Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dance - Davis Intubated Ureterotomy in A Child - 05202016
Dance - Davis Intubated Ureterotomy in A Child - 05202016
Dance - Davis Intubated Ureterotomy in A Child - 05202016
INITIAL WORK-UP
Physical exam:
Diffuse left flank tenderness without
ecchymosis.
BP 113/65
HR 66
Labs:
Hemoglobin 12.9 g/dL
Hematocrit 37.9
CT abdomen/pelvis:
Left perinephric and retroperitoneal
hemorrhage (Highlighted red).
Enhancing 7.5 cm retroperitoneal mass
with hypodense center (Yellow arrows).
INITIAL WORK-UP
Staging PET scan:
Retroperitoneal mass SUV
max 15.6
FDG avid mets:
Skull
Thoracic spine
Right humerus
Differential Diagnosis:
Lymphoma
Metastasis (Testicular)
Retroperitoneal Sarcoma
Paraganglioma
Neuroblastoma
Lt kid.
Mass
Left Retroperitoneum
PATHOLOGY
A - Nests of Zellballen (arrows) separated by fibrovascular septa with focal nuclear pleomorphism and hyperchromasia (arrow
heads). Focal angioinvasion present. H&E x 10
B - Diffuse hyperemia and foci of necrosis. Rind-like pseudocapsule is present (arrows).
Pathology Images and Findings courtesy of: Jeff Jacobsen, MD; Daphne de Mello, MD; Steve Taylor, MHS,
PA(ASCP)
DIAGNOSIS
Malignant Paraganglioma (PGL)
Malignancy defined by presence of metastases , not histology.1
Genetic testing: Patient and family positive for SDH-B gene, one of
several familial PGL syndrome genes.
Usually asymptomatic (silent) and non-functional.2
Spontaneous hemorrhage as a presenting feature of both PHEO and PGL is
rare but well-described and can be life-threatening.
MIBG (+)
PATHOGENESIS
PGLs can arise from anywhere in the paraganglionic system throughout the body3
Adrenal medulla (uniquely named PHEO)
Chemoreceptors (carotid and aortic bodies)
Vagal body
Small thoracic, abdominal, and retroperitoneal paraganglia.
While histologically identical, PHEO and PGL deserve distinction due to important
prognostic and treatment differences.
PGLs: up to 50% malignant.
PHEOs: about 5% are malignant.
Local recurrence common in all types.
QUESTION
Which of the following is FALSE regarding PHEOs and PGLs?
A. Use of IV contrast in the imaging and intervention of PHEO/PGL can trigger
malignant hypertension.
CORRECT!
Which of the following is FALSE regarding PHEOs and PGLs?
A.
Use of IV contrast in the imaging and intervention of PHEO/PGL can trigger malignant hypertension.
FALSE. This myth has been propagated from 1984 when a study showed 5 of 8 patients had increased
circulating catecholamines after IV contrast4, however multiple recent studies have found both that
catecholamines are not significantly increased and patients do not experience increased adrenergic
symptoms after non-ionic IV contrast.5,6
B.
Biopsy can trigger malignant hypertension. TRUE. Although rare in head/neck paragangliomas, these
masses contain high concentrations of catecholamines that can be released into the bloodstream with
any manipulation. If biochemical testing for urine metanephrines is positive, pre-procedural - and adrenoceptor pharmaceutical blockade is paramount.7
C.
Pre-operative embolization should be considered to aid surgical hemostasis and provide a vascular road
map. TRUE. This is especially true with head and neck tumors.
D.
Metastatic disease can be treated with high-dose I-131 MIBG. TRUE. In addition to PHEO/PGL, other
neuroendocrine malignancies can be treated with radiopharmaceuticals. This is a highly specialized
treatment with limited availability.
E.
Local control of metastases can be achieved with RF ablation. TRUE. Palliative local control of PHEO/PGL
metastases can be achieved with percutaneous RF ablation, however, alpha/beta blockade must be
given for functioning tumors and careful monitoring during and after the procedure is critical.8
Use of IV contrast in the imaging and intervention of PHEO/PGL can trigger malignant hypertension.
FALSE. This myth has been propagated from 1984 when a study showed 5 of 8 patients had increased
circulating catecholamines after IV contrast4, however multiple recent studies have found both that
catecholamines are not significantly increased and patients do not experience increased adrenergic
symptoms after non-ionic IV contrast.5,6
B.
Biopsy can trigger malignant hypertension. TRUE. Although rare in head/neck paragangliomas, these
masses contain high concentrations of catecholamines that can be released into the bloodstream with
any manipulation. If biochemical testing for urine metanephrines is positive, pre-procedural - and adrenoceptor pharmaceutical blockade is paramount.7
C.
Pre-operative embolization should be considered to aid surgical hemostasis and provide a vascular road
map. TRUE. This is especially true with head and neck tumors.
D.
Metastatic disease can be treated with high-dose I-131 MIBG. TRUE. In addition to PHEO/PGL, other
neuroendocrine malignancies can be treated with radiopharmaceuticals. This is a highly specialized
treatment with limited availability.
E.
Local control of metastases can be achieved with RF ablation. TRUE. Palliative local control of PHEO/PGL
metastases can be achieved with percutaneous RF ablation, however, alpha/beta blockade must be
given for functioning tumors and careful monitoring during and after the procedure is critical.8
CLINICAL COURSE
Follow-up CT showed resolution of
hemorrhage.
Patient started on alpha and beta
blockade (doxazosin, atenolol).
Mass resected. Extremely difficult
dissection of tumor off blood vessels
and proximal ureter.
LINK TO VIDEO
CLINICAL COURSE
Chemotherapy and radiation.
T1 corpectomy with C5-T4 fusion.
1-month follow-up: US showed a large
well-circumscribed infrarenal
retroperitoneal fluid collection and left
hydronephrosis.
kidney
fluid
QUESTION
What is the next best step in management?
A. Percutaneous nephrostomy.
B. Percutaneous urinoma drainage catheter.
C. Percutaneous nephrostomy followed by percutaneous drainage of urinoma.
D. Multiphase CT abdomen/pelvis.
E. Urology consultation.
CORRECT!
What is the next best step in management?
A. Percutaneous nephrostomy.
B. Percutaneous urinoma drainage catheter.
C. Percutaneous nephrostomy followed by percutaneous drainage of urinoma.
D. Multiphase CT abdomen/pelvis. CORRECT. Prior to intervention, a delayed
phase CT will definitively diagnose urinoma and possibly identify the location of
ureteral injury for treatment planning.9
E. Urology consultation.
CLINICAL COURSE
Follow-up CT:
Moderate left hydronephrosis
15 cm fluid collection
Non-distended distal left ureter
On 15-min delay, IV contrast is
seen excreted into collection,
confirming suspected urinoma
Dilated proximal ureter
connects to urinoma (yellow
arrow) identifying site of injury
Non-opacified distal ureter
Ureter
INTERVENTION
Percutaneous nephrostomy
Contrast injection confirms a high
proximal ureteral injury and free
flowing contrast into the urinoma.
Drainage of urinoma
Site of
injury
Urinoma drain
URETERAL REGENERATION
Davis Intubated Ureterotomy (Urologist)
1943 published initial report of use of intubated
ureterotomy for repair of UPJ obstruction in humans.
Stent allows reconstitution of an adequate tubular
lumen and prevents leakage of urine that would incite
fibrosis.10
3 steps of healing11
Fibrosis and urothelium fill in the gap.
Scar retraction brings smooth muscle edges in
proximity.
Regeneration of smooth muscle by pluripotent
fibroblasts.
INTERVENTION
Urologist obtained
retrograde ureteral access.
0.035 angled Glidewire*
advanced through proximal
ureteral defect.
INTERVENTION
Proximal wire captured by
snare* advanced through a
45 cm 9-French sheath*.
Snare and wire pulled down
ureter and out urethra.
INTERVENTION
Double J ureteral stent placed over
wire through urethra.
Urinoma drainage catheter
remained.
Nephrostomy placed.
Alternative approaches:
Snare may be passed antegrade
through the kidney.
Nephroureteral catheter may be used
in place of the nephrostomy and
ureteral stent.
FOLLOW-UP
6-week follow-up retrograde ureterogram shows a long-segment stricture at the
site of ureteral injury but no further extravasation and no hydronephrosis.
Patient currently requiring monthly ureteral stent exchanges.
REFERENCES
1.
Kimura N. et al. Pathological grading for predicting metastases in pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. 2014 Feb 21(3): 405-414.
2.
Feng N. et. al. Clinicopathological analysis of paraganglioma with literature review. World J Gastroenterol. 2009 Jun 15(24):3003-3008.
3.
Tischler A. et. al. Pheochromocytoma and Extra-adrenal Paraganglioma: Updates. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine: August 2008, Vol. 132,
No. 8, pp. 1272-1284.
4.
Raisanen J et al. Plasma catecholamines in pheochromocytoma: effect of urographic contrast media. AJR 1984; 143:43-46.
5.
Mukherjee J. et al. Pheochromocytoma: effect of nonionic contrast medium in CT on circulating catecholamine levels. Radiology. 1997 Jan: 202(1):22731.
6.
Bessell-Browne R. et al. CT of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: risk of adverse events with IV administration of non-ionic contrast material. AJR.
2007 Apr; 188(4):970-4.
7.
Pacak, K. Preoperative Management of the Pheochromocytoma Patient. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007: 92(11): 4069-4079
8.
Venkatesan A. et al. Radiofrequency Ablation of Metastatic Pheochromocytoma. JVIR 2009 Nov; 20(11): 1483-1490.
9.
Titton R. et al. Urine Leaks and Urinomas: Diagnosis and Imaging-guided Intervention. RadioGraphics 2003; 23:1133-1147.
10.
Trautner K. et al. Histological examination of the regeneration of the ureter in dogs after intubated ureterotomy. 1954. J Urol. Mar; 71(3): 274-86.
11.
Bergman H. et al. The Ureter, 2nd Edition. 1981. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.