Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 s2.0 0263822388900165 Main PDF
1 s2.0 0263822388900165 Main PDF
1 s2.0 0263822388900165 Main PDF
S. K. M a l h o t r a , a N. G a n e s a n b and M. A. V e l u s w a m i '~
aFRP Research Centre, bApplied Mechanics Department, CMechanical Engineering
Department, Indian Institute of Technology, Madras 61~)036, India
ABSTRACT
The effect of fibre orientation on the frequencies of thin square orthotropic
plates is studied using the Rayleigh-Ritz method ~br various boundary
conditions. The main purpose of the study is to find out in what way
boundary conditions influence the frequencies of orthotropic square plates.
1 INTRODUCTION
Fibre Reinforced Plastics (FRP) are finding increasing applications in
aerospace structures due to their high strength to weight and high stiffness to
weight ratios. Determination of vibration behaviour of structural components made of FRP is necessary for their design.
Chelladurai e t a l . , 1 have done limited studies using the Finite Element
Method for the two boundary conditions and the fundamental frequency.
The present study is conducted for 5 boundary conditions, i.e. CCFC,
CCCC, CSSC, CCSC and SSSS (see Table 1 for conditions). The influence
of fibre orientation and boundary conditions on the second mode is also
studied.
Bert 2 derived a formula for the approximate values of fundamental
frequency of orthotropic plates of arbitrary shape and boundary conditions,
if frequencies of the corresponding isotropic plates are known.
247
TABLE 1
Boundary
Sample
Conditions
Considered
110.
(-TT-
(F)
Noration
CCFC
cccc
(ssc
, --D
ccsc
/,
El
,---7
ssss
l___;
2 RAYLEIGH-RITZ
METHOD
ss
h
(I
[C]T[D][C]dxdy
where,
LCl=
is shown in Fig. 1.
d2w d2w aw
[
i)x2i)y2iJxi)l
plate.
249
k=l
(Oij)k(Z3 -- Z3-1)
(2)
.....
where: ~v = Ow/Ot; t represents time; p is mass per unit area; and r is the
plate thickness. Using eqns (1) and (2), U and T are evaluated.
Y
~1
3 METHOD OF SOLUTION
A series solution satisfying boundary conditions is taken as:
W~
~,
~ Wmn(J)rn(X) ~Jn(y) . . . . .
m=l,2 n=l,2
(3)
where (J)m(X) represents the beam function satisfying the plate boundary
condition in the X direction.
qJ,(y) represents the beam function satisfying the plate boundary condition in the Y direction.
251)
In the present study the conventional beam functions given below are
assumed:
(~m(X) =
x)
cosh/~ma --COS/3m-a
--Tin
sinh/3m-a
x)
sin/3m-a
tOo(y) =
TABLE 2
E.,
( G Pa )
Tie
Composite
G le
( G Pa )
Specific
gravi O'
Glass/epoxy
Kevlar/epoxy
Boron/epoxy
Graphite/epoxy
38-6
76.(t
204-(I
181.0
8.27
5.50
18-50
1(I.30
0-26
(I.34
0.23
0.28
4.14
2.3(1
5.59
7-17
1.80
1.46
2.00
1.60
251
TABLE 3(a)
Clamped Square Plate
Material
wJA/
Fibre
orientation
tO)
Present solution
Re]~ 1
Re/~ _5
0
0
0
0
42.69
50-81
48.31
53.69
38.54
45.72
43.46
48.34
38-58
45.83
43.54
48.46
Glass/epoxy
Kevlar/epoxy
Boron/epoxy
Graphite/epoxy
TABLE 3(b)
lsotropic Materials
Boundary
condition
3 terms
4 terms
5 terms
CCCC
36-12
73.74
36.19
73.17
36.12
73.72
SSSS
19.76
49.40
19.76
49.40
19.76
49.4{)
Using 3 terms itself, a good convergence is obtained, so only 3 terms are used for this study to
minimise computer time.
TABLE 4
Glass/Epoxy ( ~ / ~ )
BC
CCFC
0
(deg. )
0
15
30
45
6(}
75
90
R-R
30.50
3(1.16
28-24
24.82
20.98
18-57
17.86
CCCC
CSSC
Bert
R-R
Bert
R-R
Bert
33.74
32.48
29.15
24.77
20.80
18.33
17.55
42.69
42.19
41.38
40.99
41.38
42.16
42-64
38.61
38.5(}
38.26
38.16
38.26
38.50
38.61
31.08
29.88
27.32
25.91
27.32
29.88
31-08
29-89
29.4(I
28.41
27.91
28-41
29.4()
29.89
CCSC
R-R
Bert
40.31
36.85
4().03 36.62
38.51
35.75
36.31
34.27
33.43
32.44
30.33
30.00
29-15 29-91
SSSS
R-R
Bert
18.11
20.43
22" 17
23.2(I
22-17
20.43
18.11
19.23
2(}.12
21.81
22.6tl
21.81
20.12
19.23
252
TABLE 5
Kevlar/Epoxy ( \ h i )
BC
CCFC
CCCC
0
( deg. )
R-R
Bert
R-R
I)
15
311
45
611
75
911
35-14
34-95
34.33
28.22
20.66
15.65
14.18
43.54
41-44
35-75
28.18
18.40
15.94
14.32
50-81
50.07
48.63
47.77
48.55
50-07
50.81
CSS("
Bert
45-811
45.56
45.12
44.92
45.12
45.56
45.811
R-R
38.31
36./15
31.24
28.09
30-99
36-04
38.31
CCSC
Bert
R-R
Bert
36-06
35.11
33.18
32.17
33.18
35.11
36.06
49.71
49.08
47.39
44.38
43.21
32.31
29-94
44.95
44.52
40.28
39.12
37.50
34.611
33.34
SSSS
R-R
Bert
21-22
21.25
23-07
23-119
26.39
26-38
27.89
27-90
26.38
26.38
23.(17 27.9t}
21.24
21.25
TABLE 6
Boron/Epoxy ( \ ' ,kl)
BC
CCFC
CCCC
O
( deg. )
R-R
Bert
R-R
Bert
0
15
31)
45
60
75
911
34.65
33.43
32.38
26.73
19.90
15.71
14.63
38.91
36.97
31.97
25.24
18.97
14.97
13.77
48-31
47-58
46.21
45.32
46.09
47-58
48.31
41.16
411.90
411.56
41/.33
411.56
411.911
41.16
CSSC
R-R
36-54
34.33
311.72
26.51
3tl.72
34.31
36.54
CCSC
Bert
R-R
Bert
32.45
31.59
29.74
28-83
29.74
31.59
32.45
46-97
46-41
44.85
42.57
35.24
30.97
28.76
41t.23
39.82
38.71
36.59
33-79
31-16
31). 11
SSSS
R-R
20.04
21.86
25.11
26.59
25.1 I
21.811
20.114
Bert
18.97
20.67
23.76
25.15
23.76
20.67
18.97
253
TABLE 7
Graphite/Epoxy ( \ ~ )
BC
CCFC
0
(deg.)
0
15
3(1
45
60
75
90
R-R
38.87
36-67
36-47
30-01
21.74
15.87
14-00
CCCC
Bert
R-R
Bert
46.41
44.17
38.11
30-00
22.00
16.40
14.44
53.69
52-92
51-39
50-57
51-37
52.93
53.69
48-50
48-25
47.76
47.55
47.76
48.25
48.50
CSSC
R-R
Bert
41)-49
38.16
33.02
30.05
33.25
38.17
40.49
38.111
37-13
35.16
34.14
35.16
37.13
38.10
CCSC
R-R
52.85
52.14
5(I.32
46-41
39.96
33.97
31.42
SSSS
Bert
R-R
Bert
47.77
47.27
42.83
42-17
39.42
36.83
35.15
22.17
23.93
26.22
27.36
26.22
23.93
22.17
22.63
24.50
27.88
29.43
27.88
24.50
22-63
TABLE 8
Glass/Epoxy ( ~ M ) : R - R Solution
BC
0
(deg.)
CCFC
CCCC
(SSC
CCSC
SSSS
0
15
30
45
60
75
90
46.97
46.30
45.11
41.88
38.61
35-41
34.(11
65.08
65.24
75.30
77.94
69-38
64.83
60.85
44.82
48.47
56.49
61.50
55-17
49.87
44.95
37.11
39-93
46.34
51.31
45-12
39.48
37.10
32.83
35-61
39.13
40.22
39. l0
35.73
32.16
TABLE 9
Kevlar/Epoxy (Vh2) R - R Solution
BC
0
(deg.)
CCFC
CCCC
CSSC
CCSC
SSSS
0
15
3(1
45
6(1
75
90
58-58
58.25
55-43
49-74
42.42
34.33
31.06
48.45
56.06
62.29
69.78
62.27
57.53
56.59
35-113
47.39
63.67
72.13
60-96
47-14
39.46
56.71)
611.95
63.42
71.31
49.90
55.23
48.15
32-04
38.63
51.43
59.35
48.62
37.56
32.04
254
TABLE 10
Boron/Epoxy (\, ~ ) : R - R Solution
BC7
0
(deg.)
CCFC
CCCC
CSSC
CCSC
SSSS
0
15
30
45
60
75
90
55- 34
54.18
5 l-58
47-3t)
41-45
34.66
32.09
48.45
54.99
60.94
67.13
59.66
55.09
54.21
38.32
42.18
60.83
68.9(I
58.50
45.50
38.22
54.32
58.29
67.29
68.34
55.39
54.37
47.96
31.39
37.43
49.23
56.67
46-69
36-47
31.39
TABLE 11
Graphite/Epoxy (N/h2): R-R Solution
BC
0
(deg.)
CCFC
CCCC
CSSC
CCSC
SSSS
l)
15
3{1
45
60
75
90
62-36
60.74
58.94
52.68
44.12
34.30
30.52
32.93
40-12
54-00
62-44
50.86
38.92
32.96
41.40
50.69
67-11
76.115
64.09
48.65
41.34
52.85
53.7(1
56.32
77.73
53.39
50-32
48-73
32-6(t
38.32
51.72
59.53
47.7{I
36.64
32.17
255
REFERENCES
1. Chelladurai, T., Shastry, B. P. and Rao, G. V., Effect of fibre orientation on the
vibration behaviour of orthotropic rectangular plates, Fibre Sci. and Tech., 21
(1984) 73-81.
2. Bert, C. W., Fundamental frequencies of orthotropic plates with various
planforms and edge conditions, Shock Vib. Bull., 47 (1977) 89-94.
3. Jones, R. M., Mechanics of Composite Materials, McGraw Hill, London, 1975.
4. Tsai, S. W. and Hohn, H. T., Introduction to composite materials, volumes I and
II, Air Force Materials Laboratory Technical Report, TR-78-201, 1979.
5. Lekhnitskii, S. G., Anisotropic Plates, Gordon and Breach Sci. Pub., London,
1956.