Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(An Old) Google Case Study, in Marketing
(An Old) Google Case Study, in Marketing
Edward Williams
12 February 2007
MKTG 341.011
Google Case Study 2
Case Summary
To understand fully the business that Google is in, one should understand exactly
what Google is. Google is an internet search engine, and is currently the largest and most
used internet search engine in the World. They operate in more than 80 different
languages, have offices in many different areas around the globe, and have apparently
even “announced plans to open an office on the moon” (Etzel, Walker, & Stanton, 2007,
p. 78). The verb “google” is recognized by many popular dictionaries and means “to use
the Google search engine to obtain information ... on the World Wide Web” (Merriam-
business of, 2) leads the industry of, and 3) essentially branded searching the internet.
While there are many speculations as to why and how Google has become so
successful, our book suggests that the technology used behind the search engine is what
is really at its core. This technology is a seemingly simplistic programming code that
“allows users to conduct swift and accurate searches across the World Wide Web in a
matter of seconds.” Larry Page, cofounder of Google further explains, “The perfect
search engine would understand exactly what you mean and give back exactly what you
want” (Etzel, et al., 2007, p. 76). Google has strived to do just that.
Marketing suggests that consumers have wised-up to standard marketing practices, and
are generally “an audience that rejects marketing.” From a marketing standpoint,
Google’s success might be contributed to the fact that their sponsor advertising has
always been subtle. It is no secret that people despise pop-up advertisements and busy,
loud, and obnoxious banner advertisements. Google follows a policy against pop-up
Google Case Study 3
advertisements, and strives to keep advertisements in control with their Google AdWords
orderly and less obnoxious fashion. In what follows, I will offer my thoughts on
Issues
Consumer Expectations
Consumers’ expectations of Google and any search engine for that matter are
simple; they expect to have a search engine that will help them find what they are looking
for based on certain key terms that are entered into a search box. This search should
return only the most relevant information based on the term that was entered, and should
do so quickly and accurately. Google has obviously been the best among its competition
at doing this. As suggested earlier, internet advertising has historically been problematic
and consumers want less advertising. Google has also helped consumers to feel less
These are two areas where Google has met customer demands. They have
provided a necessary service to internet users and have done so in a more desirable and
people would previously have to go elsewhere for. GMail for instance, which directly
competes with Yahoo! Mail and MSN’s Hotmail, allows users to have an email service
through (what appears to be) their favorite search provider. In addition to this, upon its
release it gave users more than four times the storage capacity of its competition (this has
Google Case Study 4
nearly tripled since then), and the ability to search through archived mail with ease as
well.
activities.
Google understands its customers; it knows what they want, and it knows the best
way to give it to them. One way that Google further relates with its customers is by
allowing Google fans to submit their own versions of the company logo to be displayed
that it provides a direct relationship between the company’s product and its users.
statement and made available to the public on the website. Google’s mission, as the
organize the world's information and make it universally accessible and useful.” The
company has done this in an inviting way. Not only do they meet customers’ demands of
how to do this responsibly, they seem to exceed those demands by avoiding excessive
created so simplistically that anybody could use it to search the internet, while
simultaneously the programming code works away in the background to provide the best
possible feedback in the least amount of time. Google’s ease of use, stylishness, and
customer-friendliness all have contributed to the creation of value within the customers’
Google Case Study 5
minds. These coordinated marketing activities along with their organizational objectives
and customer orientation have created great customer satisfaction and have their users,
sometimes called googlers, coming back time and time again for their internet searching
needs.
cumulative SWOT analysis of the company. Google’s SWOT analysis might look like
this:
(S)trengths (W)eaknesses
(O)pportunities (T)hreats
Notice that technologies are listed under both opportunities and threats. This is
because depending on the type of new technology, and whether or not Google is able to
get on board with the new technology determines whether it is an opportunity or a threat.
Another threat is the intense competition that Google faces, which will be examined
further later.
Google is good at understanding exactly what its users want, and being able to
satisfy these wants better than their competition can. However, one thing that Google
Google Case Study 6
could use some work on is customer orientation. There are not many ways for customers
to interact with Google aside from the aforementioned Google fan logos and the recently
offered personalized Google homepage (which Yahoo! had already offered users long
before).
and legal forces may not appear to be significant for Google while operating within the
United States, but in other counties where they have offices the company needs to be
familiar with the politics and laws of those other countries. The same goes for social and
cultural forces; Google wants to be sure that something that they do does not offend
members of another culture with whom they are operating. Demographics are important:
keep in mind many people are not able to afford to have access to the internet, how does
Google interact with these people. This problem could also fall under the category for a
country’s economic condition. Competition and technology are the main contributing
As mentioned before technology can be good or bad for Google. For instance, the
ability for cell phones to search the World Wide Web has been good for Google because
they have been able to offer a mobile version of their website to users. However, there is
the possibility that computer’s will be replaced with a new and better technology (though,
not in the foreseeable future), and thus Google will have to reinvent itself to fit into this
new technology. There is also the possibility that technological advancements will allow
someone to come up with a service that would make Google’s search engine obsolete –
something that is better and faster. This brings us to the concept of competition.
all across the internet. Google is currently the most popular of them. Among the top
rankings are Yahoo! Search, MSN, and Ask.com. Yahoo! is Google’s biggest competitor
in both the search engine and email areas. Although Google is quickly expanding to
include online shopping, video search, and other useful products, Yahoo! has for years
offered some things that Google has yet to introduce. These include online games and a
special and interactive music search that allows you to view music videos and artist
biographies as well as listen to (and even create your own) online radio streams.
Alternatives
Quality and quantity are two big components in business. According to Etzel, et
al (2007, p. 516), “Both quantitative and qualitative measures should be used to formulate
as, how might customers needs be better served, and what products and services would
help customers to have a better experience? A quantitative approach might ask, how
many customers am I satisfying, and how many of my products and services are
providing customers with a positive experience? Both of these approaches are useful in
Furthermore, upon analyzing this information Google should realize that while
what they are doing is currently satisfying their users, they would likely gain more users
if they took steps to provide a better user experience. Suggestions might include more
user interaction to provide users a feeling of being connected on a more personal level
Google Case Study 8
with the company. Yahoo’s music program and customer profiles offer this. Yahoo also
has a lot of success with their online gaming programs, most of which are free to use; this
might also be a good area of expansion for Google. One problem area in Google’s
expansion is a reaction to their recent product Google Desktop, which allows users to
search their own computer for documents, similar to the Microsoft search product that
comes with Windows. Some people have felt uncomfortable with this program, feeling
that their privacy might be violated. However, it is not mandatory that Google users
install and use this program, and though maybe not made known as well as it could be,
search queries and results are not recorded by Google. In all, I do agree with Google’s
strategy to expand its product mix to include additional services, as I believe it will be
beneficial and necessary in order for Google to keep ahead of its competition.
Marketing Implications
The decision for Google to expand its product mix affects its other marketing
activities in various ways. For most of its services, Google has relied on word of mouth
and publicity for advertisement, which is not to say that it is not marketing itself. Google
has marketed itself in a very subtle but affective way. They have positioned themselves
as a search engine who “allows users to conduct swift and accurate searches across the
World Wide Web in a matter of seconds”, and they have allowed their users to basically
take over and define the company’s identity. If the company changes the product mix,
they will have to change their positioning strategy, in that they will no longer be just a
search engine but now they will be a search engine plus email server, online video host,
map and driving direction provider, and whatever else they might choose to offer. They
would likely continue to use word of mouth and publicity as their primary sources of
Google Case Study 9
advertisement. In addition, (as they have done with the Google Toolbar) they would
Recommendations
I believe that if Google does not expand its product mix to meet those of their
direct competition, they will likely lose their foothold on the market. None of the major
search engines are still only search engines, just as the more successful person-to-person
file sharing programs (i.e., Kazaa, iTunes) started off only offering digital music and now
The competition is fierce, and although most people agree that Google’s search
capabilities are better than others are, I do not believe that it is enough to make a
Google is known for releasing new products that their competitors do not offer (i.e.,
Google Earth – satellite pictures of the planet, and aforementioned Google Desktop), and
Aside from product development, Google would likely benefit from becoming
more interactive with their users to allow for a more personal connection. Let googlers
References
Etzel, M. J., Walker, B. J., & Stanton, W. J. (2007). Marketing (14th ed.). McGraw-Hill/
from http://www.google.com/intl/en/corporate/index.html.