Professional Documents
Culture Documents
United States v. Gaussen, 86 U.S. 198 (1873)
United States v. Gaussen, 86 U.S. 198 (1873)
United States v. Gaussen, 86 U.S. 198 (1873)
198
22 L.Ed. 41
19 Wall. 198
UNITED STATES
v.
GAUSSEN.
October Term, 1873
1
ERROR to the Circuit Court for the District of Louisiana: the case being thus:
An act of March 3d, 1797, 1 enacts:
'SECTION 1. That when any revenue officer . . . shall neglect or refuse to pay
into the treasury the sum or balance reported to be due to the United States
upon the adjustment of his accounts, it shall be the duty of the comptroller to
institute suit for the recovery of the same, adding to the sum stated to be due,
on such account, the commissions of the delinquent, which shall be forfeited in
every instance where suit is commenced and judgment obtained.
'SECTION 2. That in every case of delinquency, where a suit has been or shall
be instituted, a transcript from the books and proceedings of the treasury,
certified by the register and authenticated under the seal of the department,
shall be admitted as evidence, and the court trying the cause shall be thereupon
authorized to grant judgment and award execution accordingly.
'SECTION 4. That in suits between the United States and individuals, no claim
for a credit shall be admitted upon trial but such as shall appear to have been
presented to the accounting officers of the treasury for their examination, and
by them disallowed.'
This act being in force, the United States sued Gaussen, executor of Elgee, in
the court below, on a bond given in 1845, by Thomas Barrett, as collector of
the customers at the port of New Orleans, in which bond Elgee was a surety.
The declaration filed by the government referred to a transcript, which was
annexed to and made part of it, from the books of the treasury, containing eight
certain quarterly reports, numbered 5688, &c., of the first auditor, upon the
quarterly accounts of Barrett, as admitted and certified by the comptroller and
The report of the first auditor and the statement of differences thereon were, as
respected the report numbered 5688, in this form; the reports bearing the other
numbers being in form very similar:
[No. 5688.]
'TREASURY DEPARTMENT,
10
'I have examined and adjusted the accounts of Thomas Barrett, collector of the
customs for the district of New Orleans, State of Louisiana, under his bond,
dated July 6th, 1844, commencing on the 25th day of July, and ending on the
30th day of September, 1844, and find that he is chargeable with the following
sums, viz.:
$171,148 00
171 75
174 37
544 05
747 74
16 21
--------$172,802 12
'I also find that he is entitled to the following credit,
viz.:
By payments to inspectors, &c., to September 30th, 1844,.
$18,844 81
contingent expenses paid, to September 30th,1844,.. 783 46
disbursements for the revenue cutter Woodbury, to September
30th, 1844,.......................... 3,956 97
disbursements for the revenue cutter Vigilant, to September
30th, 1844,.............................. 48 00
disbursements for the revenue boats, to September 30, 1844,
.............................. 840 00
disbursements in relation to appraisements, to September 30th,
1844,.................................... 1,177 62
balance of public store account, to September 30th, 1844,
.............................. 716 25
debentures paid on merchandise exported, to September 30th,
1844,.................................... 15,994 45
fines, &c., costs of suits, to September 30th, 1844,.. 542 19
duties on merchandise refunded to correct errors, to September
30th, 1844,.............................. 672 15
duties on tonnage refunded to correct errors, to September
30th, 1844,.............................. 101 33
amount paid for extra clerk hire in the office of the naval
officer,................................. 368 00
amount paid George Royster, collector of Teche, per order of
1,278 16
And that the balance due to the United States on the 1st day of
October, 1844, amounted to,........... 43,652 16
--------$172,802 12
Page 201
'As appears from the statement and accounts herewith
transmitted for the decision of the comptroller of the treasury
thereon.
30th, 1844,
$168,645 76
171 75
174 37
5 50
.....................-----------.544 05
interest received on goods in store, to September 30th, 1844,
85 30
16 21
--------$172,802 12
---------
CR.
By payments to inspectors, &c., to September 30th, 1844,
..................... $18,844 81
contingent expenses paid, to September 30th, 1844,
......................... 783 46
disbursements for the revenue cutter Woodbury, to September
30th, 1844,......................... 3,956 97
disbursements for the revenue cutter Vigilant, to September
30th, 1844,......................... 48 00
disbursements for the revenue boats, to September 30th, 1844,
......................... 840 00
disbursements in relation to appraisements, to September
30th, 1844,......................... 1,177 62
balance of public store account, to September 30th, 1844,
......................... 716 25
debentures paid on merchandise exported, to September 30th,
1844,............................... 15,994 43
fines, &c., costs of suits, to September 30th, 1844,
......................... 542 19
duties on merchandise refunded to correct errors, to
September 30th, 1844,............... 672 15
--------$43,575 88
Page 202
Amount brought forward, .........$43,575 88
To duties on tonnage refunded to correct errors, to September
30th, 1844,.........................101 33
amount paid for extra clerk hire in office of the naval
officer, ...........................368 00
amount paid George Royster, collector of Teche, per order of
the comptroller
of the treasury, dated July 25th, 1844, and with which said
Royster has
been debited, per report No. 5387, ..$200 00
amount paid Willis H. Arnold, collector of Pearl River, per
order of the comptroller of the treasury, dated 7th August, 1844, and with
which said Arnold
has been debited, per report No. 5324,..75 24
By three months' salary
To the naval officer, to September 30th, 1844, .$62 50
To the surveyor of New Orleans, to September 30th, 1844,
62 50
To surveyor of Bayou St. John, to September 30th, 1844,
62 50
To the surveyor of Port Ponchartrain, to September 30th, 1844,
62 50
To the surveyor of Madisonville, to September 30th, 1844,
62 50
By three months and 17 days' salary to the surveyor of Lafayette,
from 14th June to 30th September, 1844, at $250 per annum,
63 87
Page 203
Statement of the case.
Amount brought forward,
$1,378 21
$39,507 50
700 00
580 00
1,280 00
17 00
Page 204
Amount brought forward
$5,685.35
$39,507.50
31.28
$161,749.04
8,973.00
160.57
346.12
544.05
83.50
51.08
$171,764.80
Dr.
16.21
sum un
To remittances, as foolows:
80,000.00
$129,624.85
To balance,
1,309.34
39,507.58
Cr.
$121,382.63
$121,382.63
$39,507.58
COLLECTOR'S OFFICE,
Indorsed: 'The United States in account current with Thomas Barrett, fro
The whole of these records (that is to say, reports of the first auditor
On the trial the government offered as evidence the copies of the report
'That the act of the 3d of March, 1797, which makes transcripts from the
'That the said reports, which, together with the quarterly returns, cons
'That the reports and statements of differences charged Barrett with gro
'That it disallowed gross sums, and subtracted gross sums on and from th
'And further, that the said reports and statements of differences did no
The court held the objections good, and rejected the evidence.
This evidence was objected to on the ground that the said statement was
Verdict and judgment having gone for the defendant, the government broug
Not everything which a treasury officer chooses to write upon the books
In the present case the auditor's reports contained debits of large sums
For example: In the report already cited, No. 5688, the collector is cre
This example, taken from the bill of exceptions, was brought to the noti
2. The quarterly returns were not admissible in evidence without the aud
2. In the instance cited on p. 209, from report No. 5688, the collector
The act of 1797 declares that no credit, not allowed by the accounting o
In these cases where the accounting officers have failed to account for
3. There are debits in the transcript not within the scope of the liabil
The act of March 3d, 1797, proceeds upon the theory that the officers of
In the present case 'copies of the report of the first auditor,' numbere
The objection that the reports were fragmentary and incomplete is not su
Nor is the objection that the reports charge Barrett with gross sums and
The reports are made up with much particularity, and give the items on e
There was error also in excluding the evidence of the accounts rendered
* 64 17
$1,164 71
-------------$39,507 50
----------* Erased
Interlined in red.** See infra, p. 207, note **.
* 159 83
266 62
630 00
12 00
-------- 384 89
-------------$39,507 50
----------* Erased
Interlined in red. ** See infra, p. 207, note **.
* 31.19
2,076.28
$43,662.56* 43,652.16
12 quarterly account rendered by Barrett, during the quarter to which the above
The
copied report and statement of differences applied, was in this form, the other
quarterly accounts being essentially like it:
13 United States in account current with Thomas Barrett, collector of the customs
The
for the district of New Orleans, from the 25th of July to the 30th of September, 1844,
in the third quarter of the year 1844.
Dr.
14
1. To payments of debentures, $15,994.43
15
2. To payments to inspector, weigher, measurer, marker, and guager, 20,009.52
16
3. To payments to revenue boats and boatment, 840.00
17
4. To payments on account of contingent expenses, 4,394.65
18
5. To payment payments to clerks in the naval office, 368.00
19
6. To payment naval officer and surveyors, for salary, 546.50
20
21To payment payment on account United States revenue cutter Woodbury,
7.
4,223.59
8. To payment on account of appraiser's office 1,177.62
22
9. To amount refunded to correcterrors in duties on merchandise, 773.48
23
10. To payment to deputy collector, Natchitoches, 630.00
24
11. To payment to collector at Teche, 200.00
25
12. To payment to collector at Shieldsborough, 75.24
26
13. To payment on account United States schooner Vigilant, 48.09
27
14. To payment on account of public stores, 1,101.14
28
To balance 121,382.62
$171,764.80
29
Cr.
30
By amount of duties on goods impoorted this quarter:
31
In vessels of the United States, $152,252.90
32
In vessels foreign equalized, 14,156.10
In vessels other foreign, 462.23
On inland importations, 1,774.53
$168,645.76
33
A. Less this amount unsettled entries, belonging to this quarter, the
34
deposits on which appear below, 6,896.72
35
$161,749.04
36
Erased
Interlined in red.
Erased.
Interlined in red.
**
See supra, p. 200, seventh and eighth lines from top, in Italics.REP.
These figures, $3239.13, are the total of the items marked with a + before them
on p. 202 (at bottom) and 203.
These figures, $3239.13, as already said, are the total of the items marked with
a + on pp. 202 and 203.
10
1 Gilpin, 44.
11
12
Gratiot v. United States, 15 Peters, 356, 370; Hoyt v. United States, 10 Howard,
109, 132; United States v. Eckford, 1 Id. 250.
13
See 1 Phillips on Evidence, 4th Am. ed., p. 307, and note, also pp. 525, 526;
Plaxton v. Dare, 10 Barnewall & Creswell, 17; Middleton v. Melton, 10 Id. 317.