Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PAPER
PAPER
VECTORING
1
ABSTRACT
Whenever an appreciable maneuvering is needed, the ultimate choice is thrust vectoring control system,
because they provide excellent survivability and improved performance in the case of military aircrafts.
Since, from the time of its inception many researchers worked on to reduce the number of actuators and in
improving the thrust vectoring angle. Even though there are different ways to achieve greater jet deflection,
Mechanical type achieved the better credits. This project deal with a mechanical type 2D vectoring nozzle and
its performance analysis. Numerical simulation of mechanical thrust vector was carried out in C-D and
SERN nozzle and the results are compared. The result proved that C-D nozzle gives better performance at
lower deflection angles, at higher angle of deflection the results proved SERN nozzles are more suitable over
C-D nozzle.
Key words: C-D and SERN Nozzle GAMBIT, FLUENT
I. INTRODUCTION
Nozzle is used to convert pressure energy into kinetic energy in order to produce thrust. For design purpose, the
nozzle can be assembly of three separate sections operating converging, throat, and diverging section Thrust vector
control is effective only while the propulsion system is operating an exhaust jet. Since, there are several types of
thrust vectoring nozzles; there are different ways to achieve the deflection of the gas jet: the most efficient one is by
mechanical deflecting the divergent section only (C-d), hence minimizing the effect on the engine upstream of the
throat (sonic) section. Thrust vectoring, also thrust vector control (TVC) is the ability of a rocket and aircraft. Thrust
vectoring greatly improves maneuverability, even at high angle of attack. Where conventional aerodynamic control
surfaces lose all effectiveness. nozzle designs which has recently has been proposed primarily for hypersonic
applications is the single expansion ramp nozzle, from the reference paper used to supersonic application of single
expansion ramp nozzle how to varying thrust parameter to be analyzed. This paper intended to provide a summary
of single expansion ramp nozzle thrust vectoring concept, studies indicate that single expansion ramp nozzles with
one fixed design point, like most fixed geometry nozzles, significant performance penalties at off-design conditions
because of changing expansion ratio, the result of an internal and external expansion process, a fixed design point
single expansion ramp nozzle still cannot perform well at far off-design condition. The internal expansion process
occurs between the nozzle throat and the trailing edge of the cowl, whereas the external expansion process occurs
the expansion ramp. The main objective and focus of the single expansion ramp nozzle is variation of the different
ramp angle and fixed cowl length angle.
0.0706 w/ m.k
2000960pa
0.8
0.8
13 e5
TABLE 3
Boundary Condition
EDGE POSITION
Left
Right
Top
Bottom
C. Initialization
NAME
Inlet
Outlet
Wall
Wall
TYPE
Pressure Inlet
Pressure Outlet
Wall
Wall
Solution initialization is done. Compute from inlet and defining convergence criteria(let the solution will be
conversed at 10e-6), defining number of iteration( let iteration number is 10000) etc. is to be done
RESULTS OF NOZZLE
The analysis of the two types of nozzles with different cases are done using the fluent software. The first CD nozzle is analyzed with the 0, 10, 20 and 30 cases and the SERN nozzle is analyzed with the 0, 10, 20 and 30
cases. Appropriate boundary conditions are applied to these two nozzles. The results are compared for various
deflection and analysis the flow separation occurred behind the divergent portion of the nozzle. Hence the nozzle
exit is examined for each flow conditions. Here by considering, Velocity, and drop pressure at the exit is plotted and
compared as shown in fig.
A. C-D NOZZLE
C-D NOZZLE
=0
= 10
= 20
= 30
1.59e5
1.50e5
1.50e5
1.50e5
621
657
665
670
2.07
2.21
2.30
2.32
SERN
=0
= 10
=2 0
= 30
3.59e5
2.51e5
1.20e5
1.00e5
585
591
688
694
1.93
2.14
2.37
2.45
CONCLUSION
CFD analysis has been done on C-D and SERN nozzles at different angles. It has been found that C-D and
SERN nozzles contribute to increase velocity and Mach number and drop the pressure in exit of the nozzles. For CD nozzle maximum normal deflect angle at 0 and 10 degree the Mach number, velocity increases because of the
deflection in divergent portion of the nozzle, so thrust vectoring also increased. The SERN nozzle deflected further
angles such as 20 and 30 degree the increased in velocity and Mach no and drop pressure in the exit of the nozzle.
Further deflection of SERN nozzles above 30 degree thrust vectoring will be increased. Compared to the four
different angles from 0 to 30 of C-D nozzle gives an increased velocity from 621m/s to 670m/s and Mach no
increased from 2.07 to 2.32 respectively and also SERN nozzle deflected from 0 to 30 the velocity increased from
585m/s to 694m/s and Mach no increased from 1.93 to 2.45 and also variation of thrust vectoring to be increased.
The results proved that C-D Nozzle gives better performance at lower deflection angles, at higher angle of deflection
the results proved SERN nozzles are more suitable over C-D nozzle.
REFERENCES
1.
Deere, K. A., Berrie, B. L., Flamm, J. D., and Johnson, S. K., Computational Study of Fluidic Thrust
Vectoring Using Separation Control in a Nozzle, AIAA Paper-2003.
2.
Flamm, J. D., Deere, K. A., Mason, M. L., Berrier, B. L., and Johnson, S. K., Experimental Study of an
Axisymmetric Dual Throat Fluidic Thrust Vectoring Nozzle for Supersonic Aircraft Application, AIAA
Paper, 2007.
3.
Murty, M. S. R., Rao, M., Chakraborty, D., Numerical Solution of Nozzle Flow Field with Jet Vane Thrust
Vector Control, Proc. IMechE Vol. 224 Part G: J. Aerospace Engineering, 2009, pp. 416- 424.
4.
Alvi, F. S., Strykowski, P. J., Krothapalli, A. and Forliti, D. J., 2000, Vectoring Thrust in Multiaxes Using
Confined Shear Layers, ASME Journal of Fluids Engineering, 122(1), 3-13.
5.
Bui, T. T., Murray, J. E., Rogers, C. E., Bartel, S., Cesaroni, A., and Denneett, M., Flight Research of an
Aerospike Nozzle Using High Power Solid Rockets, AIAA Paper 2005-3797, July 2005.
6.
P. J. Yagle, D.N. Miller, K.B. Ginnand, J.W. Hamstra Demonstration of Fluidic Throat Skewing for Thrust
Vectoring in Structurally Fixed Nozzles, Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, July 2001,
Volume 123, Issue 3,502.
7.
S.K.Damira, A. G. Marathe, K. Sudhakar and A.Issacs, Parametric Optimization of Single Expansion Ramp
Nozzle, 42nd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit 9-12 July 2006,
Sacramento, California. AIAA 2006-5188.
9.A. G. Marathe and V. Thiagarajan , Effect of Geometric Parameters on the Performance of SERN, 41st
AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit 10-13 July 2005, Tucson, Arizona .AIAA
2005-4429.