A b c d e___

f g h__

i j k l m n o p r s__ t u v

Allen Richard. 1995. Projecting Illusion: Film Spectatorship and the Impression of Reality. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Altman Rick. 1999. Film/Genre. London: BFI. genurile
Anderson Barbara. 1980. Eye Movement and Cinematic Perception. Journal of the University Film
Association 32. nos. 1 and 2 (1980): 2326.. cog
Anderson Joseph D.. 1993 fall. A Cognitive Approach to continuity. Post-Script. Essays in Film and the
Humanities vol.13 (1) p.61-66. eco
Anderson Joseph. 1996. The Reality of Illusion: Ecologigal Approach to Cognitive Film Theory. Carbondale:
Southern Illinois University Press. eco
Anderson. J. D.. & Anderson. B. F.. 1996. The case for ecological metatheory. In D. Bordwell & N. Carroll
(Eds.). Post theory: Reconstructing film studies (pp. 347367). Madison. WI : University of
Wisconsin Press. eco
Anderson Joseph D. & Barbara Fisher Anderson (eds.). 2005. Moving Image Theory: Ecological
Considerations. Carbondale. IL: Southern Illinois University Press. eco
Anderson Joseph D.. 2013. Toward ecology of the arts. in Shimamura Arthur P. (ed.). 2013b.
Psychocinematics: Exploring Cognition at the Movies. London and New York: Routledge. pp.7693. eco
Andre Emmanuelle. 2007. Estetique du motif. Cinma. musique. peinture. Presses Universitaires de Vincennes.
Andrew Dudley. 1976. The Major Film Theories : Introduction. New York : Oxford University Press.
Andrew Dudley. 1977. The Gravity of Sunrise . Quarterly Review of film studies. vol. 2. no. 3.
Andrew Dudley. 1984. Concepts in Film Theory. Oxford University Press. th classic
Andrew Dudley. 2010. What Cinema is? Bazins Quest and its Charge. Wiley-Blackwell.
Arnheim Rudolf. 1973. Vers une psychologie de lart. Paris: Seghers. th
Arnheim Rudolf. 1974. Art and visual perception. Los Angeles. th
Arnheim Rudolf. 1976. La Pense visuelle (1969). Flammarion. th
Arnheim Rudolf. 1982. The Power of the Center. University of California Press. th
Arnheim Rudolf. 1983. Film as Art London:Faber & Faber. (1957. original german 1932) Berkeley and Los
Angles: University of Californa Press /. th clasic
Aumont Jacques. 1987 [1979]. Montage Eisenstein. Bloomington. IN:Indiana University Press.
Aumont Jacques. 1980. L'espace et la matire . in Thorie du film. Paris. A.J:.atros. th an
Aumont J. Bergala A. Marie M. Vernet M.. 1983. LEsthtique du film. Paris : Nathan. th
Aumont Jacques. 1984. Vertov et la vue. in Cinmas et ralits. CIEREC Tra1Q....X XLI. Universit de Sainttienne. th peint
Aumont Jacques. 1984 b. Notes sur un fragment de La Chinoise. de Godard. Smiologiques. Linguistique et
smiologie. n0 6. Presses Universitaires de Lyon. th peint
Aumont Jacques. 1986. Godard Peintre . in Revue belge du cinma Jean-Luc Godard. Les films. no.16
Aumont J. Marie M.. 1988. L Analyse des films. Paris : Nathan. th. an. tx
Aumont Jacques. 1992. Du visage au cinema. Paris : Editions de lEtoile. th
Aumont Jacques. 1994. Introduction a la couleur : des discours aux images. Paris : Armand Colin. th
Aumont Jacques (ed.). 1995. La couleur en cinema. Mazzotta : Cinematheque francaise. th
Aumont Jacques. 1997 [1990]. The Image. London : British Film Institute.
Aumont J. Bergala A. Marie M. Vernet M. (3e ed.). 2008. LEsthtique du film. Paris : Armand Colin. th.
Aumont J. Marie M. (2e ed.). 2008 b. L Analyse des films. Paris : Armand Colin : coll. cinma. th. an. tx
Aumont Jacques (2e ed.). 2010. Le cinma et la mise en scne. Paris : Armand Colin coll. cinma. th an
B
Baird Robert. 2000. The Startle Effect: Implications for Spectator Cognition and Media Theory. Film
Quarterly 53. no. 3 (2000): 1224
Balazs Bela. 1970. (1945). Theory of the Film: Character and Growth of a New Art. trad. Edith Bone. New
York: Dover. th
Barratt Daniel. 2014. The Geography of Film Viewing. What are the Implications of Cultural-Cognitive
Differences for Cognitive Film Theory?. in Nannicelli Ted & Paul Taberham (eds.). 2014.
Cognitive Media Theory. Routledge. pp. 62-82
Baudry Jean-Louis. 1978. LEffet cinma. Paris : Albatros. psy
Bazin Andre. 1958. Quest-ce que le cinema ?. vol.I-IV. Paris : Editions du cerf. (Ce este cinematograful ?.
Bucureti. Editura Meridiane 1968). th clas
Bazin Andre. 1967 vol.1 1972 vol.2. What is Cinema ?. Berkeley: University of California Press. classic

E:\vis-cog\Biblio\FILM.DOC

Bellour Raymond. 1975. The Unattainable Text. Screen 16 no.3 (autumn 1975): 19-28.
Bellour Raymond. 1980. Le Cinma amricain. Analyses de film 2vol.. Paris : Flammarion. an
Bellour Raymond. 1980. LAnalyse du film. Paris: Albatros. th. BN 8-v-78166 (18). (The Analysis of Film.
Bloomington. IN: Indiana University Press. 2002) 1 . poststr
Bellour Raymond. 1988. Analyse du film. (2002. The Analysis of Film (edited by Constance Penley).
Bloomington. IN : Indiana University Press. an
Bellour Raymond. 1989. Le malheur dnoncer in Le Mal au cinma : textes indits. Dunkerque : Studio 43.
th
Bellour Raymond. 1990. LEntre-images : photo; cinma; video. La Diffrence. BN 8-v-101488
Bellour Raymond. 1990. Cinma et peinture. PUF. th BN 16-v-18807
Bellour Raymond. 1995. Le blocage symbolique. Lanalyse du film.
Bellour Raymond. 2009. Le Corps du cinema. Hypnoses emotions animalites. Paris: P.O.L.. coll. Trafic.
emo
Bellour Raymond. 2010. Deleuze: The Thinking of the Brain. Cinema: Journal of Philosophy and the Moving
Image 1 (2010): 8194. http://cjpmi.ifl.pt/1-deleuze/
Ben-Shaul Nitzan. 2007. Film. The Key Concepts. Berg: Oxford-N.Y.
Ben-Shaul Nitzan. 2008. Hyper-Narrative Interactive Cinema. Problems and Solutions. Amsterdam-N.Y. :
Rodopi
Bergala Alain. Initiation a la smiologie du rcit en images. les Cahiers de lAudiovisuel.
Berliner Todd. 2013. Hollywood Storytelling and Aesthetic Pleasure. in Shimamura Arthur P. (ed.). 2013b.
Psychocinematics: Exploring Cognition at the Movies. London and New York: Routledge. pp.195213. cog
Bettetini G.. 1979. Tempo del senso. La logica temporale dei testi audiovisivi. Milano : Bompiani. n
Bettetini G.. 1984. La conversazione audiovisiva. Problemi dellenunciazione filmica e televisiva. Bompiani.n
Bettetini G.. 1991. La simulatione visiva. Milano : Bompiani. n
Beylot Pierre. 2005. Le Recit audiovisuel. Paris:Armand Colin Cinema. nar
Blanco D.. 1987. Figures discursives de lnonciation cinmatographique. Actes smiotiques Documents IX 90.
n
Blankenship Janell & Tobias Nagl (eds.). 2015. European Visions. Small Cinemas in Transition. Bielefeld :
Transcript Verlag.
Block Bruce. 2001. The Visual Story: Seeing the Structure of Film. TV. and New Media. Woburn. MA: Focal
Press. manual
Bondanella Peter. 2002. The Films of Federico Fellini. Cambridge University Press. fell
Bonitzer Pascal. 1977. La notion de plan et le sujet au cinma. Cahiers du Clinma 273 / 275. th
Bonitzer Pascal. 1982 a. Le Champ aveugle. Paris Cahiers de cinema / Gallimard. psy
Bonitzer Pascal. 1992 b. Hitchcockian Suspense. in Zizek Slavoj (ed). 1992 Everything you always wanted to
know about Lacan (But were Afraid to ask Hitchcock. New York: Verso. p.15-31. original in
Cahiers du cinema no.8. hors-serie.
Bonitzer Pascal. 2000 (1978). Deframings. Cahiers du cinema. vol 4. 1973-1978. History. Ideology. Cultural
Struggle. ed. David Wilson. Noew York : Routledge.
Bordwell David. 1981. The Films of Carl-Theodor Dreyer. University of California Press. Berkeley. th
Bordwell, David. (1985 a). Narration in the Fiction Film. Winsconsin: University of Winsconsin Press. (fisa a5)
Bordwell David & Staiger Janet & Thompson Kristin. 1985 b. The Classical Hollywood Cinema. Film Style and
Mode of Production to 1960. London : Routledge end Kegan Paul. form
Bordwell David & Thompson Kristin. 1986 (second edition) 1979. Film Art: Introduction. Massachussets:
Addison-Wesley. th cog
Bordwell David. 1988. Ozu and the Poetics of Cinema. Princeton. NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bordwell. David. 1989. Making Meaning: Inference and Rhetoric in the Interpretation of Cinema. Cambridge:
Harvard University Press.
Bordwell David. 1989b. A Case for Cognitivism. in Iris 9 (Spring 1989). pp.11-40. cog
Bordwell David. 1990. A Case for Cognitivism: Further Reflections. in Iris 11 (Summer 1990). p.107-112. cog
Bordwell David. 1993. The Cinema of Eisenstein. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.
Bordwell. David & Carroll Noel (eds.). 1996. Post-Theory: Reconstructing Film Studies. Madison: University of
Wisconsin Press. th
1

See "System of a Fragment" (on THE BIRDS) and "Symbolic Blockage" (on NORTH BY NORTHWEST) in Raymond Bellour: The
Analysis '!fFilm (edited by Constance Penley) . Bloomington. IN : Indiana University Press 2002 : 28--68 . 77- 1 9 2 ; Stephen Heath:
"Film and System" (two parts). In: Screen . Vol. 1 6 . No. 1 : 7-77 and Vol. 1 6 . No. 2 : 9 1 - 1 1 3 ; editors of Cahiers du Cinema:
"John Ford's YOUNG MR. LINCOLN". In: Screen . Vol. 1 3 . No. 5 . autumn 1 972 [orig. French 1 970] . Reprinted in Bill Nichols (ed . ) :
Movies and Methods. Vol. 1 . Berkeley. CA: University of California Press 1 976: 493-5 2 9 .

E:\vis-cog\Biblio\FILM.DOC

Bordwell David & Thompson Kristin. 2003. A Film History. Introduction (2 ed.). New York: McGraw Hill. hist
cog
Bordwell David. 2005. Figures Traced in Light. On cinematic staging. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bordwel David. 2006. The Way Hollywood Tells It. Story and Style in Modern Movies. University of California
Press. nu
Bordwell David. 2007. Poetics of Cinema. Routledge. an
Bordwell David & Thompson Kristin. 2008 (eighth edition) 1979. Film Art: Introduction. New York: McGraw
Hill. th nu
Bordwell David. 2011. blog. http://www.davidbordwell.net/
Bordwell David. 2013. The viewers Share: Models of Mind in Explaining Film. in Shimamura Arthur P. (ed.).
2013b. Psychocinematics: Exploring Cognition at the Movies. London and New York: Routledge.
pp.29-52. cog
Borgoyne Robert. 1986. The Interaction of Text and Semantic Deep Structure in the Production of Filmic
Characters. Iris. Cinema et Narration. volume 1
Bouvier Michel et Leutrat Jean-Louis. 1981. Nosferatu. Paris. Gallimard. Cahiers du Cinma. th an
Boyd. B.. Carroll. J.. & Gottschall. J. (Eds.). (2010) Evolution. Literature. and Film: A Reader. New York. NY
and Chichester. West Sussex: Columbia University Press. eco
Branigan Edward. 1984. Point of View in the Cinema. A theory of Narration and Subjectivity in Classical Film.
The Hague: Mouton Publishers. BN 8-z-41813 (66)
Branigan Edward. 1986. Diegesis and Authorship in Film. Iris. 7. cog
Branigan Edward. 1991. AFI Film Reader..
Branigan, Edward. (1992). Narrative Comprehension and Film. London: Routledge. BU CAEN01 188205
Branigan Edward. 1992. Wide Angle : A Film..cog
Branigan Edward. 1993. On the Analysis of Interpretive Language. Part I. in Film Criticism. XVII. 2-3. th
Branigan Edward. 2006. Projecting a Camera. London: Routledge. aarg org th cog
Braudy Leo. 1976. The World in a Frame: What We See in Films. Garden City. NY : Anchor Pres / Doubleday.
Braudy Leo & Marshall Cohen. 2004. Film Theory and Criticism: Introductory Readings (sixth ed). New York:
Oxford University Press.
Bresson F.. 1983. Comptence iconique et comptence linguistique. Communications 33 - Seuil. th ling
Brown William. 2009. Man without a Movie Camera - Movies Without Men. Towards a Posthumanist Cinema?.
in Buckland Warren. 2009. Film Theory and Contemporary Hollywood Movies. Routledge
Francis & Taylor. nu
Browne, Nick. 1975. The Spectator-in-the-Text: The Rhetoric of "Stagecoach". Film Quarterly, Vol. 29, No. 2
(Winter, 1975-1976), pp. 26-38.
Browne Nick. 1975. Rhetorique du texte spectaculaire. in Communications no. 23. Paris : Seuil. na
Browne Nick. 1982. The Rhetoric of Filmic Narration. Michigan: UMI Research Press. na
Brunick Kaitlin L.2013. James E. Cutting & Jordan E. DeLong. 2013. Low-level Features of Film: What Yhey
are and Why We would be Lost Without Them. in Shimamura Arthur P. (ed.). 2013b.
Psychocinematics: Exploring Cognition at the Movies. London and New York: Routledge. pp.133148. vis
Brunick Kaitlin L. & James E. Cutting. 2014. Coloring the Animated World. Exploring Human Color Perception
and Preference through the Animated Film. in Nannicelli Ted & Paul Taberham (eds.). 2014.
Cognitive Media Theory. Routledge. pp. 124-138. cog
Buckland Warren (eds.). 1995. The Film Spectator: From Sign to Mind. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University
Press. th film cog
Buckland Warren. 2000. The Cognitive Semiotics of Film. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. cog
Buckland Warren & Elsaesser Thomas. 2002. Studying Contemporary American Film. A Guide to Movie
Analysis. Oxford University Press
Buckland Warren. 2009. Film Theory and Contemporary Hollywood Movies. Routledge Francis & Taylor.
Buckland Warren. 2009b. Puzzle Films: Complex Storytelling in Contemporary Cinema. Malden. MA. Oxford:
Blackwell.
Burch Noel. 1982. Narrative / Diegesis : Thresholds Limits. Screen 23 n.2 july - august.
Burch Nol. 1969 - 1987. Une praxis du cinma. . an
Burch. Noel. 1981. (1969). Theory of Film Practice. Princeton: Princeton University Press. vis
Burch Noel. 2013. The Battle of the Sexes in French Cinema. 1930-1956. Duke University Press Books
Burton Charlie 2. Directed by Brainwave. Wired.co.uk. (accessed November 19. 2011)
http://www.wired.co.uk/magazine/archive/2011/10/%20play/directed-by-brainwave
2

MyndPlay relaia joc computer.

E:\vis-cog\Biblio\FILM.DOC

Butte, George. 2008. Suture and the Narration of Subjectivity in Film. Poetics Today 29:2 (Summer 2008)
C
Carroll John M.. 1980. Toward a Structural Psychology of Cinema. The Hague: Mouton.
Carroll Noel. 1988. Mystifying Movies: Fads and Fallacies in Contemporary Film Theory. New York: Columbia
Universtiy Press
Carroll Noel. 1990. The Philosophy of Horror. or Paradoxes of the Heart. New York. London: Routledge.
Carroll, Nol. (1996). Theorizing the Moving Image. Cambridge University Press.
Carroll Noel. 2003. Engaging the Moving Image. Yale University Press.
Carroll Nol (with Jinhee Choi) (eds.). 2006. Philosophy of Film and Motion Pictures. Malden. Blackwell
Publishing.
Carroll Nol. 2006 b. Fiction. Non-Fiction. and the Film of Presumptive Assertion: A Conceptual
Analysis.(in Film Theory and Philosophy. eds. Richard Allen and Murray Smith (New York:
Oxford University Press. 1997): 173202.Reprinted by permission of Oxford University Press
(with Jinhee Choi) (eds.). 2006. Philosophy of Film and Motion Pictures. Malden. Blackwell
Publishing. pp. 154-171
Carroll Noel. 2006 c. Defining the Moving Image. in Philosophy of Film and Motion Pictures. Malden.
Blackwell Publishing
Carroll Noel. 2008. The Philosophy of Motion Pictures. Blackwell Publishing.
Carroll Noel. 2010. Art in Three Dimensions. Oxford UP.
Carroll, Noel and William P. Seeley. (2013). Cognitivism. Psychology. and Neuroscience: Movies as attentional
engines. In Arthur P. Shimamura (ed.). (2013b). Psychocinematics: Exploring Cognition at the
Movies. London and New York: Routledge. 53-75. cog
Carroll Noel & William Seeley. 2014. Cognitive Theory and the Individual Film. The Case of Rear Window. in
Nannicelli Ted & Paul Taberham (eds.). 2014. Cognitive Media Theory. Routledge. pp.235-252.
cog
Casetti Francesco.1990. Dun regard lautre. Le film et son spectateur. Lyon : Presses Universitaires de Lyon. n
Casetti Francesco. 1991. Como analizar un film. . an
Casetti Francesco. 1997 [1993]. Theories of Cinema 1945-1995. Austin. Tx: University of Texas Press [Milano.
Bompiani].
Casetti Francesco. 2007. Theory. Post-Theory. Neo-Theories: Changes in Discourses. Changes in Objects. in
Cinmas : revue d'tudes cinmatographiques / Cinmas: Journal of Film Studies. vol. 17. n 2-3.
2007. p. 33-45.
Casetti Francesco. 2008. Eye of the Century: Film. Experience. Modernity. NY: Columbia University Press
Cavell Stanley. 1971. The World Viewed. in Carroll Nol (with Jinhee Choi) (eds.). 2006. Philosophy of Film
and Motion Pictures. Malden. Blackwell Publishing. pp.67-78 (extrase din The World Viewed:
Reflections on the Ontology of Film. New York: Viking Press. 1971: 1641.
Cavell Stanley. 1981. Pursuits of Happiness: The Hollywood Comedy of Remarriage. Cambridge. MA: Harvard
University Press. comedia
Chateau Dominique. 1983. Film et ralit : pour rajeunir un vieux problme . Iris vol.1 no.1 : 51-6. n
Chateau Dominique. 1983. Digse et nonciation . Communications 38 - Seuil. n
Chteau Dominique. 1987. Le cinma comme langage. Bruxelles : AISS Publication de la Sorbonne.
Chteau Dominique. 1976. Projet pour une smiologie des relations audio-visuelles dans le film . Musique
enjeu. Paris. Le Seuil. no. 23. avril 1976.
Chteau Dominique. 1997. Le bouclier dAchille : Theorie de liconicite. Paris> LHarmattan.
Chatman. S.. 1978. Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film. Ithaca. NY: Cornell
University Press. nar
Chion Michel. 1982. La voix au cinma. Paris : Cahiers du cinma. Editions de lEtoile. th. (The Voice in
Cinema. Trans. Claudia Gorbman. New York: Columbia UP. 1999)
Chion Michel. 1985. Le Son au Cinma. Paris. d. de l'toile. th
Chion Michel. 1985 b. Ecrire un scnario. Paris : INA.Cahiers du cinma. th. an. sc
Chion Michel . 1991. LAudiovision. Paris. th. (Chion. Michel. Audio-Vision: Sound on Screen. Trans. Claudia
Gorbman. New York: Columbia UP. 1994. 1990)
Chion Michel (ed. Zizek Slavoj). 1992. The Impossible Embodiment. Everything you always wanted to know
about Lacan (But were Afraid to ask Hichcock. (ed.) Slavoj Zizek. New York: Verso. 195 sq.
Choi, Jinhee. 2005.Leaving It Up to the Imagination: POV Shots and Imagining from the Inside. The Journal
of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 63 (1): 1725.
Cinema and Cognitive Psychology. Iris 9 spring. cog

E:\vis-cog\Biblio\FILM.DOC

Clayton Alex & Andrew Klevan (eds.). 2011. The Language and Style of Film Criticism. London- N.Y..:
Routledge 3 crit
Clayton Alex. 2011. Coming to Terms. in The Language and Style of Film Criticism. London- N.Y..: Routledge.
crit
Colin Michel. 1985. Langue. film. discours. Prolegomenes a une semiologie generative du film. Paris:
Klincksieck. sem. th. cog
Colin Michel. 1987. La smiologie du cinma comme science cognitive . Iconics. The Japan Society of Image
Arts and Sciences. Tokyo p.41-63. cog
Colin Michel. 1986. Interprtation smantique et reprsentation spatiales dans la bande image . DRLAV.
Revue de linguistique 34-35 p.359-76. cog
Colin Michel. 1987. Les retransmissions sportives la tlvision : pour une approche cognitive .
Communication information 9 n.1. Universit Laval p.13-32. cog
Colin Michel. 1987. Comprendre lvnement sportif la tlvision : lexemple de la course cycliste . MANA
7. Mannheim p.97-123. cog
Colin Michel. 1987. Pour une conception topologique du point de vue . in La Subjectivit au cinma .
Actes smiotiques. Bulletin anne X 41 p.57-64. cog
Colin Michel. 1987. La Grande syntagmatique revisite . EHESS. Sminaire de Ch.Metz. Thorie du Film mimo - Paris III. cog
Colin Michel. 1995. La Grande syntagmatique revisite. The Film Spectator: From Sign to Mind. ed. Warren
Buckland. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. pp.45-86. cog
Colin Michel. 1992. Cinma; tlvision; cognition..cog BN 8-V-106402
Colman Felicity (ed.). 2009. Film. Theory and Philosophy. The Key Thinkers. McGill-Queens University Press.
th
Colman Felicity. 2011. Deleuze & Cinema: The Film Concepts.. Oxford: Berg.
Copland Aaron. 1949. "Tip to Moviegoers : Take off those Ear-Muffs . " in The New York Times. Nov. 6 . 1949 .
section six . p . 28 . This article is discussed at length in Roy M . Prendergast's Film Music: A
Neglected Art (New York : Norton . 1977) . Chap . 6.
Corballis Paul M.. 2007. Constructing and Interpreting the World in the Cerebral Hemispheres. Hochberg Julian
(Mary A.Peterson. Barbara Gillam. H.A. Sedgwick. eds.). 2007. In the Minds Eye. Julian
Hochberg On the Perception of Pictures. Films. and the World. Oxford University Press. vis
Crafton Donald. 1982. Before Mickey: The Animated Film 1898-1928. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Cubitt Sean. 2004. The Cinema Effect. Cambridge. Massachussets. MIT
Cubitt Sean. 2009. The Supernatural in Neo-baroque Hollywood. in Buckland Warren. 2009. Film Theory and
Contemporary Hollywood Movies. Routledge Francis & Taylor. nu
Currie Gregory. 1995. Image and Mind: Film. Philosophy. and Cognitive Science. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press. philo
Currie Gregory. 2004. Cognitivism. in Stam Robert & Miller Toby. 2004. A Companion to Film Theory.
Blackwell Publishing.
Currie Gregory. Art and the Anthropologists. in Shimamura Arthurs P. & Stephen E. Palmer (eds.). 2012.
Aesthetic Science: Connencting Minds. Brains. and Experience. Oxford UP. pp.107-128. cog
Currie Gregory. Matthew Kieran. Aaron Meskin (eds.). 2015. Aesthetics and the Sciences of Mind. Oxford:
Oxford University Press. forthcoming
Cutting, J.E., J.E. DeLong, and C.E. Nothelfer. 2010. Attention and the Evolution of Hollywood Film.
Psychological Science 21(3): 432439.
Cutting James E. & Ayse Candan. 2013. Movies. Evolution. and Mind: From Fragmentation to Continuity. The
Evolutionary Review 4. no. 3 (2013): 2535.
D
Danto Arthur C.. 1979. Moving Pictures. Quarterly Review of Film Studies 4 (1) p.17. th (in Noel Carroll.
2006. Philosophy of Film and Motion Pictures. Malden. Blackwell Publishing. pp.100 sq)
Danto Arthur C.. 1989. La Transfiguration du banal. Seuil. th
Dayan Daniel. 1974. The Tutor-Code of Classical Cinema. in Movies and Methods.
Dayan Daniel. 1983. Western graffiti. Jeux de langage et programmation du spectateur dans la chevauche
fantastique de John Ford. Paris : Clancier-Geunaud. (fisa a5)
Dayan Daniel & Katz Elihu. 1985. Electronic Ceremonies: Television Performs a Royal Wedding. in Signs. ed.
Marshall Blonsky. Baltimore: The John University Press. an

Analiza stilului criticii de cinema. Critica stilului critic al lui Bordwell & Thompson.

E:\vis-cog\Biblio\FILM.DOC

Deaca Mircea. 2013. Anatomia cognitiv a filmului. Introducere n abordarea semio-cognitiv a discursului
audiovizual. Bucuresti: Editura Universitii din Bucureti
Deaca Mircea. 2013. Postfilmic Cinema. Notes and Readings about Contemporary Film (Cinematograful
postfilmic. Note i lecturi despre filmul contemporan). Timisoara: Editura Brumar. 318 p.. 200 ill.
Deaca Mircea. 2011. Second Camera. Articles and Film Studies (Camera secunda. Articole i studii de film).
Timisoara: Editura Brumar. 300 p.. 400 ill
Deaca Mircea. 2009. Le Carnaval et le Film de Fellini. Bucuresti: Editura Libra. (french). 500 p.. 1.300 ill.
Deco. G. & Roland. P.. 2010. The role of multi-area interactions for the computation of apparent motion.
NeuroImage. 51. 10181026.
Deleuze Gilles. 1986. Cinema 1: The Movement-Image. London: The Athlone Press (1983).
Deleuze Gilles. 1989. Cinema 2: The Time-Image. London: Athlone (1985).
Deleuze Gilles & Flix Guattari. 1985. Kafka: Towards a Minor Literature. Minneapolis University of
Minnesota Press [1975].
Des Marais Christina. 2011 4. Video Game Uses Brain to Control Action. TechHive.
http://www.pcworld.com/article/241993/video_game_uses_brain_to_control_action.html
Devereaux Mary. 2006. Beauty and Evil: The Case of Leni Riefenstahls Triumph of the Will.. Carroll Nol
(with Jinhee Choi) (eds.). Philosophy of Film and Motion Pictures. Malden. Blackwell Publishing
(Aesthetics and Ethics: Essays at the Intersection. ed. Jerrold Levinson. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press. 1998: 22756). pp.347-361
Dmytryk Edward. 1986. On Filmmaking. London: Focal Press. 2733. manual
Doane Mary Ann. 1982. Film and the Masquerade: Theorizing the Female Spectator. in Screen. 23 (1982). p.
81.
Doane M.A.. 1987. The Desire to Desire: The Womans Film of the 1940s. Bloomington. Ind.: Indiana
University Press. sem
Doane Mary Ann. 1992. Information. Crisis. Catastrophe. In Logics of Television: Essays in Cultural
Criticism. Ed. Patricia Mellancamp. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 1990. 222-39
Dolar Mladen. 2006. A Voice and Nothing More. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Dubois Philippe. 2004. La question du figural. in Pierre Taminiaux & Claude Murcia (eds.). Cinema. Art(s)
plastique(s). LHarmattan. coll. Champs visuels. Paris.
Durgnat Raymond. 1974. The Strange Case of Alfred Hitchcock. London: Faber & Faber.
Durgnat Raymond. 2002. A Long hard Look at Psycho. London: BFI Publishing.
Dyer Richard. 1986. Heavenly Bodies: Film Stars and Society. British Film Institute. post-feminism
Dyer Richard. 2002 [1992]. Only Entertainment. Routledge
E
Eder, Jens. 2006. Ways of Being Close to Characters. Film Studies: An International Review (8): 6880. Eder,
Jens. 2008.
Eder Jens and Fotis Jannidis, Ralf Schneider (eds.). 2010. Characters in Fictional Worlds. Understanding
Imaginary Beings in Literature, Film, and Other Media. Berlin/New York: Walter De Gruyter.
Eisenstein Sergei M.. 1943. The Film Sense. trans. and ed. Jay Leyda. London: Faber and Faber. manual
Eitzen Dirk. 1993 fall. Attending to the Fiction. Post-Script. Essays in Film and the Humanities vol.13 (1)
p.46-60. Cog
Eitzen, Dirk. 1995. When Is a Documentary?: Documentary as a Mode of Reception. Cinema Journal, Vol. 35,
No. 1 (Autumn, 1995), pp. 81-102.
Eitzen Dirk. 2010. The Fun of Fear: Horror. Suspense. and Halloweeen. http://scsmionline.org/forum/the-fun-offear-horror-suspense-and-halloween. cog
Eitzen, Dirk. 2012. The Nature of Film Comedy, or Why Is Shaun of the Dead Funny? Projections. Volume 6,
Issue 2, Winter 2012: 117
Eitzen Dirk. 2014. Effects of Entertaining Violence. A Critical Overview of the General Aggression Model. in
Nannicelli Ted & Paul Taberham (eds.). 2014. Cognitive Media Theory. Routledge. cog
Elsaesser Thomas & Buckland Warren. 2002. Studying Contemporary American Film. A Guide to Movie
Analysis. Oxford University Press.
Elsaesser, Thomas. (2005). European Cinema Face to Face with Hollywood. Amsterdam University Press.
Elsaesser Thomas & Malte Hagener. 2009a. Film Theory. Introduction through the Senses. Routledge.
Elsaesser Thomas. 2009b. Tales of Epiphany and Entropy. Paranarrative worlds of You Tube. in Buckland
Warren. 2009. Film Theory and Contemporary Hollywood Movies. Routledge Francis & Taylor.
pp. 150-170.
4

Hocus Pocus relaia computer creier n jocurile video.

E:\vis-cog\Biblio\FILM.DOC

F
Fabe Marilyn. 2004. Closely Watched Films. Introduction to the Art of of Narrative Film Technique. Berkeley
and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Fayol Michel. 1985. Le rcit et sa construction. Une approche de psychologie cognitive. Dlachaux & Niestl.
Fayol Michel. 1992. Psychologie cognitive et apprentissage. Chaumont : CDDP de la H.Marne.
Feagin, Susan. 1999. Time and Timing, in Passionate Views, ed. Carl Plantinga and Greg M. Smith. Johns
Hopkins University (1999). pp. 168179.
Ferenz Volker. 2009. Mementos of contemporary american cinema. Identifying and responding to the
unreliable narrator in the movie theater. in Buckland Warren. 2009. Film Theory and
Contemporary Hollywood Movies. Routledge Francis & Taylor. pp.257-286.
Fontanille Jacques. 1990. Espaces subjectifs. . BN 8-x-32940
Forceville Charles J. & Urios-Aparisi Eduardo (eds.). 2009. Multimodal metaphor. Berlin/New York:Mouton de
Gruyter
Frampton Daniel. 2006. Filmosophy: A Manifesto for a Radically New Way of Understanding Cinema. London:
Wallflower Press.
Friedberg Anne. 1993. Window Shopping: Cinema and the Postmodern. Berkeley. CA: University of California
Press.
Friedberg Anne. 2006. The Virtual Window: From Alberti to Microsoft. MA: MIT Press.
Frow John. 2005. Genre. London: Routledge. genurile
G
Galloway Alexander R.. 2006. Gaming: Essays on Algorithmic Culture. Minneapolis. MN. London:University
of Minnesota Press.
Gardies Andr. 1980. Approche du rcit filmique. Albatros. na
Gardies Andre. 1999. Decrire a lecran. Paris : Meridiens Klincksieck. th
Gaudreault Andr. 1986. Narrator et narrateur . in Iris. n 7. Paris.
Gaudreault Andr. 1988. Du littraire au filmique. Systme du rcit. Paris : Mridien Klincksieck. (fisa a5)
Gaudreault Andr & Jost Francois. 1990. Le rcit cinmatographique. Paris : Nathan. (puise chez diteur) (fisa
a5)
Gaudreault Andre & Jost Francois. 2004. Enunciation and Narration. in Stam Robert & Miller Toby. 2004. A
Companion to Film Theory. Blackwell Publishing.. pp.45-62
Gaudreault Andr. 2009. From Plato to Lumiere: Narration and Monstration in Literature and Cinema. (trad.)
University or Toronto Press.
Gormley Paul. 2005. The New-Brutality Film. Race and Affect in Contemporary Hollywood Cinema. Intellect
Books.
Greenaway Peter. 1991. Papers. Ed. Dis-Voir.auteur
Gregersen Andreas. 2014. Cognitive Theory and Video Games. in Nannicelli Ted & Paul Taberham (eds.).
2014. Cognitive Media Theory. Routledge. pp.253-267. video game
Gregory Curie. 1995. Image and Mind: Film. Philosophy and Cognitive Science. Cambridge University Press.
Grodal Torben Kragh. 1994. Cognition. Emotion and Visual Fiction. University of Copenhangen. Department of
Film and Media Studies. cog
Grodal, Torben. (1997). Moving Pictures: A New Theory of Film Genres. Feelings. and Cognition. Oxford:
Oxford University Press. emo
Grodal Torben. 2000. Art Film. the Transient Body. and the Permanent Soul. Aura 6. 3 (2000):33-53. emo
Grodal Torben. 2002. The Experience of Realism in Audiovisual Representation. Northern Lights Film and
Media Studies Yearbook 2002. Realism and Reality in Film and Media. ed. Anne Jerslev.
Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press. University of Copenhagen.
Grodal, Torben. (2009). Embodied Visions: Evolution. Emotion. Culture. and Film. Oxford University Press.
emo
Grodal Torben. 2014. A General Theory of Comic Entertainment. Arousal. Appraisal. and the PECMA Flow. in
Nannicelli Ted & Paul Taberham (eds.). 2014. Cognitive Media Theory. Routledge. . pp.177-195.
cog
Gronstad Asjborn. 2008. Transfigurations. Death and Masculinity in American Cinema. Amsterdam University
Press.
Gueuens Jean-Pierre. 2000. Film Production Theory. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Gunning Tom. 1990. "The Cinema of Attraction". In: Thomas Elsaesser (ed . ). Early Cinema: Space. Frame.
Narrative. London: British Film Institute 1990: 5 6-62 [orig. 1986) .

E:\vis-cog\Biblio\FILM.DOC

Gunning Tom. 1995. "An Aesthetic of Astonishment: Early Film and the (In)Credulous Spectator". In: Linda
Williams (ed.): Viewing Positions. New Brunswick. N J: Rutgers University Press. th cult
H
Harbord Janet. 2002. Film Cultures. London: Sage Publications. cult ist
Hasson Uri. Ohad Landesman. Barbara Knappmeyer. Ignacio Vallines. Nava Rubin. and David J. Heeger.
Neurocinematics: The Neuroscience of Film. Projections: The Journal of Movies and Mind 2.
no. 1 (2008): 126..
Heath Stephen. 1981. Questions of Cinema. London: Macmillan. th. tx. na. poststr
Heath Stephen. 1975 a spring. Film and System: Terms of Analysis. part.I. Screen. vol. 16. no.1. pp.48-9. na
Heath Stephen. 1975 b summer. Film and System: Terms of Analysis. part II. Screen. vol. 16. no.2. pp.91-110.
Screen. 16. 1: 7-77; 16. 2:91-113
Heath Stephen. 1976 a spring. Touch of Evil. the Long Version A Note. Screen. vol.17. no.1. pp.115-7
Heath Stephen. 1976 b. Narrative Space. Screen 17 (3) p.95-7. na
Heath Stephen. 1981. Questions of Cinema. London: Macmillan.
Heath Stephen. 1999. 'Cinema and psychoanalysis: parallel histories'. in Bergstrom (1999).
Heidbrink, Henriette. 2010. Fictional Characters in Literary and Media Studies. A Survey of the Research. In
Eder Jens and Fotis Jannidis, Ralf Schneider (eds.). 2010. Characters in Fictional Worlds.
Understanding Imaginary Beings in Literature, Film, and Other Media. Berlin/New York: Walter
De Gruyter. 67-110.
Heidbrink, Henriette. 2014. To Die Right. The Impact of Ludic Forms on the Engagement with Characters.
Projections. Volume 8, Issue 1, Summer 2014: 6182 Berghahn Journals.
Henderson, J.M. 2003. Human Gaze Control during Real-World Scene Perception. Trends in Cognitive
Sciences 7(11): 498504.
Heywood, C.A., and J. Zihl. 1999. Motion Blindness. Pp. 116 in Case Studies in the Neuropsychology of
Vision, ed. G.W. Humphreys. Hove, England: Psychology Press.
Hill J.. P. C. Gibson. R. Dyer. E. A. Kaplan and P. Willemen (eds.). 1998. The Oxford Guide to Film Studies.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hochberg Julian. 1978. The Perception of Motion Pictures. Carterette (ed.) Handbook of Perception vol.X ; N.Y.
: Academic Press. vis
Hochberg. Julian. 1986. Representation of motion and space in video and cinematic displays. In K. R. Boff . R.
Kaufman. & J. P. Th omas (Eds.). Handbook of perception and human performance: Vol. 1.
Sensory processing and perception (pp. 221 to 2264). New York. NY: Wiley. cog
Hochberg Julian & Brooks Virginia. 1996. Movies in the Minds Eye. Bordwell. David & Carroll Noel (eds.).
1996. Post-Theory: Reconstructing Film Studies. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. th
Hochberg Julian (Mary A.Peterson. Barbara Gillam. H.A. Sedgwick. eds.). 2007. In the Minds Eye. Julian
Hochberg On the Perception of Pictures. Films. and the World. Oxford University Press. Vis
Hogan, Patrick Colm. 2010. Characters and Their Plots. In Eder Jens and Fotis Jannidis, Ralf Schneider (eds.).
2010. Characters in Fictional Worlds. Understanding Imaginary Beings in Literature, Film, and
Other Media. Berlin/New York: Walter De Gruyter. 134-154.
Hogan Patrick Colm. 2014. Postcolonial Humor. Attachement. and Yausjiro Ozus Early Summer. in Nannicelli
Ted & Paul Taberham (eds.). 2014. Cognitive Media Theory. Routledge. pp.196-213. cog
Hojberg Lennard & Schepelern Peter (eds.). 2003. Film Style and Story: A Tribute to Torben Grodal.
Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press. University Of Copenhagen.
Hojberg, Lennard (2014). The Circular Camera Movement. Style, Narration, and Embodiment. Projections.
Volume 8, Issue 2, Winter 2014: 7188.
Holland, Norman N. (2007). The Neuroscience of Metafilm. Projections. Volume 1, Issue 1, Summer 2007: 5974 Berghahn Journals.
Hollingworth, A., C.C. Williams, and J.M. Henderson. 2001. To See and Remember: Visually Specifi c
Information Is Retained in Memory from Previously Attended Objects in Natural Scenes.
Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 8(4): 761768.
I
Ildirar. S.. 2008. Do film illiterates understand basic cinematographic principles? Paper presented at the 29th
International Congress of Psychology. Berlin. Germany. July 2025. Vis
Ildirar, S. and Schwan, S. 2014. First-Time Viewers Comprehension of Films: Bridging Shot Transitions.
British Journal of Psychology. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/bjop.12069 .
J

E:\vis-cog\Biblio\FILM.DOC

Jenkins Henry. 1986. The Amazing Push-Me/Pull-You : Cognitive Processing Narrational Play and the Comic
Film. in Quarterly of Theory; Criticism and Practice. na
Johnson Ben. Scientists Turn Brain Activity into Moving Images. Slate 24. no. 9 (2011).
http://slatest.slate.com/posts/2011/09/24/scientists_turn_brain_activity_into_ moving_images.html
(accessed November 19. 2011).
Johnson, M.K. 2006. Memory and Reality. American Psychologist 61(8): 760771.
Jost Francois. 1983. Narration(s): en deca et au-dela. in Communications 38. Enonciation et cinema.
Jost Franois. 1984. Le regard romanesque. Ocularisation et focalisation in Cadre. 2. Cinnarrable .
Presses Universitaires de Paris-VIII. th na
Jost Francois. 1987. Loeil-camra. Presses Universitaires de Lyon.
Jost Francois. 1992. Un monde a notre image. Paris : Meridiens Klincksieck. th
Juiller Laurent. 2002. Cinema et cognition. Paris : Harmattan.
K
Keith Grant Barry (ed.). 2003. Film Genre Reader III. Austin: University of Texas Press. genurile
Keith Grant Barry. 2007. Film Genre: From Iconography to Ideology. London: Wallflower Press. genurile
Kermabon J. (ed). . Les thories du cinma aujourdhui. Cinmaction 47.
Klevan Andrew. 2011. Description. in Clayton Alex & Andrew Klevan (eds.). 2011. The Language and Style of
Film Criticism. London- N.Y..: Routledge. pp. 70-86.
Konigsberg, I. 2007. Film Studies and the New Science. Projections 1(1): 124.
Krakauer Siegfried. 1961. The nature of film. Oxford Univ Press.
Krakauer Siegfried. 1997 [1960]. Theory of Film: The Redemption of Physical Reality. Princeton N.J.:Princeton
University Press [New York: Oxford University Press]. Th
Kuenzli Rudolf E . (ed.). 1987. Dada and Surrealist Film. New York: Willis Locker & Owens.
Kuleshov Lev. 1974. Kuleshov on Film. (eds.) Levaco Ronald. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of
California Press.
Kuntzel Thierry. 1978. "The Film Work". Enclitic. 2 . 1 . 1978 : 38--6 1 [orig. francez 1972].
Kuntzel Thierry. 1980. "The Film Work. 2". Camera Obscura. 1980: 7--68 [orig. francez 1975].
Kurby, C.A. and J.M. Zacks. 2008. Segmentation in the Perception and Memory of Events. Trends in
Cognitive Sciences 12(2): 7279.
L
Laffay Albert. 1964. Logique du cinma. Paris : Masson. th. an
Lagny Michle Ropars Marie-Claire Sorlin Pierre. 1986. Gnrique des annes 30. Presses Universitaires de
Vincennes. an
Lane. A.. 2011 (November 7). Home movies. The New Yorker. 9091
Langford Barry. 2005. Film Genre: Hollywood and Beyond. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. genurile
De Lauretis T. 1984. Alice Doesnt: Feminism. Semiotics. Cinema. Bloomington. Ind. : Indiana University Press.
Leutrat Jean-Louis. 1990. La prisonnire du dsert. Une tapisserie navajo. Paris : Adam Biro.
Leutrat Jean-Louis Liandrat-Guigues Suzanne. 1990. Les Cartes de lOuest. Paris : Armand Colin.
Levin, D.T., et al. 2002. Memory for Centrally Attended Changing Objects in an Incidental Real-World Change
Detection Paradigm. British Journal of Psychology 93(3): 289302.
Levin T. Daniel. Alicia M.Hymel & Lewis Baker. 2013. Belief. Desire. Action and Other Stuff : Theory of Mind
in Movies. in Shimamura Arthur P. (ed.). 2013b. Psychocinematics: Exploring Cognition at the
Movies. London and New York: Routledge. pp. 244-266.
Lipkin Steven N. 2002. Real Emotional Logic. Film and television docudrama as Persuasive Practice. Southern
Illinois University Press. emo documentar
Lotman Iouri. 1976. Semiotics of Cinema. trans. Mark E.Suino. Michigan Slavic Contributions 5 (Ann Arbor ;
Department of Slavic Language and Literature. University of Michigan) (1977; Paris:editions
Sociales).
Lyotard Jean-Francois. 1986. Acinema in Narrative. Apparatus. Ideology. A Film Theory Reader. ed. Rosen
Philip. New York: Columbia University Press [1973. Cinema. Theorie. Lectures. Paris: ed
Klincksiek; Revue desthetiaque. 2-3-4. 1973. pp.357-69].
M
MacBean James Roy. 1985. Vent dest or Godard and Rocha at the Crossroads. in Bill Nichols (ed.). Movies and
Methods. Berkeley: University of California Press. pp. 91110.
Magliano, J.P., and J.M. Zacks. 2011. The Impact of Continuity Editing in Narrative Film on Event
Segmentation. Cognitive Science 35(8): 14891517.

E:\vis-cog\Biblio\FILM.DOC

Manovich Lev.. 2002. The Language of New Media. Massachusetts: MIT. media animatie
Marie Michel. 1974. Muriel. un film sonore. un film musical. un film par. in Muriel. histoire d'une recherche.
Paris. Galile.
Martin Adrian. 2011. Incursions. Clayton Alex & Andrew Klevan (eds.). The Language and Style of Film
Criticism. London- N.Y..: Routledge
Masson Andre. 1994. Le Rcit au cinma. Paris: Cahiers du cinema coll. Essais. nar
Mauduy Jacques Henriet Grard. 1989. Gographie du western. Paris : Nathan. an. gn
McCabe Colin. 1985. Tracking the Signifier : Theoretical Essays : Film. Linguistics. Literature. Minneapolis.
MN: University of Minessota Press. poststr
McGurk Harry & John MacDonald. 1976. Hearing Lips and Seeing Voices. Nature 264. no. 5588 (1976):
746748.
Metz Christian. 1968. Essais sur la signification au cinma. vol.1. Paris : Klincksieck (rd. 1971 1976). s
Metz Christian. 1968. Essais sur la signification au cinma. vol.2. Paris : Klincksieck (rd. 1976). s
Metz Christian. 1971. Langage et cinma. Paris : Larousse. s
Metz Christian. 1974. Modern Cinema and Narrativity. Film Language: A Semiotics of the Cinema. New
York: Oxford University Press. se
Metz Christian. 1977. Le Signifiant imaginaire. Paris : UGE. coll 10/18. (trad. 1983. Mac Millan)
Metz Christian. 1977. Essais smiotiques. Paris : Klincksieck. s
Metz Christian. 1981. La grande syntagmatique du film narratif. in Communications. 8 Lanalyse structurale
du recit. Seuil coll. Points pp.126-130. nar
Metz Christian. 1987. Lnonciation impersonnelle ou le site du film . Vertigo 1 - Le Cinma au miroir.
pp.13-34. n
Metz Christian. 1991. LEnonciation impersonnelle ou le site du film. Paris : Mridiens Klincksieck. n
Michelle. C.. 2007. Modes of reception: A consolidated analytical framework. Communication Review. 10 . 81
222 .. recepie
Mitry Jean. 1965. Esthetique et psycholosgie du cinema. Paris : Presses Universitaires de France. th clasic
Mitry Jean. 1997. The Aestetics and Psychology of the Cinema. (trad. Cristopher King). Bloomington: Indiana
University Press
Mobbs. D. . Wieskopf. N. . Lau. H. C. . Featherstone. E. . Dolan. R. J. . & Frith. C.. 2006. The Kuleshov effect:
The infl uence of contextual framing on emotional attributions. Social. Cognitive. and Affective
Neuroscience. 1. 95106. cog
Moine Raphalle. 2008. trans. Alistair Fox and Hilary Radner. Cinema Genre. Oxford: Blackwell. genurile
Morin Edgar. 1956. Le Cinma ou lhomme imaginaire. Paris : Ed . de Minuit. (2005. The Cinema. or the
Imaginary Man. Minneapolis. MN : University of Minnesota Press). th
Mulvey Laura. 1975. Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema . Screen. vol. 16. 1::. 3 - automne 1975. th psy
Mulvey Laura. 2006. Death 24x a Second: Stillness and the Moving Image. London: Reaktion Books. fem
Munsterberg Hugo. 1970 (1916). The Film A psychological Study: The Silent Photoplay in 1916. New York:
Dover Publications. th
Murch Walter. 2001. In the Blink of Eye: A Perspective on Film Editing. 2nd ed.. Los Angeles: Silman-James
Press. 2001. p.18. manual
N
Nannicelli Ted & Paul Taberham (eds.). 2014. Cognitive Media Theory. Routledge.
Nannicelli, Ted. 2014. Arthur P. Shimamura, ed., Psychocinematics: Exploring Cognition at the Movies (New
York: Oxford University Press, 2013), Book Review. Projections. Volume 8, Issue 1, Summer
2014: 126134 Berghahn Journals
Nasta Dominique. 1991. Meaning in Film - Relevant structures in soundtrack and narrative. Peter Lang: Berne.
Nasta Dominique & Huvelle Didier (eds.). 2004. Le son en perspective : nouvelles recherches. Peter Lang:
Berne. sonor
Nasta Dominique. 2013. Contemporary Romanian Cinema. The History of Unexpected Miracle. Columbia
University Press. ist
Ndalianis Angela. 2004. Neo-Baroque Aesthetics and Contemporary Entertainment. The MIT Press:
Cambridge. Massachusetts. ist
Neale Steve. 1990. Genre. London: BFI. genurile
Neale Steve. 2002. Genre and Contemporary Hollywood. London: BFI. genurile
Neale Stephen. 2000. Genre and Hollywood. London: Routledge. genurile
Nelmes Jill (ed.). 2012. Film Studies. (Fifth edition) London & N.Y.: Routledge. th
Nichols Bill (ed.). 1976. Movies and Methods. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Nichols Bill. 1991. Representing Reality. Indiana UP: Bloomington. documentar

E:\vis-cog\Biblio\FILM.DOC

10

Nichols Bill. 1994. Blurred Boundaries. Indiana UP: Bloomington. documentar

Nichols Bill. 2001. Introduction to Documentary. Bloomington. IN: Indiana University Press. documentar
Noguez Dominique. 1979. Eloge du cinma exprimental. Paris : Centre Georges Pompidou. experiment
Noguez Dominique. 1985. Une renaissance du cinma. Le cinma underground amricain. Paris :
Klincksieck. th peint
O
Oatley Keith. 2013. How Cues on the Screen Prompt Emotions in the Mind. in Shimamura Arthur P. (ed.).
2013b. Psychocinematics: Exploring Cognition at the Movies. London and New York: Routledge.
pp.269-284. cog
Odin Roger. 1979. Rhtorique du film de famille. Rhtoriques smiotiques; Revue desthtique 1-2 UGE 10/18
p.340-373. sm
Odin Roger. 1980. Lentre du spectateur dans la fiction. Thorie du film. Albatros. sm
Odin Roger. 1983. Pour une smio-pragmatique du cinma. Iris 1 p.6-81. sm
Odin Roger. 1983. Mise en phase; dphasage et performativit dans Le Tempestaire de Jean Epstein.
Communications 38 - Enonciation et cinma - p.213-238 Seuil. sm
Odin Roger. 1984. Lecture documentarisante ; film documentaire. Cinmas et ralits CIEREC Universit de
Saint-Etienne p.263-280. sm
Odin Roger. 1985. Un film-favola. Carte Semiotiche 1 settembre. sm
Odin Roger. 1988. Semiotica e analisi testuale dei film. Bianco e Nero 11 p.7-30. an
Odin Roger. 1988. Du spectateur fictionnalisant au nouveau spectateur. Approche smio-pragmatique. Iris. 8;
Narrateur; personnage; spectateur; tome II p.121-39. sm
Odin Roger. 1989. La smio-pragmatique du cinma sans crise ni dsillusion. Hors-Cadre 7 - Thories du
cinma et crise de la thorie p.77-92. sm
Odin Roger. 1991. Cinma et production du sens. Paris : Armand Colin. th. an. s
Odin Roger & Casetti F.. 1985. Lanalisi del film oggi. Carte Semiotiche 1 settembre p.25-94. an
Odin Roger & Casetti F.. 1988. De la palo la no-tlvision. Communications 51 : Tlvisions / Mutations.
Odin Roger 1989. A semio-pragmatic approach of the documentary. in Willem de Greef & Willem Hesling
(eds.) Image Reality Spectator. Essays on Documentary Film and Television. Acco: Leuven p.90100. sm
Odin Roger. 1994. Semio-pragmatique du cinema et de laudiovisuel: Modes et institutions. Towards a
Pragmatics of the Audio-Visual. vol.1. et. Jurgen Muller. Munster : Nodus Publikationen. pp.3346.
Odin Roger. 1994b. Approche semio-pragmatique. approche historique. Kodikas/Code. 17 1-4 pp.27-36.
Odin Roger. 2000. De la fiction. De Boeck Universite. th pragm
Oudart Jean-Pierre. 1969. La Suture. Cahiers du Cinema. no.211 & 212. th an
Oudart Jean-Pierre. 1977. Cinema and Suture. Screen 18 (winter 1977/1978). p.35-47
P
Paisley Livingston 4 Carl Plantinga (eds.). 2009. The Routledge Companion to Philosophy and Film. Routledge
Philosophy Companions. London and New York: Routledge. cog
Palmer R. Barton. 1989. The Cinematic Text. New York: QMS Press. an. tx
Panofsky Erwin. 1995.Style and Medium in the Motion Pictures. in Three Essays on Style. Ed. Irving Lavin.
Cambridge: The MIT Press. 1995. 91-125
Pepperman Richard D.. 2004. The Eye is Quicker: Film Editing: Making a Good Film Better. Studio City:
Michael Wiese Productions. p.11. vis
Person Per. 2003. Understanding Cinema: A Psychological Theory of Moving Imagery. Cambridge University
Press: Cambridge. emo
Phillips Patrick. 2012. Spectator. Audience and Response. in Nelmes Jill (ed.). 2012. Film Studies. (Fifth
edition) London & N.Y.: Routledge. pp.113-141
Phillips Patrick. 2012. Before getting to the bigger picture. in Nelmes Jill (ed.). 2012. Film Studies. (Fifth
edition) London & N.Y.: Routledge. pp.60-78.
Pitiot Pierre. 1972. Cinema de mort. Esquisse dun baroque cinematographique. Edition du Signe. (fisa a5)
Plantinga Carl. 1993 fall. Affect; Cognition and the Power of Movies. in Post-Script. Essays in Film and the
Humanities vol.13 (1). cog
Plantinga Carl. 1997. Rhetoric and Representation in Nonfiction Film. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
documentar
Plantinga Carl & Smith Greg M. (eds.). 1999. Passionate Views: Film. Cognition. and Emotion. Baltimore:
Johns Hopkins University Press. emo

E:\vis-cog\Biblio\FILM.DOC

11

Plantinga Carl. 2002. Cognitive Film Theory: Insiders Appraisal. in Cinemas. Journal of Film Studies.
vol.12. nr.2 (winter 2002) pp.15-37. cog
Plantinga Carl. 2009 a.Trauma. Pleasure and Emotion in the Viewing of Titanic. A Cognitive Approach. in
Buckland Warren (ed.). 2009. Film Theory and Contemporary Hollywood Movies. Routledge
Francis & Taylor. pp. 237- . nu
Plantinga Carl. 2009 b. Moving Viewers:American Film and the Spectators Experience. University of
California Press. Berkeley.
Plantinga Carl. 2013. The Affective Power of Movies. in Shimamura Arthur P. (ed.). 2013b.
Psychocinematics: Exploring Cognition at the Movies. London and New York: Routledge. pp.94111. cog
Plantinga Carl. 2014. Mood and Ethics in Narrative Film. in Nannicelli Ted & Paul Taberham (eds.). 2014.
Cognitive Media Theory. Routledge. pp. 141-157. cog
Pribram E. Deirdre. 2004. Spectatorship and Subjectivity. in Stam Robert & Miller Toby. 2004. A
Companion to Film Theory. Blackwell Publishing. pp.146-164
Price. Brian. 2006. Color. the Formless. and Cinematic Eros. In Color: The Film Reader. eds. Angela Dalle
Vacche and Brian Price. New York: Routledge. 85
Q
Quigley Cliodhna. Selim Onat. Sue Harding. Martin Cooke. Peter Knig. 2008. Audio-Visual Integration
During Overt Visual Attention. Journal of Eye Movement Research 1. no. 2 (2008): 117.
R
Radvansky, G.A., and J.M. Zacks. 2014. Event Cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ranciere, Jacques. (2006). Film Fables. Oxford-NY:Berg.
Ranciere, Jacques. (2009), The Emancipated Spectator, London: Verso.
Raz Gal. Boaz Hagin & Telma Hendler. 2013. E-Motion Pictures of the Brain: Recursive Paths Between
Affective Neuroscience and Film Studies. in Shimamura Arthur P. (ed.). 2013b.
Psychocinematics: Exploring Cognition at the Movies. London and New York: Routledge. pp.285313. Emo
Reicher, Maria E. 2010. The Ontology of Fictional Characters. In Eder Jens and Fotis Jannidis, Ralf Schneider
(eds.). 2010. Characters in Fictional Worlds. Understanding Imaginary Beings in Literature,
Film, and Other Media. Berlin/New York: Walter De Gruyter. 111-133.
Richter Hans. 1986. The Struggle for the Film. Towards a socially responsible cinema. New York : St Martin s
Press.
Riis, Johannes. 2010. Implications of Paradoxical Film Characters for Our Models and Conceptualizations. In
Eder Jens and Fotis Jannidis, Ralf Schneider (eds.). 2010. Characters in Fictional Worlds.
Understanding Imaginary Beings in Literature, Film, and Other Media. Berlin/New York: Walter
De Gruyter. 259-275.
Rodowick. David. 1991. The Difficulty of Difference: Psychoanalysis. Sexual Difference. and Film Theory. New
York and London: Routledge
Rodowick David. 2001. Reading the Figural. or. Philosophy after the New Media. Duke University Press.
Rodowick David. 2007. The Virtual Life of Film. Cambridge. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press
Rogers Sheena. 2013. Truth. Lies. and Meaning in Slow Motion Images.in Shimamura Arthur P. (ed.). 2013b.
Psychocinematics: Exploring Cognition at the Movies. London and New York: Routledge. pp.149164. vis
Rohdin Mats. 2003. Vildsvinet i filmens trdgrd. Metaforbegreppet inom filmteorin [The wild boar in the
garden of film: The concept of metaphor in film theory] Summary in English 318329. Ph.D. diss..
Stockholm:Edita Norstedts Tryckeri AB.
Rohdin Mats. 2009. Multimodal metaphor in classical film theory from the 1920s to the 1950s in Forceville
Charles J. & Urios-Aparisi Eduardo (eds.). 2009. Multimodal metaphor. Berlin/New York:Mouton
de Gruyter. p.403 sq
Rohmer ric. 1977. L'organisation de l'espace dans le Faust de F W Murnau. coll. 10/18 . Paris: UGE. th
peint
Ropars Marie-Claire. 1972. Narration and signification . in Potique no 12. en
Ropars Marie-Claire. 1976. L'ouverture d'Octobre ou les conditions thoriques ca rvolution . in Octobre.
criture et idologie. Paris. Albatros. th an
Ropars Marie-Claire. 1981. Le texte divise. Paris: PUF.

E:\vis-cog\Biblio\FILM.DOC

12

Ropars-Wuilleumier. Marie-Claire. The Graphic in FilmicWriting: A bout de souffle. or The Erratic Alphabet.
Enclitic 5.2 6.1 (spring 1982): 147-61. Deasemenea LInstance graphique dans lecriture du
Film: A bout de souffle. ou lalphabet erratique. Litterature 46 (1982): 59-81.
Rothman William. 2011. Silence and Stasis. in Clayton Alex & Andrew Klevan (eds.). 2011. The Language
and Style of Film Criticism. London- N.Y..: Routledge. pp. 107-120.
Rosenthal Alan and Corner John (eds). 2005. New Challenges for Documentary (2nd edn). Manchester
University Press. Manchester. documentar
Rushton Richard. 2009. Colman Felicity (ed.). 2009. Film. Theory and Philosophy. The Key Thinkers. McGillQueens University Press. th
S
Schaeffer Jean-Marie. 1987. Limage prcaire : du dispositif photographique. Paris : Seuil. th (fisa a5)
Schefer Jean-Louis. 1980. LHomme ordinaire au cinma. Cahiers du cinma / Gallimard. th psy
Schwan S. & Ildirar S.. 2010. Watching film for the first time: How adult viewers interpret perceptual
discontinuities in film. Psychological Science . 21 . 17.
Schwan Stephan. 2013.The Art of Simplifying Events. in Shimamura Arthur P. (ed.). 2013b. Psychocinematics:
Exploring Cognition at the Movies. London and New York: Routledge. pp. 214-226.
Seppl, Jaakko (2015). On the Heterogeneity of Cinematography in the Films of Aki Kaurismki. Projections.
Volume 9, Issue 2, Winter 2015: 2039 Berghahn Books.
Serceau Daniel. 1987. Le dsir de fictions. Paris : d. Dis-Voir.
Shamay-Tsoory S.. 2010. The neural bases for empathy. Neuroscientist . 17 . 1824.
Shaviro Steven. 1993. The Cinematic Body. University of Minnesota Press: Minneapolis.
Shimamura Arthur P. & Stephen E. Palmer (eds.). 2012. Aesthetic Science: Connencting Minds. Brains. and
Experience. Oxford UP.
Shimamura, Arthur P.. (2013 a). Experiencing Art: In the Brain of the Beholder. Oxford UP.
Shimamura, Arthur P. (ed.). (2013 b). Psychocinematics: Exploring Cognition at the Movies. London and New
York: Routledge.
Silver Curtis. 2009. Neurocinema Aims to Change the Way Movies are Made. Wired.com.
http://www.wired.com/geekdad/2009/09/neurocinema-aims-to-change-theway-movies-are-made/ 5
Silverman Kaja. 1983. The Subject of Semiotics. New York : Oxford University Press.
Silverman Kaja. 1988. The Acoustic Mirror. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Simmons Lawrence. 2009. Slavoj Zizek. in Colman Felicity (ed.). 2009. Film. Theory and Philosophy. The
Key Thinkers. McGill-Queens University Press. th
Simon J. P. et Vernet M.. 1983. Enonciation et cinma. Communications 38 - Seuil.
Simon Jean-Paul. 1979. Le Filmique et le comique. Paris : Albatros.
Simon Jean-Paul. 1983. Enonciation et narration. in Communications 38. Paris : Seuil.
Simons Daniel J. and Levin Daniel T.. 2007. Ideas of Lasting Influence. Hochbergs Anticipation of Research on
Change Blindness and Motion Picture Perception. in Hochberg Julian (Mary A.Peterson. Barbara
Gillam. H.A. Sedgwick. eds.). 2007. In the Minds Eye. Julian Hochberg. On the Perception of
Pictures. Films. and the World. Oxford University Press.
Simons Jan. . Pragmatics. Deixis. and the Political Election-Campaign Film. Towards a Pragmatics of the
Audio-Visual. vol. 1. 79
Sinnerbrink Robert. 2011. Questioning Style. In Clayton Alex & Andrew Klevan (eds.). 2011. The Language
and Style of Film Criticism. London- N.Y..: Routledge.
Sinnerbrink Robert. 2011. New Philosophies of Film: Thinking Images. London and New York: Continuum.
Small Edward S.. 1980 Cinvideo and mental images. Cinvideo and Psychology. Journal of the University Film
Association winter-spring 32 n1-2.
Smith Murray. 2014. The Pit of Naturalism. Neuroscience and the Naturalized Aesthetics of Film. in
Nannicelli Ted & Paul Taberham (eds.). 2014. Cognitive Media Theory. Routledge . pp.28-45.
cog
Smith Murray. 2012. Triangulating Aesthetic Experience. Shimamura Arthur P. & Stephen E. Palmer (eds.).
2012. Aesthetic Science: Connecting Minds. Brains. and Experience. Oxford UP. pp.80-106. cog
Smith, Murray. 2010. Engaging Characters: Further Reflections. In Eder Jens and Fotis Jannidis, Ralf
Schneider (eds.). 2010. Characters in Fictional Worlds. Understanding Imaginary Beings in
Literature, Film, and Other Media. Berlin/New York: Walter De Gruyter. 232-258.
Smith Murray. 1995. Engaging Characters: Fiction. Emotion. and the Cinema. Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
5

Scanarea creier pentru testarea audienei.

E:\vis-cog\Biblio\FILM.DOC

13

Smith Murray. 1993 fall. Cognitive; Emotion and Cinematic Narrative. in Post-Script. Essays in Film and the
Humanities vol.13 (1). cog
Smith M. Greg. 2003. Film Structure and the Emotion System. Cambridge University Press. emo
Smith M. Greg. 2014. Coming out of the Corner. The Challenges of a Broader Media Cognitivism. in Nannicelli
Ted & Paul Taberham (eds.). 2014. Cognitive Media Theory. Routledge. pp. 285-302. Cog
Smith, T.J., and J.M. Henderson. 2008. Edit Blindness: The Relationship between Attention and Global Change
in Dynamic Scenes. Journal of Eye Movement Research 2(2): 117.
Smith Tim J.. Parag K. Mital. Tim J. Smith. Robin L. Hill. and John M. Henderson. 2011. Clustering of Gaze
During Dynamic Scene Viewing is Predicted by Motion. Cognitive Computation 3. no. 1 (2011):
524.. vis
Smith Tim J.. 2012. The Attentional Theory of Cinematic Continuity. Projections: The Journal for Movies and
the Mind 6. no. 1 (2012): 127.. cog
Smith Tim J.. Daniel Levin. James E. Cutting. 2012. A Window on Reality: Perceiving Edited Moving Images.
Current Directions in Psychological Science 21. no. 2 (2012): 107113.
Smith Tim J.. Melissa L.-H. V. Tim J. Smith. Parag K. Mital. and John M. Henderson. 2012. Do the Eyes
Really Have it? Dynamic Allocation of Attention When Viewing Moving Faces. Journal of Vision
12. no. 13 (2012): 114.
Smith Tim J.. 2013. Watching You Watch Movies: Using Eye Tracking to Inform Cognitive Film Theory. in
Psychocinematics: Exploring Cognition at the Movies. ed. Arthur P. Shimamura (New York:
Oxford University Press. 2013). 165191.. cog
Smith, T.J., and P.K. Mital. 2013. Attentional Synchrony and the Infl uence of Viewing Task on Gaze Behavior
in Static and Dynamic Scenes. Journal of Vision 13(8): 16.
Smith Tim J.. 2014. Correspondences in Sergei Eisensteins Alexander Nevsky. A Case Study in Viewer
Attention. in Nannicelli Ted & Paul Taberham (eds.). 2014. Cognitive Media Theory. Routledge.
pp. 85-105
Smith Tim J. and Parag. K. Mital. 2013. Attentional Synchrony and the Influence of Viewing Task on Gaze
Behaviour in Static and Dynamic Scenes. Journal of Vision 13. no. 8 (2013): 16.
Smith Tim & John Henderson. 2008. Attentional Synchrony in Static and Dynamic Scenes. Journal of Vision
8. no. 6 (2008): 773..
Sobchack Vivian. 1982. Toward Inhabited Space: The Semiotic Structure of Camera Movement in the Cinema.
Semiotica 41. . (1982). p.318 sq
Sobchack Vivian. 1992. The Address of the Eye. A Phenomenology of Film Experience. Princeton NJ: Princeton
University Press.
Sobchack Vivian. 2004. Carnal Thoughts. Embodiment and Moving Image culture. University of California
Press.
Sonnenschein D.. 2001. Sound design: The expressive power of music. voice. and sounds effects in cinema.
Studio City. CA : Michael Wiese Productions. sonor
Sorlin Pierre. 1977. Sociologie du cinma. Paris : Aubier. soc
Speidel Susan. 2012. Film Form and Narrative. in Nelmes Jill (ed.). 2012. Film Studies. (Fifth edition) London
& N.Y.: Routledge. pp.80-112.
Spoto Donald. 1976. The Art of Alfred Hitchcock. New York: Doubleday.
Stam Robert. 1989. Subversive Pleasure: Bakhtin. Cultural Criticism. and film. Baltimore. MD: Johns Hopkins
University Press. poststr (fisa a5)
Stam Robert. 2000. Film theory: Introduction. Malden. MA. Oxford: Blackwell.
Stam Robert & Miller Toby. 2004. A Companion to Film Theory. Blackwell Publishing
Stam Robert. 2005. Introduction: The Theory and Practice of Adaptation. Literature and Film: A Guide to the
Theory and Practice of Film Adaptation. Ed. Robert Stam and Alessandra Raengo. Malden. MA:
Blackwell. 2005. 1-52.
Stewart Garrett. 2007. Framed Time: Toward a Postfilmic Cinema. Chicago. IL. and London: University of
Chicago Press. poststr
Stoichita Victor Ieronim. 2014. Efectul Sherlock Holmes. Trei intrigi cinematografice. Bucuresti: Editura
Humanitas
Suckfull Monika. 2013. Emotion Regulation by Switching Between Modes of Reception. in Shimamura Arthur
P. (ed.). 2013b. Psychocinematics: Exploring Cognition at the Movies. London and New York:
Routledge. pp. 314-336. Emo
Swallow, K.M., J.M. Zacks, and R.A. Abrams. 2009. Event Boundaries in Perception Affect Memory Encoding
and Updating. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 138(2): 236257.
Swallow, K.M., et al. 2011. Changes in Events Alter How People Remember Recent Information. Journal of
Cognitive Neuroscience 23(5): 10521064.

E:\vis-cog\Biblio\FILM.DOC

14

T
Taberham Paul. 2014. Avant-garde Film in Evolutionary Context. in Nannicelli Ted & Paul Taberham (eds.).
2014. Cognitive Media Theory. Routledge. pp.214-231. cog
Tan Ed S.. 1996. Emotion and the Structure of Narrative Film: Film as Emotional Machine. Hillsdale: N.J.
Lawrence Erlbaum. cog
Tan Ed S.. 2007. On the Cognitive Ecology of the Cinema. in Hochberg Julian (Mary A. Peterson. Barbara
Gillam. H.A. Sedgwick. eds.). 2007. In the Minds Eye. Julian Hochberg On the Perception of
Pictures. Films. and the World. Oxford University Press. vis
Tan Ed S.. 2013. The Empathic Animal Meets the Inquisitive Animal in the Cinema: Notes on a
Psychocinematics of Mind Reading. in Shimamura Arthur P. (ed.). 2013b. Psychocinematics:
Exploring Cognition at the Movies. London and New York: Routledge. pp.337-367. emo
Tan Ed S.. 2014. Engaged and Detached Film Viewing. Exploring Film Viewers Emotional Action Readiness. in
Nannicelli Ted & Paul Taberham (eds.). 2014. Cognitive Media Theory. Routledge. p.106-123.
cog
Thomson-Jones Katherine J.. 2013. Sensing Motion in Movies. in Shimamura Arthur P. (ed.). 2013b.
Psychocinematics: Exploring Cognition at the Movies. London and New York: Routledge. pp.115132. cog
Thompson K.. 1981. Eisensteins Ivan the Terrible: A Neoformalist Analysis. Princeton University Press. form
Thompson K.. 1988. Breaking the Glass Armour. Neoformalist Film Analysis. Princeton University Press. form
Truffaut Francois. 1975. Le Cinema selon Hitchcock. Paris : Robert Laffont (reed. 1966). th
Turvey Malcom. 2014. Evolutionary Film Theory. in Nannicelli Ted & Paul Taberham (eds.). 2014. Cognitive
Media Theory. Routledge. cog
V
Vaage, Margrethe Bruun. 2010. Fiction Film and the Varieties of Empathic Engagement. Midwest Studies in
Philosophy, XXXIV (2010) 158-179.
Vaage Margrethe Bruun. 2014. Blinded by Familiarity. Partiality. Morality. and Engagement with TV Series. in
Nannicelli Ted & Paul Taberham (eds.). 2014. Cognitive Media Theory. Routledge. pp.268-284.
cog
Vanoye Francis. 1989. Rcit crit - rcit filmique. Paris : Nathan. th. an
Vanoye Francis. 1991. Scnarios modles - modles de scnarios. Paris : Nathan. th. an. sc
Vanoye Francis. 1992. Prcis danalyse filmique. Paris : Nathan. th. an
Vanoye Francis. 2005. Rcit crit. rcit filmique. Paris : Nathan. 1989. Armand Colin Cinema. nar
Vernet Marc. 1983. Le regard la camra . Iris. n 2. psy
Vernet Marc. 1985. Figures de labsence 2: la voix off . Iris. n 5. psy
Vernet Marc. 1986. Le personnage de film . Iris. n 7. psy an
Vernet Marc. 1988. Figures de labsence. Paris : Cahiers du cinema.
Marc Vernet. The Look at the Camera. Cinema Journal 28. no. 2 (winter 1989): 52. 48-63. .
Veron Eliseo. 1983. Il est l. il me voit. il me parle. Communications 38 - Seuil. sem
Veron Eliseo. 1986. Les spectacles scientifiques tlviss. Figures de la production et de la rception.
Documentation franaise. sem soc
Veron Eliseo. 1987. La smiosis sociale. PUV. sem soc
Vighi Fabio. 2009. Sexual Difference in European Cinema. Palgrave Macmillan. fell
W
Ward Paul. 2008. Drama-documentary. Ethics and Notions of Performance: The Flight 93 Films. in T. Austin
and W. de Jong (eds). Re-thinking Documentary: New Perspectives. New Practices. McGrawHill/Open University Press. Maidenhead. 2008. pp. 191203. documentar
Ward Paul. 2012. The Documentary Form. in Nelmes Jill (ed.). 2012. Film Studies. (Fifth edition) London &
N.Y.: Routledge. pp.210-228. docum
Wartenberg Thomas E & Angela Curran (eds.). 2005. The Philosophy of Film: Introductory Text and Readings.
Malden. MA: Blackwell. philo
Watson Paul. 2012. Cinematic Authorship and the Film Auteur. in Nelmes Jill (ed.). 2012. Film Studies. (Fifth
edition) London & N.Y.: Routledge. pp.142-164
Watson Paul. 2012. Star Studies: Text. Pleasure. Identity. in Nelmes Jill (ed.). 2012. Film Studies. (Fifth edition)
London & N.Y.: Routledge. pp.166-185
Watson Paul. 2012. Approaches to Film Genre taxonomy/genericity/metaphor. in Nelmes Jill (ed.). 2012. Film
Studies. (Fifth edition) London & N.Y.: Routledge. pp.188-208

E:\vis-cog\Biblio\FILM.DOC

15

Wells Paul. 2012. The Language of Animation. in Nelmes Jill (ed.). 2012. Film Studies. (Fifth edition) London
& N.Y.: Routledge. pp.229-259. th animatie
Winston Wheeler Dixon & Foster Gwendolin Audrey. 2008. A Short Film History. New Brunswick: Rutgers
University Press. hist
Wolfe Jeremy M. & Todd S. Horowitz. 2004. What Attributes Guide the Deployment of Visual Attention and
How Do They Do It? Nature Reviews Neuroscience 5 (2004): 17.. vis
Wong, Cindy Hing-Yuk (2011). Film Festivals: Culture, Power and the Global Screen. New Brunswick: Rutgers
UP.
Worth Sol. 1968. Cognitive Aspects of Sequence in Visual Communication. Audio-Visual Communication
Review 16 - 2. vis
Worth Sol. 1969. The Development of Semiotics of Film. Semiotica. Mouton. vol.I. no.3 sem vis
Worth Sol & Adair J.. 1972. Through Navajo Eyes: Exploration in Film Communication and Anthropology.
Bloomington: Indiana University Press. BN 8-r-76402. antr
Wuss . P. ( 2009 ). Cinematic narration and its psychological impact: Function of cognition. emotion and play .
Newcastle upon Tyne. England: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. eco
Z
Zacks Jeffrey M.. 2013. Constructing Event Representations during Film Comprehension. in Shimamura Arthur
P. (ed.). 2013b. Psychocinematics: Exploring Cognition at the Movies. London and New York:
Routledge. pp. 227-243. cog
Zimmerman Patricia R.. 1988.Professional Result with Amateur Ease: The Formation of Amateur Filmmaking
Aesthetics. in Film History vol.2 p.267-281. amateur
Zizek Slavoj. 1992.In His Bold Gaze My Ruin Is Writ large. Everything you always wanted to know about
Lacan (But were Afraid to ask Hitchcock). (ed.) Slavoj Zizek. New York: Verso. 210-72. psi
Zizek Slavoj. 1992b. Looking Awry Introduction to Jacques Lacan through Popular Culture. October Books. psi
Zizek Slavoj. 1999.The Hitchcockian Blot. in Alfred Hitchcock: Centenary Essays. (ed.) Richard Allen & S.
Ishii-Gozales. London: British Film Institute. psi
Zizek Slavoj. 2001. The Fright of Real Tears: Kriysztof Kieslowski Between Theory and Post-Theory. London:
British Film Insitute. psi
iek Slavoj. 2007. How to Read Lacan. New York: Norton. psi

Legende:
nu : http://library.nu/

http://aaaaarg.org/
http://gen.lib.rus.ec/

E:\vis-cog\Biblio\FILM.DOC

16