Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Faria 2004
Faria 2004
Abstract
The inuence of the surface chemical groups of an activated carbon on the removal of different classes of dyes is
evaluated. Starting from the same material (NORIT GAC 1240 PLUS), the following treatments were carried out in
order to produce a series of samples with different surface chemical properties but with no major differences in their
textural properties: oxidation in the liquid phase with 6 M HNO3 and 10 M H2O2 (acid materials) and heat treatment at
700 C in H2 or N2 ow (basic materials). The specic micropores volume and mesopores surface area of the materials
were obtained from N2 adsorption equilibrium isotherms at 77 K. The surface chemistry was characterised by
temperature programmed desorption , by the determination of the point of zero charge (pHpzc) and by the evaluation of
the acidity/basicity of the samples. Elemental and proximate analyses were also carried out.
Equilibrium isotherms of selected dyes (an acid, a basic and a reactive dye) on the mentioned samples were obtained
and the results discussed in relation to their surface chemistry. In general, the Langmuir model provided the best t for
the adsorption data.
It is shown that the surface chemistry of the activated carbon plays a key role in dye adsorption performance. The
basic sample obtained by thermal treatment under H2 ow at 700 C is the best material for the adsorption of all the
tested dyes.
r 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Activated carbon; Surface chemistry; Wastewater; Decolourisation; Dyes; Adsorption
1. Introduction
The textile industry is characterised by its high water
consumption and is one of the largest industrial
producers of wastewaters. Water from spent dyebaths
and dye rinse operations contains unxed dyes and may
be highly coloured. The persisting colour and the nonbiodegradable nature of the spent dyebaths represent
serious problems to the environment. However, the
primary concern about efuent colour is its undesirable
aesthetic impact in receiving waters [1].
*Corresponding author. Tel.: +351-22-508-1468; fax: +35122-508-1449.
E-mail address: fpereira@fe.up.pt (M.F.R. Pereira).
0043-1354/$ - see front matter r 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.watres.2004.01.034
ARTICLE IN PRESS
P.C.C. Faria et al. / Water Research 38 (2004) 20432052
2044
Nomenclature
AC
a.u.
Ce
CI
d
KF
KL
L1
n
N
pHpzc
qe
activated carbon
arbitrary units
adsorbate equilibrium liquid phase concentration (mg/dm3)
Colour Index
particle diameter
parameter in the Freundlich equation
mg=gAC dm3 =mg1=n
parameter in the Langmuir equation (dm3/
gAC)
average width of the small micropores (nm)
parameter in the Freundlich equation
number of points
point of zero charge
adsorbate equilibrium solid phase concentration (mg=gAC )
qcalc
e
2. Experimental
2.1. Preparation of modified activated carbons
A Norit GAC 1240 PLUS activated carbon was used
as supplied as the starting material for this study
(Sample AC1). This carbon was selected because it is
an acid washed granular activated carbon, which
offers good adsorption properties for water applications
and a high purity level. According to the supplier
ARTICLE IN PRESS
P.C.C. Faria et al. / Water Research 38 (2004) 20432052
2045
ARTICLE IN PRESS
P.C.C. Faria et al. / Water Research 38 (2004) 20432052
2046
Table 1
Characteristics of the dyes selected for this study
Class
Commercial name
Generic name
Chemical class
lmax (nm)
Basic
Reactive
Acid
CI basic red 14
CI reactive red 241
CI acid blue 113
Cyanine
Monoazo
Diazo
514
540
566
Table 2
Textural characterisation of the AC samples
Sample
Wmicro (cm3/g)
Smeso (m2/g)
W01 (cm3/g)
W02 (cm3/g)
L1 (nm)
SBET (m2/g)
AC1
AC2
AC3
AC4
AC5
0.367
0.353
0.365
0.375
0.356
125
91
110
103
114
0.312
0.303
0.311
0.318
0.301
0.058
0.048
0.054
0.058
0.050
1.1
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.2
972
909
949
972
946
ARTICLE IN PRESS
P.C.C. Faria et al. / Water Research 38 (2004) 20432052
CO (a.u.)
2.0
1.5
AC3
1.0
AC5
0.5
AC1
AC4
(a)
0.0
0
200
400
600
800
1000
T (C)
0.6
AC2
CO2 (a.u.)
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
AC3
0.1
AC1
AC5
200
400
600
Sample
Acidity
(meq/gAC)
Basicity
(meq/gAC)
pHpzc
AC1
AC2
AC3
AC4
AC5
149
716
358
89
179
302
34
153
437
365
9.7
2.7
5.4
10.8
9.9
AC4
0.0
(b)
2047
800
1000
T (C)
ARTICLE IN PRESS
P.C.C. Faria et al. / Water Research 38 (2004) 20432052
2048
Table 4
Proximate and elemental analyses of the AC samples
Elemental analysis
Moisture (wt%)
Volatiles (wt%)
Cxed (wt%)
Ash (wt%)
C (wt%)
H (wt%)
N (wt%)
S (wt%)
O (wt%)
3.3
4.2
3.7
1.4
2.3
5.3
13.7
9.5
5.2
7.0
85.9
78.7
81.5
88.4
86.0
5.5
3.4
5.3
5.0
4.7
94.9
78.5
90.8
98.1
93.9
0.3
0.8
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.2
1.0
0.7
0.9
0.5
0.8
3.6
19.7
7.6
0.7
4.9
400
300
qe (mg/gAC)
AC1
AC2
AC3
AC4
AC5
Proximate analysis
200
100
(a)
0
0
200
400
600
800
1000
800
1000
Ce (mg/L)
300
qe (mg/gAC)
Sample
200
100
(b)
200
400
600
Ce (mg/L)
qe qm
KL Ce
1 KL Ce
600
qe (mg/gAC)
400
200
and
qe KF Ce1=n ;
(c)
0
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Ce (mg/L)
Fig. 2. Adsorption isotherms at room temperature of (a) acid,
(b) reactive and (c) basic dyes on commercial and treated ACs:
AC1 (&), AC2 (J), AC3 (n), AC4 (,) and AC5 (B).
ARTICLE IN PRESS
P.C.C. Faria et al. / Water Research 38 (2004) 20432052
Ce
3
qm KL qm
qe
and
1
ln qe ln KF ln Ce
n
2049
Table 5
Parameters of the Langmuir model
Sample
Acid dye
qm (mg/gAC)
Reactive dye
KL (dm3/mg)
SDa
qm (mg/gAC)
AC1
AC2
AC3
AC4
AC5
310
0.120
0.010
190
197
0.025
0.085
157
244
0.057
0.081
201
345
0.058
0.032
246
262
0.093
0.030
223
r
PN
a
calc 2 =N 1 ; y C =q :
SD
e
e
i1 y y
Basic dye
KL (dm3/mg)
SDa
qm (mg/gAC)
KL (dm3/mg)
SDa
0.052
0.030
0.034
0.061
0.055
0.074
0.156
0.157
0.050
0.081
546
633
568
714
680
0.963
0.994
0.640
0.828
0.955
0.004
0.002
0.005
0.002
0.003
Table 6
Parameters of the Freundlich model
Sample
Acid dye
n
AC1
AC2
AC3
AC4
AC5
Reactive dye
3
1=n
KF mg=gAC dm =mg
SD
11
175
0.037
5.6
60
0.051
7.6 106
0.052
9.8 177
0.016
6.7 107
0.078
r
PN
a
calc 2 =N 1 ; y ln q :
SD
e
i1 y y
Basic dye
3
KF mg=gAC dm =mg
4.9
5.7
5.8
4.9
5.1
53
49
65
71
66
1=n
SD
SDa
0.131
0.049
0.058
0.117
0.166
23
17
19
13
16
431
469
424
490
495
0.049
0.081
0.041
0.090
0.088
ARTICLE IN PRESS
P.C.C. Faria et al. / Water Research 38 (2004) 20432052
2050
400
800
AC4
AC4
AC5
r = 0.888
AC2
300
AC3
AC5
AC1
AC3
qm (mg /gAC)
qm (mg/gAC )
600
AC1
400
AC4
AC2
200
AC5
AC3
AC2
AC1
r = 0.899
100
200
0
0
(a)
0
0.350
100
200
300
0.375 0.380
500
800
AC4
AC5
AC2
800
600
AC4
AC1
AC3
AC 5
600
AC3
AC1
qm (mg /gAC)
r = 0.992
AC 2
qm (mg/gAC )
400
Basicity (eq/gAC )
400
200
400
200
200
400
600
800
0
90
Smeso (m /g)
Fig. 3. Maximum adsorption capacity for the basic dye versus
Wmicro (a) and Smeso (b) of the AC samples.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
P.C.C. Faria et al. / Water Research 38 (2004) 20432052
4. Conclusions
The following conclusions can be drawn from the
present work:
1. The Langmuir adsorption isotherm provides the best
t for the systems ACs/basic dye. The adsorption
data for the remaining systems are well tted with
both Langmuir and Freundlich models.
2. It is possible to tailor the surface of activated carbons
in order to optimise their adsorption capacity
towards dye molecules. Among the several treatments performed, thermal treatment with H2 at
700 C proved to be the most efcient for the removal
of both anionic and cationic dyes.
3. The differences in the textural properties of the
activated carbons cannot explain the disparity in dyes
adsorption on the samples, leading to the conclusion
that surface chemistry plays a key role in the
adsorption process.
4. For reactive and acid dyes, a close relationship
between the surface basicity of the adsorbents and
dye adsorption was shown. The interaction between
the oxygen-free Lewis basic sites and the free
electrons of the dye molecule, as well as the
electrostatic interactions between the anions and the
protonated sites of the carbon are the main adsorption mechanisms.
5. For the basic dye, the acid oxygen-containing surface
groups have a positive effect on the adsorption, but
thermally treated samples still present better performances, showing the existence of two adsorption
mechanisms involving electrostatic and dispersive
interactions.
2051
Acknowledgements
The authors are indebted to NORIT N.V., Amersfoort, The Netherlands, and to Jos!e Morgado and
!
!
Antonio
Vieira from CITEVE (Centro Tecnologico
das
Industrias T#extil e do Vestua! rio de Portugal) for
providing samples. This work was carried out with the
support of Funda@*ao para a Ci#encia e a Tecnologia
(FCT) under programme POCTI/FEDER (POCTI/
1181) and Ag#encia de Inova@*ao (ADI) under programme POCTI/FEDER (project ANOXITRATA).
References
[1] USEPA, 1996. Best management practices for pollution
prevention in the textile industry. EPA/625/R-96/004.
Cincinnati, OH: US Environmental Protection Agency.
[2] Cooper P. Removing colour from dyehouse wastewaters
a critical review of technology available. J Soc Dyers
Colour 1993;109:97100.
[3] Marmagne O, Coste C. Color removal from textile plant
efuents. Am Dyestuff Reporter 1996;85:1521.
[4] Rott U, Minke R. Overview of wastewater treatment and
recycling in the textile processing industry. Water Sci
Technol 1999;40:13744.
[5] Bhavani KD, Dutta PK. Physico-chemical adsorption
properties on chitosan for dyehouse efuent. Am Dyestuff
Reporter 1999;88:538.
[6] Bousher A, Shen X, Edyvean RGJ. Removal of coloured
organic matter by adsorption onto low-cost waste materials. Water Res 1997;31:208792.
[7] Choy KKH, McKay G, Porter JF. Sorption of acid dyes
from efuents using activated carbon. Resour Conservat
Recycling 1999;27:5771.
[8] Walker GM, Weatherley LR. Adsorption of acid dyes
onto granular activated carbon in xed beds. Water Res
1997;31:2093101.
[9] Walker GM, Weatherley LR. CDO removal from textile
industry efuent: pilot plant studies. Chem Eng J 2001;
84:12531.
[10] Bansal RC, Donnet JB, Stoeckli F. Active carbon. New
York: Marcel Decker; 1988.
! ao JJM.
[11] Figueiredo JL, Pereira MFR, Freitas MMA, Orf*
Modication of the surface chemistry of activated carbons.
Carbon 1999;37:137989.
[12] Karanl T, Kilduff JE. Role of granular activated carbon
surface chemistry on the adsorption of organic compounds. 1. Priority pollutants. Environ Sci Technol
1999;321724.
[13] Al-Degs Y, Khraisheh MAM, Allen SJ, Ahmad MN.
Effect of carbon surface chemistry on the removal of
reactive dyes from textile efuent. Water Res 2000;34:
92735.
! ao JJM, Figueiredo JL.
[14] Pereira MFR, Soares SF, Orf*
Adsorption of dyes on activated carbons: inuence of
surface chemical groups. Carbon 2003;41:81121.
[15] Papirer E, Li S, Donnet JB. Contribution to the study of
basic surface groups on carbon. Carbon 1987;25:2437.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
2052
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]