The document summarizes key messages from forums discussing the impact of cuts to services for those with learning disabilities. It notes cuts are reducing funding for partnership boards, involvement work, and support for advocacy. As a result, families fear losing existing support and are more lonely. The Care Act is also being implemented primarily to save costs rather than help families. There are concerns about employment support and expertise of those assessing needs given more generic roles due to cuts.
The document summarizes key messages from forums discussing the impact of cuts to services for those with learning disabilities. It notes cuts are reducing funding for partnership boards, involvement work, and support for advocacy. As a result, families fear losing existing support and are more lonely. The Care Act is also being implemented primarily to save costs rather than help families. There are concerns about employment support and expertise of those assessing needs given more generic roles due to cuts.
The document summarizes key messages from forums discussing the impact of cuts to services for those with learning disabilities. It notes cuts are reducing funding for partnership boards, involvement work, and support for advocacy. As a result, families fear losing existing support and are more lonely. The Care Act is also being implemented primarily to save costs rather than help families. There are concerns about employment support and expertise of those assessing needs given more generic roles due to cuts.
Cuts is the biggest message from both forums. Within Local Authorities this is happening across the regions. There is less money for: Partnership Boards Involvement work Support for people to speak up People are giving us stories about cuts that are affecting them now, and about the fear of cuts to their services and support. Families are telling us that they wont speak up about things that are going wrong with their current support because they are afraid of losing what they have. More self-advocacy groups are losing their funding. With fewer places to go to people are becoming more lonely. Loneliness was a big message coming back from our regions. We need good information about what good looks like who is working well with people and families despite the cuts. We are working on our cuts evidence paper and will be presenting it at the next Board.
We have put a few examples together with
this report of the stories we are hearing. The Care Act implementation and knowledge gap The cuts are leading to more generic roles and fewer people with experience and good knowledge of learning disability. Professionals are carrying out several roles and are not able to offer families good information, services and support. Many of the regions are reporting that families are being told that their reassessment under the Care Act is to look for cost savings. There has been a big increase in Statutory advocacy this is advocacy that has to happen like IMHA, IMCA and Care Act Advocacy. This means there is less money for general advocacy some areas are thinking about not funding this work. This means people will have less support to help them speak up. Employment There is not enough support to help people get jobs. Where there are projects these are often short term and can only work with certain groups of people.
People say that the Job Centre do not
understand how to work with people with learning disabilities. We are very worried about the message given out by the recent awarding of the CQC Experts by Experience contract to Maximus and the payments that they want to give to experts. We feel that people and families are being devalued are other members of the inspection team getting their payments reduced?
Some good news:
The Foundation for People with Learning Disabilities When I Grow Up is a four year programme funded by Reaching Communities England aims to increase work assumptions, aspirations and opportunities for young people with learning disabilities at three schools in West Berkshire, Kent and the London Borough of Redbridge. We feel that this is a positive approach to the issues around work and employment and something the Board should hear more about.
Some questions for the Board:
What information and support will be available to enable people with learning disabilities to vote in the European referendum on 23 June? How are the Board responding to the Mazars report? What do the Board think about Sir Stephen Bubbs recommendation that there should be a learning disability commissioner?