CHAPTER IV N V

CHAPTER IV
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Developers created Computer-Aided Instruction (CAI) to help teachers for their teaching
strategy and also help students to understand the lessons repeatedly. This system can help
students to analyze their lessons freely, they can study the lesson at their own pace. The
developers created CAI that can easily be used for the students who are not familiar in using a
computer.
The development team proposed this system to Cabiao National High School because the
team knew that there are many students who are willing to understand their lessons and create a
project like this in the near future.
Researchers firstly gathered all the information which have made them see what can be
possibly done to improve the systems functionality and learning how the manual processes can
be done for it to be automated.
Showing more problems on the way of development some problems were to be ignored
such as;
Lecturing through the board which consumes too much time and space on which the
teacher should be writing while the students are still lecturing on the board.
Manually recording the grades of students by collecting their test papers and write all
their grades one by one or even calling them individually their names to shout their grades
while the instructor records it, but the last procedure of recording grades are not that accurate
because some students lie for higher grades.
Not updated grade sheets and lost test papers that are not recorded yet making it
impossible to track down what the students and the instructors did in their class.
Not being notified which exercises have the students have not yet taken for them to
complete their grades before the final grading happens.
Making the problems safely done by a computer the researchers then studied some
systems alike which has problems on their own that made the CAI safer than the other
system.
The developers then created the system a CAI in particular which is more advanced
with some fail safe augmentation for a much reliable and robust learning delivery.
Table 4.1
Assessment on the Functionality of the System
(Student)
Statement
Weighted M
VI
A. The system conforms to its purpose.
4.20
Very Good
B. The system provides an accurate report of

the user.
C. The system provides accurate and fast
retrieval when searching a lesson.
D. The system provides registration of
information to a database.
E. The system conforms to the softwares
ability to disseminate and gather information.
3.75
Very Good
3.80
Very Good
3.75
Very Good
3.75
Very Good
Average Mean
3.85
Very Good
Based on the table 4.1, the average result of the assessment on the functionality of the
system is 3.85 which the interpretation of the Students in functionality is very good.
Table 4.2
Assessment on the Usability of the System
(Student)
Statement
Weighted Mean
Verbal Interpretation
A. Has accurate result of quizzes and drills.
4.15
Very Good
B. Saves lesson orderly.
4.00
Very Good
C. Is easy to learn for new users.
3.75
Very Good
D. Help guides to the user.
3.80
Very Good
E. Prompts the user about errors created in

the messages.
Average Mean
4.00
Very Good
3.94
Very Good
The table 4.2, the average result of the assessment on the usability of the system is 3.94
which means that the Systems in reliability is very good according to the student respondents.
Table 4.3
Assessment on the Security of the System
(Student)
Statement
Weighted Mean
A. The system log-in provides security.
3.70
Very Good
B. Able to secure the user.
3.50
Very Good
C. Every user has their own account.
4.00
Very Good
D. Limit the students account for some

restriction.
E. Can recover the data directly affected in
case of failure.
Average Mean
4.00
Very Good
3.25
Very Good
3.69
Very Good
The table 4.3, the average result of the assessment on the security of the system is 3.69
which interprets that the student graded the system in terms of security as very good.
Table 4.4
Assessment on the Efficiency of the System
(Student)
Statement
Weighted Mean
A. Provides easy way of learning.
3.75
Very Good
B. Provides a faster response and processing

time of information.
C. Saved the record of the student in fastest
way.
D. Utilizes its resources through computeraided based in disseminating information.
E. Capable to provide the administrator and
students to access fast and unfailing
information.
Average Mean
4.10
Very Good
3.90
Very Good
4.25
Very Good
4.00
Very Good
4.00
Very Good
The table 4.4, the average result of the assessment on the efficiency of the system is 4.00
which summarizes students interpretation of the System Efficiency as very good.
Table 4.5
Assessment on the Portability of the System
(Student)
Statement
A. Capable to install easily to different
specified environment.
B. Can adapt to changing situations and
diversified type of operations.
C. Adhere to the standard of being
conveniently transported from one
environment to another.
D. The system can be used in other system
environment.
E. It is dependable and flexible infrastructure
that provides requirements needed for
instruction.
Average Mean
Weighted Mean
3.70
Very Good
4.25
Very Good
3.40
Very Good
3.30
Good
3.90
Very Good
3.71
Very Good
The table 4.5, the average result of the assessment on the portability of the system is 3.71
which means that the students evaluation on the systems Portability is very good.
Table 4.6
Assessment on the Maintainability of the System
(Student)
Statement
A. The system can diagnose different failures
caused by error in the system.
B. The system can be modified if failure, error
or changes occur.
C. The administrator can test the system for
validation before use.
D. The system can be easily changed if new
technology arrives.
E. The programmers codes and syntaxes
provide comment that other programmers can
understand.
Average Mean
Weighted Mean
4.00
Very Good
3.75
Very Good
3.50
Very Good
4.00
Very Good
4.00
Very Good
3.85
Very Good
The table 4.6, the average result of the assessment on the maintainability of the system is
3.85 which construes that the Students observation of the systems maintainability is very good.
Table 4.7
(Instructor)
Statement
Weighted Mean
4.00
Very Good

the user.
Average Mean
3.70
Very Good
4.00
Very Good
3.80
Very Good
3.60
Very Good
3.82
Very Good
system is 3.82 which the interpretation of the Instructors in functionality is very good.
Table 4.8
(Instructor)
Statement
Weighted Mean
4.25
Very Good
4.00
Very Good
3.70
Very Good
3.80
Very Good

the messages.
Average Mean
4.40
Very Good
4.03
Very Good
which the interpretation of the Instructors in usability is very good.
Table 4.9
(Instructor)
Statement
Weighted Mean
A. The system log-in has security.
3.50
Very Good
3.50
Very Good
3.40
Very Good

restriction.
case of failure.
Average Mean
4.10
Very Good
3.80
Very Good
3.66
Very Good
which the interpretation of the Instructors in security is moderately very good.
Table 4.10
(Instructor)
Statement
Weighted Mean
3.50
Very Good

way.
information.
Average Mean
4.30
Very Good
3.90
Very Good
4.00
Very Good
3.70
Very Good
3.88
Very Good
which the interpretation of the Instructors in efficiency is moderately agree.
Table 4.11
(Instructor)
Statement
environment.
instruction.
Average Mean
Weightened Mean
4.00
Very Good
3.90
Very Good
3.50
Very Good
3.50
Very Good
3.50
Very Good
3.66
Very Good
The table 4.11, the average result of the assessment on the portability of the system is
3.66 which the interpretation of the Instructors in portability is very good.
Table 4.12
(Instructor)
Statement
or changes occur.
technology arrives.
Weighted Mean
3.60
Very Good
3.80
Very Good
3.60
Very Good
4.00
Very Good

understand.
Average Mean
4.00
Very Good
3.80
Very Good
The table 4.12, the average result of the assessment on the maintainability of the system
is 3.80 which the interpretation of the Instructors in maintainability is very good.
Table 4.13
(IT Professional)
Statement
Weighted Mean
3.90
Very Good

the user.
3.80
Very Good
4.00
Very Good
3.40
Very Good

Average Mean
3.60
Very Good
3.74
Very Good
system is 3.74 which the interpretation of the IT Professional in functionality is very good.
Table 4.14
(IT Professional)
Statement
Weighted Mean
4.00
Very Good
4.50
Very Good
4.00
Very Good
4.00
Very Good

the messages.
Average Mean
4.40
Very Good
4.18
Very Good
which the interpretation of the IT Professional in usability is very good.
Table 4.15
(IT Professional)
Statement
Weighted Mean
A. The system log-in has security.
3.60
Very Good
3.50
Very Good
4.00
Very Good

restriction.
case of failure.
4.00
Very Good
4.00
Very Good
Average Mean
3.82
Very Good
which the interpretation of the IT Professional in security is very good.
Table 4.16
(IT Professional)
Statement
Weighted Mean
3.70
Very Good

way.
information.
Average Mean
4.30
Very Good
4.00
Very Good
4.10
Very Good
3.60
Very Good
3.94
Very Good
which the interpretation of the IT Professional in efficiency is very good.
Table 4.17

(IT Professional)
Statement
environment.
instruction.
Average Mean
Weighted Mean
4.10
Very Good
3.90
Very Good
3.50
Very Good
3.50
Good
4.00
Very Good
3.80
Very Good
The table 4.17, the average result of the assessment on the portability of the system is
3.80 which the interpretation of the IT Professional in portability is very good.
Table 4.18
(IT Professional)
Statement
Weighted Mean
3.60
Very Good

or changes occur.
technology arrives.
understand.
Average Mean
3.80
Very Good
3.40
Very Good
4.00
Very Good
4.50
Very Good
3.86
Very Good
The table 4.18, the average result of the assessment on the maintainability of the system
is 3.86 which the interpretation of the IT Professional in maintainability is very good.
Table 4.19
Grand Mean
(Instructor, IT Professional, Students)
Quality Assessment
Weighted Mean
Very Good
Functionality
3.79
Usability
4.02
Very Good
Security
3.68
Very Good
Efficiency
3.91
Very Good
Portability
3.75
Very Good
Maintainability
3.82
Very Good
GRAND MEAN
3.83
Very Good
Based on the table 4.19, the grand mean of functionality, usability, security, efficiency
portability and maintainability is 3.83 which the interpretation is very good.
Project Evaluation
The researcher used statistical tools to compute the result of the evaluation conducted.
Different criteria are listed on survey questionnaires used for the evaluation, it includes the
functionality, usability, security, efficiency, portability, and maintainability of the system. The
respondents of the study are the selected students, instructor, and IT Professionals.
The proposed system was evaluated and tested first before the implementation. The
proponents used statistical treatment for the evaluation. The instrument used is questionnaire that
has different criteria which are listed and evaluated by the respondents of this study.
Chapter V
Summary, Conclusion, and Recommendation

For the researchers to know all the possible outcome and proper functionalities of the
CAI system researchers first thought of the simulating the system before it was used in the actual
class session. Limiting and improving the flow of the system it is then shown to the researchers
which would be more appropriate for the systems flow and uses making it more reliable and
debug free compared from the prototype created before the final phase of the system.
Summary of findings
Based from the chapter IV the following findings are summarized as follows:
1. Functionality the system interpreted as very good with the result of 3.79 of overall
rating which the interpretation is very good. The result stated that the proposed
Computer-Aided Instruction for VB.Net is functional.
2. Usability the system interpreted as very good with the result of 4.02 of overall rating
which the interpretation is very good. The result stated that the proposed system is usable
and easy to use.
3. Security - the system has a result of 3.68 of overall rating with which the interpretation is
very good. The result stated that the proposed system is secured and assured in validity.
4. Efficiency the system has a result of 3.91 of overall rating which the interpretation is
very good. The result stated that the proposed system is capability of a specific
application of effort to produce a specific outcome effectively with a minimum amount or
quantity of waste, expense, or unnecessary effort.
5. Reliability the system has a result of 3.75 of overall rating which the interpretation is
very good. The result stated that the proposed system is to perform its required functions
under stated conditions for a specified period of time.
6. Maintainability the system has a result of 3.82 of overall rating which the interpretation
is very good. The result stated that the proposed system has a systematic way of
maintaining the system.
CONCLUSIONS
After gathering information on Computer-Aided Instruction and conducted software
evaluation, the researchers come up with the conclusion that in accomplishing this study
Computer-Aided Instruction enhanced by the help of our software. Researchers also wanted
to impose the idea of having a quality of teaching in the near future.
SQL database is also found to be the best database for this system; data will not be over
flow because it stores a lot of data. Researchers also concluded that Computer-Aided
Instruction feature adds functionalities with the system.
Recommendation
The developers of Computer-Aided Instruction would like to recommend the following
improvement of the system, and also would like to recommend some ideas on innovation
regarding the use of Computer-Aided Instruction.
1. The researchers would like to propose and additional enhancement on Computer-Aided
Instruction, additional improvement like SMS alert, that will be received by the student
after taking their drills and quizzes.
2. The school must hire a personnel that will maintain and manage the system. The
personnel must have some experience on programming language such as Visual
Studio.net and SQL.
3. Can add other subjects of the school, so that other instructors can use the proposed
system.
4. The researchers recommend to the future researchers to continue improving the system.

CHAPTER IV N V

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

CHAPTER IV N V

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CHAPTER IV

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

A. The system conforms to its purpose.

B. The system provides an accurate report of

A. Has accurate result of quizzes and drills.

B. Saves lesson orderly.

C. Is easy to learn for new users.

D. Help guides to the user.

E. Prompts the user about errors created in

A. The system log-in provides security.

B. Able to secure the user.

C. Every user has their own account.

D. Limit the students account for some

A. Provides easy way of learning.

B. Provides a faster response and processing

B. The system provides an accurate report of

A. Has accurate result of quizzes and drills.

B. Saves lesson orderly.

C. Is easy to learn for new users.

D. Help guides to the user.

E. Prompts the user about errors created in

A. The system log-in has security.

B. Able to secure the user.

C. Every user has their own account.

D. Limit the students account for some

A. Provides easy way of learning.

B. Provides a faster response and processing

E. The programmers codes and syntaxes

A. The system conforms to its purpose.

B. The system provides an accurate report of

E. The system conforms to the softwares

A. Has accurate result of quizzes and drills.

B. Saves lesson orderly.

C. Is easy to learn for new users.

D. Help guides to the user.

E. Prompts the user about errors created in

A. The system log-in has security.

B. Able to secure the user.

C. Every user has their own account.

D. Limit the students account for some

A. Provides easy way of learning.

B. Provides a faster response and processing

Assessment on the Portability of the System

caused by error in the system.

Summary, Conclusion, and Recommendation

You might also like