Professional Documents
Culture Documents
10 Chapter 3
10 Chapter 3
They have become an integral part of the business assistance framework to offer
critical support to newly formed enterprises. Recognizing its importance, all major
stakeholders are trying to define, identify, measure, formulate and evaluate various
aspects related to these programmes. Business incubation initiatives have arisen
especially over the last decade with varying degrees of success in different parts of the
world. Many countries including India are still experimenting with it to foster
entrepreneurship.
Prior researches in other parts of the world have proved the benefits of a good
incubation programme, but no comprehensive study has been carried out by scholars
on the role of business incubation centres in promoting entrepreneurship in the Indian
context. This chapter aims to fill this information gap and provide valuable insights on
the efficacy of business incubation initiatives in the country.
in
Promoting
This segment describes the results of the first part of the survey on the role of
Business Incubation Centres in promoting entrepreneurship in terms of the various
107
For testing the first objective of this investigation pertaining to the role of Business
Incubation Centres in promoting entrepreneurship, mean scores of sampled
organizations were taken on the basis of 25 items included in the second part of the
questionnaires. Furthermore, a t-test was also performed to analyze the gaps between
perceived and actual services rendered by the business incubation centres. The level
of significance was set at a conventional level of 5 per cent. Table 3.1 presents the
108
results of the statistical analysis expressed in terms of the mean values of perceived
effectiveness.
TABLE 3.1: Role of Business Incubation Centres in Promoting
Entrepreneurship - Factor Wise Analysis
Factors
Incubatees
Mean
Std.
Error
Scores
Deviation
Mean
Std.
N
Mean
Std.
Error
Scores
Deviation
Mean
Physical
10
4.2750
.57070
.18047
42
3.4762
.60185
.09287
10
3.9444
.38222
.12087
42
2.9153
.50817
.07841
10
4.3500
.57975
.18333
42
3.1190
.74334
.11470
10
4.0500
.38222
.12087
42
3.3363
.50817
.07841
16.6194
12.8468
4.15485
3.2117
Infrastructure
Business
Assistance
Management
Guidance &
Consulting
Enabling
Environment
Average Mean
Score
The factor wise analysis of the data reveals that the sampled business incubation
centres render all the four categories of services to the incubatees reflected by the
mean values of above 3.0 on a five point scale. The differences in the mean values of
responses across various categories of services are attributed to the difference in the
perception regarding degree of efficiency in providing these services. The
Management Guidance and Consulting (
= 4.27), Enabling
= 3.47),
services ( = 3.33) as implied by the mean values of above 3.0, they do not recognize
them to be imparting business assistance services (
this service category is less than 3.0. The results betoken that the physical
infrastructure facilities (
Item
No
Description of Items
Obtained
Maximum
Score
Score
44
50
46
Incubatees
Obtained
Maximum
Score
Score
88
186
210
88.57
50
92
175
210
83.33
42
50
84
109
210
51.90
39
50
78
114
210
54.28
200
85.50
584
840
69.52
Percentage
Percentage
companies
at
provides
communication
15
provides
facilities
laboratory
to
tenant
companies.
Total 171
Business Assistance Services
Item
No
Description of Items
Obtained
Maximum
Score
Score
38
50
43
50
Incubatees
Obtained
Maximum
Score
Score
76
98
210
46.66
86
104
210
49.52
Percentage
Percentage
provides
services
secretarial
to
tenant
companies.
Your Incubation Centre
provides
assistance
technical
to
tenant
companies.
111
provides
marketing
assistance
to
tenant
40
50
80
110
210
52.38
36
50
72
123
210
58.57
45
50
90
129
210
61.42
37
50
74
148
210
70.47
36
50
72
127
210
60.47
37
50
74
126
210
60.00
43
50
86
137
210
65.23
450
78.88
1102
1890
58.30
companies.
Your Incubation Centre
10
11
support
networking
to
companies
tenant
(e.g.
with
suppliers/customers etc)
Your Incubation Centre
12
13
14
assists
the
companies
in
tenant
product
development activities.
Your Incubation Centre
16
Total 355
Item
No
Description of Items
Obtained
Maximum
Score
Score
42
50
40
50
Incubatees
Obtained
Maximum
Score
Score
84
159
210
75.71
80
106
210
50.47
Percentage
Percentage
disseminates information
on business ideas.
Your Incubation Centre
helps
the
tenant
companies in conducting
feasibility studies.
112
helps
the
tenant
companies in developing
46
50
92
147
210
70.00
46
50
92
112
210
53.33
200
87.00
524
840
62.38
business plans.
Your Incubation Centre
17
provides
business
counseling
to
tenant
companies.
Total 174
Item
No
Description of Items
Obtained
Maximum
Score
Score
42
50
41
Incubatees
Obtained
Maximum
Score
Score
84
151
210
71.90
50
82
120
210
57.14
41
50
82
167
210
79.52
39
50
78
149
210
70.95
42
50
84
111
210
52.85
Percentage
Percentage
18
created
an
environment
where
19
has
reduced
required
the
to
time
develop
marketable products.
Your Incubation Centre
has reduced early stage
20
21
has
accelerated
the
22
has
minimized
chances
of
failure
the
of
tenant companies.
113
23
44
50
88
143
210
68.09
39
50
78
119
210
56.66
36
50
72
161
210
76.66
400
81.00
1121
1680
66.72
credibility.
Your Incubation Centre
46
54
handling
tenant
companies grievances.
Total 324
114
115
= 4.40), library
facilities ( = 4.20) and laboratory facilities ( = 3.90). The analysis of the incubatee
data on the other hand reflects that the mean scores of two items, work space (
4.43) and communication facilities (
incubatees acknowledge only these services to be furnished. The remaining two items,
laboratory facilities (
less than 3.00 suggesting that these services are not imparted.
Business Assistance Services
So far as business assistance services are concerned, the results point out that the
business incubation centres believe themselves to be tendering all the nine services as
reflected by the mean scores ranging from 3.60 to 4.50. The results further indicate
116
= 3.70), legal
= 3.60). The
scores of above 3.00. They do not notice the business incubation centres to be
rendering secretarial services (
support (
= 2.48), marketing
In connection with the provision of management guidance and consulting services, the
business incubation centres recognize themselves to be furnishing all the four services
as denoted by the mean scores ranging from 4.00 to 4.60. Further, they discover
themselves to be most capable of providing business counseling ( = 4.60), assistance
in writing business plans (
= 3.50),
they do not find them to be imparting business counseling ( = 2.67) and assistance in
conducting feasibility studies ( = 2.52).
In terms of provision of enabling environment services, the data analysis reflects that
the business incubation centres conceive themselves to be tendering all the eight
services as revealed by the mean scores in the range of 3.60 to 4.40. We find that they
perceive themselves to be most accomplished in establishing incubatee credibility
(
= 4.20), minimizing
firms ( = 3.90), taking periodic feedback ( = 3.90) and formal grievance handling
( = 3.60). The incubatees however figure out their business incubation centres to be
providing only synergistic environment (
= 2.86),
= 2.83)
since the mean scores for all these services have been found to be less than 3.00.
Based on the results of data analysis presented above, it could be made out that the
business incubation centres in India are adept at rendering three out of four categories
of services to the incubatees during their period of incubation. These are: (1) Physical
Infrastructure services, (2) Management Guidance and Consulting services, and (3)
Enabling Environment services. The fourth category of services, namely, Business
Assistance is not imparted. Particularly, out of a total of 25 services, 13 are provided,
11 are not furnished and one service has neutral effectiveness.
Most of the start up ventures require physical infrastructure facilities but typically
cannot afford it since these facilities constitute a major expenditure and even finding
them is a major challenge for new businesses. The business incubation centres assist
the entrepreneurs in this regard by providing them with affordable and flexible work
space along with shared office services and equipment. Affordable means that the rent
is usually charged at a rate below market rent and flexible means that the size of the
space can be increased or decreased as per the need of the business. The rent can also
be paid in installments spreading over a period of time. Services related to building
facilities such as conference rooms, cafeteria, building security and other amenities
are also made available.
118
Previous research studies have found that the physical infrastructure services
furnished by the business incubation centres have a positive impact on the start up
businesses. By offering these services, they reduce early stage operational costs, save
time of the entrepreneurs (Von Zedtwitz, 2003; Hannon, 2005) allowing them to focus
on product development (Finer and Holberton, 2006). These services also enhance the
visibility, credibility and legitimacy of the incubatee businesses through the use of
business incubation centres postal address and positive word of mouth (Smilor and
Gill, 1986; Singh et al, 1986; Martin, 1997), besides yielding a synergistic cost
advantage (Govindrajan and Fisher, 1990).
We have also found in the present study that the business incubation centres reduced
early stage operational costs, accelerated development of new firms and established
credibility for incubatees. Secondly, both the business incubation centres and the
incubatees recognize the physical infrastructure services to be provided as indicated
by overall mean scores of 4.27 and 3.47 respectively. It may, therefore, be inferred
that the business incubation centres are making a significant contribution in
promoting entrepreneurship by tendering physical infrastructure services.
Previous research studies (Allen and Rehman, 1985; Campbell et al, 1987;
Johannisson, 1988; Allen and McCluskey, 1990; Sherman and Chappel, 1998 ;
Hansen et al, 2000; Klofsten et al 2000; Lewis, 2001; Hellmann and Puri, 2002;
Wilber and Dixon, 2003 ; Pena, 2004 ) have shown that management problems, lack
of business skills, under capitalization, and poor access to business network hamper
survival rates among new ventures and this is where the business incubation centres
play a key role by rendering business assistance services as a remedy to the various
disadvantages faced by start up ventures. These services help entrepreneurs access
capital, broaden information sources, lower business costs and time, capitalize on
opportunities, shorten learning curve and access resources needed for business
survival and growth.
119
However, in the present study we did not find the business incubation centres to be
imparting technical, marketing, legal, and product development services adequately. It
was also found that while they consider themselves to be providing these services as
denoted by a mean score of 3.94, the incubatees with a mean score of 2.91 did not
concur with them. It may, therefore, be inferred that the business incubation centres
are not making any significant contribution in promoting entrepreneurship in terms of
providing business assistance services.
Previous research studies (Birley, 1985; Sullivan, 2000; Hackett and Diltz, 2004b;
Tulchin and Shortall, 2008) have shown that the entrepreneurs not only need
resources of equipment, space and money but also advice, information and
reassurance. Start up ventures need a good business plan for securing capital and
ensuring smooth flow of funds. Business advice is indispensable at each stage of
business for faster problem solving and mentoring support enhances management
ability and confidence. The business incubation centres deliver value to incubatees
through providing business plan development support, mentoring, management
consulting, business advice and counseling services. (Fry, 1987; Deakins et al, 1998;
Robson and Bennett, 2000; Delmar and Shane, 2003; Birrell and Waters, 2004)
We have also discovered in our study that the business incubation centres
disseminated information and provided support for developing business plans to the
incubatees. Both the business incubation centres and the incubatees comprehend the
management guidance and consulting services to be furnished satisfactorily as
indicated by mean scores of 4.35 and 3.11 respectively. It may, therefore, be deduced
that the business incubation centres are making a significant contribution in
promoting entrepreneurship by rendering management guidance and consulting
services.
120
Research studies (Lichtenstein, 1992; Davidsson and Honig, 2003; McAdams and
McAdams, 2006) have shown that business incubation centres create opportunities
and environment that are conducive to incubatees to interact and create synergy. This
environment allows incubatees to share resources, experience, feelings of ups and
downs leading to reduction of isolation, and learn from each other to advance through
the start up process. The importance of having a good fit between incubatee needs and
incubator services has also been emphasized. (Autio and Klofsten, 1998)
The present study also indicates that the business incubation centres have created an
environment for tenant companies to learn from each other. They along with the
incubatees realize the enabling environment services to be imparted as revealed by
mean scores of 4.05 and 3.33 respectively. It may, therefore, be reasoned that the
business incubation centres are making a significant contribution in promoting
entrepreneurship by providing enabling environment services.
We may thus infer from the above analysis that the Indian Business Incubation
Centres are making a significant contribution in promoting entrepreneurship through
the provision of Physical Infrastructure services, Management Guidance and
Consulting services, and Enabling Environment services to the incubatees during their
period of incubation. The provision of Business Assistance services, however, is one
area that needs to be pursued further in order to make it more effective for incubatees
and enhance its contribution to the promotion of entrepreneurship.
121
For an analysis of the gaps between perceived and actual services rendered by the
business incubation centres, a t-test (Please refer: Table 3.3) and ANOVA (Please
refer: Table 3.4) was performed. The level of significance was set at a conventional
level of 5 per cent. In order to determine the perceived differences, comparative mean
scores were also calculated (Please refer: Table 3.5).
Physical
Infrastructure
Business
Assistance
Management
Guidance
and
Consulting
Enabling
Environment
Mean
Std. Error
Difference Difference
95% Confidence
Interval of the
Difference
Lower
Upper
df
Sig (2tailed)
-3.807
50
.000
-.7988
.20984
1.22029
-.37733
-5.994
50
.000
-1.0291
.17168
1.37393
-.68427
-4.882
50
.000
-1.2310
.25217
1.73744
-.72446
-5.994
50
.000
-1.0291
.17168
1.37393
-.68427
122
The statistical results of the t-test reveal vital gaps between perceived and actual
services rendered by the business incubation centres as denoted by the critical
negative mean difference and significance value of less than 0.05 across all categories
namely: Physical Infrastructure services (-.7988), Management Guidance and
Consulting services (-1.2310), Enabling Environment services (-1.0291), and
Business Assistance services (-1.0291). It is important to note that although the first
three categories of services have statistically significant gaps, they are acknowledged
to be provided by the incubatees since their mean scores are above 3.00. (Please refer:
Table 3.1). The analysis, therefore, reveals that the incubatees expectation of the
degree of effectiveness in provision of these services is higher than its current level.
However, in case of Business Assistance services, the mean value is below 3.0
suggesting that the incubatees did not discern them to be provided.
Analysis of Variance
TABLE 3.4: ANOVA between Incubatees and Business Incubation Centres
Sum of
Squares
df
Mean
Square
Sig.
.007
.007
.011
.918
1.517
1.517
1.983
.165
20.800
20.800
12.423
.001
11.355
11.355
6.346
.015
Physical Infrastructure
4. Your Incubation Centre provides work
space to tenant companies at below market
rate rent.
5. Your Incubation Centre provides
communication facilities like Phone, Fax, to
tenant companies.
7. Your Incubation Centre provides
library facilities to tenant companies.
15. Your Incubation Centre provides
laboratory facilities to tenant companies.
Business Assistance
6. Your Incubation Centre provides
secretarial services to tenant companies.
8. Your Incubation Centre provides
technical assistance to tenant
companies.
9. Your Incubation Centre provides
marketing assistance to tenant
companies.
17.374
17.374
21.223
.000
26.866
26.866
23.743
.000
15.403
15.403
10.711
.002
3.641
3.641
2.710
.106
123
16.484
16.484
14.908
.000
.251
.251
.410
.525
2.682
2.682
3.091
.085
3.958
3.958
2.353
.131
8.704
8.704
5.048
.029
1.386
1.386
2.122
.151
17.601
17.601
8.113
.006
9.773
9.773
9.993
.003
30.190
30.190
17.205
.000
2.954
2.954
4.970
.030
12.476
12.476
9.741
.003
.124
.124
.135
.715
1.003
1.003
.941
.337
19.584
19.584
14.562
.000
8.000
8.000
4.847
.032
9.190
9.190
10.272
.002
.440
.440
.682
.413
124
In terms of physical infrastructure services, the ANOVA table indicates that the
significance value of library facilities (.001) and laboratory facilities (.015) is less
than 0.05 indicating vital gaps in the perception of business incubation centres and
their incubatees regarding provision of these two services.
The results of the ANOVA for business assistance services reveal a significance value
of less than 0.05 for secretarial services (.000), technical assistance (.000), marketing
assistance (.002), networking support (.000) and assistance in securing capital (.029)
implying critical differences in the conception of business incubation centres and their
incubatees regarding provision of these five services. It is, however, worth noting that
in case of networking support and assistance in securing capital, the results indicate
that although the incubatees figure out these services to be provided in general, the
degree of efficacy is perceived to be less in comparison to that of business incubation
centres. This is evident from the mean scores of above 3.00 for each of these services
(Please refer: Table 3.5).
With regards to the enabling environment services, the ANOVA table reveals that the
significance value of synergistic environment (.030), reduced time to develop
marketable products/services (.003), minimized chances of failure (.000), establishing
credibility (.032), and periodic feedback (.002) is less than 0.05, implying significant
differences in perception of business incubation centres and incubatees regarding
provision of these services. The creation of synergistic environment and credibility
enhancement services require special attention even though the incubatees consider
these services to be furnished as indicated by mean score of above 3.00 (Please refer:
Table 3.5).
125
Incubatee
Respondent
Incubator
Total
Physical Infrastructure
4. Your Incubation Centre provides work space to
tenant companies at below market rate rent.
4.43
4.40
4.42
4.17
4.60
4.25
2.60
4.20
2.90
2.71
3.90
2.94
2.33
3.80
2.62
2.48
4.30
2.83
2.62
4.00
2.88
2.93
3.60
3.06
3.07
4.50
3.35
3.52
3.70
3.56
3.02
3.60
3.13
3.00
3.70
3.13
3.26
4.30
3.46
3.79
4.20
3.87
2.52
4.00
2.81
3.50
4.60
3.71
2.67
4.60
3.04
3.60
4.20
3.71
Business Assistance
Enabling Environment
18. Your Incubation Centre has created an
environment where tenant companies learn from
one another.
126
2.86
4.10
3.10
3.98
4.10
4.00
3.55
3.90
3.62
2.64
4.20
2.94
3.40
4.40
3.60
2.83
3.90
3.04
3.83
3.60
3.79
The comparison of mean scores point out significant gaps between perceived and
actual services rendered by the business incubation centres.
127
Service
Providing below market rate rental Work Space
Business Plan Writing Assistance
Reduced Operational Costs
Laboratory Facilities
Providing Communication Facilities
Secretarial Services
Library Facilities
Human Resource Management
Legal Services
Product Development
Reduced Product/service Development Time
Accelerated Development of Firm
Dissemination of Information on business ideas
Statutory Approval
Technical Assistance
Securing Capital
Synergistic Learning Environment
Establishing Credibility
Grievance Handling
Minimized Chances of Failure
Marketing Assistance
Conducting Feasibility Studies
Business Counselling
Networking Support
Periodic Feedback
Score
4.76
9.00
10.21
10.26
10.59
10.59
10.66
11.04
11.50
12.00
12.02
12.26
12.33
12.69
13.09
13.28
13.28
13.40
13.45
13.69
13.76
14.00
14.00
14.02
15.73
Rank
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
128
Response Category
S.No
N=42
Description of Items
Yes Percentage
1
No
Percentage
78.57
21.42
Dissemination of Information on 33
business ideas
Conducting Feasibility Studies
39
92.85
7.14
41
97.61
2.38
92.85
7.14
92.85
7.14
Secretarial Services
21
50.00
21
50.00
Library Facilities
32
76.19
10
23.80
Technical Assistance
31
73.80
11
26.19
Marketing Assistance
42
100.00
0.00
10
Legal Services
38
90.47
9.52
11
Networking Support
40
95.23
4.76
12
33
78.57
21.42
13
Statutory Approval
37
88.09
11.90
14
Product Development
37
88.09
11.90
15
Laboratory Facilities
33
78.57
21.42
16
Securing Capital
39
92.85
7.14
17
Business Counselling
38
90.47
9.52
18
29
69.04
13
30.95
19
83.33
16.66
20
Reduced
Product/service 35
Development Time
Reduced Operational Costs
41
97.61
2.38
21
37
88.09
11.90
22
39
92.85
7.14
23
Establishing Credibility
40
95.23
4.76
24
Periodic Feedback
29
69.04
13
30.95
25
Grievance Handling
39
92.85
7.14
129
Incubatee comments
Incubatees were requested to share information on their incubation experience and
provide suggestions for additional services that would have benefited them during
their incubation. Out of a total of 42, only 16 responses were provided to this
question, indicating that Incubatees were relatively satisfied with the range of services
provided to them. Suggestions for improvement in services included marketing
support, admission procedure, business advice, technical support, release of funds,
manufacturing processes support, and business counseling.
From the foregoing analysis, the following findings have emerged:
2. There are statistically significant gaps between perceived and actual services
rendered by the business incubation centres across all categories. The
incubatees perceive a significantly lower level of efficiency in the provision of
various services as compared to their business incubation centres.
From the above discussions, we may summarize that business incubation has been
globally recognized as an important mechanism for upping the entrepreneurship
quotient through a well designed venture creation process. It is a potential component
designed to foster entrepreneurship more systematically and comprehensively through
tailored support to newly formed companies. India has a large pool of semi skilled
and unskilled workforce which can be harnessed and engaged in a productive manner
by encouraging them to set up their own business ventures. The findings of the
present study reveal that systematic interventions through business incubation centres
130
have created enabling conditions for them, and thus, they assumes a lot of
significance in ameliorating unemployment and other socio-economic problems of the
country.
As the incubator concept has evolved, the range of services offered by them has
greatly expanded from providing basic equipment to a broad spectrum of professional
services. The quality, range, dependability, and accessibility of these services attract
entrepreneurs to an incubator and ultimately help them nurture their entrepreneurial
ventures successfully. Therefore, it is essential to ascertain whether they are effectively meeting the needs of the incubatees or not? We observed critical gaps between
perceived and actual services rendered by the business incubation centres which may
be detrimental to the success and survival of the Indian business incubators.
We may, thus, conclude that although business incubation centres are playing a
significant role in promoting entrepreneurship, they need to continuously shape up
their offerings consistent with the needs and expectations of their incubatees. The
portfolio of services should be coalesced into a comprehensive business assistance
program designed to successfully nurture emerging ventures.
---------------X---------------
131