Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Weldon Edmund Gay v. United States, 322 F.2d 208, 10th Cir. (1963)
Weldon Edmund Gay v. United States, 322 F.2d 208, 10th Cir. (1963)
Weldon Edmund Gay v. United States, 322 F.2d 208, 10th Cir. (1963)
2d 208
this testimony was not admissible against the appellant because the statements
of the coconspirator were made after the conspiracy had ended, if there was
one, and they were not of course made in furtherance of the conspiracy nor its
objects. It was so held in Minner v. United States, 57 F.2d 506 (10th Cir.),
Cleaver v. United States, 238 F.2d 766 (10th Cir.), and recently in Tripp v.
United States, 295 F.2d 418 (10th Cir.). Thus it was error to have admitted the
above described testimony of the F.B.I. Agent.
3
It appears from the record that the trial attorney for the appellant objected to
this testimony on the ground there had been insufficient independent proof of
the conspiracy. No other objection was made, but we believe under the
circumstances that the error is sufficiently prejudicial that it may be raised and
considered in this court although it was not called to the attention of the trial
court. Cleaver v. United States, supra; Bogileno v. United States, 38 F.2d 584
(10th Cir); Addis v. United States, 62 F.2d 329 (10th Cir.); Kelly v. United
States, 76 F.2d 847 (10th Cir.); Ladakis v. United States, 283 F.2d 141 (10th
Cir.); Wright v. United States, 301 F.2d 412 (10th Cir.), and others.
It is of course not every error that requires reversal, and no conviction will be
disturbed on an appeal when the error was not prejudicial. Berger v. United
States, 295 U.S. 78, 55 S.Ct. 629, 79 L.Ed. 1314; Rice v. United States, 149
F.2d 601 (10th Cir.); Wright v. United States, 301 F.2d 412 (10th Cir.).
However it appears that in the case at bar when the entire record is considered,
the rights of the accused were prejudiced by the admission of the testimony
under consideration.
The case is reversed as to Count Three which is the conspiracy count, and
affirmed as to Count Two, the substantive offense.