Date Tested: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 Chainage: 5+000 RHS

km 5+200 LHS
Date Tested:
Wednesday, February 10, 2016
Chainage:
5+000 RHS
LIQUID LIMIT
Container number
Number of blows
Wt.of Container +Wet soil (g)
Wt.of Container +Dry soil (g)
Wt.of water
(g)
Wt.of Container weight (g)
Wt.of Dry soil
(g)
Moisture content
(%)
Average
( %)
Atterberg limits
Liquid Limit
Plastic Limit
Plasticity Index
Group Index
Soil Classification
29.0
24.9
4.1
km 5+200 LHS
Date Tested:
Chainage:
5+000 RHS
22
42
34
37.68
40.26
34.77
36.78
2.91
3.48
23.92
24.04
10.85
12.74
26.82
27.32
Initial wt.before washing (g)
1500
Moisture content
0.0
Dry wt.after washing
1151
Initial dry weight
1500
(g)
sieve size
Standard
Mass
Retained
% Retained
% Mass
Passing
% Passing
mm.
37.50
0.0
0.0
100.0
100
20.00
24.3
1.6
98.4
98
10.00
72.3
4.8
93.6
94
5.00
180.9
12.1
81.5
81
2.00
279.8
18.7
62.8
63
0.425
232.5
15.5
47.3
47
0.075
362.1
24.1
23.2
23
Pan
-0.9
Wash Loss
349.0
Total
1500.0
23.2
PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS
FISH TOWN - HARPER ROAD PROJECT

PHASE 1
FISH TOWN
ROAD PROJECT
FISH TOWN - HARPER ROAD PROJECT
PHASE- HARPER
1
Paving of
PHASE
1
Paving of Harper - Karloken
Harper - Karloken (50km)
and Maintenance
of Karloken
to and
Paving
Harper to
- Karloken
(50km)
(50km) and Maintenance
of of
Karloken
Fish Town
(80km)
Wednesday,
February
10,(80km)
2016of Karloken to Fish Town (80km)
Fish
Town
Maintenance
5+100 RHS
P
Date Tested:
Chainage:
R
A
C
I
Z
I
N
A
LIQUID LIMIT
Container number
22
S
Y
S
I
Number of blows
Wt.of water
(g)
Wt.of Dry soil
(g)
Moisture content
(%)
Average
( %)
37
30
40.93
43.16
37.30
39.03
3.63
4.13
24.05
24.27
13.25
14.76
27.40
27.98
Atterberg limits
Liquid Limit
Plastic Limit
Plasticity Index
Group Index
Soil Classification
28.5
23.8
4.7
km 5+200 LHS
Date Tested:
Chainage:
5+100 RHS

(g)
sieve size
1000
Moisture content
0.0
763
Initial dry weight
1000
Standard
Mass
Retained
% Retained
% Mass
Passing
% Passing
mm.
37.50
0.0
0.0
100.0
100
20.00
9.9
0.7
99.3
99
10.00
29.0
1.9
97.4
97
5.00
99.9
6.7
90.7
91
2.00
209.4
14.0
76.8
77
0.425
164.2
10.9
65.8
66
0.075
250.8
16.7
49.1
49
Pan
0.0
Wash Loss
236.8
Total
1000.0
23.7
Date Tested:
Chainage:
3+580
LIQUID LIMIT
Container number
Number of blows
Wt.of water
(g)
Wt.of Dry soil
(g)
Moisture content
(%)
Average
( %)
22
48
38
38.77
41.26
33.75
35.77
5.02
5.49
22.18
23.64
11.57
12.13
43.39
45.26
Atterberg limits
Liquid Limit
Plastic Limit
Plasticity Index
Group Index
Soil Classification
48.5
30.7
17.8

Moisture content
0.0
951
Initial dry weight
1500
(g)
sieve size
Pan
1500
Standard
Mass
Retained
% Retained
% Mass
Passing
% Passing
mm.
37.50
0.0
0.0
100.0
100
20.00
0.0
0.0
100.0
100
10.00
54.2
3.6
96.4
96
5.00
111.7
7.4
88.9
89
2.00
227.8
15.2
73.8
74
0.425
247.3
16.5
57.3
57
0.075
309.5
20.6
36.6
37
0.0
Wash Loss
549.5
Total
1500.0
36.6

(g)
sieve size
Standard
mm.
37.50
20.00
10.00
5.00
2.00
0.425
0.075
Pan
Wash Loss
Total
1500
1151
Mass
Retained
g
0.0
24.3
72.3
180.9
279.8
232.5
362.1
-0.9
349.0
1500.0
0.0
1500
Moisture content
Initial dry weight
% Retained
% Mass
Passing
% Passing
%
0.0
1.6
4.8
12.1
18.7
15.5
24.1
%
100.0
98.4
93.6
81.5
62.8
47.3
23.2
%
100
98
94
81
63
47
23
23.2
LIQUID LIMIT
PLASTIC LIMIT
10
21
22
25
14
43.16
47.90
42.32
42.34
39.02
42.37
38.57
38.62
4.14
5.53
3.75
3.72
24.45
24.70
23.70
23.53
14.57
17.67
14.87
15.09
28.41
31.30
25.22
24.65
24.9
0
25
42
26.8
25
34
27.3
25
flow cufrlvoew curve
RPER ROAD PROJECT

Paving of
1
rper - Karloken
Karloken
to and
oken
(50km)
Town
(80km)
o Fish Town (80km)
A
P
C
I
E
L
S
I
E
Z
Y
L
S
I
LIQUID LIMIT
10
PLASTIC LIMIT
21
22
22
14
46.81
51.47
41.56
41.70
41.75
45.20
37.84
38.11
5.06
6.27
3.72
3.59
24.63
24.94
22.35
22.90
17.12
20.26
15.49
15.21
29.56
30.95
24.02
23.60
23.8
0
25
37
27.4
25
30
28.0
25
LIQUID LIMIT
PLASTIC LIMIT
10
21
22
28
15
46.28
50.40
34.84
34.84
39.27
41.60
31.86
31.84
7.01
8.80
2.98
3.00
24.29
24.64
22.35
21.85
14.98
16.96
9.51
9.99
46.80
51.89
31.34
30.03
30.7
0
25
48
43.4
25
38
45.3
25
Initial wt.befor
Dry wt.after wash
sieve size
Standard
mm.
37.50
20.00
10.00
5.00
2.00
0.425
0.075
P
Wash
Tota
1500
1151
Mass
Retained
g
0.0
24.3
72.3
180.9
279.8
232.5
362.1
-0.9
349.0
1500.0
0.0
1500
Moisture conte
Initial dry weig
% Retained
% Mass
Passing
% Passing
%
0.0
1.6
4.8
12.1
18.7
15.5
24.1
%
100.0
98.4
93.6
81.5
62.8
47.3
23.2
%
100
98
94
81
63
47
23
23.2
flowcufrlvoewcurve
25
28.4
25
14
31.3
25
22
29.6
25
14
30.9
25
28
46.8
25
15
51.9
25
NALYSIS
Initial wt.befor
Dry wt.after wash
sieve size
Standard
mm.
37.50
20.00
10.00
5.00
2.00
0.425
0.075
P
Wash
Tota
1500
1151
Mass
Retained
g
0.0
24.3
72.3
180.9
279.8
232.5
362.1
-0.9
349.0
1500.0
0.0
1500
Moisture conte
Initial dry weig
% Retained
% Mass
Passing
% Passing
%
0.0
1.6
4.8
12.1
18.7
15.5
24.1
%
100.0
98.4
93.6
81.5
62.8
47.3
23.2
%
100
98
94
81
63
47
23
23.2
NALYSIS
Moisture content Determination

Date:
###
Chainage
5+000 RHS
Sample No.
1
Can no.
19
Wt of wet soil (g)
111.14
Wt of dry soil (g)
103.48
Wt of can (g)
31.36
Wt of dry soil (g)
72.12
Wt of water (g)
7.66
Moisture Content (%)
10.6
Date:
Chainage
Sample No.
Can no.
Wt of wet soil (g)
Wt of dry soil (g)
Wt of can (g)
Wt of dry soil (g)
Wt of water (g)
2
28
126.52
116.36
33.89
82.47
10.16
12.3
###
5+100
1
9
152.97
138.77
32.66
106.11
14.2
13.4
Date:
Chainage
Sample No.
Can no.
Wt of wet soil (g)
Wt of dry soil (g)
Wt of can (g)
Wt of dry soil (g)
Wt of water (g)
###
1+574.3 - 1+585.7
1
9
140.32
123.17
34.33
88.84
17.15
19.3
Date:
Chainage
Sample No.
Can no.
Wt of wet soil (g)
Wt of dry soil (g)
Wt of can (g)
Wt of dry soil (g)
Wt of water (g)
###
1+585.7 - 1+595
1
9
79.73
70.97
23.43
47.54
8.76
18.4
Date:
Chainage
Sample No.
Can no.
Wt of wet soil (g)
Wt of dry soil (g)
Wt of can (g)
Wt of dry soil (g)
Wt of water (g)
Date:
Chainage
Sample No.
Can no.
Wt of wet soil (g)
Wt of dry soil (g)
Wt of can (g)
Wt of dry soil (g)
Wt of water (g)
Date:
Chainage
Sample No.
Can no.
Wt of wet soil (g)
Wt of dry soil (g)
Wt of can (g)
Wt of dry soil (g)
Wt of water (g)
Date:
Chainage
Sample No.
Can no.
Wt of wet soil (g)
Wt of dry soil (g)
Wt of can (g)
Wt of dry soil (g)
Wt of water (g)
Date:
###
1+233.8
1
9
108.7
94.83
31.36
63.47
13.87
21.9
###
1+245
1
9
158.82
141.6
32.1
109.5
17.22
15.7
###
1+220
1
9
149.74
126.24
32.79
93.45
23.5
25.1
###
3+580
1
9
169.53
149.5
33.24
116.26
20.03
17.2
###
Chainage
Sample No.
Can no.
Wt of wet soil (g)
Wt of dry soil (g)
Wt of can (g)
Wt of dry soil (g)
Wt of water (g)
Date:
Chainage
Sample No.
Can no.
Wt of wet soil (g)
Wt of dry soil (g)
Wt of can (g)
Wt of dry soil (g)
Wt of water (g)
1+740
1
9
127.38
117.4
33.15
84.25
9.98
11.8
###
5+280 LHS
1
14
138.92
128.74
33.09
95.65
10.18
10.6
2
9
144.7
132.3
31.18
101.12
12.4
12.3
0 -5 mm
Sample Source:
Date:
River Gbeh Natural Sand

###
Description/Measurement
Wt. of oven-dry sample in air (A)
Wt. of pycnometer filled with water (B)
Wt. of pycnometer + sample +water C
Bulk Specific Gravity
Bulk Specific Gravity (S.S.

Date Tested: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 Chainage: 5+000 RHS

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

Date Tested: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 Chainage: 5+000 RHS

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Date Tested: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 Chainage: 5+000 RHS

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

km 5+200 LHS

Wednesday, February 10, 2016

Wednesday, February 10, 2016

Initial wt.before washing (g)

Dry wt.after washing

Initial dry weight

PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS

FISH TOWN - HARPER ROAD PROJECT

Wednesday, February 10, 2016

Initial wt.before washing (g)

Initial dry weight

PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS

Wednesday, February 10, 2016

Initial wt.before washing (g)

Initial dry weight

PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS

Initial wt.before washing (g)

PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS

flow cufrlvoew curve

RPER ROAD PROJECT

flow cufrlvoew curve

flow cufrlvoew curve

flow cufrlvoew curve

PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS

PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS

Moisture content Determination

River Gbeh Natural Sand

You might also like