Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Childs v. Ortiz, 10th Cir. (2007)
Childs v. Ortiz, 10th Cir. (2007)
Elisabeth A. Shumaker
Clerk of Court
JAM ES A . CH ILD S,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
JOE O RTIZ, BA RR Y PARD US;
D EN N IS B UR BA N K ; R AN D Y
FOSHEE; W ILLIAM RICH TER; T.
K EELER; LT. H O LC OM B ; D ONNA
M URPH Y, et al.; STEV E O W EN S;
D O N A LD M cC ALL; JIM B RO WN;
SGT. SIM M ONS; SG T. M EYER; PH IL
M AR M ALEJO; JULIE RUSSELL;
JASON ELSE; ANTHONY A.
DECESARO; KAREN COOPER;
M ICHAEL ARELLANO ; LARRY
R EID ,
No. 06-1337
(D.C. No. 06-CV-760-ZLW )
(Colorado)
Defendants-Appellees.
After examining appellants brief and the appellate record, this panel has
determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the
determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2) and 10th Cir. R.
34.1(G). The case is therefore submitted without oral argument. This order and
judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case,
res judicata, or collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive
value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.
Comm'n, 115 F .3d 809, 812-13 (10th Cir. 1997), we deny his request to proceed
ifp, and order immediate payment of the unpaid balance of the filing fee.
Accordingly, we D EN Y M r. Childs motion to proceed ifp and we
DISM ISS the appeal. 2
Stephanie K. Seymour
Circuit Judge