Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Static Analysis Report Rev-A PDF
Static Analysis Report Rev-A PDF
PIPELAY ANALYSIS
STATIC CONDITION
IO185-ENG-REP-004
August 11,
2008
Issued for
Client
Comments
RK
GL
GP
Revision
Date
Description
Originator
Reviewed
Approved
Client
Description
Page
INTRODUCTION
3
4
4
2.0
SAFETY
3.0
RESPONSIBILITIES
4.0
REFERENCES
DESIGN DATA
METHODOLOGY
10
10
11
RESULTS
12
12
CONCLUSION
13
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
Appendices
Appendix 1.0
14
Appendix 2.0
15
Appendix 3.0
16
August-2008
Page 2 of 16
IO185-ENG-REP-004 (Rev A)
INTRODUCTION
1.1
Project Description
M/s Bharat Oman Refineries Ltd. (BORL) is setting up a 6.00 MMTPA
grass root refinery at Bina in India. As part of Bina Refinery Project, M/s
Bharat Oman Refineries Limited (BORL) intend to install a Single Point
Mooring (SPM) system and approximately 17.0 km long 1219mm (48)
diameter offshore/onshore crude oil pipeline from SPM to Crude Oil
Terminal (COT) at Vadinar for unloading/ transportation of crude oil
received through ocean tankers.
Leighton scope of work includes the following:
Installation of SPM & PLEM System (at approx. 32 m water depth)
including Piling
Installation of 1219mm (48) diameter, approx. 15.0 km long
submarine pipeline with concrete coating including laying in shore
approach
Installation of 1219mm (48) diameter, approx. 2.0 km long onshore
pipeline including terminal piping works at COT
1.1
SCOPE OF REPORT
The scope of this report includes the following:
Normal pipelay analysis for static conditions during the pipe-lay
operation from Leighton barge STEALTH.
1.2
PURPOSE
The purpose of this report is to establish the following:
To find out the stresses in the pipeline during the pipe laying at
different water depths along the proposed pipeline route and
thereby establish that the pipe-laying activity is performed keeping
the pipe stresses within the permissible limits.
This analysis is done to find out the Stinger tip, Bottom tension at
touch down, Suspended span length, Maximum overbend stress,
and Maximum sagbend stress.
August-2008
Page 3 of 16
IO185-ENG-REP-004 (Rev A)
1.3
SYSTEM OF UNITS
The International system (SI) of units is adopted as the main system of the
pipelay analysis.
1.4
NOMENCULTURE
BOP
DLB
DnV
KP
LFP
mm
MPa
MT
August-2008
Bottom Of Pipe
Derrick Lay Barge
Det norske Veritas
Kilometer Point
Land Fall Point
millimeter
Megapascal
Metric Tonne
Page 4 of 16
IO185-ENG-REP-004 (Rev A)
SAFETY
All activities that are scheduled to be carried out in accordance with this
document, the contract requirements, approved Leighton Safety
Procedures and any specific job safety analysis conducted to
commencement of work.
August-2008
Page 5 of 16
IO185-ENG-REP-004 (Rev A)
RESPONSIBILITIES
1.
2.
3.
August-2008
Page 6 of 16
IO185-ENG-REP-004 (Rev A)
REFERENCES
The latest revision of the following reference documents shall be used in
conjunction with this report.
4.1
Project Specifications
Number
1203-001-16-56-SD-03
Title
Geotechnical Investigation Report for
SPM System
Design Premise for Residual
Engineering
IO185-ENG-REP-001
4.2
Project Drawings
Number
1203-002-16-71-1001 to 1005
Title
Pipeline Alignment Sheet From PLEM to LFP
1203-002-16-71-1006 to 1008
IO185-ENG-DWG-505
4.3
Title
Rules for Submarine Pipeline Systems.
DNV - 1981
August-2008
Page 7 of 16
IO185-ENG-REP-004 (Rev A)
5.0
DESIGN DATA
The analyses described in this document are based on the pipeline data,
material properties and barge input data as provided in the following
sections. The pipelay analyses are performed using nominal pipe
properties.
5.1
Pipeline Data
The pipeline data are as per Pipeline Alignment Sheet from PLEM to LFP.
(Drawing No. 1203-002-16-71-1004 & 1005) are presented in Table 5.1
Table 5.1: Pipeline Data
Sections
Outside Diameter
Material Grade
Wall Thickness
Steel Density
Corrosion Coating
Corrosion Coating Thickness
Concrete Coating Thickness
Field Joint Coating
Field Joint Coating Density
KP 0.0 to KP 2.3
KP 2.3 to KP 9.5
& KP12.3 to LFP
1219.2mm(48-in)
API 5L GRADE (X-65)
20.6mm
7850 kg/m3
Coal Tar Enamel
4.8mm
100mm
130mm
As per EIL Spec. No.6-71-0045 Rev.2
1025 kg/m3
.
5.2
August-2008
Page 8 of 16
Data
100.585M
30.480M
6.16M
3.6m
Varies for water depth
Y = -2.5m, x = -0.75m
2
50 tonnes each
IO185-ENG-REP-004 (Rev A)
8 (including 2 tensioner)
250 Tonnes
100 Tonnes
60 Tonnes
Y Coordinate
5.436
4.93
4.349
3.767
3.191
2.542
1.87
0.62
Note: Roller positions on lay barge are based on (0, 0) barge stern coordinate
August-2008
Page 9 of 16
Y Coordinate
-1.198
-2.867
-4.557
IO185-ENG-REP-004 (Rev A)
METHODOLOGY
6.1
Description of OFFPIPE
The Static analysis is performed using OFFPIPE program. OFFPIPE is
sophisticated finite element method based on commercial computer
program. It has been developed specifically for modeling and structural
analysis of non linear problems encountered in the installation and
operation of offshore pipelines.
OFFPIPE is based on the non linear matrix, finite element method
developed specifically for analysis of flexible offshore beam and cable
structures. This method is generalization of the classical, linear EulerBernoulli theory traditionally used for the analysis of offshore platform and
similar structures. This method is equivalent to the numerical (Galerkin)
solution of the exact non linear differential equation of motion for a
continues beam, which is subjected to large deflections and non-linear
material behavior.
August-2008
Page 10 of 16
IO185-ENG-REP-004 (Rev A)
August-2008
Page 11 of 16
IO185-ENG-REP-004 (Rev A)
RESULTS
7.1
Static Analysis.
The static analyses were carried out for water depths of 5m, 8m, 10m,
20m, 25m and 30m. Table 7.1 summarises the tensions required during
pipe-lay in order to maintain the pipeline integrity during pipe-laying. The
water depths considered are inclusive of tidal height. The detail computer
outputs are provided in Appendix 2.
The static analyses indicate that the stresses in the pipe at the overbend
and sagbend were within the allowable stresses. The highest overbend
stresses recorded in the pipe is 66.92% of SMYS and highest sagbend
stress is 61.21% of SMYS.
Local buckling checks were carried out to ensure that pipeline is not
locally buckled. The local buckling checks are provided in Appendix-3 and
utilization ratio is less than 1 for all cases.
Table 7.1: Lay Stress Analysis Results
File
Name
Water
Depth
(m)
S05m
S08m
S10m
S20m
S25m
S30m
5
8
10
20
25
30
Barge
Stinger
Tension
Tip at
(Tonnes) Depth
(m)
August-2008
40
50
30
60
40
40
-0.96
-1.42
-1.91
-2.06
-2.06
-2.06
Bottom
Tension
@ Touch
Down
(Tonnes)
24.17
33.51
7.27
32.34
19.87
18.76
Trim
Angle
(deg.)
Suspended
Span Length
(m)
Max.
Overbend
Stress
(% SMYS)
Max. Sag
Bend Stress
(% SMYS)
0
0
0
0
0
0
78.68
100.47
87.66
128.10
169.04
182.87
238.88(53.32)
299.80(66.92)
256.54(57.26)
279.37(62.36)
263.29(58.77)
292.18(65.22)
147.38(32.90)
151.57(33.83)
230.86(51.53)
274.21(61.21)
205.43(45.86)
224.04(50.01)
Page 12 of 16
IO185-ENG-REP-004 (Rev A)
Conclusion
The pipe-lay analyses for the 48-inch pipeline have been performed for the
proposed pipe-lay barge STEALTH configuration. The normal static pipelay analyses performed indicate that the pipeline stresses are within the
allowable limits in accordance with the DnV-1981.
August-2008
Page 13 of 16
IO185-ENG-REP-004 (Rev A)
Appendix 1.0
Leighton Lay-Barge STEALTH Details
August-2008
Page 14 of 16
IO185-ENG-REP-004 (Rev A)
Appendix 2.0
Static Analyses OFFPIPE output
August-2008
Page 15 of 16
IO185-ENG-REP-004 (Rev A)
Appendix 3.0
Local Buckling Checks
August-2008
Page 16 of 16
IO185-ENG-REP-004 (Rev A)