Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ebrahim v. Gonzales, 10th Cir. (2006)
Ebrahim v. Gonzales, 10th Cir. (2006)
Ebrahim v. Gonzales, 10th Cir. (2006)
No. 06-9549
v.
Respondent.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined
unanimously to honor the parties request for a decision on the briefs without oral
argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore
ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding
precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and
collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and
judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and
conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
evidence to support a finding that the alleged false claims occurred on or after
April 1, 1997. W e conclude that we lack jurisdiction to review his claims and
dism iss his petition for review .
M r. Ebrahim, a native and citizen of Pakistan, entered the United States in
1996 on a nonimmigrant student visa. In September 2003 he failed to carry a full
course of study as required by his visa, and on September 9, 2004, the
Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) 1 initiated removal proceedings
against him. M r. Ebrahim subsequently conceded removability but requested that
he be allowed to depart voluntarily.
In an oral decision on February 15, 2005, the IJ denied M r. Ebrahims
application to depart voluntarily. In reaching his decision the IJ noted that
M r. Ebrahim had admitted that he had claimed to be a United States citizen to
obtain employment in restaurants in Texas and Oklahoma. The IJ said that this
admission weighed heavily against a grant of voluntary departure and concluded
as a matter of discretion [that he] should deny [M r. Ebrahims] application for an
opportunity to voluntarily depart. R. at 46. The BIA summarily affirmed the
IJs decision on April 19, 2006, leaving the IJs decision as the final agency
determination. M r. Ebrahim then sought review in this court.
1
-4-
Harris L Hartz
Circuit Judge
-5-