No

Tittle

A
1

EXECUTION
MTO Methodolgy

Piping mechanizem (Saipem stye)

3
4

PICOM input
Tripatra-Saipem Cooperation

Material Take Off by Picom

Material Database by Picom

B
4

DESIGN
Plot Plan optimazion all area

Plot Plan optimazion for ISBL Area

Isometric sketch for MTO

Passive Fire Protection for Flare line

Additional FEED pump is inform to piping very late

C
9

MATERIALS
ARF and K-Inf factor

10

Spring support MTO

11

Piping Desciprtion not same with FEED Document especially for the
valve

12

BM BQ Calculation relay on PICOM (Saipem) software

13

Checking BQ value

14

BQ piping calculation methode

15
16

Technical bid evaluation

Technical bid evaluation form

LESSON AND LEARNT PROPOSAL J

Discipline

Outline of Problems/ Troubles

PIPING

Hard discussion for finalized MTO, some factor is being added

by Saipem SA.

PIPING

Calculation for Engineering MH is different, because Piping

mechanized is caunted

PIPING
PIPING

Some PICOM mistake

Piping team of Tripatra and Saipem not seemed to work
cooperatively.

PIPING

Bad computer network connection between Tripatra network

and Saipem network occurred when Tripatra is intended to MTO
by web-based Picom application.

PIPING

Picom database is not prepared properly,

PIPING

Plot Plan optimazion not fully integrated among discipline

PIPING

It's difficult to get reduce cost from Plot Plan Area.

PIPING

Difficult to check MTO for ISBL

PIPING

Flare piping shall have passive fire protection not only for pipe
rack

PIPING

Process add Boiler FEED pump

PIPING

Budget qty increased so many

PIPING

MTO spring support to many

PIPING

Many question from Vendor for Valve description wasn't the

same with Client spec

PIPING

Many hours to be consume for BM BQ checking

PIPING

Many hours to be consume for MTO Valve checking since still

have different between Manual MTO and PICOM MTO

PIPING

Different qty for BQ between Tripatra calculation and Saipem

Milan Calculation

PIPING
PIPING

Limited time to evaluate vendor quatation.

Vendor gave quotations in not well-order so that it took timeconsuming to evaluate.

NT PROPOSAL JTB PROJECT

Causes
Different MTO methodolgy between Tripatra and Saipem Milan.
Saipem SA add some factor to give them confidence value.
Meanwhile Tripatra use Iso sktech to get MTO refer to FEED
Model.
In Saipem style, It have an activities Piping Mechnized, The
activities are :
a. Prepare Line number,
b. Check pipe break class
c. Check pipe class
Meanwhile in Tripatra work style, those activities belong to
Process
need more carefully for PICOM input
Schedule was delayed; Manhour is not used effectively.
MTO is delayed.

Bill of quantity will not be provided completely.

Only process give the plot plan comments, others department

not give their comments.

No optimation for ISBL (Saipem Milan) scope

No Isometric sketch have been produced by Saipem Milan

Client spec
Piping need to revise submmitted BMBQ

Since Saipem Milan not confortable with MTO, the use factor. It
make budget qty is increased
Saipem Milan calcualate MTO Spring sport based on pipe
weight factor. So even in Pipe rack there were 400 set spring
support. Normally we never install pipe support on pipe rack
Saipem Milan have own description because of PICOM output
1. Relay on PICOM
2. Piping material spec use dummy PMC
1. Relay on PICOM
2. ISBL scope still have different qty for net MTO
Tripatra methode :
a. Pipe divided 6 meter
b. Fitting joint number is 1
c. Tee joint number is 2
Saipem methode :
a. Pipe joint number based on Area,
Pipe rack devided 6 meter
Arround equipment 4 meter
b. Fitting joint number 2
c. Tee joint number 3

No due date of vendor submission for quotation.

There is no technical bid evaluation form in RFQ document.

Countermeasures & Lesson for other projects

Set-up MTO Methodology in eraly proposal stage. Not discuss at
the end of preparation Final MTO

To be defined which company standard to be followed, PMT to

decide

Need checker for PICOM input

Have a good understanding of our objectives and purposes.
Design a good internetwork connection.

Have a complete material database in advance.

Plot plan optimazion is one of the key project to reduce the

cost, if the proposal member didn't aware about plot plan
optimazion, how we can reduce the cost
Saipem Milan didn't do optimazion for ISBL plot plan to possible
reduce cost. The reason the plot plan optimazion will be done
during detail engineering
If MTO Methodology mention regarding Isometric MTO shall be
prepared during proposal, it mean both parties shall do the
same. Current situation only OSBL scope (Tripatra Scope) had
prepare Isometric MTO sketch

TQ to client to deleted Flare line to be PFP, only pipe rack is

mandatory not piping
Process to chek carefully

MTO methodology to be fix in the beginning of Proposal

We shall prepare procedure to counted MTO spring Support

Tripatra shall have Commodity Code builder spec such as SPRD

Tripatra shall use inetelegent software such as SPMAT

Tripatra shall use inetelegent software such as SPMAT

In case we counted based on Bill of Material, without knowing

line by line MTO, Tripatra methode to be used
Incase we know MTO line by line, Saipem methode to be used
We also need SPMAT to set up this calculation

Deadline shall be made.

Technical bid evaluation form shall be made in advance so that
vendor quoation will come in well-order.

Relevant Department
PIP
PMT

PIP
PMT

All
All
PIPING

PIPING

All

All

All

PIP
PROCESS
PROCESS
MEC

PIP
PIP

PIP
PIP

PIP

PIP

PROCUREMENT
PIPING