Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Zinoide To Indicate The Carcinoma-Like Appearance and The Pre
Zinoide To Indicate The Carcinoma-Like Appearance and The Pre
TACHYKININS
PEPTIDES
OTHER
5-HT
Kallikrein
Pancreatic
polypeptide
(40%)
Prostaglandins
5-HIAA
(88%)
Substance P
(32%)
Chromogranins
(100%)
5-HTP
Neuropeptide K
(67%)
Neurotensin
(19%)
Histamine
HCG- (28%)
Dopamine
HCG-
Motilin (14%)
Table 50-9 Distribution of Gastrointestinal Carcinoids: Incidence of Metastases and of Carcinoid Syndrome
AVERAGE
METASTASIS
(%)
CASES OF
CARCINOID
SYNDROME
SITE
CASES
Esophagus
Stomach
93 (2%)
23
Duodenum
135 (4%)
20
Jejunoileum
1032 (28%)
34
91
Meckels
diverticulum
42 (1%)
19
Appendix
1686 (45%)
Colon
91 (2%)
60
Rectum
592 (16%)
18
Ovary
34
17
Biliary tract
10
30
Pancreas
Total
3718
136
Adapted from Cheek RC, Wilson H: Carcinoid tumors. Curr Probl Surg (Nov):431,
1970.
SECTION X ABDOMEN
Carcinoid Tumors
FIGURE 50-30 Gross pathologic characteristics of carcinoid tumor. A, Carcinoid tumor of the distal ileum demonstrates the intense desmoplastic
reaction and fibrosis of the bowel wall. B, Mesenteric metastases from a carcinoid tumor of the small bowel. (Adapted from Evers BM, Townsend
CM Jr, Thompson JC: Small intestine. In Schwartz SI [ed]: Principles of surgery, ed 7, New York, 1999, McGraw-Hill, p 1245.)
SECTION X ABDOMEN
which is then metabolized in the liver and the lung to the pharmacologically inactive 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA).
Elevated urinary levels of 5-HIAA measured over 24 hours with
high-performance liquid chromatography are highly specific,
although not sensitive. A potentially useful marker of neuroendocrine tumors is the plasma concentration of chromogranin A,
a protein made in the secretory granules, which is elevated in
more than 80% of patients with carcinoid tumors. Although
recent reports have proposed chromogranin A levels to be the
test of choice for the diagnosis of carcinoid, the lack of specificity
for this test limits its usefulness as a sole marker. It appears that
the combination of 24-hour urine 5-HIAA and serum chromogranin A levels provides the best biochemical diagnostic accuracy. In terms of surveillance after resection or as a marker to
monitor response to therapy, chromogranin A levels have proven
efficacy over urine 5-HIAA levels. Plasma serotonin, substance
P, neurotensin, neurokinin A, and neuropeptide K levels can be
measured, but these peptides may not be elevated in all patients.
Provocative tests using pentagastrin, calcium, or epinephrine
may be used to reproduce the symptoms of carcinoid tumors.
The administration of pentagastrin is the safest, most reliable,
and most frequently used; however, with the accuracy of current
diagnostic tests, there are relatively few indications today for
provocative tests.
Carcinoid tumors of the small intestine are rarely diagnosed preoperatively. Barium radiographic studies of the small
bowel may exhibit multiple filling defects as a result of kinking
and fibrosis of the bowel (Fig. 50-31). There are a number of
imaging techniques used to diagnose the extent and spread of
carcinoid tumors. As CT technology has continued to progress,
CT scanning has become the imaging modality of choice for
identifying the site of disease and the presence of lymphatic or
hematogenous metastases. CT angiography may be useful in
cases associated with a large mesenteric process to identify
encasement and pseudoaneurysm formation, typical of a malignant process in the mesentery. A novel imaging study that takes
advantage of the fact that many of these tumors possess somatostatin receptors is somatostatin receptor scintigraphy using
111
In-labeled pentetreotide. This scintigraphic localization study
has shown encouraging results, with a higher reported sensitivity than conventional imaging techniques, such as CT, for
delineating and localizing carcinoid tumors. In particular,
somatostatin receptor scintigraphy is the test of choice to identify extra-abdominal metastatic disease or in cases in which the
primary cannot be appreciated on CT scan. Although CT scanning and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) are the predominant modalities for carcinoid tumor localization and
staging, MRI is emerging as a potential adjunct to these current
imaging techniques. When directly compared with CT or SRS,
MRI has shown enhanced sensitivity for hepatic metastases
evaluation. Unfortunately, MRI has not improved the ability to
identify extrahepatic disease and remains constrained by institutional expertise. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission
tomography (FDG-PET) scanning, although important in the
evaluation of other malignancies, has not proven beneficial for
carcinoids. However, the addition of newer isotopes such as
11
C5-HTP and 18F-L-dihydroxyphenylalanine (18F-DOPA)
has dramatically improved the sensitivity of PET for neuroendocrine malignancies and, when fused with conventional CT
scanning, may ultimately outperform the current accepted
imaging modalities.31
FIGURE 50-31 Barium radiograph of a carcinoid tumor of the terminal ileum demonstrates fibrosis with multiple filling defects and highgrade partial obstruction (arrows). (Courtesy Dr. Melvyn H. Schreiber,
The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Tex.)
Treatment
Surgical Therapy The treatment of patients with small bowel
incidence of retroperitoneal fibrosis. Ketanserin and cyproheptadine have been shown to provide some control of symptoms
and other antagonists, such as ondansetron, may be even more
effective.
Given the slow-growing nature of carcinoid, cytotoxic chemotherapy has had only limited success. The role of chemotherapy is confined predominantly to patients with metastatic
disease who are symptomatic, unresponsive to other therapies,
or have high tumor proliferation rates. The most frequent combination used is streptozotocin plus 5-fluorouracil or cyclophosphamide, which may result in some tumor regression in up to
one third of the patients. The duration of response, however, is
short-lived. The use of cisplatin and etoposide has shown some
promise only in patients with well-differentiated carcinoids.
Results using dacarbazine (DTIC) are conflicting.
In summary, the treatment of metastatic carcinoid tumors
requires a multidisciplinary approach and combined modalities
may be the best option, including surgical debulking, hepatic
artery embolization or chemoembolization, and medical therapy.
In addition, newer and more targeted therapies are being developed that may be useful in the future. Targeted therapy has
progressed down four separate pathways. Given the hypervascular nature of carcinoids, antiangiogenesis therapy (e.g., bevacizumab) is being investigated in combination with cytotoxic and
somatostatin therapy.34 Based on the benefit of sunitinib seen in
pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, tyrosine kinase inhibitors
have been evaluated as systemic therapy and as a liver-directed
chemoembolization strategy for carcinoids as well. The PI3KAKT-mTOR pathway has also recently emerged as a potential
target for systemic therapy. Agents such as everolimus, an
mTOR inhibitor, although initially developed as immunosuppressant therapy, have redefined themselves as potent antitumor
agents and remain under active investigation for carcinoid
disease. Perhaps the most promising targeted therapy to date is
radiolabeled somatostatin analogue therapy. In a series of over
500 patients with gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors
including carcinoid, [177Lu-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotate was well tolerated and provided significant improvements in response rates
and overall survival when compared with historical controls.35
Prognosis Carcinoid tumors have the best prognosis of all small
bowel tumors, whether the disease is localized or metastatic.
Resection of a carcinoid tumor localized to its primary site
approaches a 100% survival rate. Five-year survival rates are
approximately 65% in patients with regional disease and 25%
to 35% in those with distant metastasis. When widespread metastatic disease precludes cure, extensive resection for palliation is
indicated. In fact, long-term palliation often can be obtained
because these tumors are relatively slow-growing. A number of
factors have been evaluated in an attempt to identify patients
with carcinoid tumors who have a poor prognosis. Probably the
most useful factor identified is an elevated level of chromogranin
A, which was found to be an independent predictor of an
adverse prognosis.
Adenocarcinomas