Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Ethics of Poverty As A Population Issue
The Ethics of Poverty As A Population Issue
Written Assignment 6
Written Assignment 6
consequences that the world would face it the tendency of population growth
extended along the years as he had projected.
The Malthusian theory of population is a clear example of an analysis of
the impact of population growth. According to Tushar, "Population increases
faster than food production. Whereas population increases in geometric
progression, food production increases in arithmetic progression". In other
words, Malthus believed that the resources, even through, increasing, were not
able to follow the population growth, leading to a scarcity of resources so grave
that could in fact represent the end of the world in tragedy.
To Malthus the growth of the world population would actually lead to a
natural selection of the stronger individuals, which would actually be the ones
with a more sizeable revenue. Observing the tendency of the prices to increase
due to demand, only the rich would be able to maintain a decent living standard,
leaving the other to suffer with scarcity; to the point that the ones with no
resources would die.
Even though the problems of poverty initiate with an economic nature,
the solution is not giving people money, some government present this illusion
to the population in an attempt to gain votes and remain in power, though. The
solution is actually much deeper than that.
People need to fight poverty by enforcing other negative consequences
of societys changes. It is necessary to implement family planning, for example.
By establishing a timeline for the family growth, since having unplanned kids
can be totally avoided in todays world, the people are actually buying them time
while they seek economic stability, besides the concern with the family budget.
Written Assignment 6
It is complicated, though, to force this change upon society. A strong
point that cannot be forgotten is that there are cultures, as well as religions, that
are completely against the use of contraceptives. By taking these groups into
consideration we are choosing to think of ethics with respect for cultural
diversity and relativism.
There is, however, an argument that is valid in all social groups:
Education. There is no greater weapon against social inequality. By educating
themselves individuals are doing something for them and their families, and
also to society. Because the more educated the population, the less ignorance
persists in society. Educated people are able to seek better jobs, consequently
leading to an increase in revenue, moreover being able to make more efficient
choices.
Besides the attention that is directed to the issue, by politicians and the
media, this problem is far from being over. There has been no indication of the
possibility of poverty eradication.
The problem is big and complex, and it seems that the solution clashes
with the reality of the market economics, or even mixed economics, that we live.
By saying that the problem wont be completely eliminated, we are not
saying that the issue will not be addressed, that would actually be unrealistic;
what is being said is that due to the complexity of the issue, in spite of the
attempts, it is unlikely that poverty will be eradicated of society.
It is fundamental to understand that poverty is not the same all over the
globe. According to the World Poverty Organization (2016), Having of course
Written Assignment 6
no world government, and no real global consensus on dealing with poverty,
cutting poverty is chiefly for each country to deal with. There has been a little
international aid available for this, though often with unwanted conditions
attached, but it still relies on individual governments not all of which consider
poverty bad.The fact that some government still see poverty as a positive
influence to businesses and economy, relying on the notion that having poverty
is a basic requirement for social establishment. The organization also
emphasizes that, With global poverty, the main immediate problem is too many
believing wrongly that poverty is necessary or is even good.
In conclusion, observing the issue with attention to relativism, it saddens
to admit that there is still a long way to go, that many governments still have to
see beyond the economic benefits of a high demand and competition. These
nations need to start observing the issue through a more deontological
overview, starting with the maxim that people need to have the basics to lead
their lives with a minimum of decency. Disregarding possible pros of having
poor people in society, and truly facing the problem with the seriousness that it
deserves.
References
Written Assignment 6
Pimental, D. (1998). Population Growth and The Environment: Planetary
Stewardship. Retrieved March 09, 2016, from
http://escholarship.org/uc/item/8g67g6ng#pageTushar, S. (2014). Malthusian Theory of Population: Explained with its Criticism.
Retrieved March 09, 2016, from
http://www.economicsdiscussion.net/articles/malthusian-theory-of-populationexplained-with-its-criticism/1521
World Poverty. (2016). Solutions to World Poverty, a look at the basic answers.
Retrieved March 09, 2016, from http://world-poverty.org/solutionstopoverty.htm