Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2010 Nonprofit Social Network Benchmark Report (2: Annual)
2010 Nonprofit Social Network Benchmark Report (2: Annual)
NTEN Webinar
May 11, 2010
1
Survey Sponsors
NTEN.org
CommonKnow.com
ThePort.com
2
Speakers
NTEN.org CommonKnow.com
3
Survey Methodology
• Instrument:
A 50-question online survey was fielded
from February 3 to March 15, 2010, including 1,173
respondents representing nonprofit professionals from
small, medium and large nonprofits, and all major
segments of the industry
4
Part 1
TERMINOLOGY
5
Terms Used in Presentation
• FTE: Full-time equivalent; one full-time staff employee
6
Part 2
BIG THEMES
7
Big Themes from Social Networking Report
8
Big Themes from Social Networking Report
9
Big Themes from Social Networking Report
10
Big Themes from Social Networking Survey
11
Big Themes from Social Networking Survey
12
Big Themes from Social Networking Survey
13
Commercial vs. House Social Networks
Question Commercial House
Does your org. have one? 90% 22% (1+ communities)
Primary purpose? Marketing (92%) Marketing (57%)
Staff time (last 12 months)? 1/4 to 1/2 FTE 1/4 to 1/2 FTE
(67%) (57%)
Ext. resources budget (last None (59%) None (38%)
12 months)? $1-$10,000 (33%) $1 - $10,000 (42%)
# of community members? Average: 2,440* Average: 3,520
How old is your community? 1-24 months (87%)* 1-24 months (62%)
Fundraising revenue (last 12 Not Fundraising (60%) Not Fundraising (68%)
months)? Fundraising - raised Fundraising - Raised
$0 - $10,000 (39%)* $0 - $10,000 (22%)
Revenue from sponsorship, Not Advertising (99%)* Not Advertising (87%)
underwriting, advertising Advertising and raised Advertising and raised
$0 - $10,000 (1%) $0 - $10,000 (10%)
(last 12 months)
Why don’t you have one? Lack of expertise (47%) Insufficient budget (46%)
Insufficient budget (32%) Lack of expertise (46%)
14
Part 3
A CLOSER LOOK
15
Commercial Social Networks - Facebook
16
Commercial Social Networks - Twitter
17
Staffing / Budget - Commercial Social Networks
18
Promoting Social Networks
19
Departments Managing Social Networks
20
Fundraising from Social Networks
21
House Social Networks
23
Thanks!
QUESTIONS?
24 April 2010
Appendix
25
Nonprofits
on
Commercial
Social
Networks
90.0%
85.7%
80.0%
70.0%
59.7%
60.0%
48.1%
50.0%
40.0%
33.1%
30.0%
25.3%
20.0% 14.4%
10.0%
0.0%
26
Vertical Segments on
Commercial Social Networks
120.0%
100.0%
80.0%
60.0%
Facebook
40.0%
Twitter
20.0% YouTube
LinkedIn
0.0%
27
Role of Commercial
Social Networking Community
100.0%
92.0%
90.0%
80.0%
70.0%
60.0%
50.0% 45.8%
40.0% 34.5%
30.0% 24.3%
20.0% 17.7%
9.3%
10.0%
0.0%
Marketing Fundraising Program Market Customer Other
Delivery Research Support
28
Staff Time Allocated to
Commercial Social Networks
1.9%
5.3% 15.1%
11.2%
0
¼ to ½
¾ to 1
1 ¼ to 2
>2
66.6%
29
External Resources Allocated
to Social Networking
59.0%
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
32.8%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0% 4.7%
1.6% 1.0% 0.8%
0.0%
None Under $10,000 $10,001 - $25,001 - $50,001 - Over $100,000
$25,000 $50,000 $100,000
30
Average Community Size on Commercial Social
Networks
2,440
2,500
1,500 1,334
1,000
450 447
500
122
0
Facebook MySpace Twitter Change.org LinkedIn YouTube Flickr
31
Promoting Commercial
Social Networks
90% 83%
76%
80%
70%
60% 54% 52%
45%
50%
36%
40% 33%
29%
26%
30% 22%
20%
10%
0%
32
Dept with Primary Responsibility for
Commercial Social Networks
Other 10.5%
Marketing 20.3%
Communications 27.3%
33
Length of Presence on Commercial Social Networks – 2010
34
Fundraising on
Commercial Social Networks
45.0%
40.4%
40.0%
35.0%
30.0%
25.0%
20.0%
15.0% 12.0%
10.0%
5.1%
3.1% 2.7%
5.0% 1.9%
0.0%
Facebook Twitter YouTube Change.org MySpace LinkedIn
35
Number of House Social Networks
77.8%
80.0%
70.0%
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
16.9%
20.0%
10.0%
2.9%
1.2% 0.3% 0.8%
0.0%
None 1 2 3 4 5 or more
36
Role of House Social Network
Marketing 56.8%
Fundraising 27.4%
Other 16.5%
37
Metrics to Measure Success
of House Social Networks
59.8% 59.1%
60.0%
46.3% 45.6%
50.0%
40.0% 35.9%
28.1%
30.0% 24.6%
20.0%
7.1%
10.0%
0.0%
38
Staff Allocated to Working on
House Social Networks
5.4%
8.2% 13.6%
15.8%
0
¼ to ½
¾ to 1
1 ¼ to 2
57.0% >2
39
Number of Members
on House Social Networks
7.2%
10.0%
4.3%
5.3% 0 - 500
501 - 1000
40
Department Managing
House Social Networks
23.6%
Communications
13.9%
Development / Fundraising
13.9%
Marketing
12.7%
Programs
10.0%
IT
41
Community Duration
House Social Networks
25.0% 23.6%
20.9%
20.2%
20.0%
14.7%
15.0%
11.6%
8.9%
10.0%
5.0%
0.0%
1 - 3 months 3 - 6 months 6 - 12 12 - 24 2-3 years More than 3
months months years
42
Revenue Generation on
House Social Networks
2.0% 1.6%
7.5%
7.1%
Not Fundraising
$0 - $1,000
$1,001 - $10,000
14.5%
$10,001 - $50,000
$50,001 - $100,000
43
Fundraising Results on
House Social Networks
44.6%
45.0%
40.0%
35.0%
30.0%
22.9%
25.0% 21.7%
20.0%
15.0%
10.0% 6.0%
4.8%
5.0%
0.0%
$0 - $1,000 $1,001 - $10,000 $10,001 - $50,001 - More than
$50,000 $100,000 $100,000
44
House Social Network
Software Platform
48.5%
50.0%
45.0%
40.0%
35.0%
30.0%
22.5% %
25.0%
20.0%
12.3% 12.3%
15.0%
8.4%
10.0%
5.0%
0.0%
Other Custom Drupal Ning ThePort
45
Part 5
RESPONDENT PROFILES
46
Size of Nonprofits Surveyed
24.3% 24.4%
18.4%
14.5%
13.3%
% of
Nonprofits
5.0%
Employees
47
Annual Budget
45.0% 40.5%
40.0%
35.0% 31.3%
30.0%
% of 25.0% 19.6%
Nonprofits 20.0%
15.0%
10.0% 5.7%
2.9%
5.0%
0.0%
Under $1 $1 -$5 million $6 - $50 $51 - $250 Over $250
million million million million
48
Appendix
DETAILS OF SURVEY
RESPONDENTS
49 April 2010
Organization Types
Human Services – Crime and legal, employment, 22.7%
agriculture and nutrition, housing, public safety, youth and
recreation
Education – Higher education, K-12 18.8%
50
Organization Types
51
Complete 2010 Nonprofit Social Network
Benchmark Report Available Now
Download at www.nonprofitsocialnetworksurvey.com
Thank you!
52