Professional Documents
Culture Documents
United States v. Adams, C.A.A.F. (2004)
United States v. Adams, C.A.A.F. (2004)
United States v. Adams, C.A.A.F. (2004)
D. L. Wilkins
reconsideration.
Through
Following that
Although
aware that Mr. Cassara was involved in the case even though he
had communicated directly with Adams prior to filing the merits
pleading.
The Army court affirmed the trial courts findings and
sentence in a per curiam decision.
The Request
The
Army court denied the motion for leave to file out of time.
DISCUSSION
An accused has the right to effective representation by
counsel through the entire period of review following trial,
including representation before the Court of Criminal Appeals
and our Court by appellate counsel appointed under Article 70,
UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. 870 (2000).
See also
United
Thus, we are
As applied to
Id. at 688.
Id. at 687.
10
11
We find that
See id.
by Mr. Cassara in the missing brief and in the brief that was
later presented to the Army court as part of the motion for
reconsideration concerned the admissibility of Adams pretrial
statement to criminal investigators.
He asserted those
Adams subsequently
12
In
13
481.
Second, we note that a Court of Criminal Appeals is charged
by the UCMJ with the responsibility of reviewing the entire
record and approving only such findings of guilty and the
sentence or such part or amount of the sentence, as it finds
correct in law and fact.
Article 66(c).
We do not minimize
14
15
otherwise misplaced.
We find that
16