Professional Documents
Culture Documents
New Options and Treatment Strategies With The VSP Erbium YAG Aesthetics Lasers PDF
New Options and Treatment Strategies With The VSP Erbium YAG Aesthetics Lasers PDF
Abstract:
Er:YAG laser resurfacing has been widely
recognized as an effective and predictable method to
reverse the signs of photo-damage. Whereas other
ablative light-technologies have not developed much
further, therefore limiting their versatility and
applicability, new developments and innovations to
Er:YAG lasers have given practitioners a wide variety
of new treatment options and strategies. In order to
fully benefit from the Er:YAG lasers versatility in
aesthetics it is important for the practitioner to
understand and appreciate the basic biophysics and
technology behind the latest VSP Er:YAG lasers. A
deeper understanding of the 4 VSP Er:YAG treatment
regimes (COLD, WARM, HOT, NON-ABLATIVE)
gives insight into the clinical parameters that are
necessary for the most common VSP Er:YAG
treatments, that are mini peels, medium depth peels
and SMOOTH treatments.
Key words: laser resurfacing; VSP technology, mini
peels, SMOOTH treatments, Er:YAG lasers, scanner
INTRODUCTION
The treatment of aged and photo-damaged skin
with a variety of cutaneous resurfacing techniques has
been available for many years. The majority of these
procedures have become obsolete with the
introduction of Er:YAG lasers. Namely, Er:YAG laser
resurfacing provides an extremely safe and precise
method for feather-like light induced peeling of
aged or scarred skin tissue. Since the introduction of
new and promising non-ablative methods, ablative skin
resurfacing treatments may have lost their popularity
because of their longer healing times. However, nonablative methods are not a comparable alternative to
the ablative skin resurfacing.[10-12] Non-ablative
methods offer only subtle, incremental, and gradual
improvements. Also, a relatively high proportion of
non-respondents additionally limit the clinical success
rate. For this reason, it is now generally accepted that
only minimally ablative Er:YAG laser resurfacing
treatments consistently produces optimum results with
no comparable alternative.[1,2,21] This is especially
true for Er:YAG lasers based on the latest VSP
Laser and Health Academy. All rights reserved. Printed in Europe. www.laserandhealth.com Order No. 85120
New Options and Treatment Strategies with the VSP Erbium YAG Aesthetic Lasers
New Options and Treatment Strategies with the VSP Erbium YAG Aesthetic Lasers
heat.
Standard VSP Er:YAG single laser pulse durations
are: 100 sec (Very Short Pulse or VSP mode), 300
sec (Short Pulse or SP mode), 600 sec (Long Pulse
or LP mode), 1000 sec (Very Long Pulse or VLP
mode), and 1500 sec (eXtra Long Pulse or XLP
mode). Additionally, SMOOTH mode is a super-long
200.000-350.000 sec pulse.
COLD ABLATION
WARM ABLATION
HOT ABLATION
NO ABLATION
50
1,59
0,71
0,40
0,25
0,18
0,13
0,10
0,08
0,06
0,04
100
3,18
1,42
0,80
0,51
0,35
0,26
0,20
0,16
0,13
0,09
300
9,55
4,25
2,39
1,53
1,06
0,78
0,60
0,47
0,38
0,27
E
(mJ)
500
15,92
7,08
3,98
2,55
1,77
1,30
1,00
0,79
0,64
0,44
1000
31,85
14,15
7,96
5,10
3,54
2,60
1,99
1,57
1,27
0,88
1500
47,77
21,23
11,94
7,64
5,31
3,90
2,99
2,36
1,91
1,33
3000
95,54
42,46
23,89
15,29
10,62
7,80
5,97
4,72
3,82
2,65
New Options and Treatment Strategies with the VSP Erbium YAG Aesthetic Lasers
New Options and Treatment Strategies with the VSP Erbium YAG Aesthetic Lasers
CONCLUSION
Er:YAG lasers with a 2.94 m wavelength have the
highest absorption coefficient in water and thus do not
penetrate more than approx. 5 m into the skin. This
makes Er:YAG lasers a unique resurfacing treatment
tool where the depth of the tissue effect can be
controlled by solely choosing the appropriate laser
treatment parameters. With the introduction of VSP
technology that provides square-shaped laser pulses
without heating surrounding tissue structures, Er:YAG
laser treatments are far more predictable, which leads
to superior treatment outcomes, with less discomfort
and fewer side effects.
To further improve the safety of treatments it is
recommended to use specially-developed top-hat
Er:YAG handpieces that avoid peak fluences at the
center of the laser spot, as is the case in less advanced
Gaussian profile handpieces. Because of their much
more homogeneous beam profile, top-hat handpieces
are much safer and effective.
VSP Er:YAG lasers offer four treatment
modalities, depending on fluence and pulsewidth
settings.
In COLD ablation regimes, high fluences and short
pulsewidths ensure that the speed of ablation is faster
than heat diffusion into the skin. This regime is ideally
suited for the removal of benign skin lesions, medium
depth peels and VSP mini peels. Its unique advantage
is the absence of thermal damage to the remaining
REFERENCES
1. T.C. Spoor , R.L. Moy, Facial Rejuvenation, Martin Dunitz
Ltd. 2001, pp. 105-148.
2. K. Kunzi-Rapp, C.D. Dierickx, B. Cambier, M. Drosner,
Minimally invasive skin rejuvenation with erbium: YAG laser
used in thermal mode, Lasers in Surg. and Med. 38, pp 899907, 2006.
3. Variable Square Pulse (VSP) is a Fotona d.d. (www.fotona.eu)
proprietary technology for the generation and control of laser
pulses.
4. SMOOTH is a super long Er:YAG pulse sequence available in
VSP Er:YAG lasers developed by Fotona d.d..
5. Energy Feedback Control (EFC) is a Fotona d.d.
(www.fotona.eu) VSP based technology for the measurement
and control of individual laser pulses.
6. B. Majaron, D. Sustersic, M. Lukac, U. Skaleric, N. Funduk,
Heat Diffusion and Debris Screening in Er:YAG Laser
Ablation of Hard Biological Tissues. Appl. Phys. B 66,1-9
(1998).
7. B. Drnovsek Olup, B. Vedlin, Use of Er:YAG laser for benign
skin disorders, Lasers in Surg. and Med. 21, pp 13-19, 1997.
8. E.V. Ross, J.R. McKinlay, R.R. Anderson, Why does carbon
dioxide resurfacing work?, A review. Arch.Dermatol. 135, pp.
444-454, 1999.
9. B. Majaron, S.M. Srinivas, H.L. Huang, J.S. Nelson, Deep
coagulation of dermal collagen with repetitive Er:YAG laser
irradiation, Lasers in Surg. and Med. 26, pp 215-222, 2000.
10. N.S. Sadick, Update on non-ablative light therapy for
rejuvenation: A review. Lasers in Surg. and Med. 32, pp 120128, 2003.
11. E.F. Williams, R. Dahiya, Review of nonablative laser
resurfacing modalities, Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 12, pp.
305-310, 2004.
12. H. Grema, B. Greve, C. Raulin, Facial rhytides-subsurfacing or
resurfacing?, A review. Lasers in Surg. and Med. 32, pp 405412, 2003.
13. B. Drnovsek, M. Beltram, J. Piem, Repetitive Er:YAG laser
irradiation of human skin: a histological investigation, Lasers in
Surg. and Med. 35, pp 146-151, 2004.
14. K. Kunzi-Rapp, C.D. Dierickx, B. Cambier, M. Drosner,
Minimally invasive skin rejuvenation with erbium: YAG laser
used in thermal mode, Lasers in Surg. and Med. 38, pp 899907, 2006.
15. B. Drnovsek, M. Beltram, Histological comparison between
different modes of Er:YAG laser skin resurfacing-ablative, dual
mode and smooth mode resurfacing, Lasers in Surg. and Med..
16. B. Drnovsek, M. Beltram, M.Pizem, Novel method for
evaluation of epidermal preservation and dermal collagen
remodelling following photorejuvenation of human skin,
Lasers in Surg. and Med. 32, pp 115-119, 2003.
17. M. Beltram, B. Drnovsek, New collagen synthesis in skin
fibroblasts after Er:YAG laser skin resurfacing, Lasers in Surg.
and Med..
18. G. Luppino, L. Petrelli, A. Miolo, D. Mastropasqua, A. Di
Pietro, Use of a new Erbium laser (VSP Er:YAG)
methodology in SMOOTH mode for skin resurfacing;
preliminary clinical and histological results. Clinical Report,
May2005.
19. S. Kilmer, N. Semchyshyn, G. Shah, R. Fitzpatrick, A pilot
study on the use of a plasma skin regeneration device (Portrait
PSR3) in full facial rejuvenation procedures.
20. From Application Guidelines by T. Sult, M.D. and R. Sult
R.N., Aesthetic Lasers, Wilmar, MN 56201, USA.
21. C. B. Zachary, Er:YAG laser resurfacing, Laser and lights,
Vol.2, ed. D.J. Goldberg, Elsevier Saunders 2005, pp. 26-28.
22. B. Majaron, W. Verkruysse, K.M. Kelly, J.S.Nelson, Er:YAG
laser skin resurfacing using repetitive long-pulsed exposure and
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
DISCLAIMER
The intent of this Laser and Health Academy publication is to
facilitate an exchange of information on the views, research results,
and clinical experiences within the medical laser community. The
contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the
authors and may not in any circumstances be regarded as an
official product
information by the
medical
equipment manufacturers. When in doubt please check with the
manufacturers whether a specific product or application has been
approved or cleared to be marketed and sold in your country.