Recently, I was in a meeting/conference call with some leading executives of a
globally leading pharma company.The agenda was pipeline review and a very broad-based, open brainstorm through which we hoped to come away with pointers/thought-starters about the challenges and the future vis-a-vis this company. Quite a few points came up during the discussion - each highly relevant and potentially critical for the successful presence of this company, both in India and across the globe. What struck me was the clear and marked difference in the psychological and managerial outlook of the attendees. While those signing in from EU and North America (the "West" group as one of my colleagues noted goodnaturedly) were cautious and spoke only about "careful steps and hedging bets", those that had signed in from southeast Asia, Africa and some other third world markets (let's call them "Emergents") were decidedly enthusiastic, more upbeat and more importantly, more optimistic about where the company was headed, how it would face challenges and how it could be made future-ready. Interestingly, the topic of challenge management and future - readiness brought up similar responses and proposed areas of focus from both groups including the ever-present shadow of "diverst or push some more" for some legacy operations. Also, global topics like "in-house outsourcing",
"collaborative innovation" and their inherent challenges came up. Under
challenges, everyone became somewhat guarded on the topic of workforce multiculturalism. I understand why it happened - when you are a global player of this size and scale (refer top 5 Big Pharma for context), multiculturalism creates its own currents that impact operations and deliverables besides communication challenges. Some of the more senior (age-wise) attendees lamented how, in the "earlier days", multiculturalism was not as prominent as it is today and that, in their opinion, helped productivity and results. Not surprisingly, the counterpoints about the inevitability of multiculturalism and its ubiquity came most strongly from the younger attendees across the board. Some of these attendees pointed out that consumer and workforce diversity (including Outsourcing) were the reasons that multiculturalism was so prominent today. Another youngster pointed out about how diseases tend to cut across the phenomenon of multiculturalism, creating different impact areas, new challenges and opportunities (both for research and business). Interestingly, an age-independent consensus emerged that in the context of multiculturalism, perceived challenges often exceed actual ground realities by a wide margin. Eventually, the following was summarized:
1.
Multiculturalism is extremely crucial in the pharmaceuticals
and medical fields because different cultures lay varying degrees of emphasis on Medicine, Medicines and personal healthcare which in turn impacts their acceptance and uptake among culture-specific consumers. Understanding these impact areas can enable better consumer outreach, consumer receptivity (to efforts and messages), disease prevention and treatment outcomes. For example, in erstwhile India, age-related cognitive decline was deemed so natural and inevitable that senile dementia cases were not taken for treatment and care as readily as they are today. This is definitely changing but more needs to be done
2.
All organizations (especially larger ones) must periodically
assess the impact of multiculturalism and sensitize their workforce about it. The role expectations are decidedly distinct from standard HR operations and might segue into that of a "People Officer" or require a new title (and incumbent) altogether
3.
Tolerance of multiculturalism is not optional but mandatory for
any organization wishing to thrive in the current global marketplace
4.
Inclusive policies and decisions are only possible when
multiculturalism is accounted for in a free and fair fashion
5.
All other things being equal, organizations that acknowledge,
embrace and constructively respond to multiculturalism tend to get better responses for their products and services. Advertising firms that embrace, account for and appropriately target multicultural consumer bases see better results
6.
Finally, multiculturalism merits deeper research since some
diseases (incl. orphans) are exclusive to certain cultures and ethnicities and may even be rooted in their sociocultural mores. Further, seeing how the same medicine can elicit widely varying physiological experiences across different ethnicities, a constructive focus on multiculturalism is likely to be very helpful. Oh, by the way, while the upbeat group kept its optimism pedal floored, the "West" group also picked up steam on cautious optimism. I am so looking forward to a second brainstorm to discuss how to engender multiculturalism (even more) strongly into the organizational DNA (and, of course, review the pipeline!!!)....... Thank you for reading.....:-)