Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 3 views

    Freddie L. Perry v. Michael Quinlan, 951 F.2d 1260, 10th Cir. (1991)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Freddie Perry's complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 28 U.S.C. § 1331 against the United States Parole Commission and various state officials. The appellate court concluded that the district court correctly dismissed the action for the reasons stated in its October 28, 1991 Memorandum and Order. The appellate panel determined that oral argument was not necessary and ordered the case submitted without oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Freddie L. Perry v. Michael Quinlan, 951 F.2d 1260, 10th Cir. (1991)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Freddie Perry's complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 28 U.S.C. § 1331 against the United States Parole Commission and various state officials. The appellate court concluded that the district court correctly dismissed the action for the reasons stated in its October 28, 1991 Memorandum and Order. The appellate panel determined that oral argument was not necessary and ordered the case submitted without oral argument.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1991-12-11 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 951 F.2d 1260 Docket: 91-3251

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Freddie Perry's complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 28 U.S.C. § 1331 against the United States Parole Commission and various state officials. The appellate court concluded that the district court correctly dismissed the action for the reasons stated in its October 28, 1991 Memorandum and Order. The appellate panel determined that oral argument was not necessary and ordered the case submitted without oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    Freddie L. Perry v. Michael Quinlan, 951 F.2d 1260, 10th Cir. (1991)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Freddie Perry's complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 28 U.S.C. § 1331 against the United States Parole Commission and various state officials. The appellate court concluded that the district court correctly dismissed the action for the reasons stated in its October 28, 1991 Memorandum and Order. The appellate panel determined that oral argument was not necessary and ordered the case submitted without oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    951 F.

    2d 1260
    NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored,
    unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a
    material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral
    argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of
    November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or
    further order.

    Freddie L. PERRY, Plaintiff-Appellant,


    v.
    Michael QUINLAN, et al., Defendant-Appellees.
    No. 91-3251.

    United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.


    Dec. 11, 1991.

    ORDER AND JUDGMENT**


    Before MCKAY, Chief Judge, and SEYMOUR and EBEL, Circuit
    Judges. *
    EBEL, Circuit Judge.

    Appellant Perry appeals the district court's dismissal of his complaint filed
    pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 and 28 U.S.C. 1331 (under Bivens v. Six
    Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971)),
    against the United States Parole Commission and various state officials. We
    grant the appellant's motion to proceed in forma pauperis.

    After examining the record, we conclude that the district court correctly
    dismissed the action for substantially the reasons stated in its Memorandum and
    Order of October 28, 1991. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment below.
    The mandate shall issue forthwith.

    After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined
    unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination

    of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. Therefore, the case
    is ordered submitted without oral argument
    **

    This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or
    used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except for purposes of establishing
    the doctrines of the law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th
    Cir.R. 36.3

    You might also like