Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Spiru 11
Spiru 11
Spiru 11
Algal Research
jou r nal hom epa ge: ww w. elsevi er. com / lo cat e / algal
a r t i c l ei n f o
Article history:
Received 4 August 2015
Received in revised form 27
October 2015 Accepted 8 February
2016
Available online xxxx
Keywords:
Water remediation
Spirulina platensis
Agricultural
fertilizers Fish
water
a b s t r a c
t
Microalgal research has been an area of great interest as microalgae have higher productivities
than land plants and can be used for the production of valuable commodities such as biofuel,
animal feeds and agricultural fertil- izers, among others. To enhance the economic feasibility of
algal-based commodities, the growth of microalgae can be coupled to wastewater remediation.
The technical feasibility of cultivating Spirulina platensis with sh water for production of algae
fertilizers was investigated. The remediation potential of S. platensis was found to be good for
ammonia and nitrate removal, but inadequate for nitrite removal. Its specic growth rate of
1
0.026 h and the nutrient reduction times compare well with various literature reports. This
work provides
insight into the potential of algal biomass as agricultural fertilizers, when coupled with
aquaculture wastewater remediation. The ability of Spirulina-based fertilizers to enhance plant
growth was demonstrated in leafy vegeta- bles such as Arugula (Eruca sativa), Bayam Red
(Ameranthus gangeticus) and Pak Choy (Brassica rapa ssp. chinensis). The germination of
Chinese Cabbage (B. rapa ssp. chinensis) and Kai Lan (Brassica oleracea alboglabra) also
improved signicantly in terms of seedlings' dry weight.
2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
The global seafood consumption is increasing and the
new World Bank Report 83177-GLB [1] has projected that
aquaculture will produce half of the world's supply of sh in
2030. Intensive aquaculture utilizes large quantities of clean
freshwater, and generates nutrient-rich waste- water streams
which can cause eutrophication of coastal waters and
negatively impact downstream biological communities.
Sustainable water treatment technologies are needed to
reduce nutrient and chem- ical discharge into receiving
waters. Currently, chemical fertilizers are extensively used
for agricultural crops as they are inexpensive, have low
labor application, and provide immediate availability of the
nutri- ents. However, the excessive use of chemical
fertilizers contribute to greenhouse gas emission and can
lead to on-site soil degradation [2], nutrient pollution and
eutrophication [3]. Organic fertilizers, such as farmyard
manure and crop residues are possible alternatives to reduce
dependency on synthetic chemical fertilizers [4], as well as to
counter- act soil degradation [5]. However, these are
inadequate in meeting the nutrient demands for high
yielding crops as essential macro- and micronutrients may
not be present in desired amounts.
Microalgae research has gained interest in recent decades
and is cen- tered mainly in the exploitation of microalgae for
extraction of products of value, and the utilization of
microalgae in wastewater treatment sys- tems. A key area of
interest in microalgae biotechnology is the economic
* Corresponding author.
E-mail address: scwuang@tp.edu.sg (S.C. Wuang).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2016.02.009
2211-9264/ 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Materials
% reduction
Cultivation of S. platensis
Relative cell
density
A0 at t 0
:
1
Ay
A
x
ty t
x
3. Results
discussion
analysis
All experiments were performed in triplicate sets and the
data pre- sented are means standard deviation. The
differences in the results
obtained with two treatment groups were analyzed
statistically using two-sample t-test. The differences
observed between the treatment groups were considered
signicant for P b 0.05.
and
3.1.
Cultivation of S.
platensis
S. platensis is microscopic blue-green algae and appears as
spiral l- aments under a Nikon Ni-E upright microscope (see
Fig. 1). It is charac- terized by cylindrical, multicellular
trichomes in an open helix. As the lament length varies
between different cells, counting the laments is not an
accurate way to assess algal growth. The green pigment within
the Spirulina cells absorbs strongly at 660 nm, and this
absorbance is used as a gauge of cell growth.
Fig. 2 shows the relative algal density and pH proles of
the sh water used for Spirulina cultivation. The alga grows
1
well in sh water with a specic growth rate of 0.026 h
1
(0.623 day ) and a doubling time of 28 h. These growth
parameters compare favorably with those
reported
elsewhere [1920], indicating the suitability of cultivating
S. platensis in sh water. Throughout the experiments, the pH
remained approximately consistent between 8.238.46.
As cells assimilate nutrients during growth, the
phytoremediation potential of algae is closely linked to its
growth. Greater algal growth will promote better nutrient
removal from the cultivation media. In sh water, the main
nutrients to be removed to maintain good sh health are
ammonia and nitrite. The acceptable level for total ammonia
is less than 4 mg/L while that for free ammonia should be
less than
1.4 mg/L [21]. The desired level of nitrite is 01 mg/L and the
acceptable range is less than 4 mg/L. The acceptable concentration
of nitrates is much higher at 50 mg/L in freshwater and 100
mg/L in seawater [22]. The starting sh water concentrations
of ammonia, nitrite and ni- trate average about 2.56 mg/L,
0.245 mg/L and 15.3 mg/L respectively. As there were
signicant variations between different batches of sh
water, the percentage reductions of the nutrient (rather than
the abso- lute values) were used for comparison. Fig. 3 shows
the relative ammo- nia, nitrite and nitrate proles of sh
water cultivated with S. platensis. This alga assimilates
ammonia and nitrate quickly, with these concen- trations
rapidly decreasing with cultivation time. This is in line with a
previous report [23]. However, nitrite was not assimilated and
its level increased with growth, possibly due to its byproduction during nitrate metabolism. This implies the
necessity of a further nitrite reduction step to achieve the
recycling of sh water, when S. platensis is used as the
phytoremediation agent.
In the conventional biological treatment of aquaculture
wastewater, ammonia is rst converted to nitrite and then to
nitrate by different ni- trifying bacteria which typically has
doubling times of 24 h [24]. Nitrate is a stable end product
which does not harm the sh in the concentra- tions typically
present. In comparison, with the algal-based treatment in
this work, ammonia was also efciently reduced to non-toxic
levels. However, the alga was unable to remove nitrite. It
should be noted that Spirulina cultivated in marine sh
wastewater exhibit similar per- formance (Wuang et al.,
unpublished work). A different algae species
Fig. 2. Relative algal density (line graph) and pH (point graph) proles of sh
water used in cultivation of S. platensis.
Fig. 1. Microscopy image of S. platensis at (a) 10 magnication and (b) 100 magnication.
Table 2
Constituents of S. platensis and chemical fertilizer.
Constituents
S. platensis
Carbohydrate (%)
Protein (%)
Fat (%)
Nitrogen (%)
Phosphorus (%)
Potassium (%)
Calcium (%)
Iron (ppm)
Manganese (ppm)
Zinc (ppm)
Selenium (ppb)
1
6
4
84
.7
.
0.8
1
.0
.
1057
4
1
155.4
1
7
Chemical
fertilizer (Triple
Pro 1515-15)
12.4
6.6
12.5
0.1
455
26.1
-
Table 1
Efcacy of Spirulina in enhancing Bayam Red, Arugula and Pak Choy growth.
Plant parameter
Control
Spirulina
Chemical fertilizer
Spirulina + chemical
fertilizer
9.33 2.08
16.03 3.05
22.57 0.50
11.00 1.00
25.37 5.90**
26.00 5.57
12.33 1.53
29.50 4.71**
22.87 3.67
13.33 0.58
30.90 4.11**
19.77 4.25
Chlorophyll
content Fresh
weight (g)
Dry weight
Arugula (30 days at
harvest)
Number of
leaf Plant
height (cm)
Root length
Chlorophyll
content Fresh
weight
(g) (g)
Dry weight
Pak Choy (40 days at
harvest)
Number
of leaf
Plant height
(cm)
5.72 2.48
12.52 0.82
4.28 0.40
7.67 0.67
31.33 5.93
6.00 1.73
13.67 0.28
10.67 0.67
7.48 0.38
9.00 0.58
, ,#
48.67 3.67** *
6.17 0.60*
17.80 1.87
,
12.67 0.33** *
9.06 0.36**
9.67 0.67
28.33 3.33*
#
7.33 0.33
18.60 0.32
13.67 1.45
9.52 1.05
10.33 0.88
15.83 1.59
2.33 0.33
13.17 1.37
12.67 1.20
3.71 0.60
13.00 0.00*
17.5 2.50
7.00 1.00**
14.25 2.85
14.00 3.00
4.79 0.26*
14.00 0.00** *
19.17 0.73
6.17 1.59**
12.77 0.79
17.33 1.76
,
5.91 0.22** *
8.80 2.16
,#
36.33 1.74**
,#
22.74 1.05**
9.67 0.33
#
32.00 8.00
,#
9.67 0.33*
18.70 0.87
,
14.67 0.33** *
10.00 0.05**
,
13.50 0.50
21.75 0.75
7.00 1.00**
11.10 0.80
17.50 0.50
5.30 0.23**
4. Conclusi
on
The usefulness of S. platensis in aquaculture wastewater
treatment was studied and the subsequent application of algal
biomass in fertilizer studies was demonstrated. The
cultivation of S. platensis was done indoors, under an
illuminance of not more than 1000 lx. At these condi- tions,
the algae were able to remove the ammonia and nitrate
concen- trations in sh water, indicating its ability to treat
the water despite its inadequacy in removing nitrite.
Potentially, the efcacy of water treatment can be much
higher under sunlight where illuminance is typically about
100,000 lx. The supplementation of S. platensis for leafy
vegetables found enhanced plant growth in all tested
vegetables,
when compared to the controls. When
compared to the performance of chemical fertilizer, the
Spirulina-based fertilizer performed compara- bly in most
plant growth parameters, and favorably for one tested
species Arugula. Seed germination (when measured by
seedling's
dry weight) also improved for all tested
vegetables except White Crown. This work has evidenced
the usefulness of S. platensis in sh water treatment and its
applicability as agricultural fertilizers.
Table 3
Efcacy of Spirulina inoculation on seed germination of Chinese Cabbage, Kai Lan and White Crown.
Treatment
group
Chinese
Cabbage
T0 (control)
T1 (2 g/L)
T2 (4 g/L)
T3 (6 g/L)
T4 (8 g/L)
T5 (10 g/L)
Germination rate
(%)
Shoot Length
(cm)
Root Length
(cm)
Vigor
Index
93.3 5.8
88.3 12.6
98.3 2.9
100.0 0.0
100.0 0.0
100.0 0.0
1.07
1.02
1.22
0.92
1.08
0.95
0.19
0.08
0.05
0.14
0.19
0.13
1.82
2.01
2.28
2.71
2.05
2.31
0.24
0.15
0.31
0.35
0.40
0.17
3.45
3.30
3.85
2.75
11.15
3.09
99.8
12.5
90.1
6.4
119.9
8.0
92.0
13.9
108.0
18.6
95.0
12.5
1.88
2.21
2.02
2.02
1.83
1.96
0.15
0.17
0.17
0.23
0.12
0.14
1.51
1.56
2.08
1.65
1.70
1.83
0.15
0.11
0.40
0.06
0.12
0.13
2.60 0.13
3.93 1.48
5.00 1.20
6.53 2.68
10.22 2.78**
7.15 2.41**
Kai Lan
T0
T1
T2
T3
T4
T5
70.0
56.7
63.3
75.0
66.7
81.7
White Crown
T0
98.3 2.9
8.7
5.8
10.4
5.0
16.1
17.6
2.18 0.05
1.71 0.21
0.59
0.3
0.44
0.26
1.38**
0.59
4.80 0.06
131.6
25.6
125.3
17.3
127.9
22.4
151.5
6.9
122.1
20.8
160.1
26.0
214.3
7.6
T1
T2
T3
T4
T5
100.0 0.0
100.0 0.0
98.3 2.9
98.3 2.9
96.7 2.9
1.98
2.07
2.05
1.97
1.91
0.16
0.11
0.11
0.17
0.22
1.98
2.07
2.05
1.97
1.91
0.11
0.31
0.03
0.16
0.02
4.67
4.32
4.64
4.90
4.22
0.93
0.35
0.40
0.33
0.43
198.0
15.3
207.0
10.9
201.5
15.3
193.7
11.3
184.7
20.4
Acknowledgments
The work was supported nancially by the Social and
Innovation Research Fund (M54), awarded by the TOTE
Board, Singapore (Project
M54). High magnication
microscopy images for the study were ac- quired in the
Singapore Bioimaging Consortium (SBIC)-Nikon Imaging
Centre at Biopolis (Singapore) using a Nikon Ni-E upright
microscope.
References
[1] World Bank, Fish to 2030: prospects for sheries and aquaculture,
Agriculture and Environmental Services Discussion Paper No. 3, World
Bank Group, Washington DC, 2013.
[2] J.H. Guo, X.J. Liu, Y. Zhang, J.L. Shen, W.X. Han, W.F. Zhang, P. Christie,
K.W.T. Goulding, P.M. Vitou sek, F.S. Zhang, Signicant acidication in
major Chinese crop- lands, Science 327 (2010) 10081010.
[3] R. Howarth, F. Chan, D.J. Conley, J. Garnier, S.C. Doney, R. Marino, G.
Billen, Coup led biogeochemical cycles: eutrophication and hypoxia in
temperate estuaries and
coastal marine ecosystems, Front. Ecol.
Environ. 9 (2011) 1826.
[4] B. Yang, Z. Xiong, J. Wang, X. Xu, Q. Huang, Q. Shen, Mitigating net
global warming
potential and greenhouse gas intensities by
substituting chemical nitrogen fertil- izers with organic fertilization
strategies in ricewheat annual rotation systems in China: a 3-year
eld experiment, Ecol. Eng. 81 (2015) 289297.
[5] J.J.O. Odhiambo, V.N. Magandini, An assessment of the use of mineral and
organic fertilizers by small holder farmers in Vhembe district, Limpopo
province, South Africa, Afr. J. Agric. Res. 3 (2008) 357362.
[6] J.J. Bolton, D.V. Robertson-Andersson, D. Shuuluka, L. Kandjengo,
Growing Ulva (Chlorophyta) in integrated systems as a commercial
crop for abalone feed in South Africa: a SWOT analysis, J. Appl.
Phycol. 21 (2009) 575583.
[7] M.H. Abreu, R. Pereira, C. Yarish, A.H. Buschmann, I. Sousa-Pinto,
IMTA with
Gracilaria vermiculophylla: productivity and nutrient
removal performance of the seaweed in a land-based pilot scale
system, Aquaculture 312 (2011) 7787.
[8] P.H. de Paula Silva, S. McBride, R. de Nys, N.A. Paul, Integrating
lamentous green
tide algae into tropical pond-based aquaculture, Aquaculture 284
(2008) 7480.
[9] R.J. Lawton, L. Mata, R. de Nys, N.A. Paul, Algal bioremediation of waste
waters from land-based aquaculture using ulva: selecting target
species and strains, PLoS One 8 (2013), e77344.
[10] G. Markou, D. Georgakakis, Cultivation of lamentous cyanobacteria
(blue-green algae) in agro-industrial wastes and wastewaters: a
review, Appl. Energy 88 (2011)
33893401.
[11] R. Wang, B. Peng, K. Huang, The Research Progress of CO2 Sequestration
by
Algal
Bio-Fertilizer
in
China,
J.
CO2
Util,
2015,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2015.01. 007.
[12] R.D. Tripathi, S. Dwivedi, M.K. Shukla, S. Mishra, S. Srivastava, R. Singh,
U.N. Rai, D.K. Gupta, Role of blue green algae biofertilizer in
ameliorating the nitrogen demand and y-ash stress to the growth
and yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.) plants, Chemosphere 70 (2008)
19191929.
[13] H. Saadatnia, H. Riahi, Cyanobacteria from paddy elds in Iran as a
biofertilizer in rice plants, Plant Soil Environ. 55 (2009) 207212.
[14] A. Watanabe, R. Ito, C. Konishi, Effect of nitrogen-xing blue-green
algae on the growth of rice plants, Nature 168 (1951) 748749.
[15] E.J. Olgun, S. Galicia, R. Camacho, G. Mercado, T. Peez, Production of
Spirulina sp. in sea water supplemented with anaerobic efuents in
outdoor raceways under tem- perate climatic conditions, Appl.
Microbiol. Biotechnol. 48 (1997) 242247.
[16] M.A.B. Habib, M. Parvin, T.C. Huntington, M.R. Hasan, A review on culture,
produc- tion and use of Spirulina as food for humans and feeds for
domestic animals and sh, FAO Fish. Aquac. Circ. (2008) (No. 1034).
[17] Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 4500NH3 B & C, 20th ed. American Public Health Association (APHA), 2000.
[18] P.C. Gupta, Germination testing, in: P.K. Agrawal (Ed.), Handbook of
Seed Testing, Seednet, India 2000, pp. 242243.
[19] T. Gksan, A. Zekeriyaolu, . Ak, The growth of Spirulina platensis in
different culture systems under greenhouse condition, Turk. J. Biol. 31
(2007) 4752.
[20] F.F. Madkour, A.E.-W. Kamil, H.S. Nasr, Production and nutritive value of
Spirulina platensis in reduced cost media, Egypt. J. Aquat. Res. 38
(2012) 5157.
[21] N.M. Stone, H.K. Thomforde, Understanding Your Fish Pond Water Analysis
Report, Cooperative Extension Program, University of Arkansas at Pine
Bluff Aquaculture/ Fisheries, 2004.
[22] Ornamental Aquatic Trade Association (OATA), Water Quality Criteria
Ornamental
Fish, 2008 (Wiltshire, BA13 3JN, UK).
[23] G. Xu, X. Fan, A.J. Miller, Plant nitrogen assimilation and use efciency,
Annu. Rev.
Plant Biol. 63 (2012) 153182.
[24] W.J. Golz, Biological treatment in recirculating aquaculture systems,
Recirculating Aquaculture in the Classroom: a Training Workshop for
Agricultural Science
Teachers, a Proceedings of a Workshop
Sponsored by the Louisiana Sea Grant Col- lege Program, Louisiana
State University, and the Louisiana Department of Educa- tion, 67
December 1995, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana,
1995.
[25] R.V.S. Lavu, V. De Schepper, K. Steppe, P.N.V. Majeti, F. Tack, G.D. Laing,
Use of sele- nium fertilizers for production of Se-enriched Kenaf (Hibiscus
cannabinus): effect on Se concentration and plant productivity, J. Plant
Nutr. Soil Sci. 176 (2013) 634639.
[26] G.S. Venkataraman, S. Neelakantan, Effect of the cellular constituents of
the nitrogen xing bluegreen algae Cylindrospermum muscicola on
the root growth of rice seed- lings, J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 13 (1967)
5361.
[27] U. Mishra, S. Pabbi, Cyanobacteria: a potential biofertilizer for rice,
Resonance (2004) 610.
[28] B. Nanda, S.K. Tripathy, S. Padhi, Effect of algalization on seed
germination of vege- table crops, World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 7
(1991) 622623.
[29] Z. Shariatmadari, H. Riahi, S. Shokravi, Study of soil blue-green algae
and their effect on seed germination and plant growth of vegetable
crops, Bot. J. Iran 12 (2011) 101110.
[30] M. Jalaluddin, M. Hamid, Effect of adding inorganic, organic and
microbial fertilizers on seed germination and seedling growth of
sunower, Pak. J. Bot. 43 (2011) 28072809.
[31] Y. Miri, S.B. Kochebagh, B. Mirshekari, Effect of inoculation with biofertilizers on
germination and early growth, Dill (Anethum
graveolens), Fennel (Foeniculum
vulgare), Cumin (Cuminum
cyminum) and Marigold (Calendula ofcinalis), Int. J Agron. Plant
Prod. 4 (2013) 104108.
[32] J. Garcia-Gonzalez, M. Sommerfeld, Biofertilizer and biostimulant
properties of the microalga Acutodesmus dimorphus, J. Appl. Phycol.
(2015), http://dx.doi.org/10. 1007/s10811-015-0625-2.
[33] A.F. Sanaz, A.H. Ragaa, Effect of some re d marine algae as
biofertilizers on growth of maize (Zea mayz L.) plant, Int. Food Res. J.
20 (2013) 16291632.
[34] F.A. Faheed, A.A.-E. Fattah, Effect of Chlorella vulgaris as bio-fertilizer on
growth pa- rameters and metabolic aspects of lettuce plant, J. Agric.
Soc. Sci. 4 (2008) 165169.
[35] K.L.N. Aung, Effect of Spirulina biofertilizer suspension on growth yield
of Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek, Univ. Res. J. 4 (2011) 351363.