Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sison Vs Caoibes
Sison Vs Caoibes
Sison Vs Caoibes
the fact that during the hearing of September 29, 1999, the
complainant was assisted by Atty. Eduardo P. Flores of the
MMDA, as evidenced by the transcript of stenographic
notes [9] taken during the proceedings. The respondent
prayed that the instant complaint be dismissed for lack of
legal or factual basis.
driver; and that his errand was to secure some papers from
the Regional Trial Court in Pasig City involved in a personal
case which the respondent Judge had filed against a bank
for specific performance and damages, and since I just
suffered a mild stroke at that time, specifically on June 10,
1999, and the incident took place (sic) September, I could
not at that time personally go to Pasig to secure the
documents I needed for the next hearing of the case so I
had to send my son.
[1]
[2]
Id. at 35.
[3]
Entitled People of the Philippines v. Traffic Enforcer Salvador Sison, for contempt of
court.
[4]
Id. at 35-36.
[5]
Id. at 37.
[6]
Id. at 24.
[7]
[8]
[9]
Id. at 26.
[10]
Id.at 34.
[11]
Id. at 50.
[12]
Id. at 52-54.
[13]
Id. at 58.
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
Id. at 253.
[22]
[23]
Id. at 11-12.
[24]
[25]
[26]
[27]
[28]
[29]
[30]
[31]
[32]
[33]
Unitrust Development Bank v. Judge Jose F. Caoibes Jr., et al., A.M. No. RTJ-031745, August 20, 2003.