Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 87

1.

INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background of Project


1.2 Assignment & Objectives
1.3 Instruction to Reader
1.4 Limitation
1.5 Organisational Profile

1|Page

1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE PROJECT


The Supercritical Technology market in India is in its nascent stage as compared to the USA
market which is one of the worlds leading electricity generator and consumer. If we compare
the per capita energy or electricity availability in India which is 6419.30 KWh and the
worlds average then it is found to be a very small fraction of that. So Govt. of India has laid
more emphasis on the efficiency improvement of the power plant through advanced
technology like the Supercritical Technology. The major players for this sector are BHEL,
L&T, Doosan Heavy Industries, Thermax, BGR etc.
But no other players than BHEL is yet successful to fully exploit the capacity and market
condition. This report focuses on the credentials of the major players like BHEL, Doosan and
L&T MHI Boilers and find out the drivers of the success for BHEL which can be
implemented and followed at L&T MHI Boilers to improve its sales and market position.
Simultaneously it also emphasizes the strategies to be adopted to reach the objective.

1.2 ASSIGNMENT AND OBJECTIVES


Assignment
The primary purpose of the study is to study the development of supercritical power
generation equipment (especially boiler) market with focus on Indian Subcontinent and
gather knowledge about the major players of the industry to suggest the strategic approach for
L&T MHI Boilers Pvt. Ltd. to capture the major market share in India in its segment.

Objectives
This report addresses the following issues.
1. Comparative analysis of the Supercritical Boiler Manufacturers of India
2. SWOT analysis of the major players of the market.
3. Learning for L&T MHI Boilers Pvt. Ltd.
4. Strategic Evaluation of L&T MHI Boilers Pvt. Ltd.
5. Suggestions and Recommendations for L&T MHI Boilers Pvt. Ltd. for improving its
operational and selling efficiency

2|Page

1.3 INSTRUCTION TO READER

This report is meant for the executives and students who are already having
knowledge of power sector and well aware of the functioning of the Coal Based
Thermal Power Plant.

Analysis in the report is subjected to the availability of data.

The findings and recommendations are the personal view point of the author.

1.4 LIMITATION

The data collected for BHEL and Doosan Heavy Industries are from Secondary
Sources and presentations given by the company at different places. But complete and
up to date data was not available as most of them are related to trade secret of these
companies and volatile in nature. The law of protection of confidential information
effectively allows a perpetual monopoly in secret information. So that information
cant be shared through the report.

The report focuses on Supercritical Boiler Manufactures in Indian scenario only.

3|Page

1.5 ORGANISATIONAL PROFILE


The L&T Group
Larsen & Toubro Limited (L&T) is a technology, engineering, construction and
manufacturing company. It is one of the largest and most respected companies in India's
private sector.
Seven decades of a strong, customer-focused approach and the continuous quest for worldclass quality have enabled it to attain and sustain leadership in all its major lines of business.

L&T has an international presence, with a global spread of offices. A thrust on international
business has seen overseas earnings grow significantly. It continues to grow its overseas
manufacturing footprint, with facilities in China and the Gulf region.The company's
businesses are supported by a wide marketing and distribution network, and have established
a reputation for strong customer support.

4|Page

Founded:

in 1938

Today:

Asias leading Engineering and Construction Company

Export growth:

Over 60%

Int. Partners:

153 strategic relationships


12 Joint Ventures with global leaders

Revenue:

$13.7 billion US dollars

Resources:

45 117 people in 130 offices around the globe

Head Quarters:

Mumbai, India

Businesses:

Construction Services
Engineering & Construction Projects
Heavy Engineering
Electrical & Electronics
IT & Technology Services
Machinery & Industrial Products

Heavy Engineering

Information Technology

L&Ts Joint Ventures


E&C Projects

Construction

Electrical & Electronics

Diversified Business

5|Page

Introduction to L&T MHI Boilers Pvt. Ltd.


Established on: 16th April 2007
Technology Transferred Agreement signed on: 27th October, 2006
Commenced Manufacturing: 2010
Type of Company: Joint Venture Company of L&T and Mitsubishi heavy Industries, Japan
Shareholding Pattern: 51% L&T and 49% MHI
Product: Supercritical Boilers
Range: 500 to 1000MW Boilers and Pulverisers
Manufacturing Facility at: Hazira, Surat
Annual Production Capacity: 4000MW equivalent
License: Exclusive in India and Non Exclusive outside India

6|Page

2.LITERATURE REVIEW &


RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

2.1 History of Supercritical Boilers


2.2 Technology of Supercritical Boilers
2.3 Indian Electricity Generation Equipment Market
2.4 Research Methodology

7|Page

2.1 HISTORY OF SUPERCRITICAL BOILERS


Once through boilers has long been the vision of boiler design engineers. In the United
States, patents for once through boiler concepts date from as early as 1824. These early
inventors were undoubtedly motivated by the desire to improve the product safety because of
the notoriety of pressure vessel failures associated with the early fire tube and water tube
boilers. While advances in the boiler industry in the late 1800s such as developments by The
Babcock & Wilcox company (founded in 1867) significantly improved product safety,
interest continued in the development of once through both as a way to eliminate the need for
the steam drum and with the hope that the design would cope with the impurities contained in
the water. B&Ws research in once through boilers dates from 1916 when the boiler research
began at the companys Bayonne, New Jersey Laboratory. In keeping with the technology of
the time, this early research unit was operated at a pressure of 4 Mpa. The first significant
commercial application of once through boilers was made by Mark Benson, a
Czechoslovakian inventor, when he in 1923 provided 4-ton/hr unit of English Electric Co.,
Ltd. At Rugby, England. This unit was designed to operate at critical pressure with the belief
that operating at this pressure where there is no density difference between steam and water,
would avoid boiler tube overheating and solid deposition.
Mark Benson continued his development work, which included the installation in 1930 of a
113 ton/hr unit in Belgium. Like the unit for English Electric, this unit was intended to
operate at critical pressure. Operating at critical pressure however didnt fulfill the hoped
elimination of problems by operating at critical pressure, fulfilled and it was necessary to
reduce the boiler operating pressure to overcome problems with tube failures. In this case, the
boiler inventors vision outreached the technology available at this time for both tube
materials and water chemistry control. Nonetheless, these early units were successful
operation and served as the foundation of the boiler development work that set the direction
for the European Boiler development. Siemens ultimately acquired Mark Bensons concepts
and it is from these concepts that the Benson boiler technology now licensed worldwide by
Siemens was developed. B&W also continued with their work on Once Through boilers in
the 1920s as boiler and power plant engineers envisioned the efficiency gains that could be
achieved by the use of ultra-critical pressure cycles. B&W in 1923 began experimental work
at its Research center on a test facility capable of operation at 34.5MPa and 520C. The test
facility was used to examine the Thermal, Hydraulic and heat transfer effects in the pressure
8|Page

range from 10MPa to the maximum operating pressure of the unit. The test rig was then
transferred to Purdue University where Research continued with collaboration with B&W.
Much of the works were reported in the Technical Papers in the early 1930s by the authors
such as Kerr and Potter. Through the 1930s and 1940s power plant operating conditions
were limited to the subcritical regime because of the limitation of the metallurgy and water
chemistry control technology. In Europe, boiler technology followed the once through
philosophy. This at least in part was driven by material availability constraints and took
advantage of the fact that once through boiler generally used smaller diameter and thinner
wall tubes then did the natural circulation boiler. In addition, the once through boiler
eliminated the need for thick steel plate for the steam drum.
The rapid development of the B&W once through boiler paralleled the rapid expansion of the
United States Utility Industry in the 1960s and 1970s. The second and third boiler contracts
were also with American Electric Power, but these 450MW systems were ordered before the
Philo unit went into service. Both the boilers were tower style designs.

2.2 TECHNOLOGY OF SUPERCRITICAL BOILERS

What is Critical about Super Critical Power


Generation?
Supercritical

is

thermodynamic

expression

describing state of substance where there is no clear


distinction between the critical and gaseous phase (i.e. they are a homogenous fluid). Water
reaches this phase at a pressure above around 220Kg Bar (225.56 Kg/cm2) and temperature
374.15 0C. In addition there is no surface tension in a
supercritical fluid as there is no boundary between
liquid and gas phase.
By changing the pressure and temperature of the fluid,
the properties can be tuned to be more liquid- or
more gas like. Carbon dioxide and water are the most
commonly used supercritical fluids, being used for

9|Page

decaffeination and power generation, respectively.


Challenges for adoption of Supercritical Technology

Up to an operating pressure of around 193.74 Kg/cm2 in the evaporator part of the


boiler, the cycle is Sub-Critical. In this case a
drum-type boiler is used because the steam
needs to be separated from water in the drum
of the boiler before it is superheated and led
into the turbine.

Above

an

operating

pressure

of

224.337Kg/cm2 in the evaporator part of the


Boiler, the cycle is Supercritical. The cycle
medium

is

single

phase

fluid

with

homogeneous properties and there is no need


to separate steam from water in a drum.

Thus, the drum of the drum-type boiler which is very heavy and located on the top of
the boiler can be eliminated.

Once-through boilers are therefore used in supercritical cycles.

Advanced Steel types must be used for components such as the boiler and the live
steam and hot reheat steam piping that are in direct contact with steam under elevated
conditions.
Type

Main Steam

Main Steam

Reheat Steam

Pressure, Bar

Temperature, C

Temperature, C

Base sub critical

166

538

538

Super critical

247

535

565

Ultra super critical-I

270

585

600

Ultra super critical-II

295

595

600

10 | P a g e

Boiler for Supercritical Once Through Power Plant

Once through Boiler technology, which originated in Europe, has evolved into the
most effective application for Supper Critical Steam condition.

There are no operational limitations due to once through boilers compared through to
drum type boilers.

In fact once-through boilers are better suited to frequent load variations than drum
type boilers, since the drum is a component with a high wall thickness, requiring
controlled heating. This limits the load change rate to 3% per minute, while oncethrough boilers can step-up the load by 5% per minute..

Supercritical Cycle Benefits


Sub Critical

Supercritical

Plant Efficiency

34%-37%

41%

CO (in g/KWH)

0.42 to 0.45

0.38

NOX (in g/KWH)

0.42 to 0.45

0.38

SOX (in g/KWH)

3.4 to 3.6

0.86 to 0.91

0.77

Particulate (in g/KWH)

Types of Boiler
Generally we consider two types of boilers- Drum Boilers and Once through Boilers.

Boiler Types

Drum Boiler

Natural
Circulation
Boiler

Forced
Circulation
Boiler

Once Through
Boiler

Benson Boiler

Sulzer Boiler

11 | P a g e

Once Through Boiler


The main difference between the Benson and Sulzer type of boilers are discussed below.
Benson Boiler
Unlike the drum boiler, the once through boiler has no drum. This means that during the
once through operation the fluid passes through the economiser, evaporator and
superheater without any recirculation. Hence the evaporation end point is not fixed
locally. It moves depending on load as well as depending on balance between the fuel and
the feed water mass flow. The feed water mass flow influences not only the evaporation
endpoint, but also the steam mass flow, the steam temperature and the steam pressure.
Therefore it is very important for the feed water control to adjust the feed water mass
flow precisely, to the fuel mass flow.
For the rapid power output changes during the frequency control operation, the boiler
must be able to provide a certain amount of steam at a specific point of time. The Benson
boiler is able to store less steam than the drum boiler. If the Benson boiler provides the
necessary amount of steam at a specific point of time, it will lead to large steam pressure
deviations.
During low load operation the recirculation will take place in a Benson boiler. The
recirculation is obtained by means of the separator vessel, which has the same function as
the drum in a drum boiler. The aim of the recirculation is to avoid the flow of the water
instead of the steam to the superheaters and to the turbine in order to prevent these
components from damage.
Flow of Benson License
Benson Boiler
Technology

Siemens Pvt.
Ltd.

Hitachi Power

Babcock &
Wilcox Boiler

Thermax
Limited

Alstom Boiler

BHEL

Ansaldo Caldaie

Foster Wheeler

GB Engineering
Enterprises

12 | P a g e

Sulzer Boiler
In contrast to the Benson boiler, the Sulzer Boiler operates by means of the separator
vessel during low load operation as well as during the once through operation. Due to the
separator vessel, the evaporation endpoint is fixed locally. The water level in the
separator vessel represents the balance between the feed water and the fuel mass flow.
Depending on the water level of the separator vessel, the feed water mass flow has to be
changed. The storage capacity of the Sulzer boiler is slightly larger than the one in the
Benson boiler.
Flow of Sulzer License

Sulzer Boiler
Technology

Korean Heavy
Industries

Mitsubishi
Heavy
Industries

Formosa
Heavy Industry

L&T (for
Supercritical
Tech)

Comparison between Benson Spiral Design and Sulzer Vertical Wall Design
Parameters

Vertical Tube Wall Sulzer

Spiral Tube Wall- Benson

Design

Design

(optimized Rifle Tube)

(Smooth Tubes)

Comparison of Flow Characteristics


Velocity of Fluid in Tube

Low

High

Dynamic Characteristic of Decrease of Static head is Decrease of Static head is less


Fluid

greater than the increase of than the increase of friction


friction resistance when heat resistance

when

absorption increases, which absorption increases,

heat
which

13 | P a g e

Parameters

Vertical Tube Wall Sulzer

Spiral Tube Wall- Benson

Design

Design

(optimized Rifle Tube)

(Smooth Tubes)

makes

decrease

in

total makes

pressure drop
Flow Characteristic

increase

in

total

pressure drop

The more the heat absorption, The more the heat absorption,
the higher the mass flow rate the less the mass flow rate of
of fluid: Characteristic of fluid: Characteristic of Once
Natural

Circulation, Through, (G/Q)<0

(G/Q)>0
Imbalance of Temperature

Very Small (Advantage)

Very Big (Disadvantage)

Cost of Construction and Operation


Cost of Construction

Supercritical-100 (Base)

Supercritical-102

Ultra Supercritical- 104

Ultra Supercritical- 106

Supercritical-100 (Base)

Supercritical-103

Ultra Supercritical- 96

Ultra Supercritical- 99

Weight of Pressure parts

Higher

Lower

Frictional Pressure Losses

Lower

Higher

42%(approx.)

38% (approx.)

Lower

Higher

286 (for 2X600 MWe)

315 (for 2X600 MWe)

Lower Consumption

Higher Consumption

Less Accumulation

More Accumulation

Cost of Operation

Thermodynamic
Efficiency
CO2 Emissions
Coal

Consumption

(GCE/KWH)
Auxiliary

Power

Consumption
Accumulation of Slag
Capability in India
Indian

Technical

Type of

Waterwall

Company

Partner

Agreement

Arrangement

BHEL

Alstom

License

Spiral

Type of Tubes

Smooth Tubes

14 | P a g e

Indian

Technical

Type of

Waterwall

Company

Partner

Agreement

Arrangement

Doosan Heavy
Industries
L&T

Babcock
Mitsubishi
Babcock &

Thermax

Wilcox

BGR

Hitachi

Gammon

Ansaldo

Cethar

Riely/ Seimens

Doosan owns

Type of Tubes

Spiral

Smooth Tues

Joint Venture

Vertical

Rifled Tubes

Joint Venture

Vertical

Rifled Tubes

Joint Venture

Vertical

Rifled Tubes

Vertical

Rifled Tubes

Vertical

Rifled Tubes

Babcock

Gammon owns
Ansaldo
License

2.4 Research Methodology


The project report focuses on two major parts analysis, comparison of L&T MHI Boilers with
its competitors and computing the strategic position of L&T MHI Boilers to suggest the
opportunities, ways to survive in the stagnant power market.

Collection of Data from Primary and Secondary Sources for BHEL, LMB and Doosan

Comparing the collected Data and Analysing the strategy followed

Evaluating the strategy followed by LMB using SWOT, TWOS, SPACE Matrix

Suggesting areas of improvement

Recommending the available opportunities

15 | P a g e

3.INDIAS GENERATION
EQUIPMENT MARKET

3.1 Indian Power Sector


3.2 Indian Electrical Equipment Industry
3.3 Indian Electrical Equipment Industry Mission Plan 2012-2022
3.4 Industry Competitiveness

16 | P a g e

3.1 INDIAS POWER SECTOR


Power is a necessary fuel for a growing economy. The Indian economy is on a rising path
targeting GDP growth rate of 8-9%. To achieve this growth, it is imperative that the proper
power infrastructure is in place.
India has the fifth-largest generation capacity in the world with an installed capacity of over
225 GW, as on 31st May, 2013 and is also the sixth-largest electricity consumer, accounting
for 3.4% of total global consumption. Indias total consumption in 2009 was estimated at 632
TWh. This is expected to increase to 2,465 TWh by 2035.
The industrial sector, due to increasing capacity additions, has the highest demand for
electricity across all sectors and is expected to remain high. The domestic and commercial
sectors are likely to experience a steady demand for electricity, but the share of agriculture is
expected to see a decline in the coming years.
Generation
Thermal energy accounts for the major share of generation in India. Share of wind and other
renewable forms of energy currently stands at around 12% of the total installed capacity.
Government plans to increase the share of power generated from renewable sources in the
coming Plans. India currently stands as the 5th largest and 3rd largest producer in the world
of hydro and wind energy respectively.
With envisioned capacity additions, India is expected to reach an installed capacity of
400GW by 2022. This increase will be in line with the countrys GDP growth plans of 89%
per year.
Indias Installed Total Capacity (as on 31st May 2013)
225000

250000
200000

153188

150000
100000

39623

50000

4780

34444.12

27542

0
Thermal Nuclear Hydro

RES

Total

Captive

All Figures in MW

Total: 225 GW

Source: CEA
17 | P a g e

Capacity addition in the 11th Plan has been 69% of the original target, which is encouraging.
This is expected to increase further in the 12th Plan.

Plan-wise Capacity Additions Envisaged and Percentage Achieved

3.2 INDIAN ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT INDUSTRY


Indias electrical equipment industry is highly diverse and manufactures a wide range of high
and low technology products. The industry directly employs around half million persons and
provides indirect employment to another one million people. The industry can be broadly
classified into two sectors generation equipment and T&D equipment. For 2011-12, the
industry size is estimated at ` 1.20 lakh crores, of which generation equipment segment
consisting of BTG contributed `31,000crores while the major T&D equipment segment of
transformers, cables, transmission lines, switchgears, capacitors, energy meters, etc.,
provided the larger share of ` 64,235crores. Other electrical equipment, including instrument
transformers, surge arrestors, stamping and lamination, insulators, insulating material,
industrial electronics, indicating instruments, winding wires, etc., contributed to `
25,000crores.

Estimated Segment-wise EE
Industry Size (2011-12)
Major T&D
Equipment
53%

Generation
Equipment
26%
Other
Electrical
Equipment
21%

Source: IEEMA
18 | P a g e

Domestic Demand for Electrical Equipment


The demand for electrical equipment in India is expected to witness significant expansion on
the back of the growth of the power sector. The government is likely to add around 88.5GW
and 100 GW, respectively, under its 12th and 13th Five Year Plans.
Based on investment estimates and capacity addition targets, it is expected that the domestic
demand for BTG will be in the range of ` 125,000-150,000 crores by 2022, while that of the
T&D equipment industry will be ` 350,000375,000 crores.

Plan-wise Equipment Demand (Cumulative)


Equipment

12th Plan (20122017)

13th Plan (20172022)

(`Rs. 000 crores)

(`Rs.000 crores)

Generation equipment (BTG)

300-350

500-600

T&D equipment

700-750

1000-1150
Source: EY Analysis

BTG Industry in India


Indian players, as well as global players focusing on the Indian market, have put in place
facilities to manufacture products based on supercritical technology. During the 11th Plan,
the share of supercritical technology was 14%, while in the 12th Plan the share of
supercritical technology will be more than 60%. More than 80 GW of supercritical sets have
been awarded by India till date. Foreign players have been the recipients of the major share of
such orders.
Foreign companies have received huge bulk orders, primarily from Indian private players for
power plants to be commissioned during the 12th and 13th Five Year Plans. As a result, most
BTG equipment players in India do not have healthy order books. This scenario would lead to
intensified competition for upcoming tenders.
Domestic Capacity and Utilisation
The annual capacity in the domestic BTG equipment industry segment is currently at 25 GW
and is expected to rise to 40 GW by 201415. Many Indian companies have entered into
partnerships with global players and there are significant capacity addition plans in the next
few years.

19 | P a g e

4. MAJOR PLAYERS IN BOILER


MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY
IN INDIA

4.1 BHEL
4.2 Doosan Heavy Industries
4.3 L&T MHI Boilers Pvt. Ltd.
4.4 Comparison
20 | P a g e

4.1 BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED

21 | P a g e

4.1.1

About BHEL

Established in 1964
Engaged in design, engineering, manufacture, construction, testing, commissioning
and servicing of a wide range of products and services for the core sectors of the
economy, viz. Power, Transmission, Industry, Transportation (Railway), Renewable
Energy, Oil & Gas and Defence
BHEL has a share of 59% in Indias total installed generating capacity contributing
69% (approx.) to the total power generated from utility sets (excluding nonconventional capacity) as of March 31, 2012.
a) Credentials
 A USD 9 billion Engineering & Manufacturing
enterprise of its kind in India
 A Navaratna company and a Major Integrated
Power Plant Equipment Manufacturer in the
World
 Profit Making Company since 197172
 Consistent Dividend Paying Company for over
thirty years (FY 1976 77 onwards)
 References in over 75 countries
 Installed base of more than 1,20,000 MW
 15 Manufacturing Units+ 2 Subsidiaries+ 7 JVs+ Infrastructure to deal with
150+ project sites
 Fully indigenized technology up to 600 MW
from world leaders
 Supplied steam turbines, generators, boilers and
matching auxiliaries up to 800 MW ratings
including supercritical sets of 660/700/ 800 MW
 346 coal based sets installed, including 58 sets
of 500 MW rating
 376 nos BHEL make Hydro Utility sets installed in India

22 | P a g e

b) BHELs Manufacturing Locations

c) Share holding Pattern

Shareholding Pattern as on 31st


March 2012
President of India
1%

11%

6%

14%
68%

Foreign Institutional
Investors
Mutual Funds and UTI

23 | P a g e

d) Manpower As per Press Information Bureau, Govt. of India category-wise regular


manpower strength in BHEL
Executives

25%

Supervisors

20%

Workers/others

55%

Total

100%

The total headcount in the PSU is 49,300

Turnover per Employee (in INR Crore)


1

0.93

0.89

2010-11

2011-12

0.74

0.8
0.61
0.6

0.44

0.48

2006-07

2007-08

0.4
0.2
0
2008-09

2009-10

Turnover per Employee (in INR Cr.)

e) Products of BHEL (Focusing on boilers and Auxiliaries)


Boilers

Steam generators for utilities, ranging from 30 to 500MW capacity, using coal,
lignite, oil, natural gas or a combination of these fuels: capability to manufacture
boilers with super critical parameters up to 1000 MW unit size.

Steam generators for industrial applications, ranging from 40 to 450t/hour capacity


using coal, natural gas, industrial gases, biomass, lignite, oil, bagasse or a
combination of these fuels.

Pulverized fuel fired boilers.

Stoker boilers.

Atmospheric fluidized bed combustion boilers.


24 | P a g e

Circulating fluidized bed combustion boilers.

Waste heat recovery boilers.

Chemical recovery boilers for paper industry, ranging from capacity of 100 to 1000
t/day of dry solids.

Pressure vessels.

Boiler Auxiliaries
Fan

Axial reaction fans of single stage and double stage for clean
air application, with capacity ranging from 25 to 800m3/s and
pressure ranging from 120 to 1,480 m of gas column.

Air Pre-heater

Ljungstrom rotary regenerative air-pre-heaters for boiler and


process furnaces.
Large regenerative air-preheaters for utilities of capacity up
to 1000 MW.

Gravimetric Feeders
Pulverisers

Bowl mills of slow and medium speed of capacity up to 100


t/hour
Tube mills for pulverizing low-grade coal with high-ash
content.

Pulse Jet and Reverse Air Type Fabric Filters (Bag Filters)
Electrostatic Precipitators

Electrostatic precipitators of any capacity with efficiency up


to 99.9% for utility and industrial applications

Mechanical Separators
Soot Blowers

Long retractable soot blowers (travel up to 12.2m), wall


deslaggers, rotary blowers and temperature probes and related
control panels operating on pneumatic, electric or manual
mode.
Swivel arm type soot blowers for regenerative air-preheaters.

Valves

High-pressure and low-pressure bypass valves for utilities.


High and medium-pressure valves, cast and forged steel
valves of gate, globe, non-return (swing-check and piston liftcheck) types for steam, oil and gas duties up to 600 mm

25 | P a g e

diameter, 250 kg/cm2 pressure and 540oC temperature.

Heat Exchangers and


Pressure Vessels

Air-cooled heat exchangers


Surface condensers.
Steam jet air ejectors
Columns
Reactors, Drums
LPG/ Propane Storage Bullets
LPG/ Propane Store Mounded Vessels
Feed Water Heaters

f) BHEL Utility units (up to 2012)62% of Total Installed Capacity of India is contributed by BHEL Utility Sets

26 | P a g e

4.1.2

Turnover, Order Book & Expenditure in R&D

a) Annual Turnover (in INR Crore)

60000
50000

49510

50015

2011-12

2012-13

43337

40000

34154
28033

30000
20000
10000
0

2008-09

2009-10

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11
2010-11

2011-12

2012-13

b) Order Book (in INR Crores)


70000
59678

59037

60000

60507

50000
40000
31528
30000
22096
20000
10000
0
2008-09

2009-10
2008-09

2009-10

2010-11
2010-11

2011-12
2011-12

2012-13

2012-13

27 | P a g e

c) Performance up to Q2FY13

Sl. No.

INR Crore

H1FY13

H1FY12

H1FY12*

% Growth

(A)

(B)

(C)

(A/C)

Turnover

19,750

18,189

18,189

8.6%

PBT

3,123

3,163

2,997

4.2*

PAT

2,195

2,228

2,115

3.8%

Project

3,505

3,025

3,025

16%

4,393

3,777

3,777

16%

Commissioned
(MW)
5

Order Book
(MW)

*Total order outstanding as on 30.09.12: INR 1,22,300 Crore

d) Order Book H1 FY13


Sector

Power

Industry

Exports

Total

MW

3380

23

990

4393

INR Crores

5739

2049

975

8717

Major Orders Received

1X500 MW TG & SG Package from NTPC Vindyachal

2X660MW Package for DVC Raghunathpur

160MW BTG Package from RRVUNL Ramgarh CCPP Stage IV

ESP Package for NTPC Mauda and Sholapur Projects

28 | P a g e

e) Performance of the BHEL Plants (Source: CEA Review of Performance of Thermal


power Stations 2010-11)

f) Expenditure towards Research & Development

29 | P a g e

4.1.3

Consultants, Collaborations and Certifications

a) BHEL Technological Collaborations


Sl.

Equipment

Technology Partner

Coverage

Alstom, USA

500 1000MW

Siemens (SAG) Germany

660 1000MW

MHI, Japan

Up to 1200MW

No.
1

Supercritical Boiler

Supercritical
Turbine Generator

Pumps

Fans

TLT, Germany

b) BHEL experience with Consultants




DESIN, New Delhi

MECON, Ranchi

Development Consultants, Calcutta

M.N. Dastur & Co. Ltd., Calcutta / Chennai

Engineers India Ltd., New Delhi

Tata Consulting Engineers, Bangalore

c) BHELs Supercritical Market in India


Supercritical Domain

Introduced Supercritical Technology with technology tie-ups with Alstom


(Boiler), Siemens (TG) & MHI (Pumps)

Rapid Technology Absorption in Partnerships with Customers

30 | P a g e

Supercritical Orders basket 18 TGs and 18 SGs:

Sl. No.

Project

Rating

Customer

Scope

Ordering Route

(in MW)
1
2

Barh

2X660

NTPC

SG & TG

ICB

Bara

3X660

PPGCL

SG & TG

ICB Outbidding
L&T

Krishnapatna

2X800

APPDCL

SG

L&T

Yermarus

ICB Outbidding

2X800

RPCL

EPC Excluding

JV Route

AHP & CHP


5
6

Edlapur

1X800

RPCL

SG & TG

JV Route

Bellary

1X700

KPCL

EPC

ICB Outbidding
L&T

Lalitpur

3x660

Bajaj

SG & TG

ICB Outbidding
Alstom

Hindustan
Mouda

2x660

NTPC

TG

ICB

Raghunathpur

2x660

DVC

TG

---

10

Singrauli

2x660

DB Power

SG & TG

----

4.1.4 BHEL and Alstom Historical Agreement (dated. - 27 Oct 2005)




BHEL became the first Indian company capable of manufacturing


Supercritical Boilers

Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited (BHEL) entered into a Technology Transfer


Agreement with Alstom for design and manufacture of large-size Supercritical

31 | P a g e

Once-Through Boilers to gain access to Supercritical Technology, hitherto the


domain of leading players, thereby enabling it to enlarge its product range.


The Agreement with Alstom - an internationally reputed technology leader in


Once-Through Boilers, includes transfer of state-of-the-art technology to
BHEL for any size of Once-Through Boilers and associated Coal Pulverisers.
During the period of the Agreement, Alstom will provide training to BHEL
engineers as well as support in the
design,

engineering,

manufacturing, assembly, testing,


erection,

commissioning,

repair,

retrofit and up gradation of the


boilers.


Presided over by Mr. Sontosh


Mohan Dev, Union Minister of
State for HI&PE(Independent Charge), the agreement was signed in New
Delhi, by Mr. AK Puri, CMD, BHEL and Mr. Patrick Kron, Chairman &
Chief

Executive,

Alstom.

4.1.5 ALSTOM
a) Presence

32 | P a g e

KEY DATA

More than 8,000 Employees in India

4 R&D Centres in Bangalore (Transport),Vadodara (Power) and Hosur &


Padappai(Grid)

2 Engineering Centres for Power in Noida, Kolkata


Manufacturing Units

Power - Vadodara, Durgapur, Shahabad, Gujarat

Transport Coimbatore, Sricity

Grid - Padappai, Pallavaram, Hosur, Vadodara, Naini

b) Partnerships
Alstom in India has made strategic partnerships with strong local players to bring in
frontline technologies and enhance the quality and efficiency of its products:

Alstom and Druk Green Power Corporation in 2011- The JV will set up a
hydropower service centre in Bhutan to provide repair services for hydro runners
and other underwater parts of hydropower plants

Alstom and Bharat Forge Ltd. JV in 2009- The JV will manufacture steam
turbines and auxiliary equipment with an annual capacity of 5000 MW

c) Thermal Power Experience in India


Alstoms Steam business in India designs, engineers and constructs turnkey steam
power plants in addition to offering a range of products such as boilers, generators, air
quality control systems and CO2 capture & storage technologies.
Refernces
STCMS Neyveli 0, 1 x 250 MW Lignite Fired Power Plant full turnkey 2002
CSEB Korba 4x 50 MW R&M - 2007

Ongoing Projects

NTPC Barh II Supercritical Boilers 2 x 660 MW - under execution*


33 | P a g e

APGENCO Krishnapatnam - Supercritical Boilers 2 x 800 MW - under


execution*

Jay Pee - Bara - Supercritical Boilers 3 x 660 MW - under execution*

NTPC Mouda - Supercritical Boilers 2 x 660 MW - under execution*

NTPC Solapur Supercritical Steam Turbine Islands - 2 X 660 MW under


execution

NTPC Nabinagar Supercritical Steam Turbine Islands and Boilers* 3 X 660


MW - under execution

BHEL Gadarwara Super Thermal Power Plant* - 2 X 800 MW under


execution
* Through our technology licensee, BHEL

4.1.6 Technical Aspects of Alstom Boilers

Types of ALSTOM BOILERS


ALSTOM offers an extensive range of boilers and firing systems.

Pulverised coal tower type boiler: Suitable for all types of coal, especially to
reduce potential erosion from high ash coals

Pulverised coal two pass boiler: the most widely used design in the world, offering
lower maximum heights and potential for quicker build time

Circulating fluidised bed (CFB): the fuel-flexible solution, burning low-grade


fuels at high efficiency with low emissions

Gas and oil-fired boilers: using the latest technology and Alstom expertise for
efficient, reliable and eco-friendly solutions

Firing systems: burn a wide range of fuels, reduce your emission levels and
maintain excellent availability and reliability

34 | P a g e

Expansion and Future Plan


a) Manufacturing Capacity Expansion of BHEL

b) Some Trend Setting Steps to Accelerate Project Execution


Vendor Base

766 new Vendors added in 201112 & Vendor base is more than
20,000.

Expansion

Procurement Office opened in Shanghai, China

AMA

Advanced Manufacturing Action for long lead items

TCA

Technology Collaboration Agreement with Sheffield Forgemasters


UK for large size forgings (up to 1000 MW)

IT

eProcurement , Reverse Auction (~32%)

Rate Contracts

Long term Rate Contracts for Steel, Copper, CRGO, Transformer


Oil
(contribution to total purchase ~20%)

Outsourcing

Enhanced thrust is being given for outsourcing of low tech/


noncore
manufacturing

ACF

Away Center Fabrication adopted by Trichy & Ranipet Units

35 | P a g e

c) Strategic Plan for 2012-17

SWOT Analysis of BHEL

Strength

Argument

Low cost producer of quality

Distributed manufacturing facilities

equipments due to cheap labor and

More numbers of ancillary set ups around the

fully depreciated plants.

Flexible manufacturing set up

plant to provide readymade raw materials

Secured job attracts more labors

Economies of scale

Capacity to produce equipment up to 20000


MW

Large number of vendors to select

Produces wide range (capacity) of products

Has more than 20,000 approved vendors for

from

different types of raw materials which are


selected through strict appraisal process giving
quality the top priority

Vendors are selected through bidding process


ensuring transparency in selection
36 | P a g e

Strength
Comprehensive turnkey experience

Argument

from product design to commissioning.

Has been operating as the only indigenous


power plant equipment manufacturer since
1964 to 2007

Employees with highest level of experience in


Power Plant Equipment manufacturer are
available in BHEL with knowledge of
equipment design and commissioning

Large committed and skilled

Total of 49,000(approx.) work force is available

workforce

resulting greater division of work hence more


specialization

Relatively stable industrial relationship

Being the only Govt. utility and the oldest in the


country in producing Power Plant Equipment, it
enjoys a healthy and long term relationship with
the industry

Access to contemporary technologies

Technology transfer for Supercritical Boilers from

with back up support from renowned

ALSTOM to BHEL and consultancy services from

collaborations.

International Consultants has given it the edge to


outperform from its competitors.

Fully equipped to take capital

Having the good track record of experience BHEL

maintenance and servicing of power

is a good choice for maintenance and servicing

plants.

activities of power plants as most of the plants are


having equipments designed and commissioned by
BHEL.
(Refer CEA, Annual Report on Performance of
Thermal Power Plant)

Large share of domestic business in

69% of the Utility generating power are supplied

power industry.

with BHEL equipments

Renovation and Modernization of old

CEA has exclusive provision for BHEL to

plants.

renovate and modernize plants which were


supplied with BHEL equipments for BTG package

Regional centers for services for easy

Almost all the state capitals are having BHEL


37 | P a g e

Strength
access to customers.

Argument
customer service centers for greater interaction
with customers (so greater customer reach)

Sound financial position in terms of

Refer BHEL Balance sheet

profitability and solvency


Low debt equity ratio (even lower than

Refer BHEL Balance sheet

0.5:1) for many years, enabling


company to raise capital.
The company has 180 products under

This caters to the needs of the core sector like

30 major product groups that

power, industry, transmission, transportation,


defence, telecommunications and oil business.

BHEL's ability to acquire modern


technology and make it suitable to
Indian conditions
Strong relationship with NTPC

NTPC is planning a capacity expansion of Rs. 52


bn and based on the past, 85% of NTPC projects
have been bagged by BHEL. The company also
enjoys purchase price preference.

Huge investment in R&D Merger &

The company has taken over the Management &

Acquisition

Control of Bharat Pumps & Compressors Ltd and


completely taken over M/s- Bharat Heavy Plate &
Vessels Ltd

Weakness

High working capital requirement due to its exposure to cash starved State
Electricity Boards.

Inability to provide project financing.

Difficulties in keeping the commitments on product delivery and desired sequence


of supply.

Longer delivery cycle in comparison with International Suppliers of similar


equipments.
38 | P a g e

Inability to provide suppliers credit, soft loans for financing of power project.

Inadequate banking infrastructure.

PSU status is a big weakness for BHEL as it is subject to their rules and
regulations and is forced to carry a huge amount of labor force, which it is not
able to retrench.

The company is vertically integrated, which could have been avoided by


outsourcing its components for power generation and transmission. This could
have reduced the cost.

Opportunities

High growth forecast in Indias index of industrial production would increase


demand for industrial equipment such as motors and compressors.

Growing number of old plants (>25 Years) will provide a good market for R&M
of Thermal Power Plants.

Private sector power plant to offer expanded market as utilities suffer resource
crunch.

Export opportunities

Easy processing of ventures/ collaborations/ imports/ acquisition of new


technology.

Threats

Technical suppliers are becoming competitors with the opening up of the Indian
company.

Fall in global power equipment prices can affect profitably.

Reduced number coal block allocations.

Multilateral agencies reluctant to lend to power sector because of poor financial


management by State Electricity Boards.

Private sector power companies may give order to low cost bidder (Chinese
Bidder) compromising with quality aspect.

39 | P a g e

Strategies learnt from BHEL


i.

Technological Strategy
BHEL is the leader company to provide a technology to the various products. The two
ways of adopting technological strategies are:

ii.

Acquiring technology & making product out of it through licensing.

Developing own technology.

Development Strategy
BHEL is amongst the highest investors in Research and Development in the country.
The R&D efforts have made significant contributions to almost all areas of operation
of BHEL; a few among them are: Research and Development Strategy. The ways of
adapting the strategies are:

Upgrading its product engineering and manufacturing technology base by

induction of state-of-the-art technologies.

iii.

Upgrading equipment and facilities to maintain quality leadership.

Vendor Development
Global meeting of about 200 vendors is being held at Hardwar

iv.

Flexible Manufacturing Technology


It mainly refers to production of a wide range of products without changing or with a
little change in the current technology and manufacturing facility. It advantages will
be

Idle Time Reduction

Optimum level of inventory

Increase in productivity with an underlying strategy of maximising profits

through lowering unit costs

40 | P a g e

4.2 DOOSAN HEAVY INDUSTRIES & CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD.

41 | P a g e

1. About Doosan Group


Doosan Group is a South Korean conglomerate company. In 2009, the company was placed
471st in the Fortune Global 500. It has been included in the Forbes Global 2000 companies
from 2007. It is the parent company of KODA power. Doosan was ranked 4th among the
Worlds Best 40 Companies 2009 list, released in BusinessWeek, the U.S. economics
magazine in October 2009, Fortune Global 500.
a) History
The Doosan Group, founded in 1896. The company began as the Park Seung Jik Store in
1896 in Baeogai (now Jongno 4-ga, Seoul). Since then, Doosan has developed into a
multinational conglomerate, with particular emphasis on consumer goods, manufacturing and
the trading and construction sectors.
The company's acquisitions include Doosan Heavy Industries & Construction (formerly
Korea Heavy Industries and Construction, a heavy industry company specializing in power
and desalination plants) in 2001, Koryeo Industrial Development in 2004 and Doosan
Infracore (formerly Daewoo Heavy Industries & Machinery, a company specializing in
construction machinery) in 2005.
In 2006, Doosan acquired the boiler engineering company Mitsui Babcock UK (renamed
Doosan Babcock) and Kvaerner IMGB, the largest casting and forging company in Romania.
In 2007, Doosan acquired the construction machinery company Bobcat USA, the worlds
largest supplier of small construction equipment. Post-acquisition of Bobcat USA into
Doosan Infracore, one of the Doosan Groups subsidiary companies specializing in medium
and large construction machinery, the Doosan Group became the worlds seventh largest
supplier of construction machinery. Doosan currently has 43,000 employees in 38 countries.
Key Business Areas
Doosans core businesses are based on ISB (Infrastructure Support Business). Doosans
Infrastructure Support Businesses are made up of many subsidiaries

42 | P a g e

Doosan Group Hierarchy

Doosan
Corporation

Doosan Infracore
Doosan Babcock
(UK)
Doosan Heavy
Industries

Doosan Power
Systems
Skoda Power
(Czech)

Doosan Group
Doosan Mecatec

Doosan Industrial
Development

Doosan Engine

b) Global Presence

43 | P a g e

c) Credentials

d) Doosan Companies and Business Lines


Doosan Affiliate

Business Lines

Companies
Doosan Corporation

Trading (Export & Import Services, Import Products


Sales

Consumables (Liquor, Food, Fashion, Publishing,


Magazine, Shopping Mall)

Electro-Materials (Copper-clad laminates for Printed


Circuit Boards)

Packaging Materials (Glass Tableware, Crystals, PET


bottles, Can)

Doosan Heavy Industries

IT (Solution Service, Data Center, ISP Service)

R&D Center (Liquor, Food)

Thermal Power Plant (EPC, Boiler, T/G, HRSG, BOP)


44 | P a g e

Doosan Affiliate

Business Lines

Companies
and Construction Limited

Nuclear Power Plant (NSSS, Peripheral Systems, BOP)

Material Handling Equipments (Port Cranes, Ship


Unloader, Stacker & Reclaimer, Conveyor System

Casting & Forgings (Power Facilities, Marine Engine


Parts, Mill Steel, Die & Tool Steel)

Desalination (MSF, MED, RO, Hydro-MSF/RO)

Construction (Plants, Civil Works, Architecture Works)

Doosan Babcock (Advanced Boiler Technology-High


Efficiency & Cleaner Coal)

Doosan Engine Co., Ltd

Marine Engines, Diesel Power Plant

Doosan Mecatec

Chemical Process Equipments, Steel Bridge, General Steel


Fabrication

Doosan

Infracore

Ltd

Co., Construction Equipment, Machine Tools & Automation Systems,


Diesel Engines & Materials, Military Industry

Doosan Construction Co., Civil & Architecture Works


Ltd

e) Doosan Heavy Industries & Construction Co. Ltd.


Doosan Heavy Industries & Construction Co., Ltd., a subsidiary of Doosan Group, is one
of the largest Korean heavy industrial companies. Established in 1962, it is located in the
southern city of Changwon with an area of 4.5 million m. Its business ranges from nuclear
power plants, thermal power plants, turbines and generators, to desalination plants, castings,
forgings and construction. The company has completed a number of major power and water
projects worldwide.
History

1962 Founded as Korea Heavy Industries and Construction Co., Ltd.

1999 Integrated with several other domestic power industries

2000 Became public and was listed on Korean stock market


45 | P a g e

2001 Renamed Doosan Heavy Industries & Construction. Ranked first in global desalination
market and selected as "Global Product"

2006 Acquired Kvaerner IMGB (Currently Doosan IMGB) and Mitsui Babcock (Currently
Doosan Babcock). Established water R&D centers in Dubai (UAE) and Tampa, Florida
(USA)

2007 Began construction of the Doosan VINA plant (Vietnam)

2009 Acquired Czech-based power systems maker Skoda Power. Doosan VINA plant
completed

2011 Acquired AE&E Chennai Works (Currently Doosan Chennai Works), a boiler maker in
India

f) Shareholding Pattern of Doosan Heavy Industries & Construction


Treasury
Stocks
16%

Doosan Corp.
and Related
parties
41%

Foreign
Investors
13%
Local
Investors
30%

g) Production Capability

Production Capability (in MWe)


Wind

Boiler

Generator

Turbine

HRSG

Forging

9300

Forging
1500

Nuclear

15720

HRSG
8000

Turbine

8300

Generator

7500

Boiler
Wind

Nuclear

216

46 | P a g e

h) Manufacturing Facilities

2. Turnover, Order Book & Expenditure of Doosan heavy Industries &


Construction Co. Ltd.
I.

Sales

47 | P a g e

II.

Generating Capacity( in 2011)


119 GW

III.

Contribution of Power to Doosan heavy Industries & Construction Co. Ltd.


New

Revenue:

power

generation business is major


contributor.

The

power

division accounted for 59% of


total revenue in FY12, while
industrial products (mainly
for water systems) accounted
for 11%, casting & forging
products

10%,

and

construction 6%. Revenues


from

DPS

and

other

businesses account for 18%.

Orders:

Led

by

power

generation segment. Orders


from the power generation
segment accounted for 38%
from 86% in FY11. Industrial
products accounted for 21%,
casting & forging products
10%, and construction 8%.
Orders from DPS and other
businesses

accounted

for

23%.

Power is key earnings contributor. In FY12, the power generation division


accounted for 84% of operating profit and registered 10% OP margin. Industrial
products barely broke even level and did not contribute to earnings. The construction
division posted negative 7% OP margin and contributed losses.

48 | P a g e

IV.

Power Division Revenues, Orders

3. Collaborations
Technological Collaborations

49 | P a g e

4. Technical Aspects of Doosan Boilers


a) Doosan Boiler Technology History

Doosan SC/ USC Advantage

50 | P a g e

Sipat Supercritical Power Project


Sl.No.

Items

Make/ Parameters

Boiler package Supplier

Doosan Heavy Industries, South Korea

Turbine Package Supplier

Power Machines, Russia

600MW Boiler Type

Once through Supercritical, Two Pass, Balanced


Draft, Outdoor

Furnace Dimension

Width- 18816mt, Depth-18144mt., Volume21462m3

Super heater

Multistage with panel, Platen Pendant Section

Reheater

Multistage Type (LTRH & Final RH)

Steam Output parameters at


BMCR

7.1

Main Steam 256ksc, 5400C, 2225 T/hr

7.2

Reheat Steam 48.3ksc, 568 0C, 1742 T/hr

Design Coal Flow

Boiler Auxiliaries

9.1

438 T/hr.

Fans

9.1.1

ID Fan Supplier: FlaktWoods, Sweden


Type: PFSU-450-300-08

9.1.2

FD Fan Supplier: FlaktWoods, Sweden


Type: PFSU-280-112-04

9.1.3

PA Fan Supplier: FlaktWoods, Sweden


Type: PFTU-200-100-02

9.2

Air Preheaters

9.2.1

SAPH Supplier: Doosan


Type: 31.5-VI-1900

9.2.2

PAPH Supplier: Doosan


Type: 26.0-VI-1800

10
10.1
11

Mills

Vertical Bowl Mill 10Nos.- XHPS 1103

Coal Feeder

Gravimetric Feeder 10Nos.- 36 inches

Boiler Recirculation Pump

Make: Hayward Taylor, England

51 | P a g e

Sl.No.

Items
(BRP)

Make/ Parameters
Type: Wet Stator, Glandless, single Section Sing
Discharge Pump

12

Oil Elevations

13

Turbine

5 Nos.(AB, CD, EF, GH & JK)

13.1

Turbine Model

K-660-247 (LMZ, Russia)

13.2

HP Turbine

1 No. HP Turbine, 17 Stages


HP turbine has nozzle governing system
2 Nos. HP Stop valves, 4 nos. HP Control
Valves
1 Impulse Stage + 16 Reaction Stages

13.3

IP Turbine

1 No. of IP Turbine, 11X2 Stages


IP Turbine has throttle governing system
2 Nos. of IP Stop Valves, 4 Nos. IP Control
Valves
22 Nos. of Impulse stages

13.4

LP Turbine

2 Nos. of LP Turbines, (5X2 + 5X2) Stages


20 Nos. Impulse Stages

13.5

Number of Journal Bearing for

Turbine
13.6

Number of Journal Bearing for

Generator
13.7

Steam Turbine Parameters

Before HPSV: 247 ksc, 5370C, 2023 T/hr


Before IPSV: 43ksc, 5650C, 1681 T/hr

14

Number of HP Heaters

15

Number of LP Heaters

16

Boiler Efficiency

86.27%

17

Turbine Efficiency

45.26%

18

Turbine Heat Rate

1904 Kcal/ KWH

19

Unit Heat Rate

2207 Kcal/ KWH

20

Unit Efficiency

38.96%

52 | P a g e

Boiler parameters for 660MW Power Plant of Doosan (Sliding Pressure Operation)
Unit

100%

100%

80%

50%

Both HP

60%

BMCR

TMCR

TMCR

TMCR

Htrs out

BMCR

of

(One

Operation

Stream)

SH System
Steam Flow at SHO
Steam Pressure at

T/Hr

2225

2023.75

1572.47

963.76

1839.5

1335

Kg/cm2(a)

256

254.45

238.01

151.25

252.92

204.4

deg. C

540

540

540

540

540

540

T/Hr

1741.8

1678.37

1328.96

836.41

1784.2

1138

SHO
Steam temp. at SHO
RH System
Steam Flow

2
Kg/cm2(a)

48.3

46.7

37.2

23.6

50.5

32.2

deg. C

568

568

568

568

568

568

deg. C

299

296

281

289

309

284

Kg/cm2

1.69

1.62

1.3

0.88

1.7

1.16

Feed Water Temp

deg. C

289.64

286.23

270.35

244.34

196.15

261

Steam Temperature

Steam Pressure at
RHI
Steam Temperature
at RHO
Steam Temperature
at RHI
Pressure Drop across
RH

Control range

_______________100% BMCR to 50%


TMCR_________________

SWOT Analysis of Doosan Heavy Industries

Strengths

Strong international presence.


Presence in fast growing markets.
High net cash position.
Technology sufficient
Vertical integration
Co-operation with largest

Weakness

Instability in revenue.
Large dependence on energy sector
(EPC projects).

53 | P a g e

international technological providers


Leader in the local market and
important regional player.

Opportunity
Fast growth in energy markets in
Balkan peninsula and in the MENA
region and especially in Turkey.
Massive need for energy
infrastructure projects.
Replacement of old capacity with
highly efficient lignite fired plants by
PPC.
Entry to new markets, such as Africa,
India.
INVESTMENT RISKS

Threats

Delays in licenses of domestic


projects.
Global competition can hurt
EBITDA.

Liquidity Risk: The risk is low due to the high net cash position of the company and
the fact that its customers are financially strong.

Interest Rate Risk: This risk is trivial due to very low debt.

Credit Risk: Low risk because of a high dispersion of its customers.

Currency Risk: High risk in the last few years due to the expansion abroad.

54 | P a g e

4.3 L&T MHI BOILERS PVT. LTD.

55 | P a g e

1. About L&T MHI


L&T-MHI Boilers Private Limited is a 51:49 Joint Venture Company formed on 16th April,
2007 in India between Larsen & Toubro Limited (L&T), India and Mitsubishi Heavy
Industries Limited (MHI), Japan for engaging in the business of design, engineering,
manufacturing, selling, maintenance and servicing of Supercritical Boilers and Pulverisers in
India.
The Company has established manufacturing facility that can manufacture pressure parts and
pulverisers at Hazira, near Surat in the state of Gujarat with the technological support from
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Limited.

a) Joint Venture of L&T and MHI


JV signed on - 16th April, 2007

License- Exclusive in India and Non Exclusive outside India


Term- 20 Years
Training- 1400 Man days (280 Man Weeks)
Structure of JV
Complete Technology transfer of Supercritical boilers to Joint Venture
Supercritical Boilers for 660/700 MW, 800/840 MW, 1000/1050 MW
Pulverisers- MVM 28/32/34

56 | P a g e

Capacity- 4000 MW per Annum


Pressure Parts- 30000 Tonnes per Annum
Starting of manufacturing- 25th June 2010
b) Scope of L&T MHI

Engineering &
Designing

Marketing

Procurement

Scope
of JV

Quality &
Safety

After Sale
Services

Manufacturing

Installation

Commissioning

c) Products of L&T MHI

Supercritical boilers of 500 MW and above range

SH & RH temperature up to 605 degrees Celsius

Low NOx burners (A-PM) as standard

Two pass design with divided back pass

Front and side mill arrangements

Vertical wall as standard

Spiral wall can also be offered

57 | P a g e

d) Project and Site Locations

e) Projects Under Execution

Jaypee Nigrie
(2X660 MW)
MAHAGENCO
Koradi (3X660 MW)
PSEB Rajpura
(2X700 MW)
58 | P a g e

f) Accreditations

ISO 9001:2008certification, approved by Lloyds Register Quality Assurance.

OHSAS 18001:2007certified by Bureau Veritasfor Occupational Health and


Safety Management system.

ISMS 27001:2005for Information Security Manasgement System.

ASMECertificate of Authorization for S, PP, Uand R designators

ISO 14001:2004certified by Bureau Veritasfor Environmental Management


System.

Sr. No.
A

FEATURES

MERITS

FURNACE WALL
Vertical wall construction as standard

Easier manufacturing and simpler construction

MHI has largest number of sliding

Low mass flux compared to spiral wall and

pressure vertical wall supercritical units

hence lesser pressure drop

in operation

Lesser field joints

Rifled tube construction In high heat

Less slag accumulation

flux zone

Less thermal stresses


Simpler supporting arrangement

FIRING ARRANGEMENT
Circular corner firing (CCF) with twin

Less steam temperature imbalance between left

fire vortex as standard

and right leads


Uniform heat flux in the furnace
Less burner heat input

COAL FIRING SYSTEM


Use of MACT (Mitsubishi Advanced

High ignition ability under low O2 condition

Combustion Technology) with APM

Reduced NOx emmisions

(Advanced Pollution Minimum) burner

Reduced unburn carbon loss

and additional air port

Low excess air (15%) increases boiler


efficiency

59 | P a g e

Sr. No.
D

FEATURES

MERITS

R H TEMPERATURE CONTROL
Use of gas biasing damper in the second

Pressure control of RH temperature is achieved

pass as primary control

No RH spray under steady state operation

Additional tilting mechanism for burners


as a secondary control
Interstage attemperation as emergency
control
E

SUPERHEATER CONFIGURATION
Use of three stage superheater

Better SH steam temperature control

Use of inter stage attemperation


F

USE OF ADVANCED RELIABLE MATERIALS FOR HIGH TEMPERATURE


APPLICATIONS
CC2328 (SA213 UNS S30432) in SH &

Better creep properties

RH applications

Reduced steam oxidation leading to higher

Above material has been devloped by

availability as compared to T91 materials

MHI in collaboration with tube


manufacturers for supercritical and ultra
supercritical boilers
Non-usage of T91 materials in heating
zone

Pulverisers
Mill Offerings
MVM28, 32 and 34
Fixed/Rotary separators
Ceramic embedded liners for Roller & Table
Gearbox with thrust pad design

60 | P a g e

Features & Merits of Pulverisers


Sr No.
A

Features

Merits

Capacity
Large capacity Pulverizers

Less number of mills per Boiler unit


High Reliability and low maintenance

Liners for Griding Table & Roller


Ceramic inserts type

Suitable for Indian coals


Improved wear life (upto 8000 Hrs)

Roller Loading System


Hydraulic loading

Suitable for various coal types


Low vibration

Roller Tilting Device


Hydraulic control

Ease in maintenance

Techno economic Comparision Subcritical Vs Supercritical Vs Ultra Supercritical for


MHI
Capacity: 700 MW

Calculation with 90% PLF

Fuel: Indian Coal with 42% Ash


Fuel GCV: 3300 Kcal/Kg

Subcritical
Description

Unit

16.7 M pa
538/538
deg.c

Turbine Heat kCal /

1918

Ultra
Supercritical

Supercritical

24.1 M pa

24.1 M pa

566/593 deg.c

600/600
deg.c

1838

1814

Reducti

Reductio

on

Sub Vs

Sub Vs

SC

USC

80(4.2% 104(5.5%
61 | P a g e

Subcritical
Description

Unit

16.7 M pa
538/538
deg.c

rate
Boiler
efficiency

%
kCal /

rate

kWh

Coal

MM

consumption

T/Annum

Ash

MM

Generation

T/Annum

SOx

Supercritical

Supercritical

24.1 M pa

24.1 M pa

566/593 deg.c

600/600
deg.c

kWh

Plant heat

CO2

Ultra

MM
T/Annum
MM
T/Annum

87%

87%

87%

2207

2113

2085

3.676

3.524

3.477

1.544

1.48

1.46

7.278

6.981

6.888

0.023

0.0221

0.0218

Reducti

Reductio

on

Sub Vs

Sub Vs

SC

USC

94(4.2% 121(5.5%
)

0.152(4.

0.199

2%)

(5.5%)

0.064(4.

0.084

2%)

(5.5%)

0.297(4.

0.39

2%)

(5.5%)

0.0009(

0.0012

4.2%)

(5.5%)

Tube Material of Supercritical Boilers for MHI

62 | P a g e

MHI Reference List of Ultra Supercritical boilers


Customer

MW

Station

Steam

Fuel

C/O

Condition
(0C)

Soma Joint

1,000

538/566

Coal

1995

1,000

566/593

Coal

1997

1,000

600/600

Coal

1998

700

593/593

Coal

2000

700

593/593

Coal

2003

900

595/595

Coal

2004

600

600/600

Coal

2004

1,000

600/600

Coal

2006

1,000

600/600

Coal

2007

600, 660

600/600

Coal

2007~

1,000

600/600

Coal

2009

EPCO Shinchi #2
Tohoku EPCO
Haramachi #1
Chugoku EPCO
Misumi #1
Hokuriku EPCO
Tsuruga #2
Kyusyu EPCO
Reihoku #2
Kansai EPCO
Maizuru #1
Tokyo EPCO
Hirono #5
China Yuhuan (4
units)
Licenser
China Taizhou (2
units)
Licenser
PJ in China (15
units)
Licenser
China Jinling (1
units)
Licenser

63 | P a g e

4.4 COMPARISON OF BHEL, DOOSAN HEAVY INDUSTRIES AND


L&T MHI BOILERS

Shareholding Pattern
BHEL
President of India- 67.72%

Doosan Heavy Industries


Doosan Corporation and
RelatedParties- 41%
Local Investors- 30%

Foreign Institutional
Investors- 13.49%
Mutual Funds and UTI1.44%
Banks, Financial institutions
insurance Companies11.40%
Others-5.95%

L&T MHI Boilers


L&T-51%
MHI-49%

Foreign Investors- 13%


Treasury Stocks- 16%

Production Capacity in India


BHEL
Upto 20,000MW

Doosan Heavy Industries


Upto 2100MW

L&T MHI Boilers Pvt. Ltd.


Upto 4000MW per anuum

Doosan Heavy Industries


9,000, 000KRW million

L&T MHI Boilers Pvt. Ltd.

Order Book for 2012


BHEL
Rs. 22096 Crores

Technological Collaborations
BHEL

Supercritical Boiler
Supercritical
Turbine Generator
Pumps
Fans

Alstom, USA
Siemens (SAG)
Germany

Doosan Heavy
Industries
Babcock (Acquired)

L&T MHI Boilers Pvt.


Ltd.
JV with MHI

Gas Turbine technology


and manufacturing
through MHI license

MHI, Japan
TLT, Germany

64 | P a g e

Pressure part Material


BHEL
Furnace Wall Tubes

SA-213 T22

SH Platen

SA-213 TP347H

Doosan Heavy
Industries

Assemblies
Finishing RH

SA-213 TP347H

Assemblies

SA-213 S304H

Finishing SH Front

SA-213 T91

Shot Blasted Super


304H/ HR3C

Assemblies
Finishing SH Rear

SA-213 TP347H

Assemblies
Low Temperature

SA-213 T91

SA-213 T91

Reheater

SA-213 T23

SA-213 T22

SA-213 T12

SA-213 T12

SA-210C

SA-213 T1a

Economizer
Separator
Header SH Outlet
Header RH Outlet

SA-335 P91
SA-335 P92
SA-335 P122

Types of Supercritical Coal Fired Boiler


BHEL
Pulverised Coal Tower Type
Pulverised Coal Two Pass
Tangential firing system and

Doosan Heavy Industries


One Pass Type
Two Pass Type

L&T MHI Boilers Pvt. Ltd.


Vertical Water Wall

Integrated lignite T-firing


system

65 | P a g e

4.5 FORECAST BY BHEL AND DOOSAN


Forecast by BHEL
FORECAST OF BHEL FOR TG
All Figures in MW

40000
35000
30000
25000
20000
15000
10000
5000
0
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
0
0
0
3000
3000
3000

Doosan
BGR-Hitachi

3000

3000

3000

3000

Ansaldo Gammon

2000

2000

2000

Alstom/Bharat Forge

5000

5000

5000

5000

5000

Toshiba

3000

3000

3000

3000

3000

3000

L&T/MHI

5000

6000

6000

6000

6000

6000

BHEL

10020

13020

13020

13020

13020

13020

FORECAST OF BHEL FOR SG


All Figures in MW

45000
40000
35000
30000
25000
20000
15000
10000
5000
0

2011-12

2012-13

2013-14

2014-15

2015-16

2016-17

Doosan

3000

3000

3000

BGR/Hitachi

3000

3000

3000

3000

Cethar/Riley

4000

4000

4000

Thermax/Babcock

3000

3000

3000

Ansaldo Gammon

4000

4000

4000

L&T/MHI

5000

6000

6000

6000

6000

6000

BHEL

12500

17500

17500

17500

17500

17500

66 | P a g e

Forecast By Doosan Heavy Industries

67 | P a g e

5. STRATEGIC EVALUATION OF
L&T MHI BOILERS PVT. LTD.

5.1 Principles of Strategic Management


5.2 Strategy of major power equipment manufacturers
5.3 TWOS Matrix and Formulation of SO, WO, ST & WT Strategies
5.4 EFE Matrix and IPE Matrix
5.5 SPACE Matrix Analysis

68 | P a g e

5.1 PRINCIPLES OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT


In the present scenario, when the environment is changing rapidly, a firm simply cannot make
decisions based on long standing rules, historical policies or simple extrapolations of current
trends. Instead they must look to the future as they plan organizational objectives, initiate
strategy and set policies. The environment is becoming more and more complex and living
with uncertainty is the Managements biggest challenge.
Strategy
Strategy focuses on how to compete in an industry and how to achieve competitive advantage
by formulating plans and initiating decisions. The more accurate the firm can scan the
environment and predict the future for opportunities and threats, the better it can formulate its
strategies to fulfil their mission and derive above average returns.
Strategic competitiveness is achieved when a firm successfully formulates and implements a
value creating strategy. When a firm implements a value creating strategy that current and
potential competitors are not simultaneously implementing and when other companies are
unable to duplicate the benefits of its strategy, this firm has achieved sustained competitive
advantage. A firm is assured of sustained competitive advantage only after others efforts to
duplicate its strategy have ceased because they have failed (Fred, 1997, p.47-55).
A strategy is a unified, comprehensive and integrated plan that relates the strategic advantage
of the firm to the challenges of the environment. It is designed to ensure that the basic
objectives of the enterprise are achieved through proper execution by the organization.
A strategy is the means used to achieve the ends (i.e. objective). A strategy is a plan that is
unified, comprehensive and integrated. It ties all major aspects of the enterprise together and
all the parts of the plan are compatible to each other. A strategy begins with a concept of how
to use the resources of the firm most effectively in a changing environment. It is a long term
plan. It addresses fundamental questions such as:

What is our business?

What should it be?

What are our products, functions and markets?

What can be done to accomplish objectives?

69 | P a g e

Internal Analysis
Strategic planning begins with an appraisal of the firms strengths and weaknesses. All areas
of the firm must be assessed, including organization, financial capabilities, technical
competence, location, production skills, physical plant and equipment, management,
workforce, the sales force, image, customers, customer loyalty, cost advantages, advertising
and so on. Typically, competing firms provide a reference point, a basis for comparison, but a
variety of criteria must be used in assessing strengths and weaknesses, including objective
criteria. Strategic planning is motivated by a desire to maximize exposure of the firms
strengths, while minimizing the exposure of the weaknesses. But that does not mean that the
weaknesses have to be accepted or that new strengths cannot be acquired. The central
concern of strategic planning is to allocate the firms resources as effectively as possible.
Clearly, one purpose of the analysis of strengths and weaknesses is to define areas in which
the firm should commit resources that will improve its capabilities.
Environmental Analysis
If the environment were static there would be no need for the strategy formulation process.
The environment obviously changes continually, however, as do the firms capabilities. The
purpose of environmental analysis is to identify and assess threats and opportunities as they
are evolving in the market place. The company itself is a part of the changing environment,
especially since it develops and refines its basic competence in interaction with its customers
evolving needs.
Environmental analysis requires a constant flow of information from a potentially limitless
array of sources. Among the most obvious sources of information are sales representatives,
customers, distributors, trade associations, management associations, universities, trade
journals and professional publications. In addition to this general analysis, there is usually a
need for more detailed analysis and measurement, including forecasts. The accuracy of all
forecasts used as the basis for planning should be checked periodically for the obvious
reasons that actual experience may diverge significantly, even if the original forecasts was
reasonable. A variety of sophisticated techniques exists for sales forecasts (Makridakis,
S.,Wheelwright, S.C., Mcgee,V.E., 1983, p.138-149). The marketing strategist need not be an
expert in the use of these techniques, but he should know the basic assumptions, strengths
and weaknesses of each, especially those that are being used by the staff people who provide
the forecasts and the reports.

70 | P a g e

5.2 STRATEGIES OF MAJOR POWER EQUIPMENT


MANUFACTURERS
During the course of the study it has been established that the future is for equipment-based
services. The trend of EPC contracting the total power plant project has already started
wherein the project divisions of BHEL, DOOSAN Heavy Industries, L&T Power, Chinese
companies like Dong Fang, Shanghai Electric Corporation have outsmarted other players.
Thus in order to formulate the strategy for the Equipment manufacturers the following
common characteristics of the Private players and BHEL has been pointed out to give a better
understanding of the sector.
The similarities between these are:
1. All these companies are multi product companies
2. These are rich in technology and have best design capabilities available in India.
3. These are financially sound and can invest in the projects.
4. The customers are very much familiar with their products and have a distinguished
quality and brand image for these.
5. All these organizations are widely distributed and have presence across all regions of
the country.
However the difference between the above mentioned companies are:
1. BHEL being a PSU and a Maharatna gets favour from the government buyers.
2. The procurement policy of the PSU companies is marred by strict rules and
regulations and is governed by the CVC guidelines.
3. BHEL is also required to procure from small-scale industries under direct or indirect
control of the government.
4. The salary and perks provided to the employees of the company are also governed by
the central government rules that may not be matching the current industry standard.
The marketing strategy is identified using the following management tools:
1. SWOT Analysis, TWOS Matrix and Formulation of SO, WO, ST & WT Strategies
2. EFE Matrix and IPE Matrix
3. SPACE Matrix Analysis
71 | P a g e

The following marketing strategy needs to be needs to be adopted following the above
analysis.

Having a good combination of products, design capabilities and financial strength the
company should try to aggressively increase the presence in the EPC contracting
market of Power Plant set up and gain experience at the earliest.

In the IPPs the projects are much of smaller financial value so these do not invite
purchase preference for the government organization like BHEL.

Strong marketing efforts are required to throttle competition from the contractors that
have close proximity to the SEBs.

Outsourcing of the products needs to be improved with back-to-back arrangement or


long-term tie-ups with small component manufacturers.

Use of good corporate image to convert into long term relationship to obtain
synergistic advantage.

5.3 TOWS MATRIX


SO (Strengths-Opportunities) - Use internal strengths to capitalize on external opportunities
WO (Weaknesses-Opportunities) - Improve internal weaknesses by using external
opportunities.
ST (Strengths-Threats) - Use internal strengths to avoid external threats.
WT (Weaknesses-Threats) - This is definitely the most defensive position on the matrix..
SWOT/ TOWS Matrix
Strengths

Weaknesses

Opportunities

S-O Strategies

W-O Strategies

Threats

S-T Strategies

W-T Strategies

TOWS Matrix for L&T MHI Boilers Pvt. Ltd.


STENGTHS


WEAKNESSES

Good corporate image of 

Customers are not well

L&T could be marketed

aware about the company

72 | P a g e

upon.


and its areas of operation.

Complete
product

range
for

of 

power

generation.

won.

Considered to be having 

Intra

technology

coordination

&

design

organisation
in

L&T

sometimes

Strong & wide networks

contract

of

process or drag the issue

manpower

across

delays

the

preparation

to the last minute.

Good

financial 

As

LMB

company

Access

to

technical

database

strong

is

JV

managements

of L&T and MHI have to

of

come

together

before

MHI.

taking any decision and

L&T is the only private

interest

player to have complete

companies have to be

knowledge

and

taken into account which

turnkey

makes the process more

knowhow

for

power

generation

projects.


the

ability.

condition.


of

customers is yet to be

India.


Confidence

working

environment
dedicated

both

the

difficult.


Good

of

LMB has a very narrow


scope

with

of

Supercritical

boilers only.

professionals

with an inherited work


culture of L&T.


Use of less working


capital

and

optimum

level of inventory.
OPPORTUNITIES


SO STRATEGIES

Huge investments leading 

Increase market share

to

aggressively.

greater demand of

WO STRATEGIES


Improve procurement
cycle and reduce the

73 | P a g e

goods and services.




Demand

leading

to

performing the jobs in

Execute pilot projects to

tune with the established

gain experience and

& over capacity.

brand name.

minimize risks.

Early birds to learn faster 

To address the demand in

and thus achieve repeat

all the parts of the nation

organization structure to

orders.

to gain wide spread

address the turnkey as

Level playing field for

experience and exploit the

well as loose equipment

private & public sector

opportunities.

market.

Healthier

working

environment

and 

Invest money in the


process to have financial

participation

advantage over small

power

contractors.

Increased

external

commercial
or

To have a dual role or

To offer design solution

increased private sector


in

to the customer.

sector.


process difficulties.

industry operating at full

companies.


Present a better way of

borrowings

ADB/WB

funding

leading to better payment


options.
THREATS


ST STRATEGIES

Purchase preference may

lobbying 

Reduce costs to increase

with the government to

margins.

sector.

prevent

To train manpower to

Increased

in

Emergence

of 

of

purchase preference and

counter the threats of

leading

to

maintaining

enhanced

playing
of

new

may

in

the

competition

and to execute the jobs


efficiently.

To tie up with small 

Increase the acceptability

contractors on business

in small jobs despite the

Turnkey

sharing arrangements to

preference

effect

prevent price fall due to

competitors and PSUs.

Doosan etc.
Increased

field

level

segment.

players in the market like

contracts

extension

no.

price war.

increase

be extended to generation

competitors

To

WT STRATEGIES

for

other

74 | P a g e

business of loose sales


and

also

expose

To check the emergence

manufacturers to greater

of new players and be

risk as EPC contractors.

well prepared to counter

Political pulls & pressures

them.

may jeopardize the whole

intense competition.

To be cautious in the

process, alarming it to be

event

of

change

in

privatization and as anti-

government

and

the

people.

process

The overall process of

falling off the track.

of

reforms

liberalization of power
sector is moving at a
much faster pace than the
other

contemporary

countries.
This pace should not lead
to a total breakage of the
system.

5.4 EXTERNAL / INTERNAL FACTORS ASSESSMENT AND


STRATEGIC POSITIONING
One way to establish the Strategic Position and actions to be taken is to list the external
factors (EFE matrix) and the internal factors (IFE matrix) and then develop a SPACE Matrix
(Strategic Positioning and Action Evaluation) which was developed by Rowe, Mason and
Dickel (Strategic Management and Business Policy a methodical approach, Addison
Wesley 1982).
It is a matching tool that indicates the general type of strategy an Organisation should follow
viz Aggressive, Conservative, Defensive or Competitive. The technique involves the
production of a vector on a matrix where the X-axes represents net effect of Competitive

75 | P a g e

Advantage (CA) and Industry Strength (IS) and Y-axes represents net effect of Financial
Strength(FS) and Environment Stability.
The strategic position of L&T MHI Boilers Pvt. Ltd. as EPC contractors and strategies to be
adopted for taking up of Turnkey Projects is depicted below using the EFE, IFE and SPACE
Matrices.
External Factor Evaluation Matrix (EFE Matrix)
Key External factors

Weights

Ratings

Weighted
Score

Opportunities
Huge investments leading to greater demand of

0.1

0.2

0.075

0.15

0.025

0.075

0.1

0.2

0.05

0.05

0.075

0.15

0.075

0.15

0.025

0.05

0.15

0.6

Increased in no. of competitors leading to price war.

0.075

0.225

Emergence of new players in Indian market like

0.025

0.075

goods and services.


Demand leading to industry operating at less &
below capacity.
Better price realizations
Early birds to learn faster and thus achieve repeat
orders.
Formation of business groups and tie-ups for joint
bidding.
Level playing field for private & public sector
companies.
Healthier working environment and increased
private sector participation
Increased external commercial borrowings or
Asian Development Bank/World Bank funding
leading to better payment options
Threats
Purchase preference may be extended to generation
sector.

Doosan Heavy Industries etc.

76 | P a g e

Key External factors

Weights

Ratings

Weighted
Score

Increased Turnkey contracts may affect business of

0.025

0.05

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.2

loose sales and also expose manufacturers to greater


risk as EPC contractors.
Political pulls & pressures may jeopardize the
whole process, alarming it to be privatization and as
anti-people.
The overall process of liberalization of power sector
is moving at a much faster pace than the other
contemporary countries. This pace should not lead
to a total breakage of the system.
Total

2.375

The ratings are as follows


1. The response is superior
2. The response is above average
3. The response is average
4. The response is poor
Comments:
The score of 2.375 indicates that the L&T MHI Boilers Pvt. Ltd. is just above average in its
efforts to pursue strategies that capitalize on external opportunities and avoid threats.

Internal Factor Evaluation Matrix (IFE Matrix)

Key Internal Factors


Strengths
Good Corporate Image
Complete range of product for generation
Established brand name
Considered to be having the complete technology
and design ability

Weights

Rating

Weighted
Score

0.05
0.25
0.05
0.2

3
4
4
3

0.15
1
0.2
0.6

77 | P a g e

Key Internal Factors

Weights

Rating

Weighted
Score

Strong and wide networks of manpower across


India

0.025

0.1

Risk of operation is almost equally distributed


among L&T and MHI.

0.025

0.075

Use of less working capital and optimum level of


inventory

0.025

0.075

0.05

0.05

Low exposure to the needs & dynamics of power


generation equipment business.

0.15

0.15

Intra organisation coordination in L&T sometimes


delays the contract preparation process or drag the
issue to the last minute.

0.125

0.25

Tedious decision making process

0.05
1

0.1
2.75

Weakness
The procurement process in the company is not
updated with new vendors from time to time.

Total
The ratings are as follows
1. The response is superior
2. The response is above average
3. The response is average
4. The response is poor
Comments:

The score of 2.75 indicates that the L&T MHI Boilers Pvt. Ltd. is just above average in its
overall internal strategic position.

5.5 SPACE MATRIX OF L&T MHI BOILERS PVT. LTD.


Internal Strategic Position

Rating

Financial Strength (FS)

External Strategic Position

Rating

Environmental Stability
(ES)

o Operating Margin

o Technology changes

-2

78 | P a g e

o Return on Investment

o Rate of inflation

o Leverage

o Demand variability

o Liquidity

o Price range of

-3
-4.5
-6

competitive products
o Working Capital

o Barrier to entry into

-5

market
o Cash Flow

o Competitive pressure

-3

o Ease of exit from business

o Price elasticity of

-6

28/8demand
o Risk involved in business

5
Average

Competitive Advantage (CA)

o Consumption pattern

3.5

Rating

o New Product Development

-3

o Market Share

-6

o Product Quality

-1

o Product Life Cycle

-1

Average

Industry Strength (IS)

-6
-4.437

Rating
6

o Growth Potential

o Profit Potential

o Financial Stability
o Technological Know

how
o Customer Loyalty

-6

o Resource Utilization

o Technological Know How

-6

o Capital Intensity

o Control over Suppliers

-3

o Ease of entry into

market
o Vertical Integration

-2

o Productivity, Capacity

Utilization
Average

-3.5

Average

Directional vector:
X axis: - (-3.5) +4= 0.5 Y axis: - 3.5+ (-4.437) = -0.937

79 | P a g e

Comments:
The L&T MHI Boilers should follow the aggressive strategy. It has strong internal strengths,
which should be used to take advantage of the external opportunities. The boiler
manufacturer should go for
a) Joint ventures for advanced technology on clean power
b) Market Penetration
c) Market Development
d) Concentric diversification
e) Horizontal Integration
f) Price Competitiveness

80 | P a g e

6. CONCLUSION AND
RECOMMENDATIONS

6.1 Actions to be Initiated


6.2 Means Required for Improving Business

81 | P a g e

The study and the analysis of the data give an insight of the requisite marketing strategy for
the L&T MHI Boilers Pvt. Ltd. Thus in order to get considerable and profitable share in the
increasingly competitive market, greater emphasis is required to be put on the following
areas:
 Increasing market share Aim to increase penetration.
 Price Competitiveness to meet the levels of the competitors
 Brand building exercise To gain customers confidence in the power sector.
The above can be achieved through
1. Greater participation in the business for execution of turnkey projects.
2. Pre tendering activities to help customers developing specifications calling for
superior quality products.
3. Increased level of public relations with the customer especially for the power
generation business through dedicated Marketing & sales team.
4. Helping the customer by conducting system studies and advocating the right
equipment at the right place.
5. Improving the flow of information and speed of response towards the customer.
6. Competitive prices and delivery schedules, to meet the levels of other EPC
contractors.
7. Cost cutting exercise within the organization to improve realizations.
8. Awareness about the market development and competitor strategies.
9. Innovating ideas like life enhancement of old equipments, retrofitting old
equipments etc. This will help in increasing the customers confidence.

6.1 ACTIONS TO BE INITIATED


Customer Awareness
1. Spec-in Activities: This involves the customer education programme on the latest
trends and technologies. The customers need to be apprised of these trends and
advocated on including these in the tender specifications.
2. Prequalification actions: In this process, the customers need to be approached to
include certain pre-qualification parameters on the health of the organizations in
technical & financial terms, experience.

82 | P a g e

3. Exhibitions/Seminars/ Public Relations/ Local Advertisings: The Company needs


to improve the public presence in terms of the exhibitions and seminars and make the
customers aware about their intentions to be major player in the power generation
equipment business.

Opportunities for Business Diversification


1. Retrofit business: The companies need to use the design capabilities in capturing the
retrofit business. This will not only provide benefits to the customer but also prove the
design capabilities of the companies. This will help the companies in future to get
business from the customers with favourable conditions.
2. Providing Testing Facilities to other Manufacturers: This can also be considered
as a healthy option as certain tests are mandatory requirement under CEA and CERC
guidelines and all manufacturers dont have testing facilities and are more dependent
on BHEL for this. A good amount of revenue can be generated by providing the
facilities to the both subcritical and supercritical boiler manufacturers.
3. Providing Spares and Other Bought out Items for Manufacturing Boilers- The
bought out items of the other boiler manufacturers can be made from in-house facility
or can be fetched from outside through L&Ts excellent Supply Chain which may
cost more for other small suppliers due to lack of economy of scale and can be sold to
them at a reasonable price to keep them dependable on LMB facilities.
4. Providing Consultancy Services- As LMB is having a pool of executives of high
calibre and knowledge it can be utilised through providing consultancy services to the
utilities and other potential customers. It will not only help to build the brand but also
to enhance the experience and knowledge of the employees.
5. Leasing of Equipments- As all the machineries are not always used at the project
site, they can be leased to other contractors who are working nearby the site so that
maximum benefit of the equipments can be extracted by reducing the idle time and
vice versa.
Others
1. Expenditure towards R&D- A certain part of the total revenue is to be dedicated
towards the development of technology acquired from MHI.
83 | P a g e

2. Yearly Customer Feedback- A customer satisfaction survey is to be done on yearly


basis to get the knowledge of the problems faced by the consumer so that
improvements can be done to mitigate the deficiencies and same is to be conveyed to
the customers.
3. Identifying potential projects: The Company needs to identify potential projects on
the basis of revenue generation and ease of execution of the contracts.
4. Purchasing or Manufacturing Decisions- The materials used in the process of
manufacturing are to be grouped as per their availability and cost of purchasing. Then
the group of materials which costs the most are considered for buying or making
decisions and this process has to be repeated at least once in a year. Simultaneously
new markets are to be searched for purchasing of the costly materials. It is always
advisable to get materials manufactured from in-house facilities but it is only feasible
if the technology involved is not changing frequently otherwise purchasing is
preferred.

6.2 MEANS REQUIRED FOR IMPROVING BUSINESS


1. Training plan for the executives to deal with high volume jobs. As per the current
business models the companies are executing low volume high margins jobs, which
require dealing with less no. of customers and limited sites. Thus to improve the
efficiency of the executives, the executives need to be trained to handle such jobs.
2. Site management: The people need to be trained to handle site conditions, as with the
increase in volume of business and large number of sites, more people will be
required to manage the sites.
3. Develop manpower in multi-product applications/ application engineering through
factory and product training.
4. Strengthening network: Though the company is having a well-established marketing
network but there are certain lapses, which increase the response time to the customer.
Thus these factors need to be improved to offer the best possible services to the
customers.
5. Dedicated Team for Business Development, Strategy Preparation and
Performance Appraisal- A group of dedicated manpower is required to be
developed who will specifically be responsible for Business Development, Strategy
84 | P a g e

Preparation and Performance Appraisal. People of high calibre can also be hired
specially from BHEL which is a leader of the sector and have good network in the
industry.
6. Quantification of Strategic Plan for next 5 Years- A strategic plan is to be made
and communicated to the employees for the next 5 years with a periodical review of
their achievements so that the employees will always be able to focus on their
individual goals to be achieved.

Infrastructure / Tools
1. Better communication facilities among the executives.
2. Data management tools and software packages to keep track of the changes in the
prices of the raw material.

Procurement & Business Tie-Ups


1. In order to address the business effectively the organizations need to have long terms
tie-ups with small vendors.
2. The vendors list needs to be updated on the performance and price parameters and
also on the requirement and perception of the final customer.
3. The companies need to formulate business-sharing arrangements to minimize the
competition and improve realizations.

85 | P a g e

7. REFERENCE

86 | P a g e

1. Bolt Gordion, Market and sales Forecasting A total approach, Kogan


Page, London, 1994, p.65-72.
2. Berry, L.L, Shostack, G.L, & Upah, G.D., Emerging perspectives on
service marketing, American Marketing Association, Chicago, 1994,
p.25-38.
3. Brennan, T J, Palmer, K L, & Martinez, S A.; Alternating Currents :
Electricity markets and public policy, Washington, DC: Resources for
the Future, 2002,p.185-188.
4. Buzell, R.D., Gale, B.T, & Sultam, G.M., (1975). Market Share a key
to Profitability. Harvard Business Review 53, 1, p.97-106.
5. Byrne, J & Rich, D (eds.); Energy and environment: The policy
challenge. New Brunswick, NJ : Transaction, 1992, p.271
6. Government of India, Report of the Expert Group on Restructuring of SEBs,
July 2002.
7. Indian Electrical & Electronics Manufacturers Association (IEEMA)
8.

IEEMA Journal, June 2011.

9. IEEMA Journal, February 2012.


10. IEEMA Journal, September 2011.
11. IEEMA Journal, April 2012.
12. Ministry of Power, Government of India, Major Initiatives for Power Sector
Development, May 2011.
13. Planning Commission (Power and Energy Division), Government of India,
Annual Report on the Working of State Electricity Boards and Electricity
Departments
14. Web site of Ministry of Power: URL:http://www.powermin.nic.in,
15. Web site of Central Electricity Regulatory Commission: www.cercind.gov.in
16. Web site of Central Electricity Authority: www.cea.nic.in
17. Web site of Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited: www.bhel.com
18. Web site of Doosan Heavy Industries & Construction: www.doosan.com
19. Web site of L&T MHI Boilers Pvt. Ltd.: www.larsentoubro.com

87 | P a g e

You might also like