35 Jensen

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

The future of the European Social Model New perspectives for industrial relations, social

and employment policy in Europe? 10-12/09/2014, Dublin, Ireland


Abstract submitted for
Theme 5: Methodology: Which theory, theories and methods do we need and want in
comparative IR? Sub-theme 5A: Paradigms in industrial relations research

Classical theories and new trends within the field of Industrial Relations Changing pattern
of social stratification and the need for new understanding within the theoretical field of
industrial relations
By Carsten Strby Jensen, Associate Professor, Department of Sociology, University of
Copenhagen
Can Industrial Relations be viable if union density is less than 10 percent and if labor unions are
popularly viewed as narrow special interests groups that harm competitiveness? In other words, is
the decline of organized labor a sword of Democles hanging over the field of industrial relations?
(Budd 2004: 189)
Taking the above quite from John Budd as a starting point this paper will discuss one of the major
challenges to the field of industrial relations, namely the declining importance of the classical
collective actors like trade unions and employers association within the field of industrial relations.
The paper will discuss how social stratification in late modern societies have changed during the
last twenty to thirty years leading to a more individualized society. Individualization are one of the
challenges that are confronting the traditional systems of industrial relations in Western societies .
Individualizations tends to undermine the traditional collective oriented systems of collective
bargaining. Industrial relations research have traditionally focused on collective actors and
collective bargaining. The question asked in the paper is, what kind of theories are need in order to
understand and conceptualize labour markets and industrial relation in a world that is less and less
committed to collective actors and collective actions. How can we understand and conceptualize
labour markets in which the traditional major industrial relations actors do not play the same role as
they used to play. Industrial relations research need to be able to conceptualize industrial relations
as a system that does not primarily consists of collective actors. Industrial relations research need to
understand how changing patterns of social stratification change the field of industrial relations.
Selected biography
Ackers, P. (2007) Collective Bargaining and Industrial Democracy: Hugh Clegg and the Political
Foundation of British Industrial Relations Pluralism, British Journal of Industrial Relations 45(1):
77-101
Ackers, P. & Wilkinson, A. (2003) Introduction: The British Industrial Relations Tradition
Formation, Breakdown, and Salvage. In Ackers, P. & Wilkinson, A. (eds.) (2003) Understanding
Work and Employment: Industrial Relations in Transition, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1-30
Ackers, P. & Wilkinson, A. (2005) British Industrial Relations Paradigm: A Critical Outline of
History and Prognosis, Journal of Industrial Relations 47(4): 443-456.

Ackers, P. & Wilkinson, A. (2008) Industrial Relations and the Social Science. In Blyton, P.,
Bacon, N., Fiorito, J. & Heery, E. (2008), The SAGE Handbook of Industrial Relations, London:
Sage, 53-68.
Adams, R.J. (1983) Competing Paradigms in Industrial Relations, Relations industrielles /
Industrial Relations, 38 (3):508-531.
Adam, R.J. (1993) Theory Construction and Assessment: A Checklist. In Adams, R.J. & Meltz,
N.M. (eds.) (1993): Industrial Relations Theory Its Nature, Scope and Pedagogy, London: IMLR
Press/Rutgers University, 333-352.
Bacon, N. (2003) Human Resource Management and Industrial Relations. In: Ackers, P. &
Wilkinson (eds.) (2003) Understanding Work and Employment: Industrial Relations in Transition,
Oxford: Oxford University Press, 71-77.
Bellemare, G. (2000) End Users: Actors in the Industrial Relations System? British Journal of
Sociology 38(3):383-405.
Bech, U. (1992) Risk Society Toward a New Modernity. London: Sage.
Bernard, C., Deakin, S. & Hobbs, R. (2004) Reflexive law, corporate social responsibility and the
evolution of labour standards: the case of working time. Working paper No. 294, ESRC Centre for
Business Research, University of Cambridge.
Bray, M. & Macneil, J (2011) Individualism, Collectivism, and the Case of Awards in Australia.
Journal of Industrial Relations 53(1): 149-167.
Clegg, H.A. (1976) Trade Unionism under Collective Bargaining: A Theory Based on Comparisons
of Six Countries. Oxford: Blackwell..
Coase, R. (1937) The Nature of the Firm. Economica 4(16): 386-405
Coleman, J.S. (1986) Social Theory, Social Research, and a Theory of Action. The American
Journal of Sociology 91(6): 1309-1335.
DiMaggio, P. (1988) Interests and Agency in Institutional Theory. In: Zucker, L.G. (1998),
Institutional Patterns and Organizations Culture and Environment, Cambridge, Massachusetts:
Ballinger Publishing Company, 3-23. .
DiMaggio, P. J. & W. Powell (1983) The iron cage revisited - institutional isomorphism and
collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48 (2): 147-160.
Dobbin, F. (2005) Is Globalization Making Us All the Same? British Journal of Sociology 43(4):
569-576.
Dunlop, J.T. (1958) Industrial Relations System. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston,.
Edwards, P. (2005) The challenging but promising future of industrial relations: developing theory
and methods in context-sensitive research. Industrial Relations Journal 36(4): 264-282
Edwards, P. (2006) Industrial Relations and Critical Realism: IRs Tacit Contribution.
Workingpapers in Industrial relations, 2006:80, University of Warwick.
Elster, J. (1989) The cement of society A study of social order. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Fox, A. (1974) Beyond contract: Work, Power and Trust Relations, London, Faber.
Frege, C. (2005) Varieties of Industrial Relations Research: Take-Over, Convergence and
Divergence. British Journal of Industrial Relations 43:2(179-207).
Giddens, A. (1990) The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press..
Hall, P, & Soskice, D. (2001) Varieties of Capitalism: the institutional foundations of comparative
advantages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haworth, N. & Hughes, S (2003) International Political Economy and Industrial Relations. British
Journal of Industrial Relations 41(4): 665-682
Hechter, M. (1987) Principles of Group Solidarity. Berkeley: University of California Press,

Heery, E. & Frege, C. (2006) New Actors in Industrial Relations. British Journal of Industrial
Relations 44(4): 601-604.
Hyman, R. (1975) Industrial relations: A Marxist introduction. London: Macmillan.
Hyman, R. (1994) Theory and Industrial Relations. British Journal of Industrial Relations
32(2) 165-180.
Hyman, R. (2001) Understanding European Trade Unionism Between Market, Class and Society.
London: Sage Publications.
Hyman, R. (2001a) The Europeanisation or erosion of industrial relations? Industrial
Relations Journal 32(4): 280-293
Hyman, R. (2007) An Anglo-European Perspective on Industrial Relations Research.
Arbetsmarknad och arbetsliv, 13 (3-4): 29-41.
Kaufman, B. (2004a) Employment Relations and the Employment Relations System: A Guide
to Theorizing. In B. Kaufman (ed.), Theoretical Perspectives on Work and the
Employment Relationship, Champaign, IL: Industrial Relations Research Association, pp.
41-75.
Kaufman, B.E. (2004b) The Global Evolution of Industrial Relations Events, ideas and the IIRA.
Geneva, International labour Office.
Kaufman, B. (2004c) Toward an integrative theory of Human Resource Management. In B.
Kaufman (ed.), Theoretical Perspectives on Work and the Employment Relationship, Champaign,
IL: Industrial Relations Research Association, 321-366.
Kaufman, B.E. (2008) Paradigms in Industrial Relations: Original, Modern and Versions in
Between. British Journal of Industrial Relations 46(2):314-339.
Kaufman, B.E. (2011) The future of employment relations: insights from theory. In Townsend, K.
& Wilkinson, A. (eds.) (2011) Research Handbook on the Future of Work and Employment
Relations, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, 13-44.
Kerr, C., Dunlop, J.T., Harbison, F. & Myers, C.A. (1960) Industrialism and industrial man: The
problems of labour and the management of economic growth. Cambridge Mass: Harvard
University.
Kelly, J. (1998) Rethinking Industrial Relations Mobilization, Collectivism and Long Waves.
London: Taylor & Francis Ltd.
Kessler, I. & Purcell, J. (2004) Individualism and Collectivism in Industrial Relations. In:
Edwards, P. (2004) (ed.) Industrial Relations Theory and Practice, second edition, Oxford:
Blackwell Publishing 313-338.
Kochan, T.A., Katz, H.C. & Mckersie, R.B. (1986) The Transformation of American Industrial
Relations. New York: Basic Books.
Konzelmann, S.J. (2005)Varieties of Capitalism: Production and Market Relations in the USA and
Japan. British Journal of Industrial Relations 43 (4): 593-603.
Marginson, P. & Sisson, K. (2004) European Integration and Industrial Relations Multilevel
Governance in the Making. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Murrey, G. (2010) Framing Globalization and Work: A Research Agenda. Journal of Industrial
Relations 52(1): 11-25.
Mller-Jentsch, W. (2004) Theoretical Approaches to Industrial Relations. In: Kaufman, B.E.
(2004): Theoretical Perspectives on Work and the Employment Relationship, Industrial Relations
Research Association Series, Industrial Relations Research Association, University of Illinois 1-40.
Olson, M. (1965) The logic of collective action. Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge:
Harvard University Press.

Piore, M.J. & Safford, S. (2006) Changing Regimes of Workplace Governance, Shifting Axes of
Social Mobilization, and the Challenge to Industrial Relations Theory. Industrial Relations 45
(3):299-325.
Poole, Michael (1981) Theories of Trade Unionism: A Sociology of Industrial Relations.
London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Poole, M. (1986) Industrial relations Origins and Patterns of National Diversity. London:
Routledge & Kegan Poul.
Poole, M. (1993) Industrial Relations: Theorizing for a Global Perspective. In Adams, R.J. &
Meltz, N.M. (eds.) (1993): Industrial Relations Theory Its Nature, Scope and Pedagogy, IMLR
Press/Rutgers University. London 103-118.
Rogowski, R. & Wilthagen, T. (1994) Reflexive labour law, Studies in industrial relations and
employment regulation. Boston: Kluwer Law & Taxation, Deventer Paperback.
Rogowski, R. (2000) Industrial Relations as a Social System. Industrielle Beziehungen, 7(1): 97126.
Rose, N. (1999) Powers of Freedom. Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Scott, R. (1995) Institutions and Organizations. London: Sage Publications.
Sisson, K. (2007) Revitalising Industrial Relations: making the most of the institutional turn.
Workingpapers in Industrial relations, 2007:85, Warwick: University of Warwick.
Traxler, F. (1995) Two Logics of Collective Action in Industrial relations? In: Crouch, C. &
Traxler, F. (1995) Organized Industrial Relations in Europe: What Future, Avebury, Aldershot 2345.
Traxler, F. (2003) Bargaining, State Regulation and the Trajectories of Industrial Relations.
European Journal of Industrial Relations (2): 141-161.
Traxler, F., Blaschke, S. & Kittel, B. (2001) National labour relations in internationalized markets
A comparative study of institutions, change and performance. New York: Oxford University.
Wailes, N. (2008) Rethinking Globalization and Employment Relations: Introduction to the
Symposium. Journal of Industrial Relation 50(5): 675-679.
Wailes, N., Ramia, G. & Landsbury, R. (2003) Interests, Institutions and Industrial Relations.
British Journal of Industrial Relations 41(4): 617-637
Wailes, N., Bamber, G & Landsbury, R. (2011) International and Comparative employment
relations: an introduction. In: Bamber, G., Landsbury, R. & Wailes, N. (Eds.) (2011). International
and comparative employment relations Globalisation and Change (5. ed.). Sydney: Allan &
Unwin 1-35.
Williamson, O.E. (1975) Markets and hierarchie : analysis and antitrust implications : a study in
the economics of internal organization. New York: Free Press.

You might also like