Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LavoieHeywoodKeck CombustionSciTechnol 1 313 1970
LavoieHeywoodKeck CombustionSciTechnol 1 313 1970
313-326
A thermodynamic model which predicts the properties of the burnt and unburnt gases during the combustion
process is developed. A set of reactions which govern the formation of nitric oxide is proposed, and rate equations
for nitric oxide concentrations as a function of time in the post-flame gases are derived. The results of time-resolved
measurements carried alit on a CFR engine are described, where emitted light intensities at wavelengths selected
to record radiation from the CO
0 and NO
+0
The comparison between theoretical and experimental results for fuel-lean mixtures confirms that the important
features of the model presented are correct.
I. INTRODUCTION
It is now accepted that nitric oxide in the exhaust
gases of combustion devices is one of the pollutants
which react in the atmosphere to form photochemical smog. The automobile is the largest
single source of nitric oxide. It contributes about
50 per cent overall of the total emitted, though in
the Los Angeles basin, where the smog problem is
most severe, its contribution is significantly higher.
The processes which govern the production of
nitric oxide inside the engine cylinder are not well
understood, however. Since legislation which will
limit the amount of nitric oxide which automobile
engines can exhaust into the atmosphere is anticipated in the near future, a more basic understanding
of the production mechanism is essential.
Most of the previous work on nitric oxide production has involved correlations of nitric oxide
concentrations measured in the exhaust gases with
the engine operating parameters such as fuel/air
ratio, spark advance, engine speed, exhaust manifold pressure (e.g., Huls and Nickol (1967), Hazen
and Holiday (1962), Alperstein and Bradow (1966),
Wimmer and McReynolds (1961)). From such
studies a qualitative understanding of the process
has been built up. For example, modifications in
engine operating conditions which increase the peak
cycle temperature, or the oxygen concentration in
the burnt gases increase the nitric oxide concentration in the exhaust. The measured nitric oxide
levels are found to be nearer the equilibrium concentration corresponding to the peak cycle temperature and pressure, than to the equilibrium
concentration at exhaust conditions.
Two previous papers have proposed possible
314
where
(2)
feb
dx'
Le"
(3)
dx',
(4)
e. = cv.T. + h/.,
(5)
and
(6)
where c v. , C v ,, ' hI' and h/" are constants obtained by
fitting straight lines to the specific energy versus
temperature curves.
Substituting equations (I), (2), (5) and (6) into
(3) and (4), we obtain
pV!M
xR.f.
+ (I
- x)R"f"
(7)
and
(E - W - Q)!M
= x(c".f. + h/.) + (I
f. =
U:T"dX')/'
7'" =
- x)
h/,,)
(8)
(9)
and
x)
(10)
are the mean temperatures of the burned and unburned gases. Equations (7) and (8) may now be
solved to obtain
pV -
Mx
PoVo
+ (y" + (y. -
+ Q)
y")Mc,,,.(f,, - To)
I)(W
(II)
and
R"f.
conservation of mass,
VIM =
x (c,." T"
pv" = R"T",
(E - W - Q)!M
R"T"
+ (pV -
MR"f,,)!Mx,
(12)
w=
pc/V'.
(14)
1'0
(15)
(16)
hl b + C p"T,,(x')]/c pb
(17)
3t5
316
+ O 2~ NO +
(2) N
(3) N
2900
OH
NO
31.8;
k2 = 2
39.4;
= 7 X 10-11
k3
~ 2700
::>
....
(4) H
+ N 20 ~ N 2+
(5) 0
+ N 20 ~ N 2+ O 2+
(6) 0
+ N 20
OH + 62.4;
k. = 5 X 10- 11 e- IO8/ 1/7'
79.2;
k 5 = 6 X 1O-lIe-24.o/wr
a:
0-
::!:
NO
NO
kG
....
__;:o-';;_ _----;;:-!;;;,....-_--;-;::
2300~_ _~=-
1.0
X 1O- lIe-7.'/II1'
+ 36.4;
= 8 X 10- 11 e- 24.0/ 111'
dt
-a(fJR,
+ R, +
R2
fJ(R 2
R3
R3)
2aR G)
2yR G
(18)
I d[N]V
----
dt
= -fJ(aR, +
R2
R,
+ a(R 2 +
R5
+ R G) +
R.
R a)
R a) (19)
I d[N 20]V
(I)
NO
N 2+ 0
+
k,
75.0;
= 2 X 10- 11
dt
= -y(R. +
5+ ry, R
2
(20)
317
d[NO)V = 2(1 -
0(2)
dt
(1 +R,O(K, + -----.&....-)
1+ K
2
(21)
where K 1 = R./(R 2 + R 3 ) and K, = R./(R. + R.).
Note that we have not assumed N is in equilibrium
with N 2 through the dissociation reaction N 2 +
M"'" N + N + M. This reaction is too slow to
bring N into equilibrium at the pressures and
temperatures of interest.
The first term in the large brackets on the right
side of equation (21) is the result of reactions (1)(3). It corresponds to the Zeldovich mechanism
extended by adding thereaction between Nand OH.
The second term is the result of reactions (4)-(6)
which involve N 2 0 as an intermediary. It is this
term which under some conditions is kinetically
equivalent to the 2NO "'" N 2 + O 2 reaction.
Values of K 1 and K, are given in Table 1 for a
range of temperatures and equivalence ratios. In
general K1 and K 2 are of order unity or less, and
thus for small 0( the relative importance of the two
mechanisms just described is determined by the
TABLE I
(a) Values of K,
T= 3000 OK
2500
2000
1500
1> = 0.8
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.1
1.0
1.2
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.8
0.2
0.1
0.06
0.02
1> = 0.8
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.8
1.0
0.2
8 x 10-'
3 x 10-'
5 x 10-'
1.2
5 X
5 X
7 x
4 X
(b) Values of K,
T = 3000 oK
2500
2000
1500
10-'
10- 3
10-'
10-'
TABLE II
Values of R,/R,
1> = 0.8
T= 3000 "K
2500
1000
1500
4
9
5
X
X
X
10-'
10-'
10- 1
1.0
I X 10-'
3 X 10-'
5 X 10-'
I X 10-'
1.2
I
4
9
X
X
X
X
10-'
10-'
10-'
10-'
318
Pi
P~--J~
I
I
I
I
/ S bj
_
~+--
--~~~R~NED
I I GAS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
---1-
UNBURNED
GAS
~--
hi
Pi
Su = const
Pj
(22)
pressure-temperature-enthalpy plot.
ms
z
o
1.0,---r----,----.---...,------,
I-
0:
LJ..
0.4
W
N
0:
1L
o
FIG. 5. Frozen nitric oxide mass fraction as a
function of value of x at which element burned.
lntegrated value gives exhaust concentration.
10
V. TIME-RESOLVED MEASUREMENTS OF
NITRIC OXIDE CONCENTRATION
and
I~n =
K2(T)[NO][0]
'
I EXHA UST
,
,
I
I
/,'GJ~-,W'-
ENGINE HEAD
A
AND
COMBUSTION
CHAMBER
SPARK PLUG
WINDOW
PRESSURE
VALVE
1/
,
I
I
\
'I
V '
,,-
1-.-
TOP
VIEw
319
f- - -
'=.l
- -
-;..---
P "
/ tyj'I
\:J
10--8-8- - 8 --8-:- -- _J
1-
/' - ,
,{
INLET,
V J
--_\_'r,;;.../ @
\,2
4 I
C\
"
C\
I!!.J
'''~-'--- - -""--
~I'
_...-:
GAUGE
SECTION
A-A
- -
INLET
--
--"
...., ,'I
I
"I I 'I
Ij'
,I
"
PISTON
TOP OF STROKE
FIG. 6. Engine head and combustion chamber design for L.head, C.F.R. Engine.
OPTICAL T R A I N
SCHEMATIC
322
10 10..---.,...,-----,--,-----,-----,-------,---,---,-----,-----,-------,
-.
10 9
d I
dA.dndA
r9 s
sec cm 3
10 8
CD
CD
@
10 7
1.2
0.9
FIG. II. Spectral intensity observed at three consecutive times during the cycle, before, at, and after peak pressure
as shown by the corresponding circled numbers on the pressure-time schematic.
f'ruc$ro~%
all* ~ ^ i l L f ~ i l t j ;a1
~ f l0.6%fs due tat hechsaaail.garg~gzac.kcealf ratliaeictla, ,;41fE.rt,tagla the prc~iicacd\ L X ~ ~a@'X C
f i\ df,75 ku8acd am al~eptrI3li4hcd r;iich ~i.~~jil
t h ~
eq~xilikri8un-imhia of P$$) 10 NO, for thi5 teanllac~
atairc, 3 $31~6:
ofSJ'= II.4 fit%the i.iitt>i ,E~ae~~er
;tnd i%
rmog irm scriotas dii9ia~f-c.eramci1tcc,g-ahidcring the t2r.ncert;llncEes irm tf~e.thapc.t and $he~-;ldi;atioi~
~*ca~-ast2xfif\
re1atrs.e to tme ;i~~oili(er,
The tnDuc o f f ' = 0-4 axii\
:mot uh8aericd it) tar:, to tx itkin the experinaenr;i$
era-or, thn,~lgltu~atthe rringe of casx~!itic%a~>
ssxc~~xa~ntered
1 0 tiah: cupcrgsa-nent [rich a i d 1caa-a-ia=rric
oxis%eadtied ;;119~i floe ;tdsled) arld
hcea~t;thaera at.
he c0~14f;azatii%ralat:a redirctir'ln,
i n prin-ocipiie,~irn~iltralaee.an~,
recorsli ns csf E%fc%\h$fC
:uad light i~~ne~-a.iitic..a
;PI ;a; g i w s % I P C ; ~ ~ ~ L%'r0~31
,EB t%50
~ ~ a % c i e r ~~cjarc"ac:~$X~mg
gtk~
tiite CCO 0 and F;$T 0
ctslatgn-aua,yiie1J1 ihs: tcga-nper;attlre, C91, C), am4 S(1
cotmccs-mtra1itam ;lip O ~ E ~ ~ ~ iXt %P Sect
C L ~
itfa $'Q % 1. Is2
pt-actice, ~ne,.asbsre~lsensh
J'TQP~P ;I gi~elaaiz~sfec ~ c f e
324
dAd
n ex
o
FIG. 13. Radiation intensity observed just after
the reaction zone at various wavelengths plotted
against percent NO added. For clarity only points
for 0.54 It are shown.
~
sec cm 3
325
-30
1.5
-20
CRANK ANGLE
-10
10
20
/--
- - RATE CONTROLLED /
/
SOLUTION
1.0
40
......
50
60
, ,~EARLY
--.:.- EXPERIMENT
WINDOW W2
-0-
30
....<,
~URNED
.............
WINDOW W3
---
NO
0.5
/1
/,'
---
.- ......F
F3 '
- '
"",
LATE
10
TIME
15
MS
FIG. 15. Experimental NO concentrations observed at two windows. W, is closer to the spark than W,. Dolled
curves are computer solutions for the kinetic NO behavior of early and late burned gas, 4> = 0.9.
CRANK
ANGLE
- 30 - 20 -10
o 10 20 30 40 50 60
I. 5 ,-----,-----,--~-...,_---,-----,---___,_-__,__-_r--____,
----&-
--0-
RATE CONTROLLED
/ -- - ......
,
EARLY
SOLUTION
/
"BURNED
1.0 % NO ADDED
/
"
/
...... ~
0% NO ADDED
~
I
F...........
I
1.0
......
NO
/
I
/
/
0.5
/
/
--~
--
.- ......
;"
F
5
15
TIME
MS
FIG. 16. Experimental NO concentrations at W, with and without NO added. Kinetic solutions are shown, '"
= 0.9.
326
VI. CONCLUSIONS
'The time-resolved experimental measurements
and the data reduction described in this paper confirm that these features should be included in models
used to predict the nitric oxide concentrations found
in spark ignition engines.
I. Both the formation and decomposition of
nitric oxide in the post-flame gases are rate limited at
the conditions under which I.C. engines normally
operate.
2. At least in the lean case, the nitric oxide
formed in the flame front is negligible.
3. The state of the burned gas is not uniform; a
substantial temperature gradient, and hence nitric
oxide concentration gradient exists behind the
name zone.