Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Liabilities of Lawyers
Liabilities of Lawyers
Civil Liability
1.
2.
3.
4.
Criminal Liability
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
a. Kinds of Contempt:
Indirect one committed away from the court involving disobedience of or resistance to a
lawful writ, process, order, judgment or command of the court, or tending to belittle, degrade,
obstruct, interrupt or embarrass the court.
Civil- failure to do something ordered by the court which is for the benefit of a party.
Criminal any conduct directed against the authority or dignity of the court.
b. Acts Constituting Contempt:
1.
Misbehavior
2.
Disobedience
3.
Publication concerning pending litigation
4.
Publication tending to degrade the court; disrespectful language in pleadings
5.
Misleading the court or obstructing justice
6.
Unauthorized practice of law
7.
Belligerent attitude
8.
Unlawful retention of clients funds
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
deceit;
malpractice or other gross misconduct in office;
grossly immoral conduct;
conviction of a crime involving moral turpitude;
violation of oath of office;
willful disobedience of any lawful order of a superior court;
corrupt or willful appearance as attorney for a party to case without authority to do so (Sec.
27, Rule 138, RRC)
Procedure for Disbarment
Institution either by:
the Supreme Court, motu proprio, or
the IBP, motu proprio, or
upon verified complaint by any person
Six copies of the verified complaint shall be filed with the Secretary of the IBP or Secretary of
any of its chapter and shall be forwarded to the IBP Board of Governors.
Investigation by the National Grievance Investigators.
Submission of investigative report to the IBP Board of Governors.
Board of Governors decides within 30 days.
Investigation by the Solicitor-General
SC renders final decision for disbarment/suspension/dismissal.
1.
2.
3.
Supreme Court
IBP through its Commission on Bar Discipline or authorized investigator
Office of the Solicitor General
1.
Good faith in the acquisition of a property of the client subject of litigation (In re: Ruste, 70
Phil. 243)
2.
Inexperience of the lawyer (Munoz v. People, 53 SCRA 190)
3.
Age (Lantos v. Gan, 196 SCRA 16)
4.
Apology (Munoz v. People, 53 SCRA 190)
Lack of Intention to slight or offend the Court (Rhum of the Philippines, Inc. v. Ferrer, 20 SCRA
441).