Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 s2.0 S0016236114012320 Main PDF
1 s2.0 S0016236114012320 Main PDF
Fuel
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/fuel
Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, Peoples Republic of China
Beijing Science and Technology New Innovations Development Base Project, Beijing, Peoples Republic of China
c
MOST-USDA Joint Research Center for Biofuels, Beijing, Peoples Republic of China
b
h i g h l i g h t s
A modied kinetic model was developed to describe the sugar transfer of sweet sorghum.
The modied kinetic model was the rst related to the structure of sweet sorghum stalks.
The modied kinetic model was well tted to the extraction process.
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 11 November 2014
Received in revised form 3 December 2014
Accepted 8 December 2014
Available online 20 December 2014
Keywords:
Solid state fermentation
Kinetic model
Sweet sorghum
Sugar
a b s t r a c t
Solid-state fermentation of sweet sorghum stalk is a cost-effective technology for bioethanol production.
Sugar transfer from the interior of sweet sorghum plant cell to the surface is one of the key factors affecting the fermentation process because the system takes place in the absence of free water. Mass transfer of
sugar from the interior of the sweet sorghum to the surface of substrates is mainly driven by the sugar
concentration gradient. A mass transfer model based on three steps process was developed. Taking into
consideration of the different tissue structures of sweet sorghum stalks, a two simultaneous rst-order
kinetic model of sugar transfer with two parameters characterizing the tissue structure difference was
developed to describe the sugar transfer process in sweet sorghum. Solid-liquid extraction experiments
were used to gather experimental kinetics data of sugar transfer. Four factors impacting the mass transfer
of sugar including particle sizes, stirring speed, temperature, and osmotic pressure were investigated. The
results showed that the newly modied model tted well the kinetics of sugar transfer in different
varieties of sweet sorghum. This model could be helpful in optimizing solid state fermentation of sweet
sorghum stalks. Moreover, the kinetic model with the added structural parameters based on difference in
plant tissue structure can also be used to describe the extraction of any active substance from types of
feedstocks with similar chemical compositions and biomass structures.
2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
The depletion of fossil fuel and environmental concerns has
focused worldwide attention on research for energy crops suitable
for ethanol production [13]. Sweet sorghum is attractive as a nonfood feedstock for biofuel production because it is easily adaptable
to diverse climate and soil conditions [4,5]. It is a C4 plant
characterized by high photosynthetic efciency, high fermentation
sugars and high yield of green biomass (with 2030 dry tons/ha). It
has low requirements for fertilizer, high efciency in water usage
(1/3 that of sugarcane and 1/2 that of corn), and a short growth
period of 120150 days [6].
Solid-state fermentation (SSF) has become a promising technology to convert biomass into bioethanol due to its relatively simple
process, low energy consumption and low wastewater production
[5,7]. However, the SSF process has limits due to its particular
operational conditions [8]: it is a heterogeneous system without
free water, and growth of contaminated microorganisms.
The performance of SSF is affected by many factors, such as particle size, temperature, stirring speed and moisture [8]. In the SSF
technology, each individual sweet sorghum particle could be
regarded as a single fermentation unit. The mass transfer of sugar
91
Sugar solution
Liquid membrane
Sweet sorghum cells
Sugar
Yeast
2
1
C C 1 1 ek1 t C 2 1 ek2 t
Fig. 1. Structure of SSF systems at the microscopic scale and local mass transport
processes for sweet sorghum fermentation process. The processes occurring are 1,
sugar transferring from the interior of plant cell to the surface of substrates; 2, sugar
diffusion through liquid membrane and consumed by yeast. 3, bulk liquid phase
diffusion.
92
C C 1 1 ek1 t C 2 1 ek2 t
Fig. 2. The cross section of sweet sorghum stalks (Zone A refers to the compact
structure with green color due to containing chloroplasts in the stalk. Moreover, the
vascular bundles in this zone are smaller and the tissue structure is dense. Zone B
refers to the soft structure with white color in the stalk. The vascular bundles in this
zone are bigger and the tissue structure is sparse). (For interpretation of the
references to colour in this gure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of
this article.)
100
80
Permeability. %
Various factors impacting the sugar transfer in SSF of sweet sorghum were studied by the modied model in the following
sections.
3.3. Effect of particle size
The impact of different particle sizes 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 mm of
sweet sorghum stalks in sugar transfer was investigated. The sugar
extraction curves for different sweet sorghum stalk particle sizes
were shown in Fig. 4(a). As can be seen, the smaller particle sized
stalk reach the equilibrium faster. A similar observation was
reported by Goula AM [17], who studied the ultrasound-assisted
extract oil from pomegranate seeds observed that smaller particle
size shortened the extraction time to achieve the highest yield. As
particle size decreased the mass transfer distance shortened thus
with the shorter distance less time was needed. In addition, smaller size also meant that more surface area was exposed to the
solvent.
The mass transfer parameters of the sugar in the sweet sorghum
stalks was calculated by the modied two simultaneous rst-order
kinetic model. Because the sample was Chuntian #1, the value C1
and C2 used in this equation was 0.250.75. The results were
shown in Table 1 and Fig. 4(a). The results demonstrate that this
model tted the data very well. All the R2 of the t curve were
greater than 0.99 with exception of the 16 mm which also had a
high R2 value of 0.964. Moreover, the parameter k1 and k2 describing the extraction rate decreased with the increase of particle size.
The results demonstrated that the modied kinetic model tted
the data from the sugar transfer in the sweet sorghum very well.
3.4. Effect of stirring speed
60
40
B
A
Whole stalks
20
0
0
100
200
300
400
93
100
100
80
80
Permeability ( %)
Permeability , %
2mm
4mm
6mm
8mm
12mm
16mm
fitting of 2 mm
fitting of 4 mm
fitting of 6 mm
fitting of 8 mm
fitting of 12 mm
fitting of 16 mm
60
40
20
0 rpm
100 rpm
250 rpm
500 rpm
750 rpm
fitting of 0 rpm
fitting of 100 rpm
fitting of 250 rpm
fitting of 500 rpm
fitting of 750 rpm
60
40
20
0
0
200
400
600
800
1000
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
(a)
(b)
100
100
80
80
Permeability , %
Permeability , %
20 C
30 C
40 C
50 C
60 C
fitting of 20 C
fitting of 30 C
fitting of 40 C
fitting of 50 C
fitting of 60 C
60
40
20
50
100
150
200
250
300
1.2x10 KPa
3
1.4x10 KPa
60
1.9x10 KPa
3
2.2x10 KPa
3
40
20
0
0
0x10 KPa
350
400
0
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
(c)
(d)
Fig. 4. The effect and tting results of particle size (a), stirring speed (b) temperature (c) and osmotic pressure (d) during sugar extraction from sweet sorghum.
Table 1
The tting results of the modied kinetic model with different particle sizes.
h (mm)
k1 (min1)
k2 (min1)
R2
Permeability
2
4
6
8
12
16
0.12
0.093
0.059
0.040
0.033
0.026
0.013
0.0087
0.0067
0.0044
0.0029
0.0017
0.997
0.998
0.997
0.994
0.997
0.964
97.4
90.6
91.7
93.1
90.4
85.9
Table 2
The tting results of the modied kinetic model with different stirring speeds.
Rpm
k1 (min1)
k2 (min1)
R2
Permeability
0
100
250
500
750
0.12
0.15
0.18
0.34
0.38
0.014
0.015
0.018
0.019
0.021
0.988
0.992
0.998
0.996
0.982
96.8
96.6
99.7
99.9
98.7
94
Table 3
The tting results of the modied kinetic model with different temperatures.
T (C)
k1 (min1)
k2 (min1)
R2
Permeability
20
30
40
50
60
0.089
0.12
0.24
0.28
0.38
0.0064
0.011
0.013
0.019
0.025
0.961
0.980
0.993
0.993
0.994
85.5
95.6
96.7
99.1
99.5
Table 4
The tting results of the modied kinetic model with different osmotic pressures.
Osmotic pressure
(103 KPa)
k1 (min1)
k2 (min1)
R2
Permeability
0
1.2
1.4
1.9
2.2
0.11
0.036
0.032
0.027
0.0086
0.010
0.0058
0.0028
0.0020
0.00089
0.998
0.985
0.929
0.945
0.959
94.2
85.1
63.6
55.8
40.1
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
95