Professional Documents
Culture Documents
United States v. King, C.A.A.F. (2005)
United States v. King, C.A.A.F. (2005)
United States v. King, C.A.A.F. (2005)
Gregory E. Pavlik
The
We agree
King was
King
He was
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
In response, defense
After
The conditions
The Government
United
King must
Similarly, the
We are
The
Thus, we
McCarthy,
McCarthy, 47
Other
10
216.
King is entitled to appropriate credit.
DECISION
The decision of the United States Air Force Court of
Criminal Appeals is affirmed except to the extent that it holds
that King is not entitled to additional sentence credit for a
violation of Article 13, UCMJ.
11