Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Wom Blog Post
Wom Blog Post
By Kerry Windle
What is Word of Mouth Marketing?
Each year, organizations waste millions of dollars using traditional marketing on
millennials. Instead, companies should focus on word of mouth (WOM) marketing, defined by
Dr. David Stokes and Dr. Wendy Lomax (1994) as all interpersonal communication regarding
products of services where the receiver regards the communicator as impartial. Once initiated,
WOM marketing is essentially and according to Dr. Christy M.K. Cheung (2008), WOM
marketing is the most effective way to reach millennials.
People trust other consumers. Cognitive costs, such as the fear of spending money on a
product they will not like, keep consumers from purchasing a product. When people see or hear
positive reviews for products, their cognitive costs are likely to decrease, as they feel that if
others like them enjoy a product, they probably will too. By reducing cognitive costs,
attribution WOM marketing makes consumers more likely to purchase an item.
Why Word of Mouth is Important Today
The rise of the Internet and the millennial generation in the United States changed the
way companies market their products. Millennials are skeptical of information that comes from
companies. Instead, their peers influence them the most.
Organizations must appeal to millennials because in April 2016, they officially surpassed
baby boomers as the largest generation in the United States. If organizations who rely on
millennial purchases do not reach millennials, they could go out of business.
Born between 1981-1997, millennials were the first generation to grow up with the
Internet. Because of this, they turn to social media to gather and give information. They are more
willing to review products, give feedback, and promote brands.
In a recent study W. Glynn Mangold and Katherine Taken Smith (2012) asked millennials
how often online reviews influence them. On a scale of zero, meaning never, to ten, meaning
very frequently, the mean score was 8.45, with 28% answering with a ten, showing the
importance of WOM marketing.
Review websites such as Yelp can help the WOM marketing process. However, if the
organization does not come up on the first page, millennials are less likely to review or
even view the page. By using search engine optimization, companies can get on the first
page, increasing the likelihood WOM marketing.
5. Create Shareable Content
According to researchers Henry Jenkins, Sam Ford and Joshua Green (2013), millennials
share funny, inspiring, and emotional content. If organizations create this content,
millennials will share it with their friends. The Honest Company, founded by actress
Jessica Alba to make healthy products for babies and mothers, is a great example of this.
Their Instagram showcases funny sayings that new moms send their friends, providing
more exposure for the company.
Andrews, T. M. (2016, April 26). Its official: Millennials have surpassed baby boomers to
become Americas largest living generation. The Washington Post. Retrieved April 27,
2016.
Bruyn, A. D., & Lilien, G. L. (2008). A multi-stage model of word-of-mouth influence through
viral marketing. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 25(3), 151-163.
doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2008.03.004
Cheung, C. M., Lee, M. K., & Rabjohn, N. (2008). The impact of electronic wordofmouth.
Internet Research, 18(3), 229-247. doi:10.1108/10662240810883290
Jenkins, H., Ford, S., & Green, J. (n.d.). Spreadable media: Creating value and meaning in a
networked culture.
Mangold, W. G., & Smith, K. T. (2012). Selling to Millennials with online reviews. Business
Horizons, 55(2), 141-153. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2011.11.001
Smith, K. T. (2012). Longitudinal study of digital marketing strategies targeting Millennials.
Journal of Consumer Marketing, 29(2), 86-92. doi:10.1108/07363761211206339
Stokes, D., & Lomax, W. (2002). Taking control of word of mouth marketing: The case of an
entrepreneurial hotelier. Journal of Small Bus Ente Dev Journal of Small Business and
Enterprise Development, 9(4), 349-357. doi:10.1108/14626000210450531