makes constant contact by
means of an electronic communication device with another and addresses to or about the other
person any obscene language or addresses to the other person any threat to inflict injury to the
person or any member of his or her family, or any property or personal possessions is guilty of a
misdemeanor. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or electronic contacts made
in good faith.
Page 3
(b) Every person or persons who makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by
means of an electronic communication device with intent to annoy another person at his or her
residence, is, whether or not conversation ensues from making the telephone call or electronic
contact, is guilty of a misdemeanor. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or
electronic contacts made in good faith.
(c)
Every person or persons who makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by
means of an electronic communication device with the intent to annoy another person at his or her
place of work is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not more than one thousand
dollars ($ 1,000), or by imprisonment in a federal prison for not more than one year, or by both
that fine and imprisonment. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or electronic
contacts made in good faith. This subdivision applies only if one or both of the following
circumstances exist:
(1) There is a temporary restraining order, an injunction, or any other court order, or any
combination of these court orders, in effect prohibiting the behavior described in this section.
(2) The person or persons makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by means of
an electronic communication device with the intent to annoy another person at his or her place of
work, totaling more than 10 times in a 24-hour period, whether or not conversation ensues from
making the telephone call or electronic contact, and the repeated telephone calls or electronic
contacts are made to the workplace of an adult or fully emancipated minor who is a spouse, former
spouse, cohabitant, former cohabitant, or person with whom the person has a child or has had a
dating or engagement relationship or is having a dating or engagement relationship.
(d) Any offense committed by use of a telephone may be deemed to have been committed where
the telephone call or calls were made or received. Any offense committed by use of an electronic
communication device or medium, including the Internet, may be deemed to have been committed
when the electronic communication or communications were originally sent or first viewed by the
recipient.
(e) Subdivision (a), (b), or (c) is violated when the person acting with intent to annoy makes a
telephone call requesting a return call and performs the acts prohibited under subdivision (a), (b),
or (c) upon receiving the return call.
(f) If probation is granted, or the execution or imposition of sentence is suspended, for any person
or persons convicted under this section, the court may order as a condition of probation that the
person participate in counseling.
(g) For purposes of this section, the term "electronic communication device" includes, but is not
limited to, telephones, cellular phones, computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or
synthetic telepathy devices.
Section 5. Assault and battery with an electronic or directed energy weapon

Any person or persons who in the course of organized stalking and harassment, commits an assault
upon the person of another with an unauthorized directed energy weapon shall be punished by
imprisonment in a federal prison for two, three, or four years or by a fine not exceeding ten
thousand dollars ($10,000).
For the purposes of this section the term directed energy weapon is defined as any device that
directs a source of energy (including molecular or atomic energy, subatomic particle beams,
electromagnetic radiation, plasma, or extremely low frequency (ELF) or ultra low frequency (ULF)
energy radiation) against a person or any other unacknowledged or as yet undeveloped means of
inflicting death or injury; or damaging or destroying, a person (or the biological life, bodily health,
Page 4
mental health, or physical and economic well-being of a person via land-based, sea-based, or
space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies
directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood
management, or mind control of such persons or populations; or by expelling chemical or biological
agents in the vicinity of a person.
Page 5
Richmond council passes resolution

supporting ban on space-based
weapons
May 20, 2015

FacebookTwitterMore
9 comments
The Richmond City Council passed a resolution Tuesday supporting a ban on space-based
weapons after a lengthy discussion over whether individuals are being psychologically
and physically harmed by exotic government-patented attacks from high in the sky.
Councilmember Jovanka Beckles, a member of the Richmond Progressive Alliance (RPA),
introduced the resolution, saying it begins to address concerns of a Richmond resident
who claims shes been targeted by remote transmission from space-based weaponry.
Others claiming to have suffered physical and psychological attacks traveled from around
the country to speak at Tuesdays council meeting. One speaker claimed to have been
zapped multiple times right before his testimony at council.
The resolution supports the Space Preservation Act and Space Preservation Treaty
permanently banning space-based weapons, even though the legislation first introduced
by Rep. Dennis Kucinich in 2001 has never gained traction in Congress. It appears that
Richmond is the first municipality in the U.S. to take up this lofty issue in more than a
decade. In 2002, the City of Berkeley passed a similar resolution supporting the ban.
Conspiracy theorists believe the resolution is a step toward ensuring secret weaponry
such as chemtrails, which are trails left in the sky by high-flying aircraft that supposedly
emit a chemical or biological agent, can no longer target unwitting citizens. For RPA
members on the council, the resolution is also an anti-war initiative.
RPA members on council, Gayle McLaughlin and Eduardo Martinez, also voted in favor of
the resolution. Vice Mayor Jael Myrick and Councilmember Nat Bates were the final two
yes votes, although Bates claimed he was confused by the discussion.
Im going to support the resolution for the simple reason that we have voted on a lot of
Page 8
dumb ideas, Bates said.

Mayor Tom Butt voted no, saying he believes the conspiracy theory behind space-based
weapons is above the heads of city leaders and has taken time away from more pressing
city matters such as the budget deficit, potholes, and crime. Butt has complained in the
past about the RPA attempting to hijack council sessions to push a radical agenda
regardless of whether the issues are important to Richmond residents.
The mayor also pointed to a signed 1967 treaty banning the militarization of space.
The other dissenting vote came from Councilmember Vinay Pimple, who pointed out that
supporting a limitation on the ability of the U.S. to defend against attacks from longrange missiles might not be wise.
Pimple disputed what he called knee-jerk reactions from RPA members who depicted
President Ronald Reagans proposed space-based anti-missile program of 1983, known as
the Star Wars initiative, as inherently evil. The Cold War initiative was intended to
defend against USSR missiles during the Cold War and was shelved not for the projects
moral ambiguity but its perceived effectiveness, Pimple said.
The idea behind Star Wars, Pimple said, is you can knock out someones weapons long
before they enter your air space. The U.S. used Patriot missiles to knock out Iraqi Scuds
targeting Israel and Saudi Arabia, he added.
RPA members, however, argued that this issue is not just about war but about the
individuals in the U.S. who believe governments are using futuristic weapons in space for
the purpose of inflicting pain and mind control. Martinez argued that they may very well
be telling the truth. He recalled a science fiction novel he wrote a paper on during college
that predicted truths 20 years in advance.
Its easy for me to see that things which are wrong can happen because we have the
wrong mindset, Martinez said.
Myrick said he supported the resolution because he doesnt support war.
The weaponization of spaceis something I think is extremely immoral and we should
not be as a nation engaging in, Myrick said. Maybe some wars are unavoidable, that
may be true. But whatever we can do to get our country away from that mindset..thats
why I support this resolution.
Amy Lee Anderson, a targeted individual who brought the matter to Beckles attention,
was thankful that the council took up the issue.
No where in the United States, no targeted individual can get this support, Anderson
said. We just needed one person, one city. Because of that, you all our heroes. We are
dying within because the technology is so sophisticated. Its hard for someone who has
no experience to fathom it, its so sophisticated.
Related posts:
1. Richmond councilmember pushes city resolution banning exotic space-based

weapons
2. Dirty bomb drill in Richmond alarms conspiracy theorists, including Alex Jones
Comments
1. Cmon Richmond Standard.your bias is showing!

Page 9
Stan J. Caterbone
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
October 10, 2015
Federal Whistleblower
and
Targeted Individual (Victim)
of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
Executive Summary
Updated on October 10, 2015
I remain,
Stan J. Caterbone
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL: Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant, and the Advanced Media
Group are victims of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control and has been engaged in litigation in both
Federal and State courts seeking financial remedies and a resolution of his Civil Liberties and
his Constitutional Rights. In 1987 Stan J. Caterbone, while managing the financial firm the he
founded, Financial Management Group, Ltd., Stan J. Caterbone became a Federal Whistleblower
when, as a shareholder, he claimed fraud and misconduct within the international arms dealer
and local start-up International Signal & Control, Plc., Some 4 years later ISC was indicted and
plead guilty to the 3rd largest fraud in U.S. history, some $1 Billion and selling arms to Irag via
South Africa. In June of 2015 Stan J. Caterbone became the Movant in the U.S. District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania case No. 5:14-cv-02559-PD for the Habeus Corpus
Petition of Lisa Michelle Lambert. The case is now before the U.S. Third Circuit Court of
Appeals, Case No. 15-3400.
Page 1 of 41
Saturday, October 10, 2015

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, LTD.,
&
STAN J. CATERBONE
Federal Whistleblower (Federal False Claims Act Violation in 1987 re ISC)
Targeted Individual of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
copyright 2009
Ya know what, I am beginning to analyze this War on Terror and am having difficulty understanding
it all. To me the most effective fundamental fight against Extreme Terrorism is to reduce the motive; or the
Hatred Against America. No one seems to talk about that subject. How do we reduce that Hatred Towards
America and the West?
See, from my perspective, my situation is very disturbing. I mean we have the United States Torturing Me, a
U.S. Citizen for no good or valid reason. I have warned EVERYONE about using my situation to feed this
HATRED towards America.
Low and behold a week or so ago I have had several Muslims sign up as Followers to my
www.scribd.com/amgroup01 online webspace, which I use to post documents. The following being the most
prominent IKWAN Scope, "The Largest Muslim Brotherhood's Scope on the Web":
http://ikhwanscope.net/main/
There have also been several Muslim individuals who signed up as followers around the same time, a week
or so ago. They have also signed up as followers on my www.twitter.com/StanCaterbone webspace.
You must understand, I am a VERY Patriotic Person and live a very patriotic life - I believe in the
U.S. Constitution and Our Founding Father's vision for America; I support Our Military and our
Troops; I believe in the Rule of Law; I am a Practicing Catholic, and have been my whole life; I
Believe in the TRUTH; I believe in Right v. Wrong; Good v. Evil; and finally I believe in God. What
do you believe in?
Posted on the Yahoo Fulton Bank Stock Message Board, January 7, 2010
Date Updated:
October 10, 2015
Date Completed:
Date Initiated:
July 28, 2009

July 8, 2009
Stan J. Caterbone
scaterbone@live.com
Page 2 of 41
UDATE OF SEPTEMBER 27, 2015

In 2015 Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group had to again return to local,
state, and federal courts. Again the obstruction of due process, the local gang stalking, torture,
trespass, thefts, and the like began in earnest.
From the fabricated Petition for Involuntary
Psychiatric Commitment of April 2010 by Detective Clark Bearinger, until January of 2015, Stan J.
Caterbone and Advanced Media Group had been in seclusion and in a state of rehabilitation and
rest due to the forced medication by Fairmount Behavioral Hospital and Dr. Silvia Gratz.
The
psychotropic drugs reduce your motor skills and put you in an extreme state of confusion.
By
the
end
of
the
summer
of
2010
every
social
media
site,
including
the
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com website was taken off-line due to the intimidation and

coercion by Detective Clark Bearinger.
In May Stan J. Caterbone had again endured the Attacks and Torture from the
employees of the Lancaster County Courthouse, and the Lancaster County Government Building.
Then soon after the Residents of Lancaster County engaged in a massive Organized Stalking
Campaign. In addition an extreme Computer Hacking Campaign was initiated and executed in
an effort to again SILENCE Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group.
And Again, the
Lancaster City Police Department took the lead role. As usual Stan J. Caterbone summoned state
and federal authorities for help and assistance, including direct communications with the White
House, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and
Kathleen Kane, The Pennsylvania State Police, the Pennsylvania General Assembly, several U.S.
Congressmen, and of course the Lancaster County District Attorney's Office.
Since August 1,
2015 the Geek Squad had performed diagnostics and repairs six (6) times due to computer
hacking. On at least 2 occasions the entire hard drive had to be wiped clean and restored.
On June 23, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone was named MOVANT in the 2014 Habeus
Corpus Petition by Lisa Michelle Lambert, Case No. 14:02559 in the U.S. District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania after filing an Amicus on the case. Judge Paul
Diamond was presiding since it's filing in 2014. However, the Petition was not able to
be granted and the case was stalled on jurisdictional law based on new and compelling
evidence, or lack there of.
The Amicus was filed to cure that deficiency with direct
witness corroboration to the Prosecutorial Misconduct and Innocence of Lisa Michelle

Lambert.
In fact a working theory was filed that suggested that the East Lampeter
Police Department engaged in a strategy of Entrapment that lead to the unfortunate

murder in 1991. This, would of course, allow a wrongful death claim to be filed by the
Show family. The case is now before the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, Case No. 153400. There are three (3) questions that the Third Circuit may rule on; whether to free
Page 3 of 41
Lisa Michelle Lambert, or grant her her Habeus Corpus, and whether to grant Summary
Judgment to Stan J. Caterbone in all civil actions in both state and federal courts.
Two weeks later, on July 9, 2015, Detective Clark Bearinger filed another fabricated
Petition for Involuntary Psychiatric Commitment. And again Stan J. Caterbone endured 7 days in
the Fairmount Behavioral Hospital in Philadelphia.
However, this time there was
no
MANDATORY Treatment Program Ordered by the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas.
So Stan J. Caterbone continued filing in the courts for assistance and resolution. In August, in a
desperate attempt to stop the local torture campaign, another Emergency Injunction was filed in
the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. On August 6, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone went so far
as to undertake a Professional Polygraph Test administered by Bonnie Lee of Polygraph Solutions
of West Chester, Pennsylvania. The test ended up being 4 grueling hours of torture and a scam of
$600.00.
On July 9th , 2015 a Private Criminal Complaint was filed against Detective Clark Bearinger,
Officer Williams, Officer Binderup, and 2 unidentified patrolman.
The Complaint contained
allegations of torture and abuse at every moment of contact.
The Lancaster City Police
Department were so desperate for retaliation from the Amicus filing in the Lisa Michelle Lambert
case, that they actually broke the door in of 1250 Fremont Street in order to execute the
fabricated 302 petition. The Complaint was denied by the Lancaster County District Attorney on
August 8th . The Complaint is now under a Petition for Review by the Lancaster County Court of
Common Pleas.
On August 17, 2015 another Emergency Injunction for Relief was filed in the Lancaster
County Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 15-06985. The Injunction was heard by Judge Jeffrey
Wright, who dismissed it as frivolous. An appeal, MD 1561, is pending in the Superior Court of
Pennsylvania.
In addition, by September 26, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone had been granted Electronic Filing
Privileges in the local, state, and federal courts. This should alleviate the fraud and abuses of the
U.S. Postal Service and the computer hackers.
In 2015 Stan J. Caterbone identifies a trend that suggests that the Lancaster County
community-at-large was subject to either community targeting or community hypnosis.
The
community targeting theory is supported by experts Jullianne McKinney, Cheryl Welsh, and Dr.
John Hall. The community hypnosis theory is supported by direct personal relationships with the
Amazing Kreskin, Samuel P. Caterbone and Stan J. Caterbone.
Page 4 of 41
In September of 2015 Stan J. Caterbone begins to digitize a library of approximately 45

audio cassette tapes from his father, Samuel P. Caterbone. The tapes range in date from 1971 to
1996. The tapes prove an identical targeting campaign against both Samuel P. Caterbone and
Stan J. Caterbone.
In addition the tapes confirm that Steven P. Caterbone, brother of Stan J.
Caterbone, was most likely a target dating back to the early 1960's. In addition, the death of
Samuel P. Caterbone on July 20, 2001 was confirmed to be that of murder, not natural causes.
In the early 1990's Dr. Phillip Caterbone, brother, had been solicited by the National
Institute of Health, or NIH in Washington, D.C., for a fellowship to research and catalog a study to
find a genetic marker for depression in the CATERBONE family.
Phil interviewed all living
descendants and relatives of my father, Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., and took blood samples. I am
alleging that this was a deliberate act to continue the cover story of mental illness to distract and
provide plausible deniability for any linkage to U.S. Sponsored Mind Control.
Page 5 of 41
HISTORY
In 1987 Stan J. Caterbone went public with allegations of fraud within International Signal
and Control, or ISC as they were commonly referred.
After discussions with ISC and United
Chem Con officials (an ISC/James Guerin straw company), and as a shareholder of record since
1983 of ISC, Stan J. Caterbone had a meeting with an ISC executive on June 23, 1987, which
resulted in a 22 year legal odyssey. The discussions involved a joint venture with his company,
Financial Management Group, Ltd., or FMG, Ltd., but ended in disclosure of his recent public
allegations of fraud. Four years later, ISC founder and chairman James Guerin, and other officials
and companies pleaded guilty to a $1 Billion Dollar Fraud and export violations including the
selling of arms through South Africa to Iraq and Sadaam Hussein.
However, money, power,
influence and public corruption had been used to cover-up the activities and Federal False Claims
Act violations of Stan J. Caterbone for the next eighteen years. There ensued a total blockade of
all United States Courts for all redress and remedy available in accordance with federal, state, and
local laws.
This included recovery of his business interests; intellectual property; real estate;
personal and business real property; his unblemished and impressive reputation; and his most
valuable asset - the ability to produce income. This might be legally referred to as the Right-ToWork under federal statutes.
Notwithstanding, Stan J. Caterbone has never made a bad
investment or developed a business that did not make a profit over the next 22 years.
This
includes two real estate properties that were illegally seized through foreclosure proceedings.
Since 1987 Stan J. Caterbone has been a prisoner and enemy of the state.
ISC was a
Department of Defense (DOD) Contractor and a partner with United States Intelligence Agencies
since it's beginings in the early 1970's. One of it's first contracts was Project X with the National
Security Agency or NSA of Ft. Meade, Maryland.
In summary, the following are facts and part of the public record regarding
SIGNAL & CONTROL OR ISC:
INTERNATIONAL
Once the third (3rd) largest employer in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania, with
over 5,000 employees.
James Guerin, founder and CEO was once the largest philanthropist to charitable
organizations in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania.
The ISC/Ferranti Scandal was the third (3) largest white-collar fraud within the United
States as of 1992.
Page 6 of 41
The following are some of the public officials and politicians associated with ISC:
George H.W. Bush, former U.S. President, and Director of the Central Intelligence
Agency (CIA).
Robert Gates, former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and current
Secretary of Defense.
Bobby Ray Inman, former Board of Directors if ISC, former Director of the NSA, and
currently associated and directly involved with Mind Control Research organizations.
Alexander Haig, former U.S. Secretary of State, and ISC lobbyist and Board of
Directors?
Joseph McDade, former Pennsylvania House of Representative and Chair of the

Appropriations Committee who was later investigated for the United Chem Con
scandal.
Carlos Cardoen/Cardoen Industries, a joint venture partner with ISC and arms
merchant for the cluster bomb who eventually sold to Iraq and other Middle Eastern
Countries under U.S. sanctions.
ISC was credited with the design of the cluster bomb, and has patents filed in the U.S.
Patent Office.
In 1987 ISC completed the merger with the 3rd largest defense contractor of Great
Britain, Ferranti International; who paid $1 billion dollars for ISC and all of it's
subsidiaries.
ABC News/Financial Times aired 3 episodes on ABC Nightline with Ted Koppel
regarding the ISC/CIA defense weapons; technologies; and cluster bombs to Iraq
story and lead into the allegations that then nominee for the Director of CIA Robert
Gates was involved with ISC and the selling of arms to Iraq.
ABC News 20/20 aired a story on the ISC/CIA efforts to sell cluster bombs to Saadam
Hussein and Iraq on February 1, 1991 days after the start of the Persian Gulf War I,
with the initial bombing raid destroying a cluster bomb factory built in Iraq by
Carlos Cardoen.
On July 1st and 2nd of 1987 Stan J. Caterbone solicited the legal counsel of Lancaster
Attorney Joseph Roda for counsel regarding, FMG, Ltd., International Signal &
Control (ISC); Commonwealth Bank, etc., and was billed for his services. Joseph
Roda did absolutely nothing but refute Stan J. Caterbone's claims and would not
believe him.
In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas),

Lancaster Attorney Joseph Roda represented William Clark, ISC's in-house legal
counsel, and never mentioned any conflict to Stan J. Caterbone in 1987.
In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas), James

Guerin deposited $1.75 million dollars into an escrow account at Fulton Bank,
Lancaster, County.
Page 7 of 41

Christopher Underhill of Harman, Underhill & Brubaker, represented James
Guerin. In 2005 Christopher Underhill represented the Manheim Township Police
Department (05-cv-2288 U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania) CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al.,.

Philadelphia Attorney Joseph Tate represented James Guerin and ISC, and in 2007
Joseph Tate represented Scooter Libby during his federal prosecution by U.S.
Special Prosecutor Fitzpatrick.
THE MANIFEST OF A COVER-UP

Not only did the allegations of fraud within ISC have to be silenced at a time when merger
negotiations were ongoing with Ferranti, but all of the fraud; extortion; public corruption;
burglaries; civil rights violations; anti-trust and intellectual property right violations; lender
liability torts; false arrests; false imprisonments; as well as other civil and criminal activities had
to be covered up and buried in bureaucratic red tape.
uncovered and discovered to this day.
Information and findings are still being
Contrary to popular belief, up until 1996 a grand jury
investigation into ISC was still ongoing. It is not known whether it has closed or not. All of these
activates constitute a RICO crime due to the pattern and organization of the perpetrators. The
pattern and source of the activities can be traced back to 1987, with subgroups changing over
time, but still engaging in the same practices. The following plan of action was followed in order
to perpetrate the cover-up:
Totally discredit Stan(ley) J. Caterbone and any and all allegations in every way
possible.
Fabricate a history of mental illness.

Fabricate a criminal record.
Attach his character and honesty with rumors and propaganda.
Extort and maintain his net worth to $ zero or load him with debts.
Keep him out of any profession and or occupation when and where possible.
Totally isolate him and disenfranchise him from his friends, colleagues, and family
into a life of solitaire.
Somehow persuade the community of Lancaster County to buy into this plan of
action through money, favors, etc.,
Always keep attorneys and anyone remotely involved with the legal community
away at times when efforts for justice are pursued.
When attempts to enter the U.S. legal system arise, isolate, harass, and extort
any monies and/or possessions of value.
Page 8 of 41
Change the history of events and the truth.

THE COURTS AND THE UNITED STATES LEGAL SYSTEM
For 18 years, (from 1987 until 2005) it has always been fairly easy to keep these issues
from court dockets and judges.
During these years Stan J. Caterbone had solicited at least
twenty attorneys, some from large firms with national recognition in their respective fields of
specialties. Attorneys from New York City to Santa Barbara and San Diego California were visited
and consulted as well as a group of ex FBI agents who specialized in white collar crime that are
now globally recognized. However, the money and influence of persons and entities that wanted
these issues silence always prevailed. The issues were so complex and convoluted, and involved
such high profile politicians and U.S. agencies, it was far easier to state that there was no case, or
their were no claims that would result in remedy or redress. Between the Republican Party and
the Department of Defense, the CIA and the NSA, there was not an attorney that could not be
influenced. The obstruction of justice and due process in this case is most likely unprecedented in
nature and in malice.
However in 2005 that all changed when Stan J. Caterbone appeared as a pro se litigant
representing himself, without any counsel, in the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Pennsylvania in CATERBONE v. The Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or case no. 05-cv2288.
This case is still not settled and has been withdrawn by plaintiff Stan J.
Caterbone in October of 2008 after a successful ruling in the U.S. Third Circuit Court of
Appeals (07-4474) in September of 2008. The case will be continued upon the security
of evidence and the cease and desist of obstruction of justice and due process. On May
16, 2005 at the Federal Courthouse in Philadelphia, Stan J. Caterbone filed the case under seal.
One week later in the United States Bankruptcy Court for Eastern Pennsylvania in Reading,
Pennsylvania, again appearing as pro se, Stan J. Caterbone filed a petition for protection under
the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Code, in case no. 05-23059.
These acts of entering the United States legal system with these issues triggered yet
another round of attempts to keep these cases from the courts and judges - Organized Stalking
with Directed Energy Devices and Weapons, built on a foundation of mental telepathy or total
Mind Control.
Page 9 of 41
REMOTE VIEWING; ORGANIZED STALKING; DIRECTED ENERGY DEVICES AND

WEAPONS.
Organized stalking and harassment began in 1987 following the public allegations of fraud
within ISC. This organized stalking and harassment was enough to drive an ordinary person to
suicide. As far back as the late 1980's Stan J. Caterbone knew that his mind was being read, or
"remotely viewed". This was verified and confirmed when information only known to him, and
never written, spoken, or typed, was repeated by others. In 1998, while soliciting the counsel of
Philadelphia attorney Christina Rainville, (Rainville represented Lisa Michelle Lambert in the Laurie
Show murder case), someone introduced the term remote viewing through an email. That was
the last time it was an issue until 2005. The term was researched, but that was the extent of the
topic.
Remote Viewers may have attempted to connect in a more direct and continuous way
without success.
In 2005 the U.S. sponsored mind control turned into an all-out assault of mental
telepathy; synthetic telepathy; and pain and torture through the use of directed energy devices
and weapons that usually fire a low frequency electromagnetic energy at the targeted victim.
This assault was no coincidence in that it began simultaneously with the filing of the federal action
in U.S. District Court, or CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or 05-cv-2288.
This
assault began after the handlers remotely trained Stan J. Caterbone with mental telepathy. The
main difference opposed to most other victims of this technology is that Stan J. Caterbone is
connected 24/7 with a person who declares that she is Interscope recording artist Sheryl Crow of
Kennett Missouri. Stan J. Caterbone has spent 3 years trying to validate and confirm this person
without success. Most U.S. intelligence agencies refuse to cooperate, and the Federal Bureau of
Investigation and the U.S. Attorney's Office refuse to comment.
See attached documents for
more information.
In 2006 or the beginning of 2007 Stan J. Caterbone began his extensive research into
mental telepathy; mind control technologies; remote viewing; and the CIA mind control program
labeled MK ULTRA and it's subprograms.
Page 10 of 41
FAMILY HISTORY
If you listen to the propaganda machine and the community of Lancaster County,
Pennsylvania, including professionals, the family history of Stan J. Caterbone goes something like
the following:
Father, Samuel Caterbone, Jr., Schizophrenic who ran out on his family
because of nervous breakdowns while trying to run a small dry cleaning
business.
He traveled the world looking for the Blessed Mother Mary and
Space Aliens. He ended up living in government subsidized housing broke

and with a severe mental illness.
Brother, Samuel A. Caterbone, suffered from the very same illness has his
father, Schizophrenia, who finally killed himself trying to live in California.
Brother, Thomas W. Caterbone, suffered from the very same mental illness as
his brother, Stan J., Bipolar Mood Disorder, who ran a lawn business and
finally committed suicide at an early age.
Stan J. Caterbone, suffered from Bipolar Mood Disorder, or Manic Depression and
had a nervous breakdown in 1987 trying to compete in the financial services
industry. When he has his nervous breakdowns, he always threatens to sue
everyone in court and is deeply paranoid in thinking the whole world is
against him. He always spends all of his money during his fits of mania and
has delusions about his success as a businessman.
The Family History was formulated back in the 1960's when Samuel Caterbone, Jr.,
father of Stan J. Caterbone, became engaged in a black budget mind control program that began
during his service in the United States Navy as a radioman and air gunner.
Samuel Caterbone,
Jr., was most likely a direct product of MK ULTRA or one of it's subprograms. His brother, Samuel
A. Caterbone, was most likely part of the LSD experiments of MK ULTRA. Stan J. Caterbone is
most likely part of a program sponsored by the Department of Defense Agencies, such as DARPA
or the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA). The facts of Stan J. Caterbone's intimate discussions
with both his father and brother over the years before they died, the totality of documents that
were preserved in their estate, including service records; letters; official court papers; high school
documents; and the like - all will prove that they were in fact part of MK ULTRA or one of it's
subprograms.
Page 11 of 41
The following are the facts and the real record of the family history:
Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., (Father) served in the Navy from 1943 to 1946 and
graduated with honors from Air Gunners School in Jacksonville, Florida. He was an exceptional
student/athlete while attending Lancaster Catholic High School, participating in the band as well
as sports. He was also his senior class secretary/treasurer. After the Navy, he went on to build a
successful dry cleaning business, which he is credited with inventing a filtration system for the
solvents.
He also developed a very good investment in real estate along the Manheim Pike,
owning several properties. By his own writings and from his personal accounts to me, he was
definitely a remote viewer or data miner for some U.S. Agency with telepathic abilities.
His
viewing is documented to have begun back in the early 1970's. He also suffered from organized
stalking, and was considered an enemy and prisoner of the state. Back in the 1960's, he was a
world traveler, this is documented by his passports. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., may have been a
covert carrier for someone in intelligence. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., had his mental health history
laced with electro shock therapy. Electro Shock Therapy Experiments is another subprogram of
MK ULTRA. In addition, and especially disturbing is his criminal record with the Lancaster City
Police Department and the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas.
In 1973 Samuel P.
Caterbone, Jr. was convicted of forging a 2 checks from the Caterbone Cleaners, Inc., checking
account.
The one check to Joe the Motorists Store at the Manor Shopping Center was never
entered into evidence, it was for a total of $70.00. The other check was made out to Lancaster
Attorney James Coho for $200.00 with "divorce proceedings" written in the memo. This was his
only criminal record. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., was sentenced to one year probation by President
Judge William Johnstone.
However, on August 29, 1973 after nine months, Judge Johnstone
wrote an ORDER releasing him from probation and ordering him to "leave the vicinity of the
County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania". The President Judge of Lancaster County Court of Common
Pleas literally threw my father out of Lancaster County for forging 2 checks from his own
corporation. In 1987 I was arrested for stealing my own files from my own company, Financial
Management Group, Ltd., You can research the life of Candy Jones and Kate O'Brien to learn more
on this topic. Samuel Caterbone, Jr., has left enough writings and documentation to know that his
life fits the model for targeted individuals, complete with economic ruin, isolation, disenfranchised
from family and friends, and of course a fabricated mental illness history. You can view most of
his record online.
On or about May 18, 2001 Samuel P. Caterbone Jr., finally received an
inheritance from his mother's (Mary Caterbone) estate.
The check was for some $70,000.00.
The estate was probated in November of 2000. Some two weeks later, on Memorial Day Weekend
of 2001, he had called me to come to New York City to help care for him.
He was in perfect
health until this time. In a matter of six (6) weeks he had succumbed to lung cancer. As per
Julianne McKinney,
former intelligence officer for the U.S. Army and victim activist of U.S.
Sponsored Mind Control, the weapons are lethal enough to kill and the one thing that I worry
Page 12 of 41
about is that of dying of cancer (paraphrase). There is no doubt now that my father's death was
a murder, not natural.
Samuel A. Caterbone, (Brother) served in the United States Air Force in 1968 to 1970.
In 1991, Stan J. Caterbone accused the United States Government of using his brother, Samuel
A. Caterbone for part of the LSD experiments on mind control, or MK ULTRA. A notarized letter of
October 23, 1991 was sent certified mail to the California Attorney General on the subject matter,
with a return letter from the California Attorney General on January 14, 1992.
By his own
admission before his death, Samuel A. Caterbone disclosed to Stan J. Caterbone of the "bad LSD"
trips while in the Air Force. Since his death of December 25, 1984, Stan J. Caterbone and others
questioned the classification of suicide, and made allegations of foul play that was ultimately
responsible for his death. Finally in a meeting in Santa Barbara, California with the Santa Barbara
Public Guardian's Office, an office admitted that the death was more likely due to foul plan than
suicide.
Samuel A. Caterbone was also an exceptional student and athlete while attending
Lancaster Catholic High School.
After playing varsity football as a sophomore, he had an
unfortunate accident while deer hunting the following November.
While in the woods in
Bellefonte, Pennsylvania, his hunting pants caught fire trying to stay warm.
It left him in the
Lancaster General Hospital for months, going through painful skin grafts and isolation.
hunting accident interrupted his athletic career and scared his legs for life.
The
The Schizophrenia
diagnosis was a combination of LSD flashbacks and organized stalking and harassment.
Thomas P. Caterbone, (Brother) had an unfortunate transaction at Fulton Bank that set
a course of action that resulted in a suicide. Although diagnosed with Bipolar Disease and Manic
Depression -- embezzled and extorted monies were most likely the reason for his suicide in 1996.
Fulton Bank was involved in a fraud that took $72,000 from a real estate settlement closing and
lead to his total financial ruin and collapse in June of 1995. The funds were never recovered and
Fulton Bank is a defendant for a wrongful death claim in the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Pennsylvania in CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., 05-cv-2288.
FULTON BANK triggered a severe and lethal death blow to Thomas P. Caterbone, and as of this
day has refused to acknowledge any wrongdoing or remorse. Thomas P. Caterbone was also an
exceptional athlete. Playing for Lancaster Catholic High School, Franklin and Marshall College, the
Harrisburg Patriots, and even the Philadelphia Eagles. Tom also coached football at J.P. McCaskey
and Franklin and Marshall College.
Thomas P. Caterbone had a very successful lawn and
landscaping business before joining forces with John DePatto of United Financial Services and
selling residential mortgages.
John DePatto was the former head of Parent Bank, owned by
James Guerin and ISC. Parent Bank, owned by ISC also foreclosed on 2323 New Danville Pike,
Conestoga, Pennsylvania in 1988, which was owned by Stan J. Caterbone. Thousands of dollars
of equity was extorted in the process, despite still being short sold for a profit to Mr. Keith
Page 13 of 41
Kirchner, an executive of Lancaster Newspapers and former graduate of Lancaster Catholic High
School.
Stan J. Caterbone is a remote viewer (at least one way in), is telepathic, and a
federal whistleblower with an exceptional entrepreneurial record in spite of all of his adversaries
and their assaults. In spite of the U.S. Sponsored mind control and torture, he has endured and
will prevail. Legally, Stan J. Caterbone has been able to preserve his claims, and progress his
legal challenges and claims through both the federal and state court system appearing pro se,
without the aid or expense of additional legal counsel. Some of his claims and briefs will most
likely be landmark decisions in years to come. Stan J. Caterbone was a 2-Sport MVP at Lancaster
Catholic High School, in both football and track. Stan J. Caterbone never received less than a B
grade in his four years of high school and had an 87+ average. Stan J. Caterbone excelled in
computer technologies, taking his first full term course in 1975, while in high school and
continuing into college at Millersville University, graduating with a degree in business
administration in 1980.
Stan J. Caterbone excelled profoundly at building his companies, first
beginning with Financial Management Group, Ltd., then working with Tony Bongiovi of Power
Station Studios and the "Digital Movie"; then building Advanced Media Group, Ltd..
Over the
years, despite the illegal seizures and foreclosures, Stan J. Caterbone has amassed a portfolio of
impressive real estate deals that have always paid off in profits, no matter how or when they
were sold.
The same was true of his businesses.
Financial Management Group, Ltd., was a
$20,000 dollar investment in 1986 and was still sold for approximately $100,000 two years later,
despite the false arrests and the extortion of most of it's real value and equity.
The mental health history and the criminal records were completely fabricated, and a
close review and investigation into the actual court records and hospital records can prove that in
very short fashion.
There are TWO (2) ways to quickly dispute the Mental Health History and
Record:
One - Review the word "Delusional; delusions; etc.,;
every instance of the word
used by mental health professionals, and the false reports by friends and family were associated
with facts, and matters of the official record, the complete opposite of the meaning of the word
"delusional". And they still exist to this very day.
Two - Review the 3 Fabricated Suicide Allegations of the following dates: August
10(?), 1987 at Burdette Tomlin Hospital (Cape May County New Jersey); February 18th(?), 2005
by Kerry Egan and the Southern Regional Police Department; and July 19, 2009 for the 302
Commitment by the Lancaster City Police Department at Lancaster General Hospital.
The Criminal Record is very similar, since 1987 Stanley J. Caterbone has had 31 false
arrests; formal charges and convictions dismissed prior to court proceedings or won on summary
appeals in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania; most of which Stan J. Caterbone appearing as
Page 14 of 41
pro se (representing himself). These have resulted in civil complaints filed in 2008 in CATERBONE
v. The County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania.
THE PUBLIC RECORD

The Public Record is comprised of court filings and exhibits in U.S. Federal Courts;
Pennsylvania State Courts; and the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. In all some 40,000
pages of documents are now filed and electronically scanned or microfilmed in prothonotary
offices. In addition in both the U.S. Federal Courts and the Lancaster County Court of Common
Pleas there are more than 11 hours of audio recordings; some 3,000 scanned images; and
several video broadcasts of the ISC News broadcasts all stored on a CD-ROM and filed as an
exhibit to some of the law suits filed by Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group, as
plaintiffs. Stan J. Caterbone has over 100 court docket sheet numbers in federal, state, and local
courts.
There are also Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation records; Department of Welfare

and Lancaster County Assistance Office records; Local Real Estate Tax records; Lancaster County
Tax Assessment records; Social Security Administration Benefits records; Lancaster Catholic High
School transcripts; Millersville University transcripts; all for Stan J. Caterbone, in addition to his
court filings.
For Samuel A. Caterbone, my brother, there are United States Air Force service
records; Lancaster Catholic High School transcripts; Millersville University transcripts; Social
Security Administration records; Santa Barbara County Guardian and Public Defender records;
and papers and documents persevered from his estate.
For Samuel P. Caterbone, my father, there are United States Naval records, Lancaster
Catholic High School transcripts; Social Security Administration records; Lancaster County
Assistance Office records; Local Real Estate Tax records; Lancaster County Tax Assessment
records; Samuel Caterbone Cleaners, Inc., corporate records; Real Estate Deeds and Mortgages;
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas civil and criminal records; and of course papers and
documents persevered from his estate
PUBLIC WEBSITE ADDRESSES OF INTEREST:

www.freedomffchs.com
https://www.scribd.com
Page 15 of 41
DOCUMENTS ATTACHED FOR REVIEW

** It is important to note that as of this writing, Remote Viewing has recently
been commercialized by corporate America, and certain Fortune 500 companies are
using Remote Viewers as consultants for trend analysis and market forecasts. This is
often the evolution of most technologies born out of the U.S. Department of Defense.
Top Secret experiments and the resulting technological advancements can stay
secretive for so long.
This has recently been used in a NBC story of the Television
drama "Medium" this last season.
On July 9, 2008 I had recorded an AM radio live
broadcast on WHAN Coast to Coast with a guest that was one of the leading Physicist
turned Remote Viewer and expert that testified to this same notion.
Dated: July 28, 2009

Stan J. Caterbone
scaterbone@live.com
The following are no longer in service:
www.advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com
www.scribd.com/amgroup01
www.facebook.com/scaterbone
www.twitter.com/StanCaterbone
www.mcvictimsworld.ning.com/profile/StanJCaterbone
http://www.youtube.com/advancedmediagroup
Page 16 of 41
September 7, 2009
Stan J. Caterbone
Advance Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17603
Derrick Robinson
Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance
P.O. Box 9022
Cincinnati, Ohio 45209
Phone 1-800-571-5618
Fax 1-866-433-4170
email: info@freedomfchs.com
Re: Is County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania Ground Zero for Organized Stalking and
Covert Surveillance?
Derrick,
My pleasure. Derrick, I was trying to get group rates at our new Lancaster Convention Center
Marriot Hotel last week, just as a little fact finding mission. I have a theory that I would like to
send your way. I thought it would be very fruitful to bring some TI's together for a conference,
unless you think the exposure would be harmful.
I believe that they try new models for harassment; organized stalking and surveillance on me
here in Lancaster. Remember, Lancaster is now one of the most "Watched Communities" in the
country. "With those cameras, the Safety Coalition will operate and monitor 165 cameras across
Lancaster City making Lancaster the most watched city of its size in the nation." See article
attached, Watching you: City to add 105 more cameras.
I believe that Lancaster may be ground zero for some of the models of organized stalking and
harassment that we TI's experience and wanted to get some reaction from Lancaster. Some
history on the Lancaster Convention Center. Dale High of High Industries is the lead partner in our
new convention center/hotel. It is first class all the way. Now in the late 1980's I was a joint
venture partner with Dale High in American Helix Technology Company/Advanced Media Group.
American Helix was a cd manufacturer and I and my company Advanced Media Group was the
CD-ROM division of American Helix. I was one of a handful of CD-ROM manufacturers in the
domestic United States back then. Also in 2005 I filed a civil action against the lead hotel, the
Eden Resort Inn, for trying to block the development and building of the Hotel/Convention Center,
see
attached.
Now, some history about Lancaster and the intelligence community. Back in the 1980's there were
several defense contractors located in Lancaster, the main being International Signal & Control,
which I, of course, blew the whistle on a billion dollar fraud and arms to Iraq.
Click here for an overview of ISC.
Click here to see the Lancaster Newspapers Archives regarding International Signal & Control, or
ISC.
Click here to view the live video of the WGAL-TV News Broadcast of October 31, 1991 the evening
of the ISC indictments. The U.S. Department of Justice and other U.S. Agencies held a Press
Conference in the Philadelphia Federal Courthouse to announce the indictments and $ Billion
Dollar Fraud.
Page 17 of 41
Click here for Part 2 of the WGAL-TV 8 Broadcast.

Now politically, Lancaster is and has always been predominately Republican. Lancaster is one of
the oldest cities in the country and our courthouse was one of the first in this country. Lancaster
has one of the oldest fraternities of the Masons. Lancaster and the George W.Bush administration
has a close and very "interesting relationship". George H. Bush had a very close relationship with
ISC, and of course the NSA and CIA all had a very "close" relationship with International Signal &
Control, or ISC. The following are some transcripts for Ted Koppel and ABC News Nightline
regarding ISC and Arms to Iraq and the intelligence community. The transcripts are contained in
my Amicus for Case No. 2006-cv-2160 filed in the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division.
Now, Robert Gates, presently the Secretary of the United States Defense Department, and his
relationship to Lancaster. First of all, the attached video is the authentic transcript of Robert
Gates' confirmation hearing in September of 1991 for the Director of the Central Intelligence
Agency (CIA). If you fast forward to approximately 9:00:00 you will see the back and forth
questions from Senator Murkowski to Robert Gates regarding the allegations by several members
of the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence regarding his alleged involvement with ISC
and the Arms deals with Carlos Cardoen and the shipping of cluster bombs through South Africa
and on to Iraq. Of course, he denied all of the allegations.
Robert Gates also has relatives that live in Lancaster County, if fact he attended a wedding here a
few months ago, on May 3, 2009 at St. John Neuman Catholic Church in Manhiem Township,
Lancaster County. His wife has a niece that lives in Manheim Township.
Now, I'll give you the ABC News Nightline May 23, 1991 excerpt regarding ISC and the NSA,
National Security Agency:
"It all started legally, if covertly, back in 1974. That's when the National Security Agency, a supersecret U.S. Intelligence unit asked ISC to help complete project X, a chain of electronic listening
posts based at South Africa's Simonstown Naval Station. South Africa was using these posts to
follow Soviet submarine traffic off of the Cape of Good Hope. To ensure secrecy, ISC and the NSA
made sure shipments could not be tracked back to them. They created a company called Gamma
Systems Associates. In fact, this company was nothing more than a post office box at John F.
Kennedy Airport. Gamma was a cut-out. ... But this sanctioned covert operation was stopped in
1977 when President Carter, a strong opponent of South Africa's apartheid regime, told U.S. firms
to stop any military-related business with Pretoria. But ISC continue shipping electronics, some
civilian, some military, to South Africa. The in the early 1980's, South Africa began to intensify its
efforts at ballistic missile development. For ISC, that was a golden opportunity because on of its
top executives was a man named Clyde Ivey, an American electronics expert who has been the
father of South Africa's missile program. Ivey had extraordinary contacts in the nations defense
structure. Begining in 1984, federal investigators say, senior ISC exeutives, including Ivey, began
regular contacts with CIA officials." You can read the rest. The entire transcript of the May 23,
1991 ABC News/Nightline broadcast.
Now remember, George H. Bush was director of CIA. "He served in this role for 357 days, from
January 30, 1976 to January 20, 1977.[22] The CIA had been rocked by a series of revelations,
including those based on investigations by Senator Frank Church's Committee regarding illegal
and unauthorized activities by the CIA, and Bush was credited with helping to restore the
agency's morale.[23] In his capacity as DCI, Bush gave national security briefings to Jimmy
Carter both as a Presidential candidate and as President-elect, and discussed the possibility of
remaining in that position in a Carter administration[24] but it was not to be," according to
Wikipedia.
Now, lets get to Bobby Ray Inman, former Navy, Director of the National Security Agency (NSA),
former Director of International Signal & Control (ISC), and currently part of the Mind Control
industry. The following appears on the Welcome page of my website:
Page 18 of 41
"S.A.I.C. involvement in 1993 American Para psychological Association meeting arrangements, via
their 'Cognitive Sciences Laboratory'. Science Applications International Corporation is a big time
defense contractor, has held the largest number of research contracts of any defense contractor.
Bobby Ray Inman (ISC Board of Directors) is on its board of directors, among others."
by John Porter, CIA Program on Mind Control copyright 1996. In 1994, after Bobby Ray Inman
requested to be withdrawn from consideration as Bill Clinton's first Defense Secretary, his critics
speculated that the decision was motivated by a desire to conceal his links to ISC. Inman was a
member of the so-called "shadow board" of the company which was allegedly either negligent or
approved the exports." by Wikipedia on International Signal and Control, (ISC).
Now, lets list the former Navy personnel:
George H. Bush, former President of the United States, former Director of CIA.
James Guerin, President and Founder of International Signal & Control.
Bobby Ray Inman, former Director of the National Security Agency (NSA) and Director of
International Signal & Control, (ISC).
My father, Samuel P. Cateronne, Jr.
His father, Samuel J. Caterbone, Sr.
George Noory, of Coast to Coast Radio (just anecdotal, nothing assumed or alleged).
George W. Bush flew with the Navy.
James Cross
I will Finish later and add more.
Next we get to Jim Guerin's attorney back in 1989 through at least 1992. His name was Joseph
Tate, of Philadelpha. This link will take you to a document regarding Joseph Tate, James Guerin
and Joseph Roda, Esq., of Lancaster, my former attorney who said I fabricated everything back in
1987. The document contains a letter of September 12, 2005 from Special Prosecutor Patrick
Fitzgerald regarding Scooter Libby, Former Vice President Dick Cheney's Chief of Staff. the letter
involves Scooter Libby's Grand Jury Indictment for leaking Covert CIA Operative Valerie Plame
and eventually outing her.
Now in Austin Texas in July of 2005 I was detained by 2 Agents from The Defense Intelligence
Agency. I was merely visiting a Military Museum, that had old and vintage helicopters and
airplanes. near where my brother, Dr. Phillip Caterbone lived. I was visiting on my way to
California. While inside the museum 2 Agents from the Department of Defense Defense
Intelligence Agency escorted me outside to my Honda Oddesey and interrogated me making me
confirm that I was visiting and staying with my brother. They caused a problem for my brother's
Medical Practice by shaking up one of his secretaries. The reviewed my court documents for
CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., Case No. 2005-cv-0288 filed in the U.S. District
Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The demanded that I stay off all military bases
before releasing me.
In 2006 I was telepathic with an older NSA executive on many occasions who wanted to meet me
at the Clipper Stadium who told me he wanted to rent a facility in Lancaster for a training
exercise. I told him to to and see Dale High and the High Group for space at the Greenfield
Industrial Park. He said he was retiring and that our discussions were keeping him a few weeks
longer than expected. We had intimate discussions of my history and the Chesapeake Bay Area.
We also discussed Sheryl Crow, and he told me his wife was a fan. I turned him on to her new
album, Wildflower, and he said she liked it. We had to disengage because he was being harassed
by other telepathic assailants.
My former secretary (Susan Bare) at Pflumm Contractors, Inc., where I was controller and was
hired to rescue the company from near bankruptcy in 1993, told me that her husband, Ross Bare,
who grew up just some 10 or so doors from me, worked for the NSA. She disclosed this soon
after I hired her in 1994 or 1995.
I will finish later and add to this allegation. This is a work-in-progress.
Page 19 of 41
Stan J. Caterbone
scaterbone@live.com
Page 20 of 41
AFFIDAVIT
BE IT ACKNOWLEDGED, that Stanley J. Caterbone, Financial Management Group, Ltd.,
FMG Advisory, and and all affiliates, Pro Financial Group, Ltd., Advanced Media Group, Advanced
Media Group, Ltd., Global Entertainment Group, Ltd., Power Productions I, Radio Science
Laboratories, Ltd., of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, the undersigned deponent, being of legal
age, does hereby depose and say under oath as follows:
I am now convinced that the situation surrounding my litigation and all factors attributed
to my financial and professional demise bore out of the fact that my Father, Samuel P. Caterbone
was a victim of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control, in the truest sense of the words.
The
whistleblowing activities of 1987 either were a coincidence or I was set up in the very beginning
by Pennsylvania State Senator Gibson Armstrong (former stock broker) in 1983 when he solicited
me to purchase the ISC stock. The preceding would have been the perfect cover story for my
demise; that I was involved in a fraud. Following this analysis would lead one to conclude that
the collateral damage from the activities of my financial ruin always left my fellow businesses in
financial ruin, for example Robert Kauffman and Michael Hartlett, partners, and the shareholders
and affiliated professionals of Financial Management Group, Ltd., Tony Bongiovi and Power Station
Studios, Jim and Lynn Cross as Cross Microwave Consultants, Dave Dering, Scott Robertson, and
James Boyer as American Helix/High Industries, Ralph Mazzochi and Gallo Rosa Restaurant;
Pflumm Contractors, Inc., Mike Caterbone's AIM Wholesaler's Business, Dr. Phillip Caterbone, D.O.
And associated Primary Care Practices of Austin, Texas, Sam Lombardo and Ralph Mazzochi as
S.N. Lombardo Associates for Lancaster Avenue Project, Sheryl Crow Singer Songwriter, my
immediate family, friends, and relatives.
Following this analysis would lead one to concur that the legal and financial remedies
would only be reconciled by the above named parties enjoining my civil litigation. This AFFIDAVIT
is to be considered a legal and binding document to accomplish that remedy.
Page 21 of 41
scaterbone@live.com
Stan J. Caterbone
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
ILLEGAL NO TRESPASS NOTICES AGAINST

STAN J. CATERBONE AND ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Violations of Public Accommodations Law re Discrimination
and Anti-Trust Violations with False Statements to Authorities
September 27, 2015
Work-In-Progress
Community Stalking and Organized Libel/Slander Campaign Strategy Issue a few every
year to support false arrests; false imprisonment; fabricated mental illness history. In addition to
isolate by prohibiting entrance to major entertainment venues with good live music. Prohibit from
defending against the lies and slander in public to a minimum. Also, destroy history of strong
Christian values and church attendance on a weekly basis by keeping away from church. The
Millersville University Graduate Studies No Trespass Notice was accommodated by the denial of
entitled benefits of LETA Job Training Education Course of the Paralegal program at HACC during
the same time period.
1. David Pflumm Properties by David Pflumm Served by State Constable in June of

2005, original not signed by David Pflumm
2. Eden Resort Inn, by Drew Anthon, Owner Sent via 1st Class Mail in 2005.
3. Barley Snyder, LLC Lancaster Office, by Shawn Long, Esq., Attorney representing
Fulton Bank in 2006 Sent via 1st Class Mail
4. Lancaster Newspapers, Inc., by Steve Weaver, Manager in 2006, No Notice,
Corraborated by Jack Buckwalter, Chairman and CEO and George Warner, Atty with Barley
Snyder, LLC, No Formal Notice, allowed to reenter in 2015.
5. Ruby Tuesday, Manor Shopping Center, Lancaster, by Manager and Lancaster City
Police in 2006, No Formal Notice, allowed to reenter in 2015.
6. Alley Kat Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster by Bartender Ms. Santinello, Brett Stabley,
and Lancaster City Police, No formal Notice in 2006
7. Village Nightclub, Lancaster by George in 2008, No Formal Notice
8. Marion Court Restaurant, Lancaster, by Security Personnel, corroborated by Michael
Geesey, in 2008, No Formal Notice, allowed to enter in 2015.
9. Valentinos Cafe, Lancaster, by Jeanine, Bartender,in 2008, corroborated by John
Valentino, Owner, No Formal Notice
10. Brunswick Hotel, Lancaster, by Staff Employees, in 2008, No Formal Notice
11. Lancaster County Library and Duke Street Business Center, by Executive Director in
March of 2009, by 1st Class Mail
12. Anne Bailey's Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster, by Manager in 2009, No Formal Notice
13. Millersville University Graduate Studies and Millersville University, Millersville, by
Lori Austin, Judicial Affairs, via Certified Mail in June of 2009.
Page 25 of 41
14. TGIF Friday's, Lancaster, by Manager, in January of 2010, No Formal Notice

15. Lucky Dog Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster, by Robert Donnelly, in January of 2010, No
Formal Notice
16. Saint Mary's Catholic Church, Lancaster, by Don Spica, Usher and Lancaster City Police
Department in Feb of 2010, No Formal Notice
17. O'Halloran's Bar, Lancaster, March 25, 2010 by Male Staff Employee. No Formal Notice.
18. Fulton Bank, Fulton Financial Corporation, March 26, 2010 by Susan Follmer, Security
Officer.
19.Tobias Frog Restaurant and Bar, August 8, 2015 by Owner of Establishment, reason
was for complaining of harassment and stalking.
20. Millersville University, July 9, 2015, served notice by Millersville University Police
Chief Pete Anders, for negotiating a civil rights complaint with Assistant to the President,
Debra Hoeckler
21.Village Nightclub, July of 20015, by George..........., Owner, tried to enter several times,
with no reason and no written notice.
22.Lucky Dog Bar, August of 2015, met Abby and Keagan Pflumm outside, went inside and
was told by bartender to leave and not come back.
23.Barley Snyder, LLC Lancaster Office, receptionist Ms. Woods refused to let me
communicate with Attorney George Werner, who in 2011 entered appearance in 05-2288
for Fulton Bank in U.S. District Court.
24.Wennerstrom Property Management Company, June 2015, went to complain
regarding harassment, threats, etc., at 1252 Fremont Street and told to leave building.
Dated: September 27, 2015
Page 26 of 41
Page 27 of 41
Page 28 of 41
Page 29 of 41
! "
"
$% &
!
" #
%
"&#
(
'
!
(
,
"
"
")
"
""
-
)
!
! "
!
'
%
" !
"
!
)
+
!
" *
"
"
,
,
,
*
%
*
(
%
!
/"0
1
1 ,
"
"
4
!
"
"
!
!
#
.
.
&,,0
%
1 ,
2"3
!
)
** ! "
&,,..$/
&,,
%
&,,
%
&
, "
"
00
"
!,
"
6
7
7 , !
&,,-
8,
:
(
$;$
"2
! " ,
, ,
** !
;
5
$
!
&,,@
,
.
&<;=
>
1
9
,
&,,=
$
,
>
A
1 B3
.+
&,,=
1 B3
2
>
%
Page 30 of 41
<
1
1
* "
!
"
C#
"$
"
<
*
&, ,
24
#9
; "
&,,@(&,,= A
3
24
5
!
%
&,,0 4
! %3
"
"
!
&,,
%
!
4
'
5
4
D
%
%
"
""
,! "
0 =
0 =9
9
00&9 00
:
9
&,,-
&, , $
!
%
!
D
%
%
=
F
!
))
+
/4
),
"
0 =
/
$
G
3
%
00
3
3
"
%#
$
$
&, ,
&,,4
!- "
.
&,,@
,
*
&,,<
E
&,,
-) !
/ 4
24
/
$
D
&, ,
D
$
&,,-
&,,0
%
D
!
D
D %
7F !
>
!
D
$
A
8F
$
%
;
D
.
%
&,,3
E
$
*
00=; 00
$
5
! 7
0 =
00
Page 31 of 41
)
A
24
$;$
00
(F
&
%
B
5
00 9
" * <
00=( 00 9
:#
> ) "" ""

$
;3
#, " !
&,,-
"
"
"
0 =
&, ,
/
.
$
B
3
3
=
0 =
) "
.
&,,1
0 =
24
" "
3
"
&,,@
" E
""
B
$
<
&,,1
.
&,,-
,-(&&
2
=
@,
"
&,
3
&,,!
&,,@
&,,@
0 =
@, 1
&,,@
9
!
@,
#" !,
0 =
" "1 ,
"
"*
":
" E
F
&,,-
!
B
/
!
"
00=( 00 9
B
:
9
$
'
.
&,,1
9
0 =
&, ,
/
.
00 9
/
&,,9
&,
( "
!
.
00
$
!
&, ,
F
3
7
8
!
&,,
&, ,
Page 32 of 41
&
, * "
&&
*#
"
&:
;!
&<
:
%
$
&, ,
$
&,,-
!-
,
5
%
"
>
$
$
< !-
24
? "
;
>
&,,0
B
&,,%
(
$
&, ,
&-
A
.+ $
&@
! :
&,,$
: , *
&, ,
* @
&,,@
"
E
3
&,,
"
&,,0
7 "!
7 "
0 =
*
&=
) "
":
)"
&,,@
"
&
&0
!
< ")
+
9 &,,@
:
9
&, ,
&,,
00
:,
!6
"
"
" .
9 &,,0
0 = "&#
, *
&,,@
/
" F
0 =
;A
0 =
F
0 =
Page 33 of 41
3
"
$
+
$
.
0 =
I $
!
0 =
.
$
"2
'
+$;F
D
"$
&,;&,
3
A
00
'
$ 24
"1E1# $
K
E
A
00&
>
L
F
F
B
F
+
0=,K
A
$
$
1
+
>
1
$
>
B
!
3
F
1
00
) % 3
&,,-
!
>
! A !
00,K
1 B3
>
F
F
& 1
F
8
! 4
'
A
! 4
A
0=,K
F
00,K
0 ,K
0<,K
3
/
>
%
&,,
) %$
D 1
"
$
0 <9 F
0@,K
0@,K
$
2!
A? D!B
#
*
$
7
+
00
D 18
.
E
$
M 1
00= E
0 =
%
0 ,K
$
0 =
M
00
!
&,,9
(
9
!
1
,-(
$ !2B+EF2
(&&
Page 34 of 41
") !
"
7!
N
.
!
5
F
(
(
5
G
*
A'
, ?
*
? 1
!,
A
(
> "
!, '!
,
B
A
" " * #" !, " "
$C
* #" !, D
73
8
* 7
,
"
"
&
"
#
.
"
#(
5
7
9
'
5
%
7A
8 !
8 !
'
!
7D .2
O
% 8
'
7
'
(
(
%
%
4
K
K
M %
%
K
'
7E
(
8
"
%
'
%(
(
(
4
;
(
7
7
87
(
(
8
8
- 7 > !,
Page 35 of 41
* , "
!
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
.
.
&
B
B
B
B
B
@
E
@
E
&. @
DD
@
. DD
"
@
& DD
@
. DD
@
& DD
@
$ DD
@
DD
@
E
DD
@
EB& DD
@
EB DD
@
& B DD
@
DD
@
& DD
@
DD
@
& DD
@
DD
B@
)
B@
DD
!
!
))
1"
)
*
!
")
1
3
1
"
)
)
, "
*"
"
, "
!
*
"
")
"
7
"!
"
*
!
*
")
!
6, "
1
5
)
>
' "
*
, "
1 ,!
, "
)
!
"
"
!
!
1
"": !
1 , 1
"": !
"
1
"": !
!
"
! * !
)
*
"E
DD
")
E DD
%
,
!
!"
, "
"
"
"
1 ,"
DD
*)
PPPPPPP "
>7
%#
'?
Stan J. Caterbone
# PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
"
Stan J. Caterbone
# PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
"
June 19, 2015

PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
Pennsylvania
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
$
Lancaster
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
19
PPPPPPP
15
June
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
&,PP
Stan J. Caterbone - I was a notary from '94-'98

PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
F
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
SJC
I
.
I
&, ,
Page 36 of 41
Don't Know When
24
$
$
Q &, , "!
I
Page 37 of 41
Page 35 of 41

06/10/2007
Page 38 of 41
Page 36 of 41

06/10/2007
Page 39 of 41
Page 40 of 41
Page 41 of 41

Third Circuit 15-3400 Lambert Appeal DOCKET With SUMMARIES of ALL Recorded Filings As of January 5, 2016

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Third Circuit 15-3400 Lambert Appeal DOCKET With SUMMARIES of ALL Recorded Filings As of January 5, 2016

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

15-3400 Docket

Case Type Information:

Date NOA Filed:

LISA MICHELLE LAMBERT

Jeremy H.G. Ibrahim, Sr., Esq.

District Attorney Lancaster County

DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY

District Attorney Lancaster County

ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA

District Attorney Lancaster County

LISA MICHELLE LAMBERT

312 pg, 15.13 MB

462 pg, 53.19 MB

528 pg, 20.01 MB

174 pg, 33.18 MB

102 pg, 4.75 MB

1585 pg, 37.55 MB

232 pg, 10.74 MB

232 pg, 9.11 MB

275 pg, 20.95 MB

128 pg, 16.12 MB

122 pg, 15.55 MB

120 pg, 5.45 MB

102 pg, 6.97 MB

114 pg, 24.94 MB

643 pg, 76.22 MB

United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania

United States District Court

Date Filed: 05/02/2014

represented by JEREMY H.G. IBRAHIM

United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF

represented by STANLEY J. CATERBONE

1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (Filing fee $ 5 receipt number

2 CJA 20 APPIONTMENT OF ATTORNEY JEREMY H.G. IBRAHIM for LISA

3 ORDER THAT JEREMY IBRAHIM, ESQ., IS APPOINTED AS PETITIONER'S

4 BRIEF ON BEHALF OF AMICI CURIAE STANLEY J. CANTERBONE AND

5 STATEMENT OF MOVANT STANLEY J. CATERBONE. (jpd, ) (Entered:

6 LETTER FROM STAN J. CATERBONE DATED 8/7/15 ADDRESSED TO THE

8 MOTION TO FILE SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by STANLEY J. CATERBONE.

7 ORDER THAT MOVANT STANLEY J. CATERBONE'S REQUEST FOR

United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania

10 MOTION TO FILE STATEMENT OF MOVANT filed by STANLEY J. CATERBONE.

11 MOVANT STANLEY J. CATERBONE'S MOTION TO FILE EXHIBT. (jpd, )

12 MOVANT STANLEY J. CATERBONE'S MOTION TO FILE STATEMENT OF

13 LETTER APPLICATION FROM TIMOTHY RICE #DU-2363 ADDRESSED TO THE

14 MOVANT STANLEY J. CATERBONE'S MOTION TO FILE EXHIBIT OF MOVANT.

15 ORDER THAT MR. CATERBONE'S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

16 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 15 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment,, Order on

17 Clerk's Notice to USCA re 16 Notice of Appeal, : (jpd, ) (Entered: 10/02/2015)

18 MOVANT STANLEY J. CATERBONE'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN

9 MOTION TO FILE SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by STANLEY J.

NOTICE of Docketing Record on Appeal from USCA re 16 Notice of Appeal, filed by

United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania

20 EX PARTE ORDER FILED UNDER SEAL. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S.

21 MOVANT STANLEY J. CATERBONE'S MOTION TO RECUSE JUDGE PAUL

23 APPLICATION BY DAVID W. BROWN FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF

PACER Service Center

Search Criteria: 5:14-cv-02559-PD

Date Filed: 10/09/2015

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

21400 UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE