Blaming the Sabine River Authority for historic floods that devastated much of Newton and Orange counties in March 2016, 240 people have signed on to a lawsuit to sue the dam managers.
Blaming the Sabine River Authority for historic floods that devastated much of Newton and Orange counties in March 2016, 240 people have signed on to a lawsuit to sue the dam managers.
Blaming the Sabine River Authority for historic floods that devastated much of Newton and Orange counties in March 2016, 240 people have signed on to a lawsuit to sue the dam managers.
Blaming the Sabine River Authority for historic floods that devastated much of Newton and Orange counties in March 2016, 240 people have signed on to a lawsuit to sue the dam managers.
04/25/16 13:49:19 Orange City DC Scanned by Anne
FILED: 4/20/2016 6:01:22 PM
Vickie Edgerly, District Clerk
‘Orange County, Texas
REAUD, MORGAN & QUINN, L.L.P. 8% Denise Smith, Deputy
Glen W. Morgan sawn Wayne A. Reaud
Cris Guinn (1955-200 Of Counsel
Curtis W, Leister 801 Laurel Stret
ohn Werner P.O, Box 20008
Mark Frasher Beaumont, Texas 77720-6008 Phone (408) 898-1000
Adam Nichols Fax 409) 299-8236,
Sheigh Summerlin Rhodes
Taslor Miler
Don Burgess
OF Counsel
Rodney G. Ellis Bien se
Of Counsel
April 20, 2016
District Clerk
Orange County
Re: Bonin, CHANDLER & MANUEL, ET AL VS. SABINE RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS AND
SaBINE RIVER AUTHORITY OF LOUISIANA
Dear District Clerk:
Please accept these Exhibits as attachments to Plaintiffs’ Original Petition originally
filed in Envelope 10222727 on 4/20/16 at 5:19pm and again in Envelope 10223254 on 4/20/16
at 5:37pm.
I apologize for my mistake not attaching them when I resubmitted the Civil Case
Information Sheet as a searchable document.
Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or concerns.
Very truly yours,
REAUD, Morgan & QUINN, L.L.P.
By: _Danyel Marquardt
Danyel Marquardt
Senior Legal Assistant
‘dm04/22/16 13:30:18 Orange Cty DC Scanned by Denise
FILED: 4/20/2016 6:37:38 PM
Viekie Edgerly, District Clerk
Orange County, Texas
By: Denise Smith, Deputy
CAUSE No, 8160137-C
PERRY BONIN, ACE CHANDLER 8 IN THE DISTRICT COURT
AND MICHAEL MANUEL, ET AL
§
vs. § ORANGE COUNTY, TEXAS:
§
SABINE RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS §
and SABINE RIVER AUTHORITY § 163rd
OF LOUISIANA § JUDICIAL DISTRICT
PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL PETITION
COMES NOW Perry Bonin, Ace Chandler and Michael Manuel, et al. whose names
are more fully listed on Exhibits “A”, “B” and “C” attached hereto and hereinafter referred
to as “Plaintiffs”, and files this their Original Petition complaining of Defendants, Sabine
River Authority of Texas and Sabine River Authority of Louisiana, and for cause of action
would respectfully show unto the Court as follows:
I INTRODUCTION
‘The Texas Constitution's protection of rights and liberties include the command that
‘No person's property shall be taken, damaged or destroyed for or applied to publie use
without adequate compensation being made.” ‘Tex.Const. Art. I, Section 17(a). Similarly,
the Louisiana Constitution provides that “Property shall not be taken or damaged by the
state or its political subdivisions except for publie purposes and with just compensation paid
to the owner or into court for his benefit.” Louisiana Const. Art. I, Section 4(B).
Beginning on or about March 9, 2016, the Sabine River Authorities of Texas and
Louisiana, each a governmental entity acting in the exercise of the powers granted it by the
respective States caused there to be a deliberate release of water from the Toledo Bend04/22/16 13:30:18 Orange Cty DC Scanned by Denise
spillway gates into the Sabine River. During the next 24 hours, nine spillway gates had
been opened to a measure of twenty-two feet each. It is estimated that at the peak, the
amount of water being deliberately released into the Sabine River was over 200,000 cubic
feet per second. As a point of comparison, Niagara Falls is said to average approximately
85,000 cubie feet per second of discharge.
By opening the spillway gates in this manner, the Defendants knew, or were
substantially certain, that harm would result to the many thousands of homeowners,
business owners, churches, and others who owned property downstream. Indeed, the
Defendants and others quickly released predictions of the flood levels which would result
from this enormous discharge.
‘The predietions turned out to be a tragic reality for many thousands of Texas
residents. The community of Deweyville was perhaps hardest-hit, as shown by the
photographs below:04/22/16 13:30:19 Orange Cty DC Scanned by Denise04/22/16 13:30:20 Orange Cty DC Scanned by Denise
And yet the damage and devastation continued, along with the water, down the
Sabine. The City of Orange, Texas also experienced extensive flooding, as shown by the
photograph below:04/22/16 13:30:21 Orange Cty DC Scanned by Denise
Further damage on the Louisiana side of the Sabine River is shown in the
photographs below:
All along the Sabine River and nearby areas, homes and businesses and churches
were flooded, property was destroyed, burial vaults were disinterred and scattered, and
animals and livestock were killed, in the name of and by the authority of the Defendants,
each a governmental entity deliberately acting in the exercise of the powers granted it by04/22/16 13:30:21 Orange Cty DC Scanned by Denise
its respective State. Plaintiffs herein assert their constitutional right to be adequately
compensated for their property which was taken or damaged for public use
I. PARTIES
Plaintiffs listed in Exhibits “A”, “B” and “C" attached hereto would show that they
are resident-citizens of the States of Texas and Louisiana. Plaintiffs bring this case
pursuant to Level 3 of the Revised Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiffs allege that
their damages, individually, are within the jurisdictional limits of this court and further
allege, pursuant to Rule 47 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, are collectively for
monetary relief over $1,000,000; and individually are either for monetary relief of $100,000
or less} or over $100,000 but not more than $200,000; or over $200,000 but not more than
$1,000,000.
Venue is proper in Orange County, Texas, as it is the County in which the principal
offices of Defendant Sabine River Authority of ‘Texas is found, and as it is a County in which
a substantial part of the acts and events giving rise to this action took place.
Defendant, SABINE RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS, is a governmental agency
with a general office in Orange, Orange County, Texas and may be served with process at
12777 N. Highway 87, Orange, Texas 77632
Defendant, SABINE RIVER AUTHORITY OF LOUISIANA, is a governmental
agency and may be served with process through the Secretary of State for the State of
Louisiana by
erving them through their Legal Services Section, 8585 Archives Ave., Baton
Rouge, LA 70809.04/22/16 13:30:22 Orange Cty DC Scanned by Denise
I. CLAIMS BY OWNERS OF PROPERTY IN TEXAS ARISING OUT OF THE
TAKING OF PROPERTY IN THE STATE OF TEXAS BY SABINE RIVER
AUTHORITY OF TEXAS AGAINST SABINE RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS.
Tn March 2016, as a result of the actions set forth above, the property of the Plaintifis
listed in Exhibit “A” hereto was taken, damaged, or destroyed. The Plaintiffs in Exhibit “A
are residents of the State of Texas.
As such, Plaintiffs invoke the protections of Article I of the Texas Constitution and
pray for adequate compensation for such taking, damaging, and destruction of property.
IV. CLAIMS BY OWNERS OF PROPERTY IN LOUISIANA
ARISING OUT OF THE TAKING OF PROPERTY IN THE STATE
OF LOUISIANA BY SABINE RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS
AGAINST SABINE RIVER AUTHORITY OF LOUISIANA
In Mareh 2016, as a result of the actions set forth above, the property of the Plaintifis
listed in Exhibits “B” and “C” hereto was taken or damaged. ‘The Plaintiffs in Exhibit “B
are residents of the State of Louisiana; the Plaintifi’s in Exhibit “C” are residents of the State
of Texas,
As such, Plaintiff's invoke the protections of Article | of the Louisiana Constitution
and pray for adequate compensation for such taking, damaging, and destruction of property.
V. REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURE
Plaintiffs request that Defendants supply all information required by TEX.R.CIV.P.
194.04/22/16 13:30:22 Orange Cty DC Scanned by Denise
PRAYER
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Plaintiffs prays that the Defendants be
cited to answer and appear and that upon final hearing, the Plaintiff's recover the following:
1, Compensation, in the form of money damages, for all property taken, damaged, or
destroyed, pursuant to their rights under the appropriate State Constitution;
2. Pre-judgment interest, post-judgment interest, and costs of court to the fullest
extent allowable by law; and
3. Such other and further relief, at law or in equity, as to which Plaintiffs are justly
entitled.
Respectfully submitted,
REAUD, MORGAN & QUINN, L.LP.
801 Laurel Street
P.O. Box 26005
Beaumont, Texas 77720-6005
(409) 838-1000
Fax (409) 833-8236
By L/.GlenW. Morgay
Glen W. Morgan
State Bar No. 14438900
gmorgan@rmglawfirm.com
Adam Nichols
State Bar No, 24046531
anichols@rmqlawfirm.com
John Werner
State Bar No. 00787920
werner@rmqlawfirm.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
PLAINTIFFS RESPECTFULLY DEMAND A TRIAL BY JURY