Measurement Systems Analysis - Summary Report

Gage Name:

#VALUE!

Characteristic:

Hole Depth

Gage Number:

#VALUE!

Gage Type:

#VALUE!

Range of Dimension:

Gage R&R
Date Performed:

Performed By:

% RR of Tolerance

86.2%

Bias
Date Performed:

Performed By:

Bias:

#DIV/0!

#DIV/0!

Linearity
Date Performed:

30-Dec-99

Slope (a):

#DIV/0!

#DIV/0!

Performed By:

Intercept (b):

#DIV/0!

#DIV/0!

Goodness of Fit:

#DIV/0!

#DIV/0!

Stability
Date Started:

30-Dec-99

Performed By:

Conclusion:

Gage was stable for 20 days.

Gage was NOT stable for 20 days.

Gage is acceptable for all parameters.

Gage is NOT Acceptable for all parameters and will not be used.
Gage is NOT Acceptable for all parameters but will be used for the following reasons.

Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03

ystems Analysis - Summary Report

Gage system may be acceptable based on importance of application and cost

or all parameters but will be used for the following reasons.

Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03

Measurement Systems Analysis - Gage R&R Study

Part Number and Name:
Characteristic:
USL
LSL

XX-XXX-XX
Hole Depth

Gage Name:
Gage Number:

0.314
0.308

Digital Depth Micrometer

XXXX

Gage Type:

Date Measured:
Performed By:

?
?

Depth Micrometer

Part
Appraiser/Trial #
Appraiser A
Trial 1
(Name)
Trial 2
(Title / Function)
Trial 3
Average A
Range A

1
0.3097
0.3096
0.3091
0.3095
0.0006

2
0.3078
0.3076
0.3084
0.3079
0.0008

3
0.3076
0.3076
0.3084
0.3079
0.0008

4
0.3087
0.3087
0.3083
0.3086
0.0004

5
0.3074
0.3088
0.3092
0.3085
0.0018

6
0.3074
0.3086
0.3068
0.3076
0.0018

7
0.3079
0.3094
0.3079
0.3084
0.0015

8
0.3084
0.3085
0.308
0.3083
0.0005

9
0.3069
0.3088
0.3095
0.3084
0.0026

10
0.3077
0.3063
0.3087
0.3076
0.0024

0.3083 Xbar A
0.0013 Rbar A

Appraiser B
(Name)
(Title / Function)

Trial 1
Trial 2
Trial 3
Average B
Range B

0.3086
0.3086
0.3086
0.3086
0.0000

0.3096
0.3076
0.308
0.3084
0.0020

0.3081
0.3076
0.3086
0.3081
0.0010

0.3099
0.3092
0.3083
0.3091
0.0016

0.3076
0.3087
0.3094
0.3086
0.0018

0.307
0.3086
0.3091
0.3082
0.0021

0.3095
0.3097
0.3102
0.3098
0.0007

0.3065
0.3075
0.3077
0.3072
0.0012

0.3106
0.3088
0.3094
0.3096
0.0018

0.3069
0.3075
0.3067
0.3070
0.0008

0.3085 Xbar B
0.0013 Rbar B

Trial 1
Trial 2
Trial 3
Average C
Range C

0.3088
0.307
0.3089
0.3082
0.0019
0.0033
0
0.3088

0.3091
0.3083
0.3079
0.3084
0.0012
0.0033
0
0.3083
0.7071

0.3088
0.3086
0.309
0.3088
0.0004
0.0033
0
0.3083
0.5231

0.3088
0.3074
0.3092
0.3085
0.0018
0.0033
0
0.3087
0.4467

0.309
0.309
0.3087
0.3089
0.0003
0.0033
0
0.3086
0.403

0.3071 .3079.
0.3075
0.3089
0.3087
0.3072
0.3078
0.3081
0.0016
0.0017
0.0033
0.0033
0
0
0.3079
0.3088
0.3742
0.3534

0.3077
0.3087
0.3087
0.3084
0.0010
0.0033
0
0.3080
0.3375

0.307
0.3086
0.3091
0.3082
0.0021
0.0033
0
0.3087
0.3249

0.3075
0.3074
0.3075
0.3075
0.0001
0.0033
0
0.3074
0.3146

Appraiser C
(Name)
(Title / Function)

UCL
LCL
Part Average
K3(Constant)

Average of 3 Ranges
XbarDif
UCL
LCL
Repeatability(EV)
Reproducibility(AV)
Gage R & R
Tolerance
Part Variation
Total Variation
NDC

%
%
%
%

EV
AV
Gage R & R
PV

0.0013
0.0002
0.0032938
0
0.0008
0.0000
0.0008
0.006
0.0004
0.0009
1

5 Trials
2.11
0

4 Trials
2.28
0

0.7071
2 Ops

0.5231
3 Ops

Constants
3 Trials
2.58
0
0.5908

2 Trials
3.27
0
0.8862

# Parts
10

#Trials
3

# Trials
D4
D3
K1
K2

% of Total
% of
Variation
Tolerance
86.18%
12.57%
0.00%
0.00%
86.18%
12.57%
50.72%
7.40%

Conclusion:

Gage system may be acceptable based on importance of application and

Instructions:

Just enter your measurement data in Cells C11:L13, C17:L19, C23:L25

The template will automatically calculate all of the values based on your data

Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03

0.3083 Xbar C
0.0012 Rbar C

0.0014 RP (Range of Part Averages)

UCL represents the limit of the individual R's

Circle those beyond the limit.
Identify and correct causes
LCL = 0 D3=0 for up to 7 trials

Stacked Average Chart

0.3500

Average

0.3000
0.2500
0.2000
0.1500
0.1000
0.0500
0.0000
1

Part Reading
Appraiser A

Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03

Appraiser B

Appraiser C

UCL

LCL

10

nt Systems Analysis - Gage R&R Study

?
?

RP (Range of Part Averages)

Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03

Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03

Measurement Systems Analysis - Gage R&R Study

Part Number and Name:
Characteristic:

Gage Name:
Gage Number:

USL
LSL

2
1

Date Measured:
Performed By:

Gage Type:

Part
2
-0.56
-0.68
-0.58
-0.6067
0.1200

3
1.34
1.17
1.27
1.2600
0.1700

4
0.47
0.5
0.64
0.5367
0.1700

5
-0.8
-0.92
-0.84
-0.8533
0.1200

6
0.02
-0.11
-0.21
-0.1000
0.2300

7
8
9
10
0.59
-0.31
2.26
-1.36
0.75
-0.2
1.99
-1.25
0.66
-0.17
2.01
-1.31
0.6667 -0.2267 2.0867 -1.3067
0.1600 0.1400 0.2700 0.1100

0.1903
0.1840

Trial 1
Trial 2
Trial 3
Average B
Range B

0.08
-0.47
0.25
-1.22
0.07
-0.68
0.1333 -0.7900
0.1800 0.7500

1.19
0.94
1.34
1.1567
0.4000

0.01
1.03
0.2
0.4133
1.0200

-0.56
-1.2
-1.28
-1.0133
0.7200

-0.2
0.22
0.06
0.0267
0.4200

0.47
-0.63
1.8
-1.68
0.55
0.08
2.12
-1.62
0.83
-0.34
2.19
-1.5
0.6167 -0.2967 2.0367 -1.6000
0.3600 0.7100 0.3900 0.1800

0.0683
0.5130

Trial 1
Trial 2
Trial 3
Average C
Range C

0.04
-1.38
-0.11
-1.13
-0.15
-0.96
-0.0733 -1.1567
0.1900 0.4200

0.88
1.09
0.67
0.8800
0.4200

0.14
0.2
0.11
0.1500
0.0900

-1.46
-1.07
-1.45
-1.3267
0.3900

-0.29
-0.67
-0.49
-0.4833
0.3800

0.02
-0.46
1.77
-1.49
0.01
-0.56
1.45
-1.77
0.21
-0.49
1.87
-2.16
0.0800 -0.5033 1.6967 -1.8067
0.2000 0.1000 0.4200 0.6700

-0.2543
0.3280

0.1689 -0.8511
0.7071
0.8815 0.8815
0
0

1.0989
0.5231
0.8815
0

0.3667
0.4467
0.8815
0

-1.0644
0.403
0.8815
0

-0.1856
0.3742
0.8815
0

0.4544 -0.3422 1.9400 -1.5711

0.3534 0.3375 0.3249 0.3146
0.8815 0.8815 0.8815 0.8815
0
0
0
0

Appraiser/Trial #
Appraiser A
Trial 1
Trial 2
Trial 3
Average A
Range A
Appraiser B

Appraiser C

Part Average
K3(Constant)
UCL
LCL

Form xxx Rev. A 08-Jul-03

1
0.29
0.41
0.64
0.4467
0.3500

3.5111

Average of 3 Ranges
XbarDif

0.3417
0.4447
0.8815
0
0.2019
0.2297
0.3058
1
1.1046
1.1461
5

UCL
LCL
Repeatability(EV)
Reproducibility(AV)
Gage R & R
Tolerance
Part Variation
Total Variation
NDC

%
%
%
%

EV
AV
Gage R & R
PV

5 Trials
2.11
0

4 Trials
2.28
0

0.7071
2 Ops

0.5231
3 Ops

Constants
3 Trials 2 Trials
2.58
3.27
0
0
0.5908 0.8862

# Parts
10

# Trials
D4
D3
K1
K2

#Trials
3

% of Total
% of
Variation
Tolerance
17.61%
20.19%
20.04%
22.97%
26.68%
30.58%
96.38%
110.46%

Conclusion:

Gage system needs improvement

Instructions:

Just enter your measurement data in Cells C11:L13, C17:L19, C23:L25

The template will automatically calculate all of the values based on your data

Form xxx Rev. A 08-Jul-03

UCL represents the limit of the individual R'

Circle those beyond the limit.
Identify and correct causes
LCL = 0 D3=0 for up to 7 trials

stems Analysis - Gage R&R Study

8-May-03
?

Xbar A
Rbar A

Xbar B
Rbar B

Xbar C
Rbar C
RP (Range of Part Averages)

Form xxx Rev. A 08-Jul-03

UCL represents the limit of the individual R's

Form xxx Rev. A 08-Jul-03

Measurement Systems Analysis - Bias Worksheet

Note 1: If you perform a complete Linearity Study, you do not have to do this Bias study.
Note 2: This analysis is only valid for 15 repeated readings on 1 sample. Otherwise, see your Quality Manager for assistance.
Part Number and Name:

Gage Name:

Date Performed:

Characteristic:

Gage Number:

Performed By:

Gage Type:

Reference Value:

(NIST traceable standard or as measured using master method, I.e. CMM )

Sample Measurements:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

Sample Average:
Bias

repeatability =

0.00000

bias =

0.00000

t=

#DIV/0!

Significant t value (2-tailed) =

2.206

lower conf. limit =

#DIV/0!

upper conf. limit =

#DIV/0!

Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03

#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!

#DIV/0!

Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03

Measurement Systems Analysis - Bias Worksheet

Note 1: If you perform a complete Linearity Study, you do not have to do this Bias study.

Note 2: This analysis is only valid for 15 repeated readings on 1 sample. Otherwise, see your Quality Manager for assistance.

Part Number and Name:

Gage Name:

Date Performed:

Characteristic:

Gage Number:

Performed By:

Gage Type:

Reference Value:

6.0000

(NIST traceable standard or as measured using master method, I.e. CMM )

Sample Measurements:

5.8000

5.7000

5.9000

5.9000

6.0000

6.1000

6.0000

6.1000

6.4000

10

6.3000

11

6.0000

12

6.1000

13

6.2000

14

5.6000

15

6.0000

Sample Average:
Bias

repeatability =

0.22514

bias =

0.05813

t=

0.114683

Significant t value (2-tailed) =

2.206

lower conf. limit =

-0.1167

upper conf. limit =

0.1320

Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03

6.0067
0.0067

Bias is Acceptable

Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03

Measurement Systems Analysis - Linearity

Note: This analysis is only valid for studies of 5 parts measured 12 times each. Otherwise see your Quality Manager.
Part Number & Name:

Gage Name:

Date Performed:

Characteristic:

Gage Number:

Performed By:

Specification:

Gage Type:

Part Ref. Values:

g=

m=

12

Sample Average:

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

10

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

11

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

12

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

Bias Average:

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

Range:

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

Trials:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

Slope (a):
Intercept (b):
Goodness of Fit:

f(x) = NaNx + NaN

R = 0

#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!

#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!

Linearity Plot

1.0000
0.9000
0.8000
0.7000
0.6000
0.5000
0.4000
0.3000
0.2000
0.1000
0.0000
0.0000 0.1000 0.2000 0.3000 0.4000 0.5000 0.6000 0.7000 0.8000 0.9000 1.0000

Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03

Measurement Systems Analysis - Linearity

Note: This analysis is only valid for studies of 5 parts measured 12 times each. Otherwise see your Quality Manager.
Part Number & Name:
Characteristic:
Specification:

Gage Name:
Gage Number:
Gage Type:

Part Ref. Values:

g=
5

m=

Date Performed:
Performed By:

1
2.0000

2
4.0000

3
6.0000

4
8.0000

5
10.0000

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

2.7000
2.5000
2.4000
2.5000
2.7000
2.3000
2.5000
2.5000
2.4000
2.4000
2.6000
2.4000

5.1000
3.9000
4.2000
5.0000
3.8000
3.9000
3.9000
3.9000
3.9000
4.0000
4.1000
3.8000

5.8000
5.7000
5.9000
5.9000
6.0000
6.1000
6.0000
6.1000
6.4000
6.3000
6.0000
6.1000

7.6000
7.7000
7.8000
7.7000
7.8000
7.8000
7.8000
7.7000
7.8000
7.5000
7.6000
7.7000

9.1000
9.3000
9.5000
9.3000
9.4000
9.5000
9.5000
9.5000
9.6000
9.2000
9.3000
9.4000

Sample Average:

2.4917

4.1250

6.0250

7.7083

9.3833

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

0.7000
0.5000
0.4000
0.5000
0.7000
0.3000
0.5000
0.5000
0.4000
0.4000
0.6000
0.4000

1.1000
-0.1000
0.2000
1.0000
-0.2000
-0.1000
-0.1000
-0.1000
-0.1000
0.0000
0.1000
-0.2000

-0.2000
-0.3000
-0.1000
-0.1000
0.0000
0.1000
0.0000
0.1000
0.4000
0.3000
0.0000
0.1000

-0.4000
-0.3000
-0.2000
-0.3000
-0.2000
-0.2000
-0.2000
-0.3000
-0.2000
-0.5000
-0.4000
-0.3000

-0.9000
-0.7000
-0.5000
-0.7000
-0.6000
-0.5000
-0.5000
-0.5000
-0.4000
-0.8000
-0.7000
-0.6000

Bias Average:

0.4917

0.1250

0.0250

-0.2917

-0.6167

Range:

0.4000

1.3000

0.7000

0.3000

0.5000

Trials:
12

Slope (a): -0.1316667

Intercept (b): 0.73666667
Goodness of Fit:
0.7143

Slope is NOT Acceptable

Intercept is NOT Acceptable
Goodness of Fit is NOT Acceptable

Linearity Plot
1.5000
1.0000
0.5000

f(x) = - 0.1316666667x + 0.7366666667

R = 0.7143184159
0.0000
1.0000 2.0000 3.0000 4.0000 5.0000 6.0000 7.0000 8.0000 9.0000 10.0000 11.0000
-0.5000
-1.0000
-1.5000
Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03

Reference Value

-1.5000

Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03

Reference Value

Measurement Systems Analysis - Stability Study

Part Number and Name:

Gage Name:

Date Started:

Characteristic:

Gage Number:

Performed By:

Specification:

Gage Type:

Sample #:

Day #1

Day #2

Day #3

Day # 4

Day # 5

Day #6

Day #7

Day #8

Day #9

Day #10

Day #11

Day #12

Day #13

Day #14

Day #15

Day #16

Day #17

Day #18

Day #19

1
2
3
4
5
Xbar
Range(Max-Min)

Xdoublebar(Grand Average)
Rbar (Average Range)
UCL(Range Chart)
LCL(Range Chart)

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

UCL (Xbar Chart)

LCL(Xbar Chart)

Conclusion:

Gage was stable for 20 days.

Gage was NOT stable for 20 days.

Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

X Bar Chart For Stability

Sample Mean

12

10

Sample
Averages
0
Day #1

Day #2

Day #3

Day # 4 Day # 5

Day #6

Day #7

Day #8

Day #9 Day #10 Day #11 Day #12 Day #13 Day #14 Day #15 Day #16 Day #17 Day #18 Day #19 Day #20

Days

UCL
LCL

Sample Range

Range Chart For Stability

1
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
Day #1

Sample
Ranges
Day #2

Day #3

Day # 4 Day # 5 Day #6

Day #7

Day #8

Day #9 Day #10 Day #11 Day #12 Day #13 Day #14 Day #15 Day #16 Day #17 Day #18 Day #19 Day #20

Days

Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03

UCL
LCL

stems Analysis - Stability Study

Day #20

0.000

Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03

Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03

Measurement Systems Analysis - Stability Study

Part Number and Name:

Gage Name:

Date Started:

Characteristic:

Gage Number:

Performed By:

Specification:

Gage Type:

Sample #:

Day #1

Day #2

Day #3

Day # 4

Day # 5

Day #6

Day #7

Day #8

Day #9

Day #10

Day #11

Day #12

Day #13

Day #14

Day #15

Day #16

Day #17

48.600

48.400

48.800

48.900

48.500

48.500

48.400

48.700

47.800

47.900

48.100

48.200

48.100

48.300

48.000

47.900

48.100

48.700

48.800

47.900

50.100

49.000

49.000

48.200

48.000

48.600

48.300

48.600

48.500

48.700

48.900

48.700

48.300

48.400

48.300

48.000

48.000

49.200

49.000

49.000

48.300

47.700

48.700

48.400

48.700

48.900

48.500

48.600

48.600

48.700

48.700

48.600

48.400

48.800

48.900

48.500

48.500

48.400

48.700

47.800

47.900

48.100

48.200

48.100

48.300

48.000

47.900

48.100

48.700

48.800

47.900

50.100

49.000

49.000

48.300

48.000

48.600

48.300

48.600

48.500

48.700

48.900

48.700

48.300

48.400

Xbar

48.58

48.48

48.28

49.44

48.8

48.8

48.32

48.22

48.3

48.16

48.42

48.46

48.42

48.6

48.4

48.22

48.34

Range(Max-Min)

0.4

0.8

0.9

1.2

0.5

0.5

0.2

0.9

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.6

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.6

Xdoublebar(Grand Average)

48.475

Rbar (Average Range)

0.655

UCL(Range Chart)

1.68

1.68335

1.68335

1.68335

1.68335

1.68335

1.68335

1.68335

1.68335

1.68335

1.68335

1.68335

1.68335

1.68335

1.68335

1.68335

1.68335

LCL(Range Chart)

0.000

UCL (Xbar Chart)

48.8549

48.8549

48.8549

48.8549

48.8549

48.8549

48.8549

48.8549

48.8549

48.8549

48.8549

48.8549

48.8549

48.8549

48.8549

48.8549

48.8549

LCL(Xbar Chart)

48.0951

48.0951

48.0951

48.0951

48.0951

48.0951

48.0951

48.0951

48.0951

48.0951

48.0951

48.0951

48.0951

48.0951

48.0951

48.0951

48.0951

Gage was stable for 20 days.

Conclusion:

Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03

Gage was NOT stable for 20 days.

Sample Mean

X Bar Chart For Stability

50
49.5
49
48.5
48
47.5
47
Day #1

Day #2

Day #3

Day # 4 Day # 5

Day #6

Day #7

Day #8

Day #9 Day #10 Day #11 Day #12 Day #13 Day #14 Day #15 Day #16 Day #17 Day #18 Day #19 Day #20

Sample Range

Days

Sample
Averag
es
UCL

Range Chart For Stability

1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
0.4

Sample
Ranges

0.2
0
Day #1

UCL
Day #2

Day #3

Day # 4 Day # 5

Day #6

Day #7

Day #8

Day #9

Day #10 Day #11 Day #12 Day #13 Day #14 Day #15 Day #16 Day #17 Day #18 Day #19 Day #20

Days

Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03

LCL

ms Analysis - Stability Study

Day #18

Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03

Day #19

Day #20

48.300

48.100

48.000

48.600

48.600

48.600

48.500

48.700

48.700

48.300

48.100

48.000

48.600

48.600

48.600

48.46

48.42

48.38

0.3

0.6

0.7

1.68335

1.68335

1.68335

48.8549

48.8549

48.8549

48.0951

48.0951

48.0951

art For Stability

Day #11 Day #12 Day #13 Day #14 Day #15 Day #16 Day #17 Day #18 Day #19 Day #20

Days

Sample
Averag
es
UCL

art For Stability

Sample
Ranges
UCL

Day #11 Day #12 Day #13 Day #14 Day #15 Day #16 Day #17 Day #18 Day #19 Day #20

LCL

ays

Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03

Part Number & Name:

Characteristic:
Specification:
Date:

Gage Name
Gate Number
Gage Type
Performed By:

Sample No A-1 A-2 A-3 B-1 B-2 B-3 C-1

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
Key :

G = Good
B = Bad

Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03

C-2

C-3

Reference Decision

Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03

A*B
B
G Count B Count
A

Total

A* Ref Decision
Ref Decision
G Count B Count

Total

G Count
Expected Count
B Count
Expected count
Count
Expected Count

Total

Po(A*B)

Po(A* Ref)

Pe(A*B)

Pe(A* Ref)

G Count
Expected Count
B Count
Expected count
Count
Expected Count

B*C
C
G Count B Count
B

Total

B* Ref Decision
Ref Decision
G Count B Count

Total

G Count
Expected Count
B Count
Expected count
Count
Expected Count

Total

Po(B*C)

Po(B* Ref)

Pe(B*C)

Pe(B* Ref)

Total

C* Ref Decision
Ref Decision
G Count B Count

Total

G Count
Expected Count
B Count
Expected count
Count
Expected Count

Total

Po(A*C)

Po(C* Ref)

Pe(A*C)

Pe(C* Ref)

Total

G Count
Expected Count
B Count
Expected count
Count
Expected Count

A*C
C
G Count B Count

Total

Total

G Count
Expected Count
B Count
Expected count
Count
Expected Count

Kappa = (Po-Pe)/(1-Pe)
Degree of agreement between operators
Kappa
A
B
C

A
-

Degree of agreement between operators & Ref Decision

Kappa
Ref Decision

Note: Kappa measures the agreement between the two raters when both are rating same object. Its value ranges
from 0 to 1. A value of 1 indicates perfect agreement while value of 0 indicates that agreement is no better than
chance. A general rule of thumb is that values of Kappa greater than 0.75 indicate good to excellent agreement while
values less than 0.40 indicate poor agreement. Reference AIAG MSA Manual, Third Edition
Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03

Note: Kappa measures the agreement between the two raters when both are rating same object. Its value ranges
from 0 to 1. A value of 1 indicates perfect agreement while value of 0 indicates that agreement is no better than
chance. A general rule of thumb is that values of Kappa greater than 0.75 indicate good to excellent agreement while
values less than 0.40 indicate poor agreement. Reference AIAG MSA Manual, Third Edition

Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03

Part Number & Name

Characteristic
Performed By

90-0-33745 Handle
Scratches, Marks, Spots
Shailesh Patel & Peter Barlow

Measurement System
Date

Sample No A-1 A-2 A-3 B-1 B-2 B-3 C-1

1
G
G
G
G
G
2
G
G
G
G
G
3
G
G
G
G
G
4
G
G
G
G
G
5
G
G
G
G
G
6
G
G
G
G
G
7
G
G
G
G
G
8
G
G
G
G
G
9
B
B
B
B
B
10
B
B
B
B
B

C-2
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
B
B

C-3

Manual Visual Inspection

7/5/2003

Reference Decision
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
B
B

11

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

G
G
G
G
B
G
G
G
G
G
G
G

G
G
G
G
B
G
B
G
G
G
G
G

G
G
G
G
B
G
G
G
G
G
G
G

G
G
G
G
B
G
G
G
G
G
G
G

G
G
G
G
B
G
G
G
G
G
G
G

G
G
G
G
B
G
G
G
G
G
G
G

G
G
G
G
B
G
G
G
G
G
G
G

24

25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36

G
G
G
B
B
G
G
B
G
G
G
G

G
G
G
G
G
G
G
B
G
G
G
G

B
G
G
G
G
G
G
B
G
G
G
G

G
G
G
G
G
G
G
B
G
G
G
G

G
G
G
G
G
G
G
B
G
G
G
G

G
G
G
G
G
G
G
B
G
G
G
G

G
G
G
G
G
G
G
B
G
G
G
G

37

38
39

B
B

B
B

B
G

B
G

B
G

B
G

B
G

40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50

B
G
G
G
G
B
G
G
B
G
G

G
B
G
G
G
B
G
G
B
G
G

B
G
G
G
G
B
G
G
B
G
G

G
G
G
G
G
B
G
G
B
G
G

G
G
G
G
G
B
G
G
B
G
G

G
G
G
G
G
B
G
G
B
G
G

G
G
G
G
G
B
G
G
B
G
G

Key :

G = Good
B = Bad

Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03

isual Inspection

Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03

A*B

Total

B
G Count B
76
63.9
7
19.1
83
83.0

G Count
Expected Count
B Count
Expected count
Count
Expected Count

Count
1
13.1
16
3.9
17
17.0

Total
77
77.0
23
23.0
100
100.0

Total

A* Ref Decision
Ref Decision
G Count B Count
G Count
77
0
Expected Count
64.7
12.3
B Count
7
16
Expected count
19.3
3.7
Count
84
16
Expected Count
84.0
16.0

Po(A*B)

0.92

Po(A* Ref)

0.93

Pe(A*B)

0.68

Pe(A* Ref)

0.68

B*C

Total
Po(B*C)
Pe(B*C)

C
G Count B
82
68.9
2
15.1
84
84.0

G Count
Expected Count
B Count
Expected count
Count
Expected Count

Count
0
13.1
16
2.9
16
16.0

Total
82
82.0
18
18.0
100
100.0

Total

0.98

Po(B* Ref)

0.98

0.72

Pe(B* Ref)

0.72

A*C

Total
Po(A*C)
Pe(A*C)

B* Ref Decision
Ref Decision
G Count B Count
G Count
82
0
Expected Count
68.9
13.1
B Count
2
16
Expected count
15.1
2.9
Count
84
16
Expected Count
84.0
16.0

G Count
Expected Count
B Count
Expected count
Count
Expected Count

C
G Count B
77
64.7
7
19.3
84
84.0

Count
0
12.3
16
3.7
16
16.0

Total
77
77.0
23
23.0
100
100.0

Total

C* Ref Decision
Ref Decision
G Count B
G Count
84
Expected Count
70.6
B Count
0
Expected count
13.4
Count
84
Expected Count
84.0

0.93

Po(C* Ref)

0.68

Pe(C* Ref)

0.73

Count
0
13.4
16
2.6
16
16.0

Kappa = (Po-Pe)/(1-Pe)
Degree of agreement between operators
Kappa
A
B
C

A
0.75
0.78

B
0.75
0.93

C
0.78
0.93
-

Degree of agreement between operators & Ref Decision

Kappa
Ref Decision

A
0.78

B
0.93

Note: Kappa measures the agreement between the two raters when both are rating same object. Its value ranges
from 0 to 1. A value of 1 indicates perfect agreement while value of 0 indicates that agreement is no better than
chance. A general rule of thumb is that values of Kappa greater than 0.75 indicate good to excellent agreement
while values less than 0.40 indicate poor agreement. Reference AIAG MSA Manual, Third Edition
Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03

Total
77
77.0
23
23.0
100
100.0

Total
82
82.0
18
18.0
100
100.0

Total
84
84.0
16
16.0
100
100.0

tors & Ref Decision

C
1.00

ct. Its value ranges

t is no better than
ellent agreement
n
Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03