Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CREW: U.S. Department of Homeland Security: U.S. Customs and Border Protection: Regarding Border Fence: A2C Analysis Final (Redacted)
CREW: U.S. Department of Homeland Security: U.S. Customs and Border Protection: Regarding Border Fence: A2C Analysis Final (Redacted)
Deployment Analysis
Location: East Brickyard to Gun Sights (Zone 27), San Diego, California – 0.40
Miles of Remote Area
Key Issues/Constraints:
• This area is in remote East San Diego County, located immediately adjacent to
Cetis Hill, approximately 2.5 miles east of the Tecate Port of Entry and
approximately 2 miles south of Potrero, California, which is located on State
Route 94.
• On the west side near an area known as the “Brickyard”, there are two short
sections of landing mat fence, which act more as cover for groups waiting to
effect an entry than they do as a deterrent. The border at this point is comprised
of a natural drainage of the local watershed. Prior ideology was that the seasonal
watershed was a sufficient natural barrier and has since been proven errant. Due
to the lack of primary fencing, the area is subjected to numerous entries and
vehicle drive-through attempts. (b) (7)(E)
(b) (7)(E)
(b) (7)(E)
(b) (7)(E)
(b) (7)(E)
• On the east side near Gun Sights, the primary barrier is a natural barrier consisting
of a steep hill punctuated by cliff faces. There is one short section of low primary
landing mat fencing, located at the natural drainage of the community
immediately south of the international boundary. The subsequent development on
the south side combined with the lack of primary fencing, the area is subjected to
numerous entries and vehicle drive-through attempts.
(b) (7)(E)
(b) (7)(E)
o The natural barrier, which consists of steep hills and cliff faces, has been
used to the advantage of the entrants. This barrier provides a position of
high ground for possible assaults on agents. This area has been the scene
of at least three rockings in the recent past, one rocking resulted in an
officer involved shooting.
(b) (7)(E)
• The border road and the secondary east/west road are not all weather roads. These
roads are basically graded dirt roads which become impassable during periods of
inclement weather. The inclement weather ranges from heavy rain to sleet and
snow in the winter months. The resultant inability to patrol the area gives the
ASO’s free reign over a large portion of the El Cajon Station’s primary operating
domain (POD)
o This inaccessibility also negatively affects other public safety efforts to
include rescue and area policing to reduce cross-border crime such as
bandit activity and predatory violence against illegal entrants.
• Additionally, the border road along the Gun Sights stretch of boundary is
bordered on the south by steep hills and cliff faces while the north side of the road
is bounded by a deep ravine. The border road through this area follows the lay of
the land, with numerous curves and grades. Due to poor road conditions there
have been several vehicle accidents along this stretch of border road. These poor
conditions prevent agents from quickly responding to entries or sensors
activations.
• The close proximity of the secondary road to the border road in the Gun Sights
area creates yet another challenge. Entrants can conceivably reach the secondary
road in a matter of minutes, especially during hours of darkness. The area can be
viewed from the secondary road but with a limited field of view.
(b) (7)(E)
Analysis of Alternatives:
(b) (7)(E)
• Due to the terrain aspects to the north (to include steep ridges and canyons, rock
outcroppings and high growth vegetation) and innumerable trails that exist in the
area, an inordinate number of sensors would be required to provide the necessary
detection capability to State Route 94. (b) (7)(E)
(b) (7)(E)
(b) (7)(E)
(b) (7)(E)
(b) (7)(E)
(b) (7)(E)
(b) (7)(E)
(b) (7)(E)
o The Sector Chief anticipates that the deployment of MSS combined the
current baseline deployment will facilitate increased detection and
identification but will not meet classification or response requirements that
the pedestrian fence alternative provides.
• Border Patrol Agents – Border Patrol Agents are capable of detecting entries,
identifying and classifying the threat, and responding to intrusions, but can be
overwhelmed by the number of illegal entrants they confront. However, these
capabilities are hindered by the terrain and lack of access. Current deployment
• The estimated total cost of such a deployment over three years is $37,800,000.
(b) (7)(E)
(b) (7)(E)
(b) (7)(E)
o The Sector Chief anticipates that the deployment of the additional 84 total
agents combines with the deployment baseline will enhance detection,
identification, classification and response requirements but is deficient in
the areas of executability and sustainability when compared to the
pedestrian fence alternative.
• Pedestrian Fence – 0.40 miles of pedestrian fence will deter illegal entrants who
are not physically capable of climbing the structure and significantly delay those
who may be fit enough to climb it. This delay will allow time for successful law
enforcement resolution closer to the border and will require fewer agents.
o Bollard design (PV-1) built to accommodate anti-climb, vehicle stop
capability and 18’ height requirements.
o Estimated cost to commercially construct fencing, access road and
associated drainage installation - $2,694,930, which includes three years
of maintenance.
o As a stand alone feature, pedestrian fence cannot detect illegal entrants or
alert enforcement personnel for a proper response and resolution to the
situation. As a result, personnel and technology are required to
compliment tactical infrastructure.
o Proposed access roads and fencing will enhance operations by increasing
agent mobility and enabling them to tactically address a reduced volume
of pedestrian traffic in the area. San Diego Sector has requested a fence
design that meets both pedestrian and vehicle stop capability requirements
for the East Brickyard – Gun Sights project area.
(b) (7)(E)
o Estimated cost to construct vehicle fence is $2.2 million per mile, not
including necessary road and drainage structures. There will be
significant cost associated to build associated all-weather
construction/maintenance road.
o Total cost for the Cetis Hill project section of vehicle fence would be
$1,144,000, which includes three years maintenance.
o There will be significant cost associated to build associated all-weather
construction/maintenance road.
o The Sector Chief Patrol Agent anticipates that the deployment of the
vehicle fence combined with the current deployment baseline will not
enhance detection, identification, classification and response requirements.
• Best Technology Combination - An analysis of technology components was
conducted to determine what component of technology would be most cost
effective. Based on the analysis conducted by Field Commanders and the Sector
Chief, the most cost effective combination of technology mix for the East
Brickyard – Gun Sights area was determined to be the cameras and sensors. This
alternative provides enhanced detection, identification and classification
capabilities but does not address the response or persistence of impedance
requirements. The cost of this combination would be $7,936,500.00
• The fiscal cost of such a deployment over three years is estimated at $37,800,000.
• The fiscal cost to construct pedestrian fencing, access road and associated
drainage installation is estimated at $2,694,930.
• The operational cost of the total number of agents deployed to gain and maintain
control of the East Brickyard – Gun Sights area precludes any significant
deployment of agents to address shifts in smuggling activity.
• The installation of technology, as a stand alone alternative, would not provide the
required level of deterrence or enhance agent time-distance response.
Projected Results:
• (b) (7)(E)
This ultimately will minimize exposure to the dangers associated with
terrain and subsequent environmental impacts.
• (b) (7)(E)
. The added
tactical infrastructure will afford agents the ability to confront, intercept and deter
illegal entrants before entering into a more hazardous environment.
• The installation of a pedestrian fence will deter and significantly slow those who
are not fit enough to negotiate the fence. Fencing will deflect a large number
from crossing.
• Those who challenge the pedestrian fence will require equipment or assistance
from others, thereby increasing the level of difficultly and frustration of the
criminal element.
• Long term effect will allow significantly fewer agents to maintain control in Zone
27.
• Field Commanders will be able to redeploy agents to new areas of operation to
address the shift in smuggling patterns.
• Fewer aerial assets will be required to support operations and rescue operations to
the north, which will reduce risks to agents and pilots and result in budget savings
associated with subsequent maintenance and fuel costs.
• Create the potential to re-allocate several million dollars in yearly salaries for a
one-time cost of technology and tactical infrastructure deployment.