Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SpecProceeding Digest
SpecProceeding Digest
100
MEMORY AID
IN
REMEDIAL LAW
SPECIAL PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL PROCEEDINGS - A remedy by
which a party seeks to establish a status,
a right or a particular fact. (Rule 1,
Section 3)
JURISDICTION
GENERAL RULE: Regional Trial Court
EXCEPTION: MTC has jurisdiction in the
following cases:
1. Probate proceedings whether testate
or intestate where the gross value of
the estate does NOT exceed
P300,000 or P400,000 in Metro
Manila, EXCLUSIVE of interest,
damages
of
whatever
kind,
attorneys fees, litigation expenses
and costs.
2. DELEGATED JURISDICTION
in Cadastral and Land
Registration Cases covering lots
where there is no controversy or
opposition or contested lots where
the value of which does not exceed P
100T.
appeal is taken to the CA, not
to the RTC since MTC is equal to RTC
in this instance.
3. SPECIAL JURISDICTION
petitions for writ of Habeas
Corpus in case of absence of RTC
judges.
SC and CA have original jurisdiction
over Habeas Corpus cases, concurrent
with the RTC.
ORDINARY
ACTION
SPECIAL
PROCEEDING
to protect or
enforce a right or
prevent or redress a
wrong
involves the
establishment of the
right, status or fact
involves two or
more parties
governed by
ordinary rules
governed by special
rules supplemented
supplemented by
special rules
by ordinary rules
heard by courts of
general jurisdiction
heard by courts of
limited jurisdiction
Initiated by a
pleading and parties
respond through an
answer
Initiated by means of
a petition and parties
respond by means of
an opposition
IN
SETTLEMENT
Issuance of Letters
Testamentary/Administration
(A special administrator may be
appointed) (Rule 77-80)
Filing of Claims
(Rule 86)
Payment of Claims
Sale/Mortgage/Encumbrance
of Properties of the Estate
CHAIRPERSON: Jinky Ann Uy ASST. CHAIRPERSONS: Allen Farias, Maricris Oronea EDPS: Martessa Nuylan, Charissimae
Ventura, Jocelyn Zabala SUBJECT HEADS: Jona Obia (Civil Procedure); Alnaiza Hasiman (Special Civil Actions and
Special
Proceedings); Jeenice de Sagun (Criminal Procedure); Elaine Masukat (Evidence)
MEMORY AID
RULE 73
VENUE AND PROCESS
VENUE
INHABITANT
OF
PHILIPPINES
(whether citizen or alien) Court
of province/city where he
resides at the time of death.
INHABITANT
OF
FOREIGN
COUNTRY RTC of any province
wherein he had his estate.
Residence means his personal, actual
or physical habitation, his actual
residence or place of abode. (Fule vs.
CA, L-40502, Nov. 29, 1976)
Where estate of deceased persons
settled. (Sec.1)
2 KINDS OF SETTLEMENT
A. EXTRAJUDICIAL SETTLEMENT (Rule 74, Section 1)
B. JUDICIAL SETTLEMENT - Testate or
Intestate Proceedings instituted in
the country where decedent has his
residence
EXTENT OF JURISDICTION
Probate courts are courts of LIMITED
jurisdiction. It may only determine and
rule upon issues relating to the
settlement of the estate, namely:
1. administration of the estate;
2. liquidation of the estate; and
3. distribution of the estate.
GENERAL RULE: Probate court cannot
determine issue of ownership.
EXCEPTIONS:
1. Provisionally, ownership may be
determined for the purpose of
including property in inventory,
without prejudice to its final
determination in a separate action;
or
2. When all the parties are heirs and
they submit the issue of ownership
to the probate court provided that
the rights of third parties are not
prejudiced. (Bernardo vs. CA, L18148, Feb. 28, 1963)
IN
REMEDIAL LAW
CHAIRPERSON: Jinky Ann Uy ASST. CHAIRPERSONS: Allen Farias, Maricris Oronea EDPS: Martessa Nuylan, Charissimae
Ventura, Jocelyn Zabala SUBJECT HEADS: Jona Obia (Civil Procedure); Alnaiza Hasiman (Special Civil Actions and
Special
Proceedings); Jeenice de Sagun (Criminal Procedure); Elaine Masukat (Evidence)
MEMORY AID
REMEDY IF THE VENUE IS IMPROPERLY
LAID
ORDINARY APPEAL not certiorari or
mandamus UNLESS want of jurisdiction
appears on the record of the case.
RTC may issue writs and processes.
(Sec.3, Rule 73)
GENERAL RULE: Probate court cannot
issue writs of execution.
Reason: its orders usually refer to the
adjudication of claims against the estate
which the executor/administrator may
satisfy without the need of executory
process.
EXCEPTIONS:
EXCLUSIVE
(expressio
unius est exclusio alterius)
1. To satisfy the contributive share
of the devisees, legates and
heirs when the latter had
entered prior possession over the
estate. (Sec. 6, Rule 88)
2. To enforce payment of the
expenses of partition. (Sec. 3,
Rule 90)
Where the estate settled upon
dissolution of marriage (Sec.2)
Upon the death of either the husband or
the wife, the partnership affairs must be
liquidated in the testate or intestate
proceedings of the deceased husband or
wife. If both have died, liquidation may
be made in the testate or intestate
proceedings of either.
RULE 74
SUMMARY SETTLEMENT OF ESTATE
GENERAL RULE: If a person dies, his
estate is submitted to a judicial
settlement proceeding.
EXCEPTION: The heirs may resort to:
1. Extrajudicial settlement of estate;
or
2. Summary settlement of estate must
be conducted in accordance with
regular procedure NOT under rules
of summary procedure. (Regalado)
In these exceptions an administrator
or executor need not be appointed.
IN
REMEDIAL LAW
EXTRAJUDICIAL
SETTLEMENT
BY
AGREEMENT BETWEEN HEIRS (Sec.1)
Requisites:
A. Substantive
1. The decedent left a) no will
b) no debts
2. The heirs are all of age or the
minors are represented by their
judicial or legal representatives
duly authorized for the purpose
B. Procedural
1. Division of estate must be in a
PUBLIC INSTRUMENT or by
AFFIDAVIT of ADJUDICATION in
the case of a sole heir.
2. Filed with proper Registry of
Deeds
3. Publication of notice of the fact
of extrajudicial settlement once
a week for 3 CONSECUTIVE WKS.
4. Bond filed equivalent to the
value of PERSONAL property.
CHAIRPERSON: Jinky Ann Uy ASST. CHAIRPERSONS: Allen Farias, Maricris Oronea EDPS: Martessa Nuylan, Charissimae
Ventura, Jocelyn Zabala SUBJECT HEADS: Jona Obia (Civil Procedure); Alnaiza Hasiman (Special Civil Actions and
Special
Proceedings); Jeenice de Sagun (Criminal Procedure); Elaine Masukat (Evidence)
MEMORY AID
the same with the Register of Deeds.
(Regalado)
Is a Public Instrument necessary for the
validity of an extrajudicial settlement?
NO. Private instrument/document or
Oral agreement of partition is valid
among the heirs who participated in the
extrajudicial
settlement.
The
requirement under Sec. 1, Rule 74 that it
must be in public instrument is NOT
constitutive of the validity but is merely
evidentiary in nature. (Hernandez vs
Andal)
However,
Reformation
compelled. (Regalado)
may
be
EXTRAJUDICIAL
SETTLEMENT
JUDICIAL
SETLLEMENT
No court intervention
requires summary
judicial adjudication
gross estate must not
exceed P10T
allowed in both
testate and intestate
available even if
there are debts; it is
the court which will
make provision for
its payment
May be instituted by
ANY INTERESTED
PARTY even a
creditor of the
estate without the
consent of all heirs
bond to be
determined by the
court
amount of bond is
equal to the value of
personal property
IN
REMEDIAL LAW
CHAIRPERSON: Jinky Ann Uy ASST. CHAIRPERSONS: Allen Farias, Maricris Oronea EDPS: Martessa Nuylan, Charissimae
Ventura, Jocelyn Zabala SUBJECT HEADS: Jona Obia (Civil Procedure); Alnaiza Hasiman (Special Civil Actions and
Special
Proceedings); Jeenice de Sagun (Criminal Procedure); Elaine Masukat (Evidence)
MEMORY AID
YEARS from the discovery of
fraud.
3. Reconveyance of real property.
Where the estate has been summarily
settled, the unpaid creditor may, within
2 years, file a motion in the court
wherein such summary settlement was
had, for the payment of his credit.
EXCEPTION:
If on the date of the
expiration of the two-year period, the
creditor or heir is a) A minor or incapacitated, or
b) In prison or
c) Outside the Philippines,
he may present his claim within one year
after such disability is removed. (Sec. 5
Rule 75)
IN
REMEDIAL LAW
CHAIRPERSON: Jinky Ann Uy ASST. CHAIRPERSONS: Allen Farias, Maricris Oronea EDPS: Martessa Nuylan, Charissimae
Ventura, Jocelyn Zabala SUBJECT HEADS: Jona Obia (Civil Procedure); Alnaiza Hasiman (Special Civil Actions and
Special
Proceedings); Jeenice de Sagun (Criminal Procedure); Elaine Masukat (Evidence)