Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 s2.0 S0022480406005300 Main
1 s2.0 S0022480406005300 Main
1 s2.0 S0022480406005300 Main
doi:10.1016/j.jss.2006.10.007
reserved.
31
0022-4804/07 $32.00
2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
32
RESULTS
Patient Demographics
All pathologic diagnoses were pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Tumors with a mean diameter of 2.9 cm
were mainly located at the pancreatic head, and T3
lesions comprised most of the resectable pancreatic
cancers (Table 2).
Determining Prognostic Factors for Disease-Free Survival
TABLE 1
Patients Characteristics
Frequency(%), mean SD
Gender
Male
Female
Age (years)
Total bilirubin (mg/dL)
Preoperative CA 19-9 (U/mL)
Biliary decompression
Surgery
Conventional PD
PPPD
DP with splenectomy
Complications
Mortality
39 (63.9)
22 (36.1)
59.9 8.2
7.6 8.2
442.1 645.5
32 (52.5%)
18 (29.5)
28 (45.9)
15 (24.6)
26 (42.6)
1 (1.6)
PD pancreaticoduodenectomy.
PPPD pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy.
DP distal pancreatectomy.
The overall mean survival rate of patients with resectable pancreatic cancer was estimated to be 39.6
mo, with a 5-y survival rate of 16.4%. The mean for
disease-free survival (DFS) was 22.6 mo. Upon univariate analysis, peripancreatic microscopic cancer invasion (P 0.0142), lymphovascular invasion (P
0.0038), and an adjusted CA 19-9 level 50 U/mL (P
0.0049) were significant predictive factors for cancer
recurrence (Table 3). However, only an adjusted CA
19-9 level 50 U/mL (Exp (B) 2.097, P 0.027) was
an independent predictive factor in multivariate analysis (Table 4). In fact, 42 patients (68.9%) experienced
cancer recurrence within 1 y of surgical treatment.
When comparing adjusted CA 19-9 values between
early recurrence (within 12 mo) and late recurrence
(after 12 mo), significant differences were noted, with
higher values in early recurrence (167 246.08 U/mL,
versus 45.93 75.55 U/mL, Students t-test, P
33
TABLE 2
Tumor Characteristics
Frequency(%), mean SD
Tumor size (cm)
Tumor location
Proximal
Distal
T stage
T1
T2
T3
N stage
N0
N1
Histologic grade
Well
Moderate
Poor
Perineural invasion
Lymphovascular invasion
2.9 1.3
46 (75.4)
15 (24.6)
1 (1.6)
4 (6.6)
56 (52.5)
29 (47.5)
32 (52.5)
5 (8.2)
38 (62.3)
12 (19.7)
15 (24.6)
5 (8.2)
Frequency
Mean DFS
(months)
39
22
24.83
14.67
0.7787
30
31
16.49
24.32
0.5318
29
32
21.83
18.36
0.4584
18
43
22.20
19.31
0.1470
46
15
24.34
14.34
0.2594
1
4
56
NA
8.99
20.64
0.3061
29
32
33.20
12.27
0.3671
32
27
11.53
27.15
0.1095
20
41
42.82
11.83
0.0142
56
5
5.61
24.61
0.0038
46
15
25.06
8.43
0.1593
33
28
29.52
12.00
0.0045
5
38
12
26.25
15.69
15.31
0.3459
Gender
Male
Female
Jaundice
No
Yes
Biliary decompression
No
Yes
Actual CA 19-9
50
50
Tumor location
Proximal
Distal
T stage
T1
T2
T3
N stage
N0
N1
Transfusion
No
Yes
Peripancreatic invasion
No
Yes
Lymphovascular invasion
No
Yes
Perineural invasion
No
Yes
Adjusted CA 19-9
50
50
Histologic grade
Well
Moderate
Poor
DFS disease-free survival.
P-values
34
TABLE 4
TABLE 6
95% Confidence
Interval
Variables
P-values
Exp (B)
Lower
Upper
Adjusted CA 19-9
Lymphovascular invasion
0.027
0.057
2.097
2.680
1.117
0.972
3.934
7.387
Early recurrence
Late recurrence
Adjusted CA
19-9 50
Adjusted CA
19-9 50
Total
P-values
19
16
23
3
42
19
0.005
Adjusted CA 19-9
(cut-off point)
37
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.0602
0.0491
0.0045
0.0090
0.025
0.078
0.1263
0.1263
amination, is another candidate for predicting recurrence risk. Lymphovascular invasion was not found to
be a statistically significant predictive factor (P
0.057, Exp (B) 2.680), but the P values suggest that
the presence of lymphovascular invasion could be helpful in predicting disease-free survival.
The drawback of our study is the fact that it was
based on retrospective observations of limited available medical records. Among the patients who underwent macroscopically curative resection of pancreatic
cancer in our institution, the data of only approximately 60% of the patients (61 out of 102 patients)
were available with both preoperative CA 19-9 and
recurrence data in this study. Considering that CA
19-9 may reflect the tumor burden, adjusted preoperative CA 19-9 levels and tumor size are closely related
with marginal significance (P 0.077, R2 0.0529,
not shown in results). We expect that this relationship
would be statistically significant if the sample size
were much larger. Therefore, a controlled prospective
study is likely necessary to unveil the exact relationship between adjusted preoperative CA 19-9 levels and
disease-free survival.
According to our anecdotal experiences with preoperative CA 19-9 after biliary decompressions, we can
easily find definitive reduction of actual CA 19-9 levels
as the cholestasis is resolved by biliary drainage procedures, such as endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage (ERBD), endoscopic nasobiliary biliary drainage
(ENBD), or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD). We think the concept of adjusted CA 19-9
levels is also available even in these circumstances
because all patients undergoing the biliary drainage
procedure can not reach the normal levels of bilirubin
before surgery. However, the ability of adjusted CA
19-9 after biliary decompression before surgery to predict recurrence may not be reliable due to possible
procedure-related cholangitis, pancreatitis, and ascending infection. These clinical settings might falsely
elevate CA 19-9 again.
In most studies, serial CA 19-9 levels are generally
used to evaluate the relationship between CA 19-9 and
the response prognosis to adjuvant chemoradiation. How-
ever, a few articles have evaluated the prognostic relevance of baseline CA 19-9. Berger et al. [22] divided
patients into four groups, according to preoperative
levels: undetectable, normal, 38 to 200 U/mL, and
200 U/mL. Patients with lower baseline CA 19-9 (undetectable and normal) had statistically significant,
prolonged survival (P 0.003). Ni et al. [23] demonstrated that high tumor marker levels, including CA
19-9, are associated with advanced stages of pancreatic
cancer, and the positive expression of CEA, CA19-9,
and CA242 levels predicted shorter survival time.
We believe that adjusted baseline CA 19-9 may be a
better clinical application for estimating survival or
recurrence risk than serial values, as treatment strategies can be individualized based on baseline preoperative levels. For example, appropriate preoperative
chemoradiation or postoperative adjuvant therapy
may be initially planned based on the risk of recurrence estimated by the preoperative adjusted CA 19-9.
Future prospective studies are needed to validate this
treatment strategy.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
CONCLUSIONS
14.
REFERENCES
19.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
15.
16.
17.
18.
20.
21.
22.
23.
35