Spms - Ipcr-Ecenter 2016

SSS SPMS FORM 1
SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW (IPCR) FORM

For Supervisory and Non-Supervisory Positions
(Please read instructions at the back before filling out this form)
NAME
(Last Name)
PILAPIL
SECTION/TEAM (if applicable)
(First Name)
JIMMY
(Middle Name)
RAADA
MEMBER SERVICES SECTION
(Suffix)
POSITION TITLE/DESIGNATED POSITION (if applicable)

SSO-II/MSS-OIC TEAM HEAD
BRANCH/DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/UNIT
DIVISION/GROUP/SECTOR
GENERAL SANTOS CITY BRANCH
SOUTH MINDANAO DIVISION
C O M M I T M E N T
EMPLOYEE ID NO.
990187
OFFICIAL TIME
8:00 AM-5:00 PM
C O N T R A C T
I commit to deliver and agree to be rated on the attainment of the Performance Commitment (Part I) in accordance with the indicated Success Indicators for the period _JULY 2015_____ to DECEMBER 2015__.
07/01/2015
Ratee's Signature
Date
APPROVED BY:
MARIA TERESA S. JUANICH
07/01/2015
JOVE L. COLASITO
07/01/2015
Signature over Printed Name and Position Title of Immediate Supervisor
Date
Signature over Printed Name and Position Title of Next Higher Supervisor
Date
PART I
P E R F O R M A N C E
WEIGHT
ALLOCATION
CATEGORY
C O M M I T M E N T
MAJOR FINAL OUTPUT

(MFO)
PART II
SUCCESS INDICATOR (SI)

(Target + Measure)
A C T U A L
A C C O M P L I S H M E N T
ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENT
%
ACCOMPLISHED
A N D
R A T I N G
WEIGHTED
REMARK
SCORE
(Use separate sheet, if necessary)
Strategic Function/s
Compliance to ARTA requirements
10
ARTA ratings obtained
92% ARTA rating obtained
92.39%
100%
10.00
Core Function/s
Compliance to SLA on processing time
80
Application/s reviewed
Applications reviewed within the approved

committed processing time for 2015.
-Simple/Complex Corrections
-Salary Loan applications
-Educational Loan applications
-UMID
25,936
100%
80.00
Service Quality
10
Service Quality rating obtained
75% Service Quality rating obtained
Branch Service Quality Rating: 90%
100%
10.00
Support Function/s
0.00
TOTAL
100
Total Score
Numerical Rating
Adjectival Rating
100.00
5
O
COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DEVELOPMENT PURPOSES
DISCUSSED WITH:
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL:
The assessment of my performance in Part II have been shown and discussed with
me by my immediate supervisor.
I agree with the Performance Rating
I disagree with the Performance Rating. Specify reasons/s_______________
Ratee's Signature
Signature over Printed Name of

Immediate Supervisor
02/12/16
MONIQUE S. ALCANTARA
Date

Next Higher Supervisor
RATING SCALE
APPROVED BY:
Date
JOVE L. COLASITO
Date

Branch/Dept./Office/Unit Head
Date
Score
100.00
90-99.99
75-89.99
60-74.99
Numerica
l
5
4
3
2
59.99 below
Adjectival
Outstanding (O)
Very Satisfactory (VS)
Satisfactory (S)
Unsatisfactory (US)
Poor (P)
Rating Scale as approved by the SSS PCEO and

SPMS PMT on 02 February 2016.
INSTRUCTIONS
The Individual Performance Commitment and Review (IPCR) Form is divided into 3 parts namely, the Commitment Contract, Performance Commitment and Actual Accomplishment and Rating. The
Performance Commitment portions shall be accomplished by the Ratee in agreement with his/her Immediate Supervisor before the start of the rating period, while the Actual Accomplishment and Rating p
the Ratee with his/her Immediate Supervisor at the end of the rating period, based on the agreed upon Performance Commitment.
PART I
ACCOMPLISHMENT AND APPROVAL OF PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT
1. This form shall be accomplished in one (1) copy only.
2. The approved Office Performance Commitment and Review (OPCR) Form shall serve as basis for the
accomplishment of the IPCR.
3. The Ratee shall write the Major Final Output/s (MFO/s) and the corresponding Success Indicator/s (SI/s) for
Strategic/Core/Support Functions, whichever is applicable. Insert additional rows if necessary.
Definition of terms:
- Major Final Output (MFO) is a good or service that an employee is mandated to deliver to his/her clients.
- Success Indicator (SI) is a yardstick consisting of performance target/s and performance measure/s.
- Strategic Function pertains to key program/project that has a significant impact on the OPCR of the
department and scorecard of the organization as a whole, identified during the organization's planning
session.
1.
2.
PART II
COMPUTATION OF THE ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENT AND
Using the Semestral Performance Report, the Supervisor shall obtain the actual
- Effectiveness refers to the column heading % of Accomplishment".
- Timeliness refers to the column % Output Submitted/Completed within Com
Rating is obtained through the following:
- Weighted Score is the product obtained after multiplying the "% accomplishe
each output.
- Total Score is the sum of all weighted score obtained by the Branch/Departm
- Numerical Rating is the equivalent rating of the Total Score, e.g. 5.
- Adjectival Rating is the equivalent description of the numerical rating, e.g. 5=
3.
After the final rating is obtained, the Ratee must agree or disagree with his/he
affix his/her signature and date in the space provided for in the form
- Core Function pertains to an activity inherent to the branch/department/office/unit based on the

branch's/department's/office's/unit's functions/mandate.
4.
The Immediate Supervisor and Next Higher Supervisor (if applicable) shall reco
Ratee's rating by affixing his/her signature and date in the space provided for in t
- Support Function pertains to either an activity that is not within the regular functions of the ratee or
membership in a committee that require considerable amount of time and effort and is duly covered by an
Administrative/ Office Order.
5.
The Branch/Department/Office/Unit Head shall approve the accomplished IPC

and date in the space provided for in the form.
6.
The Immediate Supervisor may put in qualitative comments, observations

'Comments and Recommendations for Development Purposes' box, if necessary
4. Each MFO shall have a corresponding weight allocation to be determined by the Supervisor and Ratee,
aligned with the weight allocation of the said MFO in the approved OPCR.
5. The Ratee, Immediate Supervisor (Team Head, if applicable) and Next Higher Supervisor (Section Head) shall
discuss and agree upon the Performance Commitment by affixing their signatures and date in the
Commitment Contract portion of IPCR.
6. The original copy of the approved IPCR shall be kept by the Immediate Supervisor to serve as basis for
monitoring and assessing the accomplishment of the Ratee within the rating period. The Immediate
Supervisor shall provide the Ratee a copy of the approved IPCR as his/her reference.
7. Based on the Ratee's accomplishment, the Immediate Supervisor shall conduct coaching or mentoring,
whenever necessary.
1.
SUBMISSION SCHEDULE
The Immediate Supervisor shall submit to the Branch/Department/Office
accomplished IPCR within 5 days before the start of the rating period.
2.
The Branch/Department/Office/Unit Head shall return to the Immediate Supervis

days from receipt of the said form.
3.
The Branch/Department/Office/Unit Head shall submit to the Performance

Relations Department (PMERD) the approved IPCR with ratings along
Individual Performance Ratings on or before July 20 for the 1st semeste
and on or before January 20 for the 2nd semester of the previous year's rat
ADMINISTRATIVE SANCTIONS
Unless justified and accepted by the PMT, non-submission of the fully accomplished IPCR to PMERD within the specified dates shall be a ground for:
1. Ratees disqualification from performance-based personnel actions which would require the rating for the given period such as promotion, training or scholarship grants and performance enhancem
submission of the report form is the fault of the Ratee.
2. An administrative sanction will be imposed for violation of reasonable office rules and regulations and simple neglect of duty for the supervisors or employees responsible for the delay or non-submissio
commitment report based on deadline set by PMERD.
3. Failure on the part of the Branch/Department/Office/Unit Head to notify their subordinates on their unsatisfactory or poor performance during a rating period shall be a ground for an administrative offe
STRUCTIONS
mitment Contract, Performance Commitment and Actual Accomplishment and Rating. The Commitment Contract and the
upervisor before the start of the rating period, while the Actual Accomplishment and Rating portion shall be accomplished by
nce Commitment.
PART II
COMPUTATION OF THE ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENT AND RATING
Using the Semestral Performance Report, the Supervisor shall obtain the actual accomplishment of the Ratee.
Effectiveness refers to the column heading % of Accomplishment".
Timeliness refers to the column % Output Submitted/Completed within Commitment Date/Total Output.
Rating is obtained through the following:
Weighted Score is the product obtained after multiplying the "% accomplished" by the "weight allocation" for
each output.
Total Score is the sum of all weighted score obtained by the Branch/Department/Office/Unit in all MFOs.
Numerical Rating is the equivalent rating of the Total Score, e.g. 5.
Adjectival Rating is the equivalent description of the numerical rating, e.g. 5=Outstanding.
After the final rating is obtained, the Ratee must agree or disagree with his/her performance rating and shall
affix his/her signature and date in the space provided for in the form
The Immediate Supervisor and Next Higher Supervisor (if applicable) shall recommend his/her approval of the
Ratee's rating by affixing his/her signature and date in the space provided for in the form.
The Branch/Department/Office/Unit Head shall approve the accomplished IPCR by affixing his/her signature
and date in the space provided for in the form.
The Immediate Supervisor may put in qualitative comments, observations and recommendations in the
'Comments and Recommendations for Development Purposes' box, if necessary.
SUBMISSION SCHEDULE
The Immediate Supervisor shall submit to the Branch/Department/Office/Unit Head, for review, the
accomplished IPCR within 5 days before the start of the rating period.
The Branch/Department/Office/Unit Head shall return to the Immediate Supervisor the approved IPCR within 3
days from receipt of the said form.
The Branch/Department/Office/Unit Head shall submit to the Performance Management and Employee
Relations Department (PMERD) the approved IPCR with ratings along with the Summary List of
Individual Performance Ratings on or before July 20 for the 1st semester performance rating period
and on or before January 20 for the 2nd semester of the previous year's rating period.
RATIVE SANCTIONS
specified dates shall be a ground for:
given period such as promotion, training or scholarship grants and performance enhancement bonus, if the failure of the
neglect of duty for the supervisors or employees responsible for the delay or non-submission of the individual Performance
ctory or poor performance during a rating period shall be a ground for an administrative offense for neglect of duty.
SSS SPMS FORM 1

NAME
(Last Name)
FEROLINO
(First Name)
JANET
(Middle Name)
ALCORIZA
(Suffix)

SENIOR CLERK
C O M M I T M E N T
EMPLOYEE ID NO.
090428
OFFICIAL TIME
8:00 AM-5:00 PM
C O N T R A C T
07/01/2015
Ratee's Signature
Date
APPROVED BY:
JIMMY R. PILAPIL
07/01/2015
07/01/2015
Date
Date
PART I
WEIGHT
ALLOCATION
CATEGORY
C O M M I T M E N T
MAJOR FINAL OUTPUT

(MFO)
PART II

(Target + Measure)
A C T U A L
A N D
R A T I N G
WEIGHTED
REMARK
SCORE
%
ACCOMPLISHED
13,315
100%
60.00
Core Function/s
Service Quality
60
Application/s evaluated
Applications evaluated within the approved

-Sickness/Maternity reimbursement
-UMID
20
Transmittal lists (TL) with

documents attached released
TL with documents attached released within the

approved committed processing time for 2015
100.00%
100%
20.00
10
Reports consolidated
Reports on daily transactions consolidated within

commitment date
100.00%
100%
10.00
10
100%
10.00
Support Function/s
0.00
TOTAL
100
Total Score
Numerical Rating
Adjectival Rating
100.00
5
O
DISCUSSED WITH:
JIMMY R. PILAPIL
Ratee's Signature

02/12/16
Date

RATING SCALE
APPROVED BY:
Date
JOVE L. COLASITO
Date

Date
Score
100.00
90-99.99
75-89.99
60-74.99
Numerica
l
5
4
3
2
59.99 below
Adjectival
Outstanding (O)
Satisfactory (S)
Unsatisfactory (US)
Poor (P)

SSS SPMS FORM 1

NAME
(Last Name)
(First Name)
LAGO
SAMBITORY
MEMBER SERVICE SECTION E-CENTER
(Middle Name)
CANOY
(Suffix)
JR.
SENIOR MEMBER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE
C O M M I T M E N T
EMPLOYEE ID NO.
OFFICIAL TIME
8:00 AM- 5:00 PM
C O N T R A C T
I commit to deliver and agree to be rated on the attainment of the Performance Commitment (Part I) in accordance with the indicated Success Indicators for the period _JULY 2015___ to DECEMBER 2015__.
10/01/2015
Ratee's Signature
Date
APPROVED BY:
RUBEN L. ROMERO
10/01/2015
10/01/2015
Date
Date
PART I
WEIGHT
ALLOCATION
CATEGORY
C O M M I T M E N T
MAJOR FINAL OUTPUT

(MFO)
PART II

(Target + Measure)
A C T U A L
A N D
R A T I N G
WEIGHTED
REMARK
SCORE
%
ACCOMPLISHED
3,270
100%
90.00
100%
10.00
Core Function/s
90

-Sickness/maternity reimbursement
-UMID
Service Quality
10
Support Function/s
0.00
TOTAL
100
Total Score
Numerical Rating
Adjectival Rating
100.00
5
O
DISCUSSED WITH:
JIMMY R. PILAPIL
Ratee's Signature

02/12/16
Date

RATING SCALE
APPROVED BY:
Date
JOVE . COLASITO
Date

Date
Score
100.00
90-99.99
75-89.99
60-74.99
Numerica
l
5
4
3
2
59.99 below
Adjectival
Outstanding (O)
Satisfactory (S)
Unsatisfactory (US)
Poor (P)

SSS SPMS FORM 1

NAME
(Last Name)
CLERINO
(First Name)
LILIAN
(Middle Name)
(Suffix)
C O M M I T M E N T
EMPLOYEE ID NO.
OFFICIAL TIME
C O N T R A C T
07/01/2015
Ratee's Signature
Date
APPROVED BY:
07/01/2015
JOVE L. COLASITO
07/01/2015
Date
Date
PART I
WEIGHT
ALLOCATION
CATEGORY
C O M M I T M E N T
MAJOR FINAL OUTPUT

(MFO)
PART II

(Target + Measure)
A C T U A L
%
ACCOMPLISHED
A N D
R A T I N G
WEIGHTED
REMARK
SCORE
0.00
Core Function/s
Service Quality
80

-Funeral
claim checks
-ACOP
100.00%
100%
80.00
10
Reports on fact of death/birth/etc

submitted
Reports on fact of death/birth/ etc submitted

within the approved committed processing time
for 2015
100.00%
100%
10.00
10
90.00%
100%
10.00
Support Function/s
0.00
TOTAL
100
Total Score
Numerical Rating
Adjectival Rating
100.00
5
O
DISCUSSED WITH:
RATING SCALE
APPROVED BY:

Date

Date
02/12/16
Ratee's Signature
Date

Date
Score
100.00
95-99.99
90-94.99
75-89.99
Numerica
l
5
4
3
2
74.99-below
Adjectival
Outstanding (O)
Satisfactory (S)
Unsatisfactory (US)
Poor (P)

SSS SPMS FORM 1

NAME
(Last Name)
LOZADA
(First Name)
ROGER
(Middle Name)
BACALA
(Suffix)

JUNIOR MEMBER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE
C O M M I T M E N T
EMPLOYEE ID NO.
100194
OFFICIAL TIME
8:00 AM- 5:00 PM
C O N T R A C T
07/01/2015
Ratee's Signature
Date
APPROVED BY:
JIMMY R. PILAPIL
07/01/2015
07/01/2015
Date
Date
PART I
WEIGHT
ALLOCATION
CATEGORY
C O M M I T M E N T
MAJOR FINAL OUTPUT

(MFO)
PART II

(Target + Measure)
A C T U A L
%
ACCOMPLISHED
A N D
R A T I N G
WEIGHTED
REMARK
SCORE
0.00
Core Function/s
90

-ACOP
-Pregnant Women
-Senior Citizen
-PWD
Service Quality
10
8,502
100%
90.00
100%
10.00
Support Function/s
0.00
TOTAL
100
Total Score
Numerical Rating
Adjectival Rating
100.00
5
O
DISCUSSED WITH:
JIMMY R. PILAPIL
Ratee's Signature

02/12/16
Date

RATING SCALE
APPROVED BY:
Date
JOVE L. COLASITO
Date

Date
Score
100.00
90-99.99
75-89.99
60-74.99
Numerica
l
5
4
3
2
59.99 below
Adjectival
Outstanding (O)
Satisfactory (S)
Unsatisfactory (US)
Poor (P)

SSS SPMS FORM 1

NAME
(Last Name)
ROMERO
(First Name)
MILA JUDITH
(Middle Name)
MOVILLA
(Suffix)

SENIOR ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
C O M M I T M E N T
EMPLOYEE ID NO.
892859
OFFICIAL TIME
8:00 AM- 5:00 PM
C O N T R A C T
I commit to deliver and agree to be rated on the attainment of the Performance Commitment (Part I) in accordance with the indicated Success Indicators for the period _JULY 2015___ to SEPTEMBER 2015__.
07/01/2015
Ratee's Signature
Date
APPROVED BY:
JIMMY R. PILAPIL
07/01/2015
07/01/2015
Date
Date
PART I
WEIGHT
ALLOCATION
CATEGORY
C O M M I T M E N T
MAJOR FINAL OUTPUT

(MFO)
PART II

(Target + Measure)
A C T U A L
%
ACCOMPLISHED
A N D
R A T I N G
WEIGHTED
REMARK
SCORE
0.00
Core Function/s
90

-Sickness/maternity reimbursement
-UMID
Service Quality
10
8,272
100%
90.00
100%
10.00
Support Function/s
0.00
TOTAL
100
Total Score
Numerical Rating
Adjectival Rating
100.00
5
O
DISCUSSED WITH:
JIMMY R. PILAPIL
Ratee's Signature

02/12/16
Date

RATING SCALE
APPROVED BY:
Date
JOVE L. COLASITO
Date

Date
Score
100.00
90-99.99
75-89.99
60-74.99
Numerica
l
5
4
3
2
59.99 below
Adjectival
Outstanding (O)
Satisfactory (S)
Unsatisfactory (US)
Poor (P)

SSS SPMS FORM 1

NAME
(Last Name)
GARCIA
(First Name)
DIEGO
(Middle Name)
BALOFEOS
(Suffix)

JUNIOR MEMBER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE
C O M M I T M E N T
EMPLOYEE ID NO.
130083
OFFICIAL TIME
8:00 AM- 5:00 PM
C O N T R A C T
I commit to deliver and agree to be rated on the attainment of the Performance Commitment (Part I) in accordance with the indicated Success Indicators for the period _JULY 2015___ to DECEMBER 2015__.
07/01/2015
Ratee's Signature
Date
APPROVED BY:
JIMMY R. PILAPIL
07/01/2015
07/01/2015
Date
Date
PART I
WEIGHT
ALLOCATION
CATEGORY
C O M M I T M E N T
MAJOR FINAL OUTPUT

(MFO)
PART II

(Target + Measure)
A C T U A L
%
ACCOMPLISHED
A N D
R A T I N G
WEIGHTED
REMARK
SCORE
0.00
Core Function/s
90

-Complaints/counselling
-UMID
Service Quality
10
4,092
100%
90.00
100%
10.00
Support Function/s
0.00
TOTAL
100
Total Score
Numerical Rating
Adjectival Rating
100.00
5
O
DISCUSSED WITH:
JIMMY R. PILAPIL
Ratee's Signature

02/12/16
Date

RATING SCALE
APPROVED BY:
Date
JOVE L. COLASITO
Date

Date
Score
100.00
90-99.99
75-89.99
60-74.99
Numerica
l
5
4
3
2
59.99 below
Adjectival
Outstanding (O)
Satisfactory (S)
Unsatisfactory (US)
Poor (P)


Spms - Ipcr-Ecenter 2016

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

Spms - Ipcr-Ecenter 2016

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Spms - Ipcr-Ecenter 2016

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

SSS SPMS FORM 1

SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW (IPCR) FORM

MEMBER SERVICES SECTION

POSITION TITLE/DESIGNATED POSITION (if applicable)

Signature over Printed Name and Position Title of Immediate Supervisor

MAJOR FINAL OUTPUT

SUCCESS INDICATOR (SI)

ARTA ratings obtained

92% ARTA rating obtained

Applications reviewed within the approved

Service Quality rating obtained

75% Service Quality rating obtained

Branch Service Quality Rating: 90%

COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DEVELOPMENT PURPOSES

Signature over Printed Name of

Signature over Printed Name of

Signature over Printed Name of

Rating Scale as approved by the SSS PCEO and

- Core Function pertains to an activity inherent to the branch/department/office/unit based on the

The Branch/Department/Office/Unit Head shall approve the accomplished IPC

The Immediate Supervisor may put in qualitative comments, observations

The Branch/Department/Office/Unit Head shall return to the Immediate Supervis

The Branch/Department/Office/Unit Head shall submit to the Performance

SSS SPMS FORM 1

SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW (IPCR) FORM

MEMBER SERVICES SECTION

POSITION TITLE/DESIGNATED POSITION (if applicable)

MARIA TERESA S. JUANICH

Signature over Printed Name and Position Title of Immediate Supervisor

MAJOR FINAL OUTPUT

SUCCESS INDICATOR (SI)

Applications evaluated within the approved

Transmittal lists (TL) with

TL with documents attached released within the

Reports on daily transactions consolidated within

Service Quality rating obtained

75% Service Quality rating obtained

Branch Service Quality Rating: 90%

COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DEVELOPMENT PURPOSES

Signature over Printed Name of

MARIA TERESA S. JUANICH

Signature over Printed Name of

Signature over Printed Name of

Rating Scale as approved by the SSS PCEO and

SSS SPMS FORM 1

SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW (IPCR) FORM

MARIA TERESA S. JUANICH

Signature over Printed Name and Position Title of Immediate Supervisor

MAJOR FINAL OUTPUT

SUCCESS INDICATOR (SI)

Branch Service Quality Rating: 90%

Applications evaluated within the approved

Service Quality rating obtained

75% Service Quality rating obtained