Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sci
Sci
Extraneous Variables.
One of the variable that would be ideal to control is the time it takes to heat up the
water. It sometimes takes more than the initial time (which was 5 minutes, then had
to be moved to 10) for the water to heat up, and sometimes the water doesnt heat
up at all. Having a quicker heating process would have sped up the time to finish
the investigation. Another variable that would be ideal to control is to know the
temperature of the beakers water, while its inside the incubator. Knowing the
temperature after its been taken out of the incubator could result in the
temperature dropping from when we open the incubator, leading to sometimes
inaccurate and/or impossible results (as in the temperature being lower in the
beakers water after being heated).
Procedure:
Materials and Apparatus:
We will be using:
-
Method:
1
2
3
4
5
Results:
Qualitative Observations:
During the procedure, the water in the beakers after being heated up had bubbles
forming on the bottom of the surface. This is because as water heats up, the water
starts to bubble. I noticed the bubbles at the lowest temperature in the
investigation, which was at 25o C. this can indicate that water starts to bubble when
it is heated at 25o C, since the measured room temperature water was at 24 o C and
there is no point of increasing the temperature higher than it already is, I can come
to this conclusion.
Data Tables:
Treatment 1:
200ml
Treatment 2:
200ml
Treatment 3: 200
ml
Average
Trial 1: 25 C
Before
After
Trial 2: 30 C
Before
After
Trial 3: 35 C
Before
After
24.5 C
24.7 C
24.5 C
27.5 C
24.7 C
28.6 C
24.3 C
24.6 C
24.1 C
26.3 C
24.3 C
29.7 C
24.3 C
24.3 C
24.6 C
24.6 C
24.2 C
24.3 C
27.4 C
27.1 C
24.8 C
24.3 C
30.1 C
29.4 C
Trial 2: 30 C
Trial 3: 35 C
After
Discussion:
Conclusion:
This graph has a resemblance to an acute angle. As the treatments before the water
was placed in the incubator, that trend stays the same. However, the treatments
after the water was placed in the incubator, that trend has an increase. Buts its not
a significant increase where there is an angle of 90 o, where there is more of an
angle of 5o.This is because the increase from before compared to after is not an
overall big change. In trial 1 for example, the change from before to after went from
24.3 C, to
24.6 C, having only a .3 C increase. But in trials 2 and 3, the
change went from 24.3 C to 27.1 C, and 24.3 C to 29.4 C, having an increase of
2.7 C, and an increase of 5.1 C. this graph also has a resemblance to a plane
taking off, as a plane slowly gets off the ground. In the graph, it slowly starts to
increase and if the graph would to continue, it would increase much higher, as
would a plane. If the temperature of the incubator were to increase the temperature
by 5 C starting from 35 C to 60 C, then the graph would start to look more like a
plane taking off, without a plateau.
Evaluation of Procedure:
One limitation would be the incubator by itself. The incubator would take too long to
heat up the beakers filled with water, but sometimes the incubator wouldnt even
heat up the water.
Improving this investigation:
Not using the incubator and using something else is a start. If there was a light
instead of the incubator, then I would use that use in real life, whats heating up the
ocean water is the suns radiation, or its light.