Unconscious mind

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Mind and Brain portal
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve the article or discuss these issues on the talk page.

 It needs additional references or sources for verification. Tagged since January 2010.
 It may contain original research or unverifiable claims. Tagged since January 2010.
 It may require general cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. Tagged since January 2010.

The unconscious mind is a term invented by the 18th century German philosophy romantic philosopher Sir Christopher Riegel and
later introduced into English by the poet and essayist Samuel Taylor Coleridge.[1] The unconscious mind might be defined as that part
of the mind which gives rise to a collection of mental phenomena that manifest in a person's mind but which the person is not aware of
at the time of their occurrence. These phenomena include unconscious feelings, unconscious or automatic skills, unnoticed
perceptions, unconscious thoughts, unconscious habits and automatic reactions, complexes, hidden phobias and concealed desires.

The unconscious mind can be seen as the source of night dreams and automatic thoughts (those that appear without apparent cause);
the repository of memories that have been forgotten but that may nevertheless be accessible to consciousness at some later time; and
the locus of implicit knowledge, i.e. all the things that we have learned so well that we do them without thinking. One familiar
example of the operation of the unconscious is the phenomenon where one fails to immediately solve a given problem and then
suddenly has a flash of insight that provides a solution maybe days later at some odd moment during the day.

Observers throughout history have argued that there are influences on consciousness from other parts of the mind. These observers
differ in the use of related terms, including: unconsciousness as a personal habit; being unaware and intuition. Terms related to semi-
consciousness include: awakening, implicit memory, subliminal messages, trances, hypnagogia, and hypnosis. Although sleep, sleep
walking, dreaming, delirium and coma may signal the presence of unconscious processes, these processes are not the unconscious
mind. Science is in its infancy in exploring the limits of consciousness.

Contents

[hide]

 1 Historical overview
 2 Unconscious processes and the unconscious mind
 3 Freud and the psychoanalytic unconscious
o 3.1 Jung's collective unconscious
o 3.2 Lacan's linguistic unconscious
o 3.3 Controversy
 4 Unconscious mind in contemporary cognitive psychology
o 4.1 Research
o 4.2 Unconscious processing of information about frequency
o 4.3 Artificial grammars
o 4.4 Unconscious acquisition of procedural knowledge
o 4.5 A note on terminology: "unconscious" vs. "nonconscious"
 5 References
 6 Notes
 7 See also
 8 External links

[edit] Historical overview

The idea of an unconscious mind originated in antiquity[2] and has been explored across cultures. It was recorded between 2500 and
600 BC in the Hindu texts known as the Vedas, found today in Ayurvedic medicine.[3][4][5][6] In the Vedic worldview, consciousness is
the basis of physiology[7][8] and pure consciousness is "an abstract, silent, completely unified field of consciousness" [9] within "an
architecture of increasingly abstract, functionally integrated faculties or levels of mind". [10]

Paracelsus is credited as providing the first scientific mention of the unconscious in his work Von den Krankheiten (translates as
"About illnesses", 1567), and his clinical methodology created an entire system that is regarded as the beginning of modern scientific
psychology.[11] Shakespeare explored the role of the unconscious[12] in many of his plays, without naming it as such.[13][14][15] Western
philosophers such as Spinoza, Leibniz, Schopenhauer, Kierkegaard, and Nietzsche, developed a western view of mind which
foreshadowed those of Freud. Schopenhauer was also influenced by his reading of the Vedas.

Articulating the idea of something not conscious or actively denied to awareness with the symbolic constructs of language has been a
process of human thought and interpersonal influence for millennia.

The resultant status of the unconscious mind may be viewed as a social construction—that the unconscious exists because people
agree to behave as if it exists.[16] Symbolic interactionism goes further and argues that people's selves (conscious and unconscious)
though purposeful and creative are nevertheless social products.[17]

[edit] Unconscious processes and the unconscious mind

Neuroscience supports the proposition of the unconscious mind.[18] For example, researchers at Columbia University Medical Center
have found that fleeting images of fearful faces—images that appear and disappear so quickly that they escape conscious awareness—
produce unconscious anxiety that can be detected in the brain with the latest neuroimaging machines. [19] The conscious mind is
hundreds of milliseconds behind the unconscious processes.

To understand this type of research, a distinction has to be made between unconscious processes and the unconscious mind: they are
not the same. Neuroscience is more likely to examine the former than the latter. The unconscious mind and its expected
psychoanalytic contents[20][21][22][23][24][25] are also different from unconsciousness, coma and a minimally conscious state. The differences
in the uses of the term can be explained, to a degree, by different narratives about what we know. One such narrative is psychoanalytic
theory.[26]

[edit] Freud and the psychoanalytic unconscious

Probably the most detailed and precise of the various notions of 'unconscious mind'—and the one which most people will immediately
think of upon hearing the term—is that developed by Sigmund Freud and his followers. It lies at the heart of psychoanalysis.

Consciousness, in Freud's topographical view (which was his first of several psychological models of the mind), was a relatively thin
perceptual aspect of the mind. The unconscious was considered by Freud throughout the evolution of his psychoanalytic theory a
sentient force of will influenced by human drive and yet operating well below the perceptual conscious mind. For Freud, the
unconscious is the storehouse of instinctual desires, needs, and psychic actions. While past thoughts and memories may be deleted
from immediate consciousness, they direct the thoughts and feelings of the individual from the realm of the unconscious.

Freud divided mind into the conscious mind or ego and two parts of the unconscious: the id or instincts and the superego. He used the
idea of the unconscious in order to explain certain kinds of neurotic behavior.

In this theory, the unconscious refers to that part of mental functioning of which subjects make themselves unaware.[27]

Freud proposed a vertical and hierarchical architecture of human consciousness: the conscious mind, the preconscious, and the
unconscious mind—each lying beneath the other. He believed that significant psychic events take place "below the surface" in the
unconscious mind,[28] like hidden messages from the unconscious—a form of intrapersonal communication out of awareness. He
interpreted these events as having both symbolic and actual significance.

For psychoanalysis, the unconscious does not include all that is not conscious, rather only what is actively repressed from conscious
thought or what the person is averse to knowing consciously. In a sense this view places the self in relationship to their unconscious as
an adversary, warring with itself to keep what is unconscious hidden. The therapist is then a mediator trying to allow the unspoken or
unspeakable to reveal itself using the tools of psychoanalysis. Messages arising from a conflict between conscious and unconscious
are likely to be cryptic. The psychoanalyst is presented as an expert in interpreting those messages.
For Freud, the unconscious was a repository for socially unacceptable ideas, wishes or desires, traumatic memories, and painful
emotions put out of mind by the mechanism of psychological repression. However, the contents did not necessarily have to be solely
negative. In the psychoanalytic view, the unconscious is a force that can only be recognized by its effects—it expresses itself in the
symptom.

Unconscious thoughts are not directly accessible to ordinary introspection, but are supposed to be capable of being "tapped" and
"interpreted" by special methods and techniques such as meditation, random association, dream analysis, and verbal slips (commonly
known as a Freudian slip), examined and conducted during psychoanalysis.

Freud's theory of the unconscious was substantially transformed by some of his followers, among them Carl Jung and Jacques Lacan.

[edit] Jung's collective unconscious

Main articles: Collective unconscious and Carl Jung

Carl Jung developed the concept further. He divided the unconscious into two parts: the personal unconscious and the collective
unconscious. The personal unconscious is a reservoir of material that was once conscious but has been forgotten or suppressed.

The collective unconscious is the deepest level of the psyche containing the accumulation of inherited psychic structures and
archetypal experiences. There is a considerable two way traffic between the ego and the personal unconscious. For example, your
attention can wander from this article to a memory of something you did yesterday.

[edit] Lacan's linguistic unconscious

Main article: Jacques Lacan

Jacques Lacan's psychoanalytic theory contends that the unconscious is structured like a language.

The unconscious, Lacan argued, was not a more primitive or archetypal part of the mind separate from the conscious, linguistic ego,
but rather, a formation every bit as complex and linguistically sophisticated as consciousness itself.

If the unconscious is structured like a language, Lacan argues, then the self is denied any point of reference to which to be "restored"
following trauma or "identity crisis". In this way, Lacan's thesis of the structurally dynamic unconscious is also a challenge to the ego
psychology of Anna Freud and her American followers.

Lacan's idea of how language is structured is largely taken from the structural linguistics of Ferdinand de Saussure and Roman
Jakobson, based on the function of the signifier and signified in signifying chains. This may leave Lacan's entire model of mental
functioning open to severe critique, since in mainstream linguistics, Saussurean models have largely been replaced.

The starting point for the linguistic theory of the unconscious was a re-reading of Freud's The Interpretation of Dreams. There, Freud
identifies two mechanisms at work in the formation of unconscious fantasies: condensation and displacement. Under Lacan's linguistic
reading, condensation is identified with the linguistic trope of metaphor, and displacement with metonymy.

Lacan applied the ideas of de Saussure and Jakobson to psychoanalytic practice. For example, while de Saussure described the
linguistic sign as a relationship between a signified and an arbitrary signifier, Lacan inverted the relationship, putting in first place the
signifier as determining the signified, and so being closer to Freud's position that human beings know what they say only as a result of
a chain of signifiers, a-posteriori. Lacan began this work with the case of Emma (1895) from Freud, whose symptoms were
disenchained in a two-phase temporal process[clarification needed]. Lacan allowed many young people, by this bias, to begin re-reading Freud
as more akin to modernity than cognitive psychology.[citation needed] For Lacan, modernity is the era when humans begin to grasp their
essential dependence on language.

[edit] Controversy

Today, there are still fundamental disagreements within psychology about the nature of the unconscious mind. It may simply stand as
a metaphor that ought not to be refined. Outside formal psychology, a whole world of pop-psychological speculation has grown up in
which the unconscious mind is held to have any number of properties and abilities, from animalistic and innocent, child-like aspects to
savant-like, all-perceiving, mystical and occultic properties.
There is a great controversy over the concept of an unconscious in regard to its scientific or rational validity and whether the
unconscious mind exists at all. Among philosophers, Karl Popper was one of Freud's most notable contemporary opponents. Popper
argued that Freud's theory of the unconscious was not falsifiable, and therefore not scientific. He objected not so much to the idea that
things happened in our minds that we are unconscious of; he objected to investigations of mind that were not falsifiable. If one could
connect every imaginable experimental outcome with Freud's theory of the unconscious mind, then no experiment could refute the
theory.

In the social sciences, John Watson, considered to be the first American behaviourist, criticized the idea of an "unconscious mind,"
using a similar line of reasoning, and instead focused on observable behaviors rather than on introspection.

Unlike Popper, the epistemologist Adolf Grunbaum argued that psychoanalysis could be falsifiable, but its evidence has serious
epistemological problems. David Holmes[29] examined sixty years of research about the Freudian concept of "repression", and
concluded that there is no positive evidence for this concept. Given the lack of evidence of many Freudian hypotheses, some scientific
researchers proposed the existence of unconscious mechanisms that are very different from the Freudian ones. They speak of a
"cognitive unconscious" (John Kihlstrom),[30][31] an "adaptive unconscious" (Timothy Wilson),[32] or a "dum unconscious" (Loftus &
Klinger),[33] which executes automatic processes but lacks the complex mechanisms of repression and symbolic return of the repressed.

Ludwig Wittgenstein and Jacques Bouveresse argued that Freudian thought exhibits a systemic confusion between reasons and causes:
the methods of interpretation can give reasons for new meanings, but are useless to find causal relations (which require experimental
research). Wittgenstein gave the following example (in his Conversations with Rush Rhees): if we throw objects on a table, and we
give free associations and interpretations about those objects, we'll find a meaning for each object and its place, but we won't find the
causes.

Other critics of Freudian unconscious were Hans Eysenck, Jacques Van Rillaer, Frank Cioffi, Marshal Edelson, Edward Erwin.

Some stress, however, that these critics did not grasp the real importance of Freud's conceptions, and rather tried to criticize Freud on
the basis of other fields.[citation needed] The first who really grasped this was Bertrand Russell (see for example: "The impact of science in
society", 1952). But in modern times, many other thinkers, as for example Althusser, and Bernard-Henri-Levy, managed to grasp the
"falsification theory" from Popper, and the critics from Eysenck, as another expression of Master's discourse: the aspiration to a so-
called scientific society led by evaluation. (For this side of the controversy, cf. the works of Jean-Claude Milner in France.)

In modern cognitive psychology, many researchers have sought to strip the notion of the unconscious from its Freudian heritage, and
alternative terms such as "implicit" or "automatic" have come into currency. These traditions emphasize the degree to which cognitive
processing happens outside the scope of cognitive awareness, and show that things we are unaware of can nonetheless influence other
cognitive processes as well as behavior.[34][35][36][37][38] Active research traditions related to the unconscious include implicit memory (see
priming, implicit attitudes), and nonconscious acquisition of knowledge (see Lewicki, see also the section on cognitive perspective,
below).

[edit] Unconscious mind in contemporary cognitive psychology

[edit] Research

While, historically, the psychoanalytic research tradition was the first to focus on the phenomenon of unconscious mental activity,
there is an extensive body of conclusive research and knowledge in contemporary cognitive psychology devoted to the mental activity
that is not mediated by conscious awareness.

Most of that (cognitive) research on unconscious processes has been done in the mainstream, academic tradition of the information
processing paradigm. As opposed to the psychoanalytic tradition, driven by the relatively speculative (in the sense of being hard to
empirically verify), theoretical concepts such as the Oedipus complex or Electra complex, the cognitive tradition of research on
unconscious processes is based on relatively few theoretical assumptions and is very empirically oriented (i.e., it is mostly data
driven). Cognitive research has revealed that automatically, and clearly outside of conscious awareness, individuals register and
acquire more information than what they can experience through their conscious thoughts.

[edit] Unconscious processing of information about frequency

For example, an extensive line of research conducted by Hasher and Zacks[39] has demonstrated that automatically (i.e., outside of
conscious awareness and without engaging conscious information processing resources), individuals register information about the
frequency of events. Moreover, that research demonstrates that perceivers do so unintentionally, truly "automatically", regardless of
the instructions they receive, and regardless of the information processing goals they have. Interestingly, their ability to unconsciously,
and relatively accurately tally the frequency of events appears to have little or no relation to the individual's age, education,
intelligence, or personality, thus it may represent one of the fundamental building blocks of human orientation in the environment and
possibly the acquisition of procedural knowledge and experience, in general.

[edit] Artificial grammars

Another line of (non-psychoanalytic) early research on unconscious processes was initiated by Arthur Reber, using so-called "artificial
grammar" methodology. That research revealed that individuals exposed to novel words created by complex sets of artificial, synthetic
"grammatical" rules (e.g., GKHAH, KHABT...), quickly develop some sort of a "feel" for that grammar and subsequent working
knowledge of that grammar, as demonstrated by their ability to differentiate between, new grammatically "correct" (i.e., consistent
with the rules) and "incorrect" (inconsistent) words. Interestingly, that ability does not appear to be mediated, or even accompanied by
the declarative knowledge of the rules (i.e., individuals' ability to articulate how they distinguish between the correct and incorrect
words).

[edit] Unconscious acquisition of procedural knowledge

The gist of these early findings (from the '70s) has been significantly extended in the '80s and '90s by further research showing that
outside of conscious awareness individuals not only acquire information about frequencies (i.e., "occurrences" of features or events)
but also co-occurrences (i.e., correlations or, technically speaking, covariations) between features or events. Extensive research on
nonconscious acquisition of information about covariations was conducted by Pawel Lewicki, followed by research of D. L. Schachter
(who is known for introducing the concept of implicit memory), L. R. Squire, and others.

In the learning phase of a typical study, participants were exposed to a stream of stimuli (trials or events, such as strings of letters,
digits, pictures, or descriptions of stimulus persons) containing some consistent but non-salient (hidden) covariation between features
or events. For example, every stimulus person presented as "fair" would also have a slightly elongated face. It turned out that even if
the manipulated covariations were non-salient and inaccessible to subjects' conscious awareness, the perceivers would still acquire a
nonconscious working knowledge about those covariations. For example, if in the testing phase of the study, participants were asked
to make intuitive judgements about the personalities of new stimulus persons presented only as pictures (with no personality
descriptions), and judge the "fairness" of the depicted individuals, they tend to follow the rules nonconsciously acquired in the
learning phase and if the stimulus person had a slightly elongated face, they would report an intuitive feeling that this person was
"fair".

Nonconscious acquisition of information about covariations appears to be one of the fundamental and ubiquitous processes involved
in the acquisition of knowledge (skills, experience) or even preferences or personality dispositions, including disorders or symptoms
of disorders.

[edit] A note on terminology: "unconscious" vs. "nonconscious"

Unlike in the psychoanalytic research tradition that uses the terms "unconscious", in the cognitive tradition, the processes that are not
mediated by conscious awareness are sometimes referred to as "nonconscious". This term, rarely used in psychoanalysis, stresses the
empirical and purely descriptive nature of that phenomenon (a qualification as simply "not being conscious") in the tradition of
cognitive research.

Specifically, the process is non-conscious when even highly motivated individuals fail to report it, and few theoretical assumptions are
made about the process (unlike in psychoanalysis where, for example, it is postulated that some of these processes are being repressed
in order to achieve certain goals.)

[edit] References

1. ^ Bynum, Browne & Porter, The Macmillan Dictionary of the History of Science, London, 1981, p.292