Professional Documents
Culture Documents
01 15 00023 Kgs edit1CLEAN
01 15 00023 Kgs edit1CLEAN
www.springerlink.com/content/1738-494x(Print)/1976-3824(Online)
DOI 10.1007/s12206-013-0913-y
Abstract
Investigations were conducted on the machining of AISI D2 tool steel via conventional electrical discharge machining (CEDM) and
cryogenic cooled electrode in electrical discharge machining (CCEDM). Machining parameters, including discharge current, pulse on
time, and gap voltage, were varied to investigate their effects on machining performance such as on electrode wear ratio (EWR), surface
roughness (Ra), microstructure, surface morphology, and elemental composition. Experimental results showed that EWR was reduced by
20% in CCEDM compared with in CEDM. Moreover, the Ra in CCEDM decreased by approximately 19% compared with that in
CEDM. The results also indicated that the surface morphology of the workpiece machined via CCEDM was better than that of the workpiece machined via CEDM. Lastly, the damaged layer and microcracks were less in the workpiece machined via CCEDM than those in
the workpiece machined via CEDM.
Keywords: Cryogenic cooling; Electrical discharge machining; Electrode wear ratio; SEM; Surface roughness
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Introduction
Electrical discharge machining (EDM) is a widely used
process in manufacturing high-precision components from
extremely hard and exotic metals. EDM is frequently used in
mold- and die-making industries [1]. Haron et al. [2] reported
that the highest material removal rate (MRR) was achieved at
6.5 A when machining AISI 1045 steel with an electrode diameter of 20 mm. Ozgedik et al. [3] conducted an experimental investigation on tool wear in EDM on an AISI 1040 steel
workpiece with cylindrical copper as the tool electrode. The
experimental results indicated that the metal removal rate increased with pulse duration. Amorim et al. [4] examined the
behavior of copper and graphite electrodes during the machining of AISI P20 tool steel; according to their observation,
copper and graphite presented similar MRR trends at positive
polarity. Furthermore, when the discharge current was high,
MRR was high, electrode wear was low, and surface roughness (Ra) was improved with the copper electrode under negative polarity.
Batish et al. [5] investigated the effects of the process parameters and the mechanism of material deposition in EDM
on the surface properties of EN31,H11 and high-carbon highchromium die steel materials. The material transfer mecha*
Vinoth Kumar. S and Pradeep Kumar. M / Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 29 (9) (2015) 1~9
2. Experimental setup
The experiments were performed on an ELECTRONICA
XPERT 1 EDM machine. The dimensions of the square copper electrode and workpiece are 19 mm 19 mm 140 mm
and 22 mm 22 mm 10 mm, respectively, for all work
combinations. The chemical composition and material properties of AISI D2 tool steel are provided in Tables 1 and 2, respectively.
2.1 Modified tool electrode
Fig. 1 shows the modified tool electrode setup for EDM.
Mn
Si
Cr
Ni
Mo
Fe
Weight %
1.4
.60
0.6
11
.30
0.7
0.7
Balance
Conditions (C)
7.7
25
Poissons ratio
0.27-0.30
25
190-210
25
Thermal expansion
(10-6/C)
10.4
20-100
(a)
(b)
Vinoth Kumar. S and Pradeep Kumar. M / Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 29 (9) (2015) 1~9
Current (A)
9, 12, and 15
Dielectric fluid
Polarity
Machining environments
(i) CEDM
(ii) CCEDM
Vinoth Kumar. S and Pradeep Kumar. M / Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 29 (9) (2015) 1~9
Fig. 6. Effects of pulse on time and discharge current on EWR: (a) gap
voltage 45 V; (b) gap voltage 55 V; (c) gap voltage 65 V.
Fig. 7. Effects of pulse on time and discharge current on Ra: (a) gap
voltage 45 V; (b) gap voltage 55 V; (c) gap voltage 65 V.
which increased heat energy at the electrode-workpiece interface and resulted in the rapid melting and vaporization of the
electrode. In CCEDM, however, the LN2-cooled electrode
exhibited enhanced thermal conductivity, and thus, reduced
the melting and vaporization of the electrode. Consequently,
EWR was reduced in CCEDM compared with in CEDM.
3.3 Ra
Fig. 7 shows the effects of pulse on time and discharge current on Ra. As indicated in the figure, Ra increased with discharge current and slightly decreased in both processes. This
finding could be attributed to the presence of a sufcient
amount of machining debris in the dielectric fluid that modified and widened the plasma channel. The application of LN2
cooling improved the thermal conductivity of the electrode
and ensured a stable spark, which reduced electrode wear,
melting, and vaporization, and resulted in a smooth surface.
The Ra value of the work surface was 8.7 mm and 7.0 mm
for a current of 9 A, a pulse on time 300 ms, and a gap voltage
of 55 V in CEDM and CCEDM, respectively. Ra under the
LN2 cooling of the electrode was reduced by 20% compared
with that in CEDM.
3.3 Electrode temperature
Fig. 8 shows the effects of pulse on time and discharge cur-
Vinoth Kumar. S and Pradeep Kumar. M / Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 29 (9) (2015) 1~9
Conventional EDM
(CEDM process)
Conventional EDM
(CEDM process)
Vinoth Kumar. S and Pradeep Kumar. M / Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 29 (9) (2015) 1~9
(a) CEDM
(b) CCEDM
(a) CEDM
(b) CCEDM
Fig. 11. EDAX analysis of the workpiece surface of AISI D2 tool steel
at a current of 9 A, a pulse on time of 100 s, and a gap voltage of 45
V: (a) CEDM; (b) CCEDM.
Fig. 12. EDAX analysis of the workpiece surface of AISI D2 tool steel
at a current of 15 A, a pulse on time of 300 ms, and a gap voltage of 65
V: (a) CEDM; (b) CCEDM
4. Conclusion
Experiments were performed on AISI D2 steel under
CEDM and CCEDM. The conclusions drawn from the investigation are as follows.
(1) The results indicate that wear is reduced by 10%-21%
under LN2 cooling of the electrode compared with under
CEDM.
(2) The average surface roughness in LN2 cooling of the
electrode is reduced by 5%-10% compared with that in
CEDM.
(3) Electrode temperature decreases by 25% at a discharge
current of 15 A and a pulse on time of 300 ms in CCEDM
compared with in CEDM.
(4) The width of microcracks increases with peak current
and pulse on time in both cases, whereas globules and recast
layers are less in CCEDM than in CEDM.
(5) The depth of the damaged layer, as well as the width and
number of microcracks and cracks, increases with discharge
current and pulse on time. The subsurface damage layer and
microcracks are less at low discharge current and pulse on
time. Damaged layers and microcracks are less in CCEDM
than in CEDM.
(6) Carbon is reduced by 11% in the elemental composition
of the workpiece specimen because of the cryogenic cooling
of the electrode.
References
[1] I. Puertas and C. J. Luis, A study of optimization of machining parameters for electrical discharge machining of boron
carbide, Mater Manuf Process., 19 (2004) 1041-70.
[2] CHC. Haron, B. Deros, A. Ginting and M. Fauziah, Investigation on the influeuence of machining parameters when
machining tool steel using EDM, J Mater Process Technol.,
116 (2001) 84-7.
[3] A. Ozgedik and C. Cogun, An experimental investigation of
tool wear in electric discharge machining, Int J Adv Manuf
Technol., 27 (2005) 488-500.
Vinoth Kumar. S and Pradeep Kumar. M / Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 29 (9) (2015) 1~9