Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ijmcar - Flat H-Curvature Tensors On Hsu
Ijmcar - Flat H-Curvature Tensors On Hsu
ABSTRACT
The main object of this paper is to study the flatness of the Bochner flat, H-Projectively flat, HConharmonically flat, H-Concircurally flat, Conharmonically* flat and Conformally* flat Hsu-structure manifold.
KEYWORDS: Riemannian Curvature Tensor, Bochner Curvature Tensor, H-Projective Curvature Tensor, H- ConHarmonic Curvature Tensor, H-Con-Circular Curvature Tensor, Conharmonic* Curvature Tensor, Conformal*
Curvature Tensor and Hsu-Structure Manifold
Received: Nov 10, 2015; Accepted: Nov 16, 2015; Published: Nov 21, 2015; Paper Id.: IJMCARDEC20154
1. INTRODUCTION
If on an even dimensional manifold Vn, n = 2m of differentiability class C, there exists a vector valued
real linear function
, satisfying
2 = ar I n ,
(1.1a)
(1.1b)
r = 2 then it is a GF-structure
which includes -structure for a 0, an almost complex structure for a = i, an almost product structure for a =
1, an almost tangent structure for a =0.
Let the Hsu-structure be endowed with a metric tensor g, such that
g (X ,Y ) + a r g ( X , Y ) = 0 .
Then {, g} is said to give to Vn - metric Hsu-structure and Vn is called a metric Hsu-structure manifold.
Agreement(1.1): In what follows and the above, the equations containing X,Y,Z., etc. hold for these
arbitrary vector in Vn.
The curvature tensor K, a vector -valued tri-linear function w.r.t. the connexion D is given by
www.tjprc.org
editor@tjprc.org
38
R( X , Y ) Z = D X DY Z DY D X Z D[ X ,Y ] Z ,
(1.2a)
where
[ X , Y ] = D X Y DY X .
(1.2b)
R (X , Y )Z = R ( X , Y )Z
(1.3)
is given by
R( X , Y )Z = H {g (Y , Z )X g ( X , Z )Y }
(1.4)
Ric(Y , Z ) = (C11R)(Y , Z ).
(1.5)
1
where by (C1 R)(Y , Z ) , we mean the contraction of R ( X , Y ) Z with respect to first slot.
Ric(Y , Z ) = Ric(Z , Y ),
(1.6a)
Ric(Y , Z ) = g ( (Y ), Z ) = g (Y , (Z )),
(1.6b)
(C11 ) = k
(1.6c)
(n + 4)
[Ric(X , Z)Y Ric(Y, Z)X + g( X , Z ) (Y ) g(Y, Z) ( X ) + Ric(X , Z)Y Ric(Y, Z)X + g(X , Z ) (Y )
(n + 2)(n + 4)
+ 2 g ( X , Y ) Z ]
(1.7)
1
[ Ric (Y , Z ) X Ric ( X , Z )Y Ric (Y , Z )X + Ric ( X , Z )Y + 2 Ric ( X , Y )Z ].
( n + 2)
P( X , Y ) Z = R( X , Y ) Z
1
[ Ric ( X , Z )Y Ric(Y , Z ) X + Ric(X , Z )Y Ric(Y , Z )X + 2 Ric(X , Y )Z
(n + 4)
g ( X , Z ) (Y ) g (Y , Z ) ( X ) + g (X , Z ) (Y ) g (Y , Z ) (X ) + 2 g (X , Y ) (Z )].
(1.8)
U ( X , Y )Z = R( X , Y ) Z +
T ( X , Y )Z = R( X , Y )Z
k
[ g (Y , Z ) X g ( X , Z )Y + g (Y , Z )X g (X , Z )Y 2 g (X , Y )Z ].
n ( n + 2)
L ( X , Y ) Z = R ( X , Y ) Z +
k
[g (Y , Z ) X g ( X , Z )Y ]
( n 2)(n 1)
(1.9)
(1.10)
(1.11)
39
C ( X , Y )Z = R( X , Y )Z
1
k
[g (Y , Z ) ( X ) g ( X , Z ) (Y )] +
[g (Y , Z ) X g ( X , Z )Y ]
(n 2)
(n 2)(n 1)
(1.12)
THEOREM (2.1)
A Bochner flat Hsu-structure manifold V n if n 2 2na r n 2 a 2 r 5na 2 r 4 8a r 4a 2 r + 3n 0 is flat.
Proof: If the manifold is Bochner flat then from equaton (1.7), we get
(n + 2)
(2.1)
Now applying on X and Y in equation (2.1) and using equation (1.3), we get
)( )
+ g 2Y, Z 2 X 2Ric 2 X ,Y Z 2g 2 X ,Y (Z ) +
(n + 2)
) ]
+ 2g 2 X ,Y Z
(2.2)
(n + 2)
( )( )
k
[g(X , Z )Y g(Y , Z )X + g( X , Z ) Y g( Y , Z )
+ g ( Y , Z ) ( X ) 2Ric( X ,Y )Z 2g ( X , Y ) (Z ) +
(n + 2)
= Ric(Y , Z )X Ric(X , Z )Y g(X , Z ) (Y ) + g (Y , Z ) (X ) Ric 2 X , Z 2Y + Ric 2Y , Z 2 X g 2 X , Z 2Y
2
) ]
+ 2g 2 X ,Y Z
(2.3)
k
[g ( X , Z )Y g(Y , Z )X + g(X , Z )Y g(Y , Z )X + 2g(X ,Y )Z ]
(n + 2)
= Ric(Y, Z )X Ric(X, Z )Y g(X, Z ) (Y ) + g(Y, Z) (X ) a2r Ric( X, Z)Y + a2r Ric(Y, Z)X a2r g( X, Z ) (Y )
+ a2r g(Y, Z) ( X ) 2ar Ric( X,Y )Z 2ar g( X,Y ) (Z ) +
k
g(X, Z )Y g(Y, Z)X + a2r g( X, Z )Y a2r g(Y, Z)X + 2ar g( X,Y )Z
(n + 2)
(2.4)
Contracting of equation (2.4) w.r.t X, we get
(n
(n
4na r n 2 a 2r 4na 2r 4 8a r 4a 2r RY k a 2r 2a r 3 Y = 0
(2.5a)
(2.5b)
www.tjprc.org
editor@tjprc.org.
40
(n
2na r n 2 a 2r 5na 2r 4 8a r 4a 2r + 3n k = 0
If n 2 2na r n 2 a 2 r 5na 2 r 4 8a r 4a 2 r + 3n 0
Then k = 0 .
Putting k = 0 in equation (2.5a), we get Ric=0, since n 2 2na r n 2 a 2 r 5na 2 r 4 8a r 4a 2 r + 3n 0 . Putting
k = 0 and Ric=0 in equation (2.1), we get R=0, which proves the statement.
[(
(2.6)
Now applying on X and Y in equation (2.6) and using equation (1.3), we get
(n + 2 )R ( X , Y )Z
(2.7)
+ Ric(X , Z ) 2Y + 2Ric X , 2Y Z .
(2.8)
+ a r Ric(X , Z )Y + 2a r Ric(X , Y )Z .
(2.9)
{n(1 a ) 4a
2r
+ a 2r 1 Ric(Y , Z ) = 0 .
{(
From theorem if n 1 a 2r 4a r + a 2r 1 0
Hence Ric (Y , Z ) = 0 .
Now putting Ric = 0 in equation (2.6), we get R = 0 .
Hence the theorem.
THEOREM (2.3): A H-Conharmonically flat Hsu-structure manifold V n , n 1 2a r na 2 r a 2 r 0 is flat.
Proof: If the manifold is H-Conharmonically flat then from equation (1.9), we get
(n + 4)R( X ,Y )Z = Ric(Y, Z)X Ric( X , Z)Y Ric(X, Z)Y + Ric(Y, Z)X 2Ric(X ,Y )Z g( X, Z) (Y) + g(Y, Z) ( X )
g (X , Z ) (Y ) + g (Y , Z ) (X ) 2 g (X , Y ) (Z )
(2.10)
Now applying on X and Y in equation (2.10) and using equation (1.3), we get
41
(n + 4)R( X,Y)Z = Ric(Y, Z)X Ric(X, Z)Y Ric( 2 X, Z) 2Y + Ric(2Y, Z) 2 X 2Ric( 2 X,Y )Z g(X, Z) (Y)
+ g (Y , Z ) (X ) - g 2 X , Z ( 2Y ) + g 2Y , Z ( 2 X ) 2g 2 X ,Y (Z )
(2.11)
+ g (Y , Z ) (X ) - g 2 X , Z ( 2Y ) + g 2Y , Z ( 2 X ) 2g 2 X ,Y (Z )
(2.12)
+ g (Y , Z ) (X ) - a 2r g ( X , Z ) (Y ) + a 2r g (Y , Z ) ( X ) 2a r g ( X ,Y ) (Z )
(2.13)
(n 2 6a
+ 2a r na2r 2a 2r Ric(Y , Z ) k a 2r 1 g (Y , Z ) = 0
(2.14)
(n 2 6a
+ 2a r na 2r 2a 2r RY k a 2r 1 Y = 0
(2.15)
2 n 1 2a r na 2r a 2r k = 0
If n 1 2a r na 2r a 2r 0 , then k = 0 .
(2.16)
Now applying on X and Y in equation (2.16) and using equation (1.3), we get
n(n + 2 )R ( X , Y ) Z = k [ g (Y , Z )X g (X , Z )Y + g 2Y , Z 2 X g 2 X , Z 2Y 2 g 2 X , Y Z ].
(2.17)
Comparing equation (2.16) and (2.17) and using equation (1.3), we get
g (Y , Z ) X g ( X , Z )Y + g (Y , Z )X g (X , Z )Y 2 g (X , Y )Z == g (Y , Z )X g (X , Z )Y
+ g 2Y , Z 2 X g 2 X , Z 2Y 2g 2 X , Y Z
www.tjprc.org
(2.18)
editor@tjprc.org.
42
g (Y , Z ) X g ( X , Z )Y + g (Y , Z )X g (X , Z )Y 2 g (X , Y )Z == g (Y , Z )X g (X , Z )Y
+ a 2r g (Y , Z )X a 2r g ( X , Z )Y 2a r g ( X , Y )Z
(2.19)
{n 1 2a
na2r a 2r g (Y , Z ) = 0
If n 1 2a r na 2r a 2r 0 then g (Y , Z ) = 0 .
Putting g (Y , Z ) = 0 in equation (2.16), we get R=0. Which proves the theorem.
THEOREM (2.5): A Conharmonically* flat Hsu-structure manifold V n , n 1 a r is flat.
Proof: If the manifold is Conharmonically* flat then from equation (1.11), we get
(n 1)(n 2)R( X , Y ) Z = k [g ( X , Z )Y g (Y , Z )X ]
Applying
(2.20)
(n 1)(n 2)R( X , Y )Z = k [g (X , Z )Y g (Y , Z )X ]
(2.21)
(1 n a )g(Y , Z ) = 0
r
(2.22)
If n 1 a r then g (Y , Z ) = 0
Putting g (Y , Z ) = 0 in equation (2.20), we get R=0, this proves the theorem.
THEOREM (2.6): A Conformally* flat Hsu-structure manifold V n , n 1 a r is flat.
Proof: If the manifold is Conharmonically* flat then from equation (1.12), we get
(n 2)R( X , Y )Z = g (Y , Z ) ( X ) g ( X , Z ) (Y ) +
Applying
(n 1)
[g ( X , Z )Y g (Y , Z )X ]
(2.23)
(n 2)R( X , Y )Z = g (Y , Z ) (X ) g (X , Z ) (Y ) +
k
[g (X , Z )Y g (Y , Z )X ]
(n 1)
(2.24)
(n 1)
(n 1)
[g(X , Z )Y g(Y , Z )X ]
43
(2.25a)
Or
(n 1)(a r 1)RY ka r Y = 0
(2.25b)
(1 n a )k = 0
r
(2.25)
If n 1 a r then k = 0
CONCLUSIONS
Putting k = 0 in equation (2.25b), we get Ric=0, since n 1 a r . Putting k = 0 and Ric=0 in equation (2.23), we
get R=0, which proves the statement.
REFERENCES
1.
De U. C. and Shaikh A. A., (2007). Diferential Geometry of Manifolds, Narosa Pub. House, New Delhi.
2.
Duggal, K. L., (1971). On differentiable structures defined by algebraic equations I, Nijenhuis Tensor, N. S., 22, 238-242.
3.
Duggal, K. L., (1971). On differentiable structures defined by algebraic equations II, F-connexions, Tensor, N. S., 22, 255260.
4.
Habeeb M. Abood., (2010.) Almost Hermatian manifold with flat Bochner tensor, European Journal of pure and applied
mathematics, 3(4), 730-736.
5.
Mishra, R. S. and Pandey, S. B., (1974). On H-Conharmonic curvature tensor in Khler manifolds, Ind. J. Pure and Appl.
Math, 7(11), 1277-1287.
6.
Mishra, R. S. and Singh, S. D., (1975). Some properties of Pseudo H-Projective curvature tensor in a differentiable manifolds
equipped with KH-structures, Ind. J. Pure. And Appl. Math., 6, 444-450.
7.
Musha Jawarneh and Mohammad Tashtoush., (2011). M-Projective curvature tensor on kaehlar manifold, Int. J. Contemp.
Math. Sciences, Vol. 6, no. 33, 1607 1617.
8.
Zhen, G. Cabrerizo, J. L., Fernandez, L. M. and Fernandez, M., (1997). On conformally flat at contact metric manifolds,
Indian J. Pure Appl. Math., 28, 725-734.
9.
10. Kirichenko V. F., (1977). Differential geometry of K-spaces, Itogi, Nauki I Tehniki., VINITI, Moscow, problem geometric,
8,139-161.
11. Kobayashi S., and Nomizu K., (1969). Foundations of differential Geometry, V.II, John Wiley and Sons.
12. Mishra, R. S., (1973). A course in tensors with applications to Riemannian Geometry, II edition Pothishala Pvt. Ltd.,
Allahabad.
13. Mishra, R. S., (1984). Structure on a differentiable manifold and their applications, Chandrama Prakashan, 50-A, Balrampur
House, Allahabad.
www.tjprc.org
editor@tjprc.org.