1.

2.
3.
4.
5.

Pakala Narayan Swami v. Emperor, AIR 1939 PC 47[ Indian or foreign]

Nazir Ahmed v. King Emperor, 1936 PC 253 (3)
Bhaman Hiranadav.Emperor, AIR 1937 Sind 251; 171 IC 737 [footnote vs.missing]
State of Orissa v. Jayadhar, Cut LR (Cr) 433
State of tamilnadu thr. Superintendent of Police , CBI/SIT v. Nalini and Others,AIR 1999

SC 2640
6. Rabindrakumar pal @Dara Singh v. Republic of India, (2011) 2 SCC 490; (2011) 1
SCALE 741
7. Barendrakumarghosh v. king emperor,(1925) 27 BOMLR 148
8. RamaswamyAyyanger v. State of Tamil Nadu (1976) 3 SCR 876, 1976 AIR 2027
9. PandurangaTukia and Bhillia v. State of Hyderabad, AIR 1955 SC 331
10. Khacheru Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 1956 SC 546
11. Israr v. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 2005 SC 249
12. Zabar Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 1957 SC 465: 1957 Cr LJ 581
13. Yamuna Singh &Ors vs State Of Bihar,1996 SCC (Cri) 1177
14. Topandas v. State of Bombay, AIR 1956 SC 33
15. Ram Narain Poply v. CBI, AIR 2003 SC 2748
16. Inder Singh Bagga Singh v. State of Pepsu, AIR 1955 SC 439
17. Premlal v. State of Madhya Pradesh, 1969 Jab LJ (Short Note) 29
18. Basdev v. State of Pepsu, AIR 1956 SC 488;Ratanlal and Dhirajlal, Law of Crimes,
23rdEdn. PP. 212-221
19. S C Bahri v State of Bihar, 1994 Cr LJ 3271 (Para 21); AIR 1994 SC 2420
20. Yamuna Singh &Ors vs State Of Bihar, 1996 SCC (Cri) 1177
21. State of Kerala v. P. Sugathan&Anr., (2000) 8 SCC 203
22. AradadiRanudu @ Aggiramudu v. The State, SC Criminal Appeal no 404 of 2012
23. Fowler v. Padget, (1898) 7 TLR 509 (514); 101 ER 1103
24. State of U.P. v. Satish,
25. TrimukhMarotiKirkan v. State of Maharashtra, [(2006) 10 SCC 681: (2007) 1 SCC (Cri)
80] (SCC p. 694, para 22); videPrithipal Singh v. State of Punjab [(2012) 1 SCC 10 :
(2012) 1 SCC (Cri) 1]
26. Rohtash Kumar v. State of Haryana (2013) 14 SCC 434;Nika Ram v.State of H.P. [(1972)
2 SCC 80 : 1972 SCC
27. RaviralaLaxmaiah v. State of A.P., (2013) 9 SCC 283; Vide, State of U.P. v. Ravindra
Prakash Mittal [(1992) 3 SCC 300 : 1992 SCC (Cri) 642 : AIR 1992 SC 2045] , Gulab
Chand v. State of M.P. [(1995) 3 SCC 574 : 1995 SCC (Cri) 552 : AIR 1995 SC 1598]

28. HanumantGovindNargundkar v. State of M.P., AIR 1952 SC 343:

VideSharadBirdichandSarda v. State of Maharashtra AIR 1984 SC 1622; Chattar Singh
v. State of Haryana, AIR 2009 SC 378, 383 (para 12)
29. Tomaso Bruno &Anr. v State of U.P., Supreme Court of India, Criminal Appeal no. 142 of
2015
30. Ponusamy v. State Of Tamil Nadu, Criminal Appealno. 429 of 2006
31. Palvinderkaur v. State of Punjab, AIR 1952 SC 354; Vide Roshanlal v. state of Punjab,
AIR 1965 SC 1413
32. Babu Singh v. State of Punjab
33. Anvar v. P. K. Basheer, Supreme Court Civil appeal no. 4226 of 2012
34. Supreme Court Criminal appeal no. 142 of 2015
35. VrajlalTarachand v. State of Gujrat, AIR 1967 Guj 225
36. Suresh Chandra Bahri vs State Of Bihar, 1994 AIR 2420
37. Public Prosecutor v. Muniswami, AIR 1941 Mad 503
38. JogtaKikla v. State of Gujarat,AIR 1962 Guj 225; vide ShamimRahmani v. State of Uttar
Pradesh, AIR 1975 SC 1883

1. Pakala Narayan Swami v. Emperor, AIR 1939 PC 47[ doubt whether it is foreign case or
Indian case ,Indian case citation is (1939) 41 BOMLR 428]
2. State of tamilnadu thr. Superintendent of Police , CBI/SIT v. Nalini and Others

On the night of 21.5.1991 a diabolical crime was committed. It stunned

the whole nation. Rajiv Gandhi, former Prime Minister of India, was
assassinated by a human bomb. With him 15 persons including 9
policemen perished and 43 suffered grievous or simple injuries.

Assassin Dhanu an LTTE (Liberation Tigers of Tamil Elam) activist, who

detonated the belt bomb concealed under her waist and Haribabu, a
photographer (and also a conspirator) engaged to take photographs of
the horrific sight, also died in the blast. In this case it was a camera
which was found intact on the body of Haribabu at the scene of the
crime. Film in the camera when developed led to unfolding of the
dastardly act committed by the accused and others. 26 faced the trial
before the Designated Court. Prosecution examined 288 witnesses and
produced numerous documents and material objects. [ check sec 21 of
IEA is not applicable] committed offences punishable underSection 120B of IPC read with Sections 302 of IPC, 326 of IPC, 324 of IPC, 201
of IPC, 212 of IPCand 216 of IPC; Sections 3,4 and 5 of Explosive
Substances Act of 1908; Section 25 of Arms Act of 1959; Section 12 of
Passport Act, 1967; Section 14 of the Foreigners Act, 1946; Section 6(1A)
of the Wireless Telegraphy Act, 1933 and Sections 3, 4 and 5 of TADA of
1987. Supreme Court affirm the charges.