Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Synergy - Nano-Tera 2016
Synergy - Nano-Tera 2016
Prof. Christophe
Ballif
Prof. Anna
Fontcuberta
i Morral
Prof. Michael
Graetzel
Industrial partners:
Dr. Bjrn
Niesen
Various markets
Photovoltaic
power plants
Benchmark
0.55-0.8 /W at 17-21 % module
efficiency (95-160 /m2)
Electricity at 5 cts/kWh in sunny
countries
Needs higher
efficiency, lower
manufacturing
costs, higher
reliability (> 30
years lifetime)
C. Ballif, Nano-Tera.ch Meeting 2016
Various markets
Ubiquitous energy
scavengers
Benchmark
Application specific
Needs best efficiency at
low-medium illumination
level (shunt free
devices)
Needs higher
efficiency
Acceptable
manfacturing costs
Sufficient reliability
W/cm2
Pm = 15
Vm = 0.5 V
Pm = 1.5 W/cm2
Vm = 0.44 V
CIGS
CdTe
Perovskite
Solution.?
Source: U. Sydney, updated values added
Source: pveducation.org
10
Tandem cells
Superstrate /
encapsulation
Transparent contact
Perovskite or GaAs NW
top cell
Transparent contact
Optical coupling/
interconnection
Transparent contact
Si or CIGS bottom cell
Rear contact
Substrate /
encapsulation
Several PV technology
combinations:
Top cell:
Perovskites or GaAs nanowires
Bottom cell:
CIGS or Silicon cell
Two tandem configurations:
Mechanically stacked 4terminal tandems
Monolithically integrated 2terminal tandems
C. Ballif, Nano-Tera.ch Meeting 2016
11
Transparent contact
Si or CIGS bottom cell
Rear contact
Challenges:
Top cell performance
Electrodes with broadband
transparency
Parasitic absorption in charge
transport layers
Low-temperature processing
Stability
Up-scaling to bottom cell size
Substrate /
encapsulation
C. Ballif, Nano-Tera.ch Meeting 2016
12
13
Monolithic tandem
Mechanically stacked
14
ITO
1 5x10 /cm
Density
2 3x10
/cm
3 5x10 /cm
of NWs
in PDMS film
NW density
3
1
1 cm
Transmittance
Transmittance
Si solar cell along
with high density NW-PDMS
with low density NW-PDMS
1.0
0.8
EQE
2 m
0.6
0.4
0.2
2 m
0.0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Wavelength, nm
15
Ti/Au
ITO
GaAs NWs
p-i-n GaAs
NW forest
2 m
ITO
PDMS
p-Si
PDMS
P+-Si
Al
Principal scheme of device
16
17
18
19
20
21
a.
Sn4+
SnO2
Au
-25
FTO
HTL
Intensity / a.u.
Jsc / mA cm-2
-20
Sn 3d
O 1s
-10
SnO2
FTO
500
-5
Au
HTL
470
460
ESL
450
FTO
600
400
200
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
Binding Energy / eV
Voltage / V
Scan
Jsc
directio
(mA cm-2)
n
Voc
(V)
backward
forward
1.14
1.13
21.3
21.2
480
Perovskite
FTO
490
Ti4+
Ti 2p
TiO2
Perovskite
SnO2
C 1s
TiO2
Perovskite
TiO2
At 10 mV/s
-15
Perovskite
SnO2
SnO2
FF
PCE
(%)
Light
intensity
(mW cm-2)
0.74
0.75
18.4
18.1
98.4
Highly efficient planar perovskite solar cells through band alignment engineering
DOI: 10.1039/C5EE02608C (Communication) Energy Environ. Sci., 2015, 8, 2928
22
23
Hybrid
evaporation/
solutionprocessing
process,
(<150C)
24
Perovskite mini-module
~10 cm2
~0.2 cm2
~100 cm2
Standard
lab cell size
Mini-module
size
Typical 4-inch
wafer size
Challenges:
1) Obtain uniform perovskite layer over full substrate size
2) Eliminate pinholes in perovskite and transport layers
25
26
Transparent contact
Si or CIGS bottom cell
Rear contact
Substrate /
encapsulation
C. Ballif, Nano-Tera.ch Meeting 2016
27
20.4%
High SR
suitable as
bottom cell
Efficiencies > 20% with low band gap materials and high
spectral response in the high wavelength region
ideal as bottom cell
A. Chirila et al., Nature Materials 10, 857 (2011)
A. Chirila, P. Reinhard et al., Nature Materials 12, 1107 (2013)
28
Superior performance
compared to standard
ITO electrode
M. Morales-Masis, et al.
IEEE J. Photovoltaics 5 (2015).
29
Transparent contact
Si or CIGS bottom cell
Rear contact
Substrate /
encapsulation
C. Ballif, Nano-Tera.ch Meeting 2016
30
Voc (mV)
Jsc (mA/cm2)
FF (%)
h (%)
1104
17.4
73.6
14.2
699
34.1
76.7
18.3
667
12.7
74.9
6.3
20.5
31
Voc
1050
1044
Jsc
19.8
19.7
FF
75.6
77.2
724
701
38.3
16.4
78.3
78.2
Eff.
15.76
15.98
16.05
21.73
8.96
25.01
Aperture area:
PSC cell: 0.25 cm2
SHJ cell: 4 cm2
With optical coupling liquid between sub-cells and antireflection foil on perovskite glass substrate
unpublished
32
Change top
cell orientation
p
p
n
nn
p
n p
p
Double-side
polished
bottom
Replace glass
substrate by
silicon cell
2TT
Glass substrate
Recombination layer
Glasssubstrate
substrate
Recombination
layer
Glass
p
n
n
nn
Single-junction perovskite process flow Perovskite top cell in monolithic tandem process flow
MRS spring - EE3.4.2 - jeremie.werner@epfl.ch
33
Low-temperature Perovskite/Silicon
monolithic tandem solar cells
J.Werner et al.
JPCL 7, 161-166
(2016)
Aperture
area (cm2)
Voc
(mV)
Jsc
(mA/cm2)
FF
(%)
Eff.
(%)
1.22
1.22
704
687
32.1
17.0
74.4
77.1
16.8
9.02
with ARF
1.22
1703
16.1
70.9
19.5
w/o ARF
0.17
1670
13.8
78.6
18.1
with ARF
0.17
1692
15.8
79.9
21.4
DSP-SHJ
DSP-SHJ, 53% illumination
Monolithic
tandem
MPP
tracking
19.2
21.2
34
4TT
2TT
Reference
PK/Si
13.4%
PK/Si
17%
Synergy
PK/Si
13.7%
PK/Si
21.3%
PK/Si
19.6%
PK/Si
18%
PK/Si
21.2%
Synergy
Synergy
PK/Si
19.8%
PK/Si
20.1%
PK/Si
25.0%
PK/CIGS
18.6%
PK/CIGS
19.5%
Synergy
PK/CIGS
20.5%
Synergy
Synergy
35
Summary
GaAs nanowire solar cell with transparent electrodes
High-performance perovskite cells with Cs-based absorber material
with enhanced stability and efficiency of 21.2%
Fully laser-scribed 5 cm x 5 cm perovskite mini-module
4-terminal perovskite/CIGS and perovskite/Si tandem cell
measurements with performance up to 25%
Monolithic perovskite/Si tandem cell with >21% efficiency
Promising steps towards optimized tandem devices, with potential
efficiencies beyond 30%
Exploring commercialization paths with industry partners
36