Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Caskey v. Starbuck, 10th Cir. (1999)
Caskey v. Starbuck, 10th Cir. (1999)
AUG 19 1999
PATRICK FISHER
Clerk
v.
No. 98-8097
(D.C. No. 96-CV-1024-D)
(D. Wyo.)
Respondents-Appellees.
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before BRORBY, EBEL and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.
In February 1994, petitioner-appellant John Donald Caskey pled guilty to
taking indecent liberties with a child, in violation of Wyo. Stat. 14-3-105. In
May 1996, Caskey filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C.
After examining appellants brief and the appellate record, this panel has
determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the
determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2) and 10th Cir. R.
34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This
Order and Judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of
the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the
citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be
cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
*
-2-
David M. Ebel
Circuit Judge
-3-